Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline fje  
#1 Posted : 21 September 2025 19:53:10(UTC)
fje

Spain   
Joined: 14/02/2011(UTC)
Posts: 128
Location: Madrid
Hi, I got a new/old (second hand) CS2 60213 that gives me some troubles.

I am testing with it several Mfx locs in a couple of test tracks I built using M-tracks and C-tracks.

I should say that neither of both test tracks are pretty new (of course) and maybe not 100% clean, but when I use them with the same locs using an (also old) Intellibox I, I don't have any problem, except that the loc can stop due to a problem of current micro-cut due to dirty in the tracks or the "pukos", but nothing more.

CS2 60213 instead changes the loc direction or even switch on a loc function. It seems CS2 is much more sensible to a possible current micro-failure than the other (old) Intellibox.

I am afraid that when I would use it in one of (from time to time) built layouts it would give me many troubles because my tracks ar old and impossible to have them 100% clean.

So, is there any way to lower the CS2 sensitivity to those micro-cut of current in possible dirty tracks (or "pukos").

Thanks and kind regards.

Javier

P.S.: When I build a layout, I usually use a booster between the Control Station and the layout (mainly for protecting the Control Station), would it lower the sensibility micro-cut problems I find now?
Offline H0  
#2 Posted : 21 September 2025 20:01:31(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,491
Location: DE-NW
Hi!
Originally Posted by: fje Go to Quoted Post
So, is there any way to lower the CS2 sensitivity to those micro-cut of current in possible dirty tracks (or "pukos").
Is it really a CS2 issue, i.e. does the CS2 show the change of direction and the activation of the function?
Maybe the sensitivity is with the decoders, depending on the protocol.
You can disable mfx in the CS2 and use MM and DCC as you do with the Intellibox to see if that makes a difference.

If the sensitivity is with the CS2 then a booster might help. A non-mfx booster will isolate the CS2 from the track and there should be no way of interference from dirt on the rails.

Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
Offline fje  
#3 Posted : 22 September 2025 08:11:33(UTC)
fje

Spain   
Joined: 14/02/2011(UTC)
Posts: 128
Location: Madrid
Originally Posted by: H0 Go to Quoted Post
Hi!
Originally Posted by: fje Go to Quoted Post
So, is there any way to lower the CS2 sensitivity to those micro-cut of current in possible dirty tracks (or "pukos").
Is it really a CS2 issue, i.e. does the CS2 show the change of direction and the activation of the function?
Maybe the sensitivity is with the decoders, depending on the protocol.
You can disable mfx in the CS2 and use MM and DCC as you do with the Intellibox to see if that makes a difference.

If the sensitivity is with the CS2 then a booster might help. A non-mfx booster will isolate the CS2 from the track and there should be no way of interference from dirt on the rails.


Thanks. Yes, the change of direction and the activation of the function are seen in the CS2, so, it seems to be a problem of the CS2.

On the other hand, both decoders (37921 and 37886) seems to be Mfx-only decoders, but I will try your suggestion of test them using MM protocol in order to isolate the problem between the decoder/protocol and the CS2/protocol.

I will also try it putting my booster (It is a "Do it yourself" Märklin 60174-like)

But everything has to wait a couple of weeks, as I am not at home just now, so, no access to them.

Thanks again and best regards.

Javier
Offline kiwiAlan  
#4 Posted : 22 September 2025 12:44:01(UTC)
kiwiAlan

United Kingdom   
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC)
Posts: 8,552
Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
Originally Posted by: fje Go to Quoted Post


I will also try it putting my booster (It is a "Do it yourself" Märklin 60174-like)


Where did you get information to make one of these? I would appreciate a link if possible.

TIA
Offline fje  
#5 Posted : 22 September 2025 13:16:03(UTC)
fje

Spain   
Joined: 14/02/2011(UTC)
Posts: 128
Location: Madrid
Originally Posted by: kiwiAlan Go to Quoted Post


Where did you get information to make one of these? I would appreciate a link if possible.

TIA


I got it from another Spanish colleague, in fact I got it already built, but I feel I have all the documentation, the components, the electronic circuit and components and even the electronic board design, should you be interested in, I can contact my colleague (if still available) and ask for sending you information or selling you a board (is still available).

Regards

Offline kiwiAlan  
#6 Posted : 22 September 2025 18:50:51(UTC)
kiwiAlan

United Kingdom   
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC)
Posts: 8,552
Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
Originally Posted by: fje Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: kiwiAlan Go to Quoted Post


Where did you get information to make one of these? I would appreciate a link if possible.

TIA


I got it from another Spanish colleague, in fact I got it already built, but I feel I have all the documentation, the components, the electronic circuit and components and even the electronic board design, should you be interested in, I can contact my colleague (if still available) and ask for sending you information or selling you a board (is still available).

Regards



I would appreciate that if it is still available.
Thank you
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.309 seconds.