Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline MegaBlackJoe  
#1 Posted : 12 November 2021 13:10:33(UTC)
MegaBlackJoe

Belarus   
Joined: 12/11/2021(UTC)
Posts: 2
Location: Minskaya voblasts', Minsk
Märklin released a defective 88136 model. It looks like metall impregnated plastic has played a bad joke. Although the weight and traction power have increased, the body of the locomotive has a very bad quality. The model itself has a lot of plastic debree scattered all over body, gears, cab. It looks as if the plastic has begun to destoy from the factory. The paint quality of the locomotive is very low and I am surprised that the model has passed quality assurance control. This is the worst Z scale model ever offfered by Märklin. As an owner of 88131 - I am shocked, because 88136 was a flawless model - the paint quality is supreme. At first I thought that the problems are related to the paint but after closer examination of the paint, I saw that the body is destoyed small pieces of plastic have left the body at the factory. This is how it looks like in reality. The model is just from the factory - there is no dust on it - these are plastic debree scattered all over it. Märklin offers to send the locomotive back to their factory to the repairment department - but I don't see the way how the repairment can fix factory defects, I also paid the import tax and a shipping fee.
Snimok.PNG
Snimok2.PNG














Offline Zme  
#2 Posted : 12 November 2021 17:49:06(UTC)
Zme

United States   
Joined: 02/10/2013(UTC)
Posts: 412
Location: West Texas
Hello, hope you are well, and welcome to the site.

I can see what your comment is about. The shell has small flecks of material stuck to it and in the upper photo, the lines are not strong and consistent. Am I correct, there seems to be a slight color change from one end to the other. I know how disappointing this must be. These defects don’t just rub away but are imbedded into the material.

It would seem, even if this may not impact performance or operation, it is something which Marklin should be made aware of. I know there is no way to avoid postal and import fees, but there may be no alternative. I have never used their warranty service, but have hear only good things about them. It is likely, yours is not the only instance of these flaws. It could be an entire batch is impacted. I would notify them and see what happens. These are expensive models and should be covered by warranty from any defects. I have never held one of these in my hand, so don’t know what quality standard it should meet.

For your first contact, you may use this link:

https://www.maerklin.de/...mer-service/contact-form

Here is a link to their support page for repairs should this be considered a repair.

https://www.maerklin.de/...r-service/repair-service

Hopefully everything will work out to your satisfaction. Please let us know what happens. I ordered this model too, but have not received it yet, so I am very interested in your outcome.

Again, welcome to the best Marklin user site available.

Take good care.

Dwight
Offline kiwiAlan  
#3 Posted : 12 November 2021 21:50:45(UTC)
kiwiAlan

United Kingdom   
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC)
Posts: 6,436
Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
Originally Posted by: Zme Go to Quoted Post
Hello, hope you are well, and welcome to the site.

I can see what your comment is about. The shell has small flecks of material stuck to it and in the upper photo, the lines are not strong and consistent. Am I correct, there seems to be a slight color change from one end to the other. I know how disappointing this must be. These defects don’t just rub away but are imbedded into the material.


I think the colour difference is just the way different lighting can change colours. But I was appalled at the top edge of the windows (both ends) where the body has chipped on the edge, to a point where you can see the outside of the window frame that is printed on the glazing. That definitely shouldn't be like that, and the only fix is a return to marklin for a new body.

But you should be OK returning it, do some research with your local customs department to make sure you fill out the customs declaration correctly and that the item is being returned for "warranty repair". Marklin should then do the same when it is returned to you so you don't get doubled charged tax.

thanks 1 user liked this useful post by kiwiAlan
Offline marklinist5999  
#4 Posted : 13 November 2021 13:55:22(UTC)
marklinist5999

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2021(UTC)
Posts: 1,170
Location: Michigan, Troy
It's not so much the colors, the die molding job looks sad.
Offline Poor Skeleton  
#5 Posted : 14 November 2021 18:13:46(UTC)
Poor Skeleton

United Kingdom   
Joined: 09/10/2015(UTC)
Posts: 392
Location: England, Cambridge
Originally Posted by: Zme Go to Quoted Post
Hopefully everything will work out to your satisfaction. Please let us know what happens. I ordered this model too, but have not received it yet, so I am very interested in your outcome.



