marklin-users.net community
| Forum
Welcome to the forum
Home
Community Forum
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please
Login
or
Register
.
Forum
Active Topics
Login
Register
Notification
Error
OK
marklin-users.net community | Forum
»
General topics
»
General MRR
»
Why does 3-rail AC still exist?
4 Pages
«
<
2
3
4
Go to Page...
Why does 3-rail AC still exist?
Share
Email this topic
LinkBack Topic URL
Retweet this Topic
Share Topic on Google+
Like this Topic
Share on Facebook
Digg this Topic
Reddit this Topic
Share on Tumblr
Options
Watch this topic
Print this topic
View
» Normal
Threaded
Previous Topic
Next Topic
sudibarba
#151
Posted :
08 November 2020 01:41:25(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 28/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 880
Location: Augusta, GA USA
Marklin has always protected the older systems and kept everything vertically functional.
I hope they continue that philosophy. Of course, as I have huge amounts of C Track and M track
I am not interested in a change.
Eric
2 users liked this useful post by sudibarba
kimballthurlow
,
petestra
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
Mr. Ron
#152
Posted :
27 November 2020 23:58:57(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 05/07/2020(UTC)
Posts: 311
Location: Mississippi, Vancleave
My! this has been an interesting and long discussion of 3 vs 2 rail. I am 86 and can remember back when model railroaders laid their own track and switches. Way back then, there was no ready track unless you went with Lionel, Marklin, American Flyer or Marx. Everything was hand laid track; even the ties had to be hand cut for use. I remember a childhood friend of mine had a Marklin train using the old style raised 3rd rail. At the time, I was just getting into 2 rail HO, My friend's Marklin train was always running without problems while my 2 rail trains wouldn't run reliably. O scale (non Lionel) used outside 3rd rail which was very reliable, though not very prototype. Steam locomotives with an outside 3rd rail pickup wasn't proto, but one didn't really notice. The pickups were a piece of wire spring rubbing on the 3rd rail. There were models of electric locomotives with the same outside 3rd rail that was more true to prototype. In the U.S. there was the outside 3rd rail system used mostly in the large cities and subway systems and the overhead wire system used on the interurban systems between cities. These were extensions of the transcontinental steam rail lines. Railroads like the Milwaukee, Northern and Virginian used overhead wire on their long routes. The use of electricity was chosen due to the cost and availability of electric power. When diesels came along, everything changed with the demise of steam and long distance wire. As Americans, we naturally took up 2 rail as we rejected any 3 rail models which were called "tinplate" and considered toys for around the Christmas tree. As for the popularity of 2 rail over 3 rail, serious modelers as opposed to children, wanted to be considered "serious" model railroaders. Even today, Marklin is still considered "tinplate", but has it's following, I for one being a long time 2 railer, have switched over to 3 rail. Today's 2 rail is completely changed from the way it was 80 years ago. Much less emphasis today is placed on building models, either from kits or scratch built. Instead it consists mostly of "toss it up in the air and it comes down full assembled and ready to run". As a result , craftsmanship has lessened in favor of the ready-to-run train system. I guess people now-a-days don't have enough free time to devote to model building. IT's only the old guys, like myself who still have the time (although diminishing) and patience to build. Due to age, I have switched to 3 rail so I can get a layout up and running quickly. I do like the European prototype models and being American, that really doesn't bother me. It's MY railroad and I can run it any way I want. I may run American cars with German locomotives. I would also like to point out; 3rail doesn't lend itself to hand laid track methods. When you use Marklin track sections, what you get is it; not much you can do. When you use 3 rail track, you are committed to the 3 rail system. 2 rail systems allow you to design track in ways that can't be done with 3 rail. Personally, I like the realism of 2 rail track and it's cars and locos. It has come a long way up from the Strombecker wood locomotive to the present magnificent models. Again, for us old timers, DCC leaves us out in the cold (can't teach an old dog new tricks). I'm not sure if I have answered the OT at all, but would like to contribute to the discussion anyway I can.
3 users liked this useful post by Mr. Ron
ixldoc
,
kimballthurlow
,
river6109
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
charlesb2255
#153
Posted :
15 September 2023 04:38:25(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 15/09/2023(UTC)
Posts: 1
Location: Florida, West Palm Beach
I model the Pennsylvania RR in the 1950. I created a 3 rail AC version of the GG1 so I could run passenger trains of the that era.
