Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline eduard71  
#1 Posted : 13 June 2021 01:53:07(UTC)
eduard71

Chile   
Joined: 27/02/2008(UTC)
Posts: 294
Location: Santiago
Hello all,

Another model from Märklin is presenting problems with Zinkpest. This time is the 37501. I have used this model only a few times and today I decided to run it and it was stock, one side of the driving set was not runnig. I decided to make an inspection and after reviewing I saw the problem it is Zinkpest in one of the bogies of the motorized car, the other bogie is perfect with no sign of zinkpest. Actually the boige came apart when I inspected it.

This will be my third model with the problem. Until now I have had this issue with:

36805 Koff green

37521 Seethal brown

37501 DB 420

I am attaching some photos for your reference and I have sent an mail to Markln Service. Also, I did some research in the Stummi Forum and the problem has been discussed since 2019 when some members also found their models damaged. Some of the members in the Stummi have indicated that Marklin has repair the train for around 105 euros plus shipment. I would be more interested in getting the replacement bogie but in the parts databese of Marklin the it is not available.

I will let you know what Marklin responses.

37501.5.jpg37501.3.jpg37501.4.jpg37501.2.jpg37501-1.jpg

thanks 5 users liked this useful post by eduard71
Offline xxup  
#2 Posted : 13 June 2021 02:55:28(UTC)
xxup

Australia   
Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC)
Posts: 9,457
Location: Australia
Hmmm.. I expect that the rear and front bogies were made of the same stuff - I would be trying to get both bogies replaced by Marklin..
Adrian
UserPostedImage
Australia flag by abFlags.com
Offline mvd71  
#3 Posted : 13 June 2021 06:03:45(UTC)
mvd71

New Zealand   
Joined: 09/08/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,708
Location: Auckland,
If it is zinkpest I would expect Märklin to replace it at no cost. It only occurs because of a poor quality casting.
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by mvd71
Offline marklinist5999  
#4 Posted : 13 June 2021 15:57:42(UTC)
marklinist5999

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2021(UTC)
Posts: 3,074
Location: Michigan, Troy
Marklin will not warranty anything made under Kingsbridge Capital holding ownership. The first two above itmes were. An expection may possibly be an insider model.
Offline H0  
#5 Posted : 14 June 2021 10:16:54(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,254
Location: DE-NW
Originally Posted by: JohnjeanB Go to Quoted Post
Yes just after WW2 it delivered items prone to "Zinkpest" but it was corrected by a series of measures. [...]
Bravo Märklin keep on the good work.
Another case of "Zinkpest".
Bad for Märklin's reputation if they cannot offer an affordable remedy to affected customers. Even if that model was made before insolvency and under different management/ownership.

Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by H0
Offline marklinist5999  
#6 Posted : 14 June 2021 11:07:13(UTC)
marklinist5999

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2021(UTC)
Posts: 3,074
Location: Michigan, Troy
Ethically, yes Tom! The same applies for General Motors, etc. Whom failed to warrant defective vehicles or components in vehicles produced before the 2009 bankruptcy, claiming that legally that was a different company.
Offline H0  
#7 Posted : 14 June 2021 13:13:01(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,254
Location: DE-NW
Originally Posted by: marklinist5999 Go to Quoted Post
Marklin will not warranty anything made under Kingsbridge Capital holding ownership.
The item 37501 was made under insolvency management before Simba Dickie took over.

Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
Offline Drongo  
#8 Posted : 14 June 2021 13:42:24(UTC)
Drongo

Australia   
Joined: 03/06/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,221
Location: Sydney, NSW
I've been accused of "Marklin Bashing" - well this supports my claims.
Take it easy . . . . or any other way you can get it !!!!
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Drongo
Offline hxmiesa  
#9 Posted : 14 June 2021 19:36:11(UTC)
hxmiesa

Spain   
Joined: 15/12/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,519
Location: Spain
In my opinion Märklin HAS to to take action on this problem. It´s a very modern model.
To hide behind the excuse that it was done while under another ownership does not really hold water...
First off, most buyers will go for the BRAND, regardless of the actual owner. He might not even be aware of who was the owner at the moment of production.
Secondly, the new owners bought the company because they see value in the know-how and name, so are morally and logically obliged to defend that standpoint, if they want to keep their investment.

Actually, this model is discussed on Stummis since 2017.
But even if the model of the OP is no longer produced and spare parts seems unavailable, they DID issue a new model in 2019; M37508 | T22655 -maybe your needed part can still be obtained under another ref.?

Edited by user 15 June 2021 07:14:42(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Best regards
Henrik Hoexbroe ("The Dane In Spain")
http://hoexbroe.tripod.com
thanks 3 users liked this useful post by hxmiesa
Offline Mr. Ron  
#10 Posted : 15 June 2021 03:10:11(UTC)
Mr. Ron

United States   
Joined: 05/07/2020(UTC)
Posts: 311
Location: Mississippi, Vancleave
If Marklin wants to maintain their reputation for quality trains, they SHOULD make good on the faulty zinc castings.
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by Mr. Ron
Offline marklinist5999  
#11 Posted : 15 June 2021 14:15:49(UTC)
marklinist5999

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2021(UTC)
Posts: 3,074
Location: Michigan, Troy
Think they are reading? Do they care? Both my Trostberg Koff, and first issue SBB DE 6/6 Seetal have it.
Offline marklinist5999  
#12 Posted : 15 June 2021 14:17:51(UTC)
marklinist5999

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2021(UTC)
Posts: 3,074
Location: Michigan, Troy
Originally Posted by: marklinist5999 Go to Quoted Post
Think they are reading? Do they care? Both my Trostberg Koff, and first issue SBB DE 6/6 Seetal have it.


Mad Had we all not bought our affected models, or much else, would Simba Dickie have wanted the company? We all know what happens when there are no buyers.
Offline mvd71  
#13 Posted : 16 June 2021 05:52:25(UTC)
mvd71

New Zealand   
Joined: 09/08/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,708
Location: Auckland,
Originally Posted by: marklinist5999 Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: marklinist5999 Go to Quoted Post
Think they are reading? Do they care? Both my Trostberg Koff, and first issue SBB DE 6/6 Seetal have it.


Mad Had we all not bought our affected models, or much else, would Simba Dickie have wanted the company? We all know what happens when there are no buyers.


Quite right, it has been our collective purchases that keep our favourite company afloat and whilst the product in question may be out of warranty, it would be nice to think they would look after the owners of these models given the nature of the defect.
Offline 60904  
#14 Posted : 04 July 2021 13:42:47(UTC)
60904

Germany   
Joined: 27/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 312
Hi, send the bogies to Märklin an d see what will happen. Very likely they might send new ones at no cost.
Greetings
Martin
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.496 seconds.