Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline boitpo  
#1 Posted : 16 July 2016 21:19:43(UTC)
boitpo

New Zealand   
Joined: 29/05/2016(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Taupo
I am new to the hobby and have been looking at all the track plans people post with amazement of the ideas people have. I will use c track with MS2 control. Will run early steam and diesel no electric's.
I have an area for a small layout in a U shape around the wall? 197cm south wall,315cm west wall,110cm north wall. I would like a shutting yard station area , sidings with industry that can feed one another, for example coal mine to factory's. A small village? Maybe a Wharf could be canal feed or coastal bringing frieght in taking products out. Ambitious I Know but have had this idea for a long time. Please help
Offline DB Fan  
#2 Posted : 16 July 2016 21:43:43(UTC)
DB Fan

United States   
Joined: 01/03/2016(UTC)
Posts: 180
Location: Colorado
Wow. If my math is correct then you have a room 31.5m x 19.7m x 11m. What a layout I could buildBigGrin Love . I'm sure you meant 3.15m x 1.97m x 1.1m. BigGrin still a pretty good size for a layout. I'm in the same stage and in search for a layout plan. This is a great forum with a lot of knowledgeable and great members.

Robert
Offline boitpo  
#3 Posted : 16 July 2016 21:46:49(UTC)
boitpo

New Zealand   
Joined: 29/05/2016(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Taupo
Opps. Yes you are correct 1.97m x3.15m x 1.1m. Base Board 1.scarm (1kb) downloaded 110 time(s). This is One Idea For A Baseboard.
Offline pederbc  
#4 Posted : 16 July 2016 22:37:25(UTC)
pederbc

Sweden   
Joined: 11/06/2007(UTC)
Posts: 61
Location: Eslöv, Sweden
Sorry, but I don't see the problem. In my world there is still 100cm on a meter, unless it has changed recently Cool . Cent, as in centimeter means 100 and in this case 1/100.

Cool Cool Cool Cool Cool

/Peder
Offline boitpo  
#5 Posted : 16 July 2016 22:59:02(UTC)
boitpo

New Zealand   
Joined: 29/05/2016(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Taupo
I had the dimensions at 1970cm x 3150cm x 1100cm. I have corrected this now
Offline boitpo  
#6 Posted : 24 July 2016 07:43:16(UTC)
boitpo

New Zealand   
Joined: 29/05/2016(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Taupo
Have been playing with scarm Base Board 2.scarm (8kb) downloaded 84 time(s). I want two reverse loops ,like a dog bone conecting to a station and yard area. But have a bit of distance or open running between.Slow going
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by boitpo
Offline boitpo  
#7 Posted : 03 August 2016 23:51:35(UTC)
boitpo

New Zealand   
Joined: 29/05/2016(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Taupo
I have got this far now with my track plan. Base Board 1 BACKUP.bmp (18,607kb) downloaded 64 time(s).It gives me two stations with the option of running behind them to give the impression of a long dog bone. I still have to work on heights and elevations and some sidings for factorys. How do I upload the track plan directly to the forum so people don't have to download to veiw please. Regards Stephen.
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by boitpo
Offline BrandonVA  
#8 Posted : 04 August 2016 05:21:10(UTC)
BrandonVA

United States   
Joined: 09/12/2011(UTC)
Posts: 2,533
Location: VA
Stephen,

To have the images viewable in the thread, the file size needs to be quiet a bit smaller. If there is an option to export as a jpg/jpeg that will help a lot. I have resized it here for discussion.

baseboardbackup_resize.jpg

I think it's a very nice first attempt. Is the dog bone elevated or hidden like a shadow station?

I will attempt to fill in for Ak, (in a greatly diminished capacity). I think the turnout circled in red should be flipped. Removes the S curve and also makes the passing lane slightly longer:

baseboardbackup_resize.jpg

-Brandon
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by BrandonVA
Offline boitpo  
#9 Posted : 04 August 2016 05:47:01(UTC)
boitpo

New Zealand   
Joined: 29/05/2016(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Taupo
Thanks Brandon, I was thinking of having one reverse loop hidden, and the other one above it semi exposed. still have a bit more to do on the plan. Regards Stephen.This is another plan using my existing M track, all new old stock, most in original boxes. The only thing that worries me is reliability running digital on it(shorting and modern loccos and rolling stock).I still like the look of M Track. With control boxes to switch the turnouts it is a lot cheaper to do.Regards Stephen BoivinM&C Track Layout.jpg
thanks 3 users liked this useful post by boitpo
Offline BrandonVA  
#10 Posted : 04 August 2016 21:49:21(UTC)
BrandonVA

United States   
Joined: 09/12/2011(UTC)
Posts: 2,533
Location: VA
Stephen,

What kind of operations do you want to do on your layout? Do you like to just watch the trains run, do shunting, super prototypical operation, etc? Do you have a style preference, like a classic Marklin layout or a more scenic setup, etc?