The reason I chose marklin is for the fact that they had a system for overhead catenary. Try creating a reverse loop in DC for that.
1 user liked this useful post by charlesb2255
kimballthurlow
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
mike c
#154
Posted :
15 September 2023 05:23:58(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 7,977
Location: Montreal, QC
Actually overhead catenary with DC was a relatively easy way to avoid the problems with 2 rail DC. When using a catenary, the + was always the catenary and the - was always one (or both rails). When a locomotive would run on a reverse loop with both tracks used for -, there was never an issue with a short. When the tracks were separated into + and -, it created a short when the loop closed.
This enabled many modellers to run 3 rail AC models using the track and the centre rail and to run 2 rail DC models using the track and the catenary on the same layout.
Regards
Mike C
2 users liked this useful post by mike c
hxmiesa
,
marklinist5999
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
river6109
#155
Posted :
15 September 2023 13:01:25(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,770
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
Originally Posted by: mike c
Actually overhead catenary with DC was a relatively easy way to avoid the problems with 2 rail DC. When using a catenary, the + was always the catenary and the - was always one (or both rails). When a locomotive would run on a reverse loop with both tracks used for -, there was never an issue with a short. When the tracks were separated into + and -, it created a short when the loop closed.
This enabled many modellers to run 3 rail AC models using the track and the centre rail and to run 2 rail DC models using the track and the catenary on the same layout.
Regards
Mike C
This is exactly what I do with my electric locos, of course it doesn't work with steam or diesel locos., I've also noticed some modellers use the overhead for interior lights in carriages on a separate power supply
John
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
WWW
1 user liked this useful post by river6109
marklinist5999
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
Goofy
#156
Posted :
16 September 2023 07:15:23(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 12/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 9,087
Originally Posted by: mvd71
Loop two rail track back around on itself and you have your answer. The three rail system eliminates the polarity issues when doing layouts that are more than simple loops.
What issues?
I have no problem by use two rail polarity by use reverse-loop digital modul.
H0
DCC = Digital Command Control
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
Goofy
#157
Posted :
16 September 2023 07:26:39(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 12/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 9,087
I agree that it is more easier way to build up Märklin layout by use Märklin tracks but it´s more expensive than two rail.
There are still fans who support Märklin by tradition.
There is always pro and con by start a hobby for example train models and what kind of track type should i use today.
In fact does pro train modeller do have experience and can tell story about Märklin tracks and two rail tracks.
I don´t think Märklin will stop produce theirs Märklin tracks so long the company still works.
H0
DCC = Digital Command Control
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
amartinezv
#158
Posted :
16 September 2023 12:54:12(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 25/08/2004(UTC)
Posts: 320
Location: Madrid,
Hello Good morning
I think the 3-lane system is the best. We all know its advantages.
But I think it has two problems, although these only affect a very small part of the fans.
The first is that if you want to make a very realistic layout with very large radius turnouts, you have the problem that it is very difficult to get the current collector slider over the rails on a very slender turnout.
The second problem, which only affects heavy use layouts, for example MiWuLa or Merklingen, is that the pukos wear out due to the friction of the sliders and disappear, in the two mentioned installations, they started with K-track, and now they have changed to the 2-rail system.
Best regards
Antonio Martínez
marklin, IB, era 3, Train controller
www.raildigital.es/davidruso
WWW
2 users liked this useful post by amartinezv
Mark5
,
Alsterstreek
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
marklinist5999
#159
Posted :
16 September 2023 12:54:50(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 10/02/2021(UTC)
Posts: 3,268
Location: Michigan, Troy
More choice and flexibility. It isn't like both types never experience a spot on a layout where a train will pause or stop.
1 user liked this useful post by marklinist5999
Mark5
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
petestra
#160
Posted :
16 September 2023 13:04:31(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 27/07/2009(UTC)
Posts: 5,855
Location: Leesburg,VA.USA
As for me, the choice was very clear. We, my brothers and I, grew up in the late 50s/early 60s. Dad had American Flyer and Lionel trains. At around
7 or 8, I got the Tyco DC HO set "General", Civil War era train. It was ALWAYs derailing and never ran right, in spite of dad making me a board layout with
tracks tacked down. I lost interest. Then, one Christmas back then, I saw the fantastic, huge Märklin show layout at FAO Schwartz in Manhattan and I was hooked with
Märklin then and never looked back. The multi-train operation with signals just blew me away! Cheers from Peter.
Facebook
6 users liked this useful post by petestra
PJMärklin
,
marklinist5999
,
Marklineisenbahn
,
Mark5
,
Eurobahnfan
,
mbarreto
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
Marklineisenbahn
#161
Posted :
16 September 2023 20:06:13(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 14/05/2011(UTC)
Posts: 297
Location: New York City
Hallo Gentlemen,
Back in mid 1960 my Christmas meant a tall fir tree, a circle of Märklin M -track on the floor, three or four wagons and a steam locomotive and of course a blue transformer – And … and my Dad on his knees playing with them… and me heh … sitting in the corner and watching and crying aloud over the whole situation !
For many folks ,frankly it is an essential part of Christmas - Märklin model H0 railroad set.
And there is no doubt in my mind that for sure, Märklin H0 starter sets will be once again lying under many festively decorated fir trees this year at Christmas, making not only children's eyes sparkle and glitter but some adults as well ;)
Märklin always had a great sense of appeal to children and adults regardless if it was permanent layout or so-called carpet bahn.Those trains were robust and reliable even in the hands of children… not like Roco or Fleischmanns
My Regards to all of you,
Marklineisenbahn
4 users liked this useful post by Marklineisenbahn
petestra
,
Mark5
,
dickinsonj
,
Eurobahnfan
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
Mark5
#162
Posted :
16 September 2023 20:26:49(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 29/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,421
Location: Montreal, Canada
"pukos wear out due to the friction of the sliders and disappear,"
I have never heard this before.
Would that happen on any other layout than MiWuLa?
(1000s of hours of use)
Has anyone every had this happen? I know if you lean on or push down the pukos by accident then yes, it will have contact issues... but "wear out due to friction of the sliders" I highly doubt any normal layout would wear out. Please correct me if I presume. Its seems the sliders wear out first. Does K track wear out sliders more quickly is another question? I don't know.
Originally Posted by: amartinezv
....
The second problem, which only affects heavy use layouts, for example MiWuLa or Merklingen, is that the pukos wear out due to the friction of the sliders and disappear, in the two mentioned installations, they started with K-track, and now they have changed to the 2-rail system.
DB DR FS NS SNCF c. 1950-65, fan of station architecture esp. from 1920-70.
In single point perspective, where do track lines meet?
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
petestra
#163
Posted :
16 September 2023 21:05:37(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 27/07/2009(UTC)
Posts: 5,855
Location: Leesburg,VA.USA
Originally Posted by: Mark5
"pukos wear out due to the friction of the sliders and disappear,"
I have never heard this before.
Would that happen on any other layout than MiWuLa?
(1000s of hours of use)
Has anyone every had this happen? I know if you lean on or push down the pukos by accident then yes, it will have contact issues... but "wear out due to friction of the sliders" I highly doubt any normal layout would wear out. Please correct me if I presume. Its seems the sliders wear out first. Does K track wear out sliders more quickly is another question? I don't know.
Originally Posted by: amartinezv
....
The second problem, which only affects heavy use layouts, for example MiWuLa or Merklingen, is that the pukos wear out due to the friction of the sliders and disappear, in the two mentioned installations, they started with K-track, and now they have changed to the 2-rail system.
Hi Mark. I use old M track and C track on my layout and I still have some old M track from my first 1966 layout. No problems. Cheers, Peter.
Facebook
2 users liked this useful post by petestra
Alsterstreek
,
Mark5
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
Alsterstreek
#164
Posted :
16 September 2023 22:05:01(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 16/11/2011(UTC)
Posts: 5,726
Location: Hybrid Home
Originally Posted by: amartinezv
The second problem, which only affects heavy use layouts, for example MiWuLa or Merklingen, is that the pukos wear out due to the friction of the sliders and disappear, in the two mentioned installations, they started with K-track, and now they have changed to the 2-rail system.
The Miniatur-Wunderland website explains:
"The Roco Line track is used in our Hamburg, Scandinavia and Italy sections. Why did we use Roco and not Märklin? Because there is much more rolling stock available for two-line track, so we were spared having to convert the material. As tram track or in the harbour area, the two-rail track is generally excellent because you can also lay road paving between the rails without interference."
Source (German):
https://www.miniatur-wun...modellbahn/gleissysteme/
Greetz - Ak
My current "layout":
https://www.marklin-user...aigne-Project#post592818
4 users liked this useful post by Alsterstreek
petestra
,
dickinsonj
,
Mark5
,
Marklineisenbahn
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
Goofy
#165
Posted :
17 September 2023 09:19:15(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 12/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 9,087
Originally Posted by: Mark5
"pukos wear out due to the friction of the sliders and disappear,"
I have never heard this before.
Would that happen on any other layout than MiWuLa?
(1000s of hours of use)
In fact it happens after so many hours use of the Märklin tracks and slider.
We call it friction and you can see the result on the Märklin tracks on the puckos where there are oxid.
Of course does the slider make friction on the top of puckos on the tracks.
H0
DCC = Digital Command Control
1 user liked this useful post by Goofy
Mark5
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
David Dewar
#166
Posted :
17 September 2023 12:46:14(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 01/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 7,373
Location: Scotland
Originally Posted by: Goofy
Originally Posted by: Mark5
"pukos wear out due to the friction of the sliders and disappear,"
I have never heard this before.
Would that happen on any other layout than MiWuLa?
(1000s of hours of use)
In fact it happens after so many hours use of the Märklin tracks and slider.
We call it friction and you can see the result on the Märklin tracks on the puckos where there are oxid.
Of course does the slider make friction on the top of puckos on the tracks.
After so many hours you say. My C track is still fine after years of use. You do need to clean the rails after some hours of use which helps with slider contact. Never heard of Pukos disappearing.
Take care I like Marklin and will defend the worlds greatest model rail manufacturer.
2 users liked this useful post by David Dewar
marklinist5999
,
Mark5
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
marklinist5999
#167
Posted :
17 September 2023 14:29:18(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 10/02/2021(UTC)
Posts: 3,268
Location: Michigan, Troy
Yes David. I would think friction is higher when new.
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
H0
#168
Posted :
17 September 2023 17:51:44(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,310
Location: DE-NW
Originally Posted by: Mark5
Has anyone every had this happen?
I once saw a Märklin layout in a museum. There was no more traffic on the loops with slim turnouts because the Pukos had become so short that locos would always short-circuit the layout.
There still was traffic on the industrial area with regular turnouts (where rails near the frogs are insulated).
Not an everyday problem for private layouts, but It can happen on layouts other than MiWuLa, too.
Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize
a high level of quality
, the
best possible fidelity to the prototype
, and
absolute precision
. You will see that
in all of our products
." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
6 users liked this useful post by H0
petestra
,
Mark5
,
marklinist5999
,
Unholz
,
Alsterstreek
,
hxmiesa
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
Mark5
#169
Posted :
17 September 2023 18:11:35(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 29/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,421
Location: Montreal, Canada
Anyone seen the rather large K-track pukos where off/down?
How about pukos getting shiny if worn down, is there a way to blacken the metal again without losing conductivity? .... I remember reading somewhere about blackening agents in "gun metal" application but I do not recall the products.
DB DR FS NS SNCF c. 1950-65, fan of station architecture esp. from 1920-70.
In single point perspective, where do track lines meet?
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages
«
<
2
3
4
Go to Page...
marklin-users.net community | Forum
»
General topics
»
General MRR
»
Why does 3-rail AC still exist?
Forum Jump
marklin-users.net community | Forum
General topics
- General MRR
- H0-scale
- Small scale
- Big scale
- Prototype
--- Videos
----- Steam
----- Electric
----- Diesel
----- Training and Instructional
----- Accidents
- Digital
- Model railroad software
- Model railroad photography
- Great layouts I have seen...
- News from Märklin and others
- Events, forum member meets, exhibitions & TV shows
Your layout, your trains and more....
- The Public Gallery by our members
Reviews
- Loco Reviews
- Reviews of rolling stock
- Accessories reviews
- Model kit reviews
- Digital components and Software reviews
Collector's Corner
- Collector's Corner general
- Märklin Sprint
- Construction kits
- Steam engines
- Tinplate toys
- Faller collectibles and other vintage accessories
The Projects & Workshop area
- Track plans
- Painting & Weathering
- Model railroad wiring
- Model kits & layout details, kitbashing and such
The Club Corner
- Model railroad & related club area - general
You
cannot
post new topics in this forum.
You
cannot
reply to topics in this forum.
You
cannot
delete your posts in this forum.
You
cannot
edit your posts in this forum.
You
cannot
create polls in this forum.
You
cannot
vote in polls in this forum.
|
Powered by YAF.NET
|
YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.818 seconds.