I too have one of these on order and have been excitedly watching for shipping notification, so I'm also very interested to hear the outcome.

I can imagine that the metal loaded plastic is more difficult to mould than regular plastic, but I'm surprised no-one else has commented if this is a regular problem. Trainini's reviews are usually highly critical so I'm sure they would have picked up on this if it's typical.

I'll be sure to report back when mine finally arrives - assuming Marklin's UK distributor has been allocated some of this model.

All the best


Chris

Offline Mman  
#6 Posted : 20 November 2021 14:37:08(UTC)
Mman

United Kingdom   
Joined: 23/05/2021(UTC)
Posts: 128
Location: England, Guildford
My 88136 Ludmilla arrived today weighing 53.64 grams, some tiny imperfections only apparent in close up photographs.
Runs nicely and negotiates 145mm radius curves at speed. Actually runs better in one direction than the other which is not unusual in these Z locos.
I haven’t tried a haulage test yet.
ChrisG
14AED63D-B0BD-4F0B-9903-F7AB6C7D4890.jpeg0F4862C6-09CE-4947-A262-AFEE7D645E4F.jpegEA2E7D80-71D0-424B-8930-F720EFEDD831.jpeg
Offline Zme  
#7 Posted : 20 November 2021 15:38:51(UTC)
Zme

United States   
Joined: 02/10/2013(UTC)
Posts: 412
Location: West Texas
Hello, hope all is well.

Apparently, the mold/injection process is hit or miss and not a widespread issue. Yours appears much improved but it is by no means perfect. I see some edges which lack crispness, at lease the small flecks are largely missing. The windows are/seem correctly placed. Will you accept this or notify Marklin?

Otherwise must be impressive to handle.

Let us know what you decide.

Thanks for sharing, take good care.

Dwight
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Zme
Offline Poor Skeleton  
#8 Posted : 20 November 2021 15:40:00(UTC)
Poor Skeleton

United Kingdom   
Joined: 09/10/2015(UTC)
Posts: 392
Location: England, Cambridge
Originally Posted by: Mman Go to Quoted Post
My 88136 Ludmilla arrived today weighing 53.64 grams, some tiny imperfections only apparent in close up photographs.
Runs nicely and negotiates 145mm radius curves at speed. Actually runs better in one direction than the other which is not unusual in these Z locos.
I haven’t tried a haulage test yet.


Quite jealous - I phoned through my card details on Wednesday, but Gaugemaster still haven't shipped it. Hopefully Monday! Looking forward to seeing how many coaches it can haul around my layout! (My guess is more than can stay on the track!

Have a great weekend "testing" your new acquisition!


Chris

thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Poor Skeleton
Offline Poor Skeleton  
#9 Posted : 22 November 2021 22:36:25(UTC)
Poor Skeleton

United Kingdom   
Joined: 09/10/2015(UTC)
Posts: 392
Location: England, Cambridge
Mine arrived today and I've been able to spend a bit of time running and evaluating the model. As Chris G reported it's a nice smooth runner - unusually so, I feel, as I find the six wheel bogie not to be terrible smooth. This model runs infinitely smoother than either of my other two Ludmillas.

I was running some haulage tests over the weekend - here are the results

Model Weight Haulage
88786 BR218 24g 5
8874 BR218 37g 6
88132 Ludmilla 34g 9
88136 Ludmilla 54g 10

The haulage figure is the number of 8720 bogie coaches the loco can pull around my layout (with ~3% gradients).

The surprise is that despite its much greater weight the vintage 8874 can only manage one more coach than the modern equivalent. Equally surprising, the lighter 88132 Ludmilla can manage three additional coaches, yet the much heavier 88136 can only pull one more. Not entirely representative as the most demanding part of the layout is on a curve, but I'm still surprised the new model didn't manage more.

I've been too scared to look closely at the quality of the moulding, but there was nothing I found offensive at first glance, so I'm going to leave it at that!

Cheers


Chris
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Poor Skeleton
Zme
Offline Zme  
#10 Posted : 23 November 2021 04:03:12(UTC)
Zme