With the 2nd plan I would try to reverse the turnouts wherever they make an S, it will look better with the trains running through it and increase the lenght of the passing siding. Sometimes it looks better if all the tracks aren't parallel with the edge of the layout, but for classic style layouts this works very well.

I liked your first design, reminded me of my layout :)

UserPostedImage

-Brandon

thanks 2 users liked this useful post by BrandonVA
Offline boitpo  
#11 Posted : 06 August 2016 01:33:27(UTC)
boitpo

New Zealand   
Joined: 29/05/2016(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Taupo

I'm just starting out. Will build base board and have a play with the track that I have and see what I can make fit. The M-C Layout is what I will Start With to keep the buget down and Build from here. I also have 12 5200 Curves as well. I won't plan scenery yet as Ideas will change no doubt. Base board dimensions are fixed as this is the room I have available. It's a resonable size. As For the era I like Steam and early Diesel.
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by boitpo
Offline boitpo  
#12 Posted : 15 December 2016 10:42:04(UTC)
boitpo

New Zealand   
Joined: 29/05/2016(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Taupo
WP_20161215_21_19_28_Pro.jpg I have built a temporary base board to try some ideas on. Regards Stephen
Offline boitpo  
#13 Posted : 15 December 2016 11:14:07(UTC)
boitpo

New Zealand   
Joined: 29/05/2016(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Taupo
I can't get the photo the right way up. Regards Stephen
Offline Shamu  
#14 Posted : 15 December 2016 12:32:19(UTC)
Shamu

Australia   
Joined: 12/07/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,068
Location: In a building site in Yeppoon
Flip.jpg
Sad when its cheaper to buy a new 29640 starter set from Germany than a CS2 on its own in Oz, welcome to the joys of Marklin down under .
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Shamu
Offline hwestl  
#15 Posted : 15 December 2016 14:45:46(UTC)
hwestl

Sweden   
Joined: 13/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 82
Location: Ystad, Sweden
Originally Posted by: Shamu Go to Quoted Post
welcome to the joys of Marklin down under


Not sure why you turned Stephens picture. Wasn't it absolutely perfect from the beginning??
LOL

thanks 3 users liked this useful post by hwestl
Offline DaleSchultz  
#16 Posted : 15 December 2016 17:11:05(UTC)
DaleSchultz


Joined: 10/02/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,032
Originally Posted by: boitpo Go to Quoted Post
M&C Track Layout.jpg


see this tip http://cabin-layout.blog...n-siding-design-tip.html
for an improvement on the left of this image where the track comes out of the tunnel into the station

Dale
Intellibox + own software, K-Track
My current layout: https://cabin-layout.mixmox.com
Arrival and Departure signs: https://remotesign.mixmox.com
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by DaleSchultz
Offline Webmaster  
#17 Posted : 20 December 2016 19:44:46(UTC)
Webmaster


Joined: 25/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 10,823
Originally Posted by: boitpo Go to Quoted Post
I can't get the photo the right way up. Regards Stephen

Quite understandable, from the forum server location perspective in the Northern hemisphere - all Southern hemisphere layouts look like this... Wink BigGrin

Thanks for posting the evidence for what it really is like, us "northerners" have thought this all the time... ThumpUp
Just joking of course. Smile
Juhan - "Webmaster", at your service...
He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Old Chinese Proverb]
thanks 6 users liked this useful post by Webmaster
Offline boitpo  
#18 Posted : 21 December 2016 06:19:31(UTC)
boitpo

New Zealand   
Joined: 29/05/2016(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Taupo
WP_20161219_17_16_04_Pro.jpgWP_20161215_21_19_28_Pro.jpgWP_20161219_17_15_52_Pro.jpgWP_20161219_17_16_34_Pro.jpgWP_20161219_17_15_40_Pro.jpgWP_20161219_17_16_26_Pro.jpg Some more pics. Different design this time. I'm glad the photos are the right way up for the northern hemisphere. After a few whiskeys they look good down here as well. Regards Stephen
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by boitpo
Offline boitpo  
#19 Posted : 18 June 2019 06:50:31(UTC)
boitpo

New Zealand   
Joined: 29/05/2016(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Taupo
Time for an update20190608_085158.jpg20190608_085132.jpg20190608_085309.jpg20190608_085119.jpg
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by boitpo
Offline Alsterstreek  
#20 Posted : 18 June 2019 12:12:04(UTC)
Alsterstreek

Portugal   
Joined: 16/11/2011(UTC)
Posts: 4,482
Location: westernmost
Since available space is expanding after your baseboard started growing wings, how about taking it to the second level - see attached?
oval2019dogbone-alternatives.png
Alternatively, stub tracks could remain grounded with high lines flying above the former.

These are only schematic drawings. The basic idea is - exploiting the full potential of the enlarged baseboard - to reserve one level for a full uninhibited "butterfly-shaped race course" along the ledges.
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Alsterstreek
Offline Alsterstreek  
#21 Posted : 18 June 2019 13:54:09(UTC)
Alsterstreek

Portugal   
Joined: 16/11/2011(UTC)
Posts: 4,482
Location: westernmost
The Central Midland track plan by the late John Armstrong comes to my mind, too.
:o)

Central%20Midland%20track%20plan.jpg
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by Alsterstreek
Offline rbw993  
#22 Posted : 18 June 2019 17:27:38(UTC)
rbw993

United States   
Joined: 19/08/2008(UTC)
Posts: 562
From the Atlas track planning book. This was my dream layout when I was a kid.
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by rbw993
Offline boitpo  
#23 Posted : 19 June 2019 10:04:30(UTC)
boitpo

New Zealand   
Joined: 29/05/2016(UTC)
Posts: 47
Location: Taupo
Originally Posted by: Alsterstreek Go to Quoted Post
Since available space is expanding after your baseboard started growing wings, how about taking it to the second level - see attached?
oval2019dogbone-alternatives.png
Alternatively, stub tracks could remain grounded with high lines flying above the former.

These are only schematic drawings. The basic idea is - exploiting the full potential of the enlarged baseboard - to reserve one level for a full uninhibited "butterfly-shaped race course" along the ledges.


Yes I agree the only way is up. But I like to change the design of the tracks and try new ideas. I'm trying to work out a way of doing elevations but not making them permanent. So they can be chaged easily when I get bored with the current or future plan, with the same ease as changing the track design.
The flexibility of change is why I choose C track
Regards Stephen
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by boitpo
Offline Alsterstreek  
#24 Posted : 19 June 2019 10:44:34(UTC)
Alsterstreek

Portugal   
Joined: 16/11/2011(UTC)
Posts: 4,482
Location: westernmost
Originally Posted by: boitpo Go to Quoted Post
I'm trying to work out a way of doing elevations but not making them permanent. So they can be chaged easily when I get bored with the current or future plan, with the same ease as changing the track design.


NOCH offers ramps made of flexible foam to be bent into shape according to the course of the track to be carried. They exist for 4%, 6%, 7% and 8% gradients. 4% is borderline, and all the others are too steep for my taste. Example:

https://shop.noch.com/pr...-cm-9-cm-high-99359.html

I had two of them on my first C track layout in 2003. Since they supported two tight R1 radius curves (I was still young, and they were much cheaper back then...), I had to glue them down with white wood glue in order to remain in place. A MRR dealer once warned me that the foam might crumble away after some time, but during their limited service period in my realm they behaved well, even after "un-gluing" them from their initial positions.

Originally Posted by: boitpo Go to Quoted Post
The flexibility of change is why I choose C track

:o)
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Alsterstreek
Offline kiwiAlan  
#25 Posted : 19 June 2019 22:46:28(UTC)
kiwiAlan

United Kingdom   
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC)
Posts: 4,357
Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
Originally Posted by: Alsterstreek Go to Quoted Post

NOCH offers ramps made of flexible foam to be bent into shape according to the course of the track to be carried. They exist for 4%, 6%, 7% and 8% gradients. 4% is borderline, and all the others are too steep for my taste. Example:


Woodland Scenics also make flexible polystyrene ramps, but in shallower inclines. I think these may also be available through Noch.



thanks 2 users liked this useful post by kiwiAlan
Users browsing this topic
OceanSpiders 2.0
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2019, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.910 seconds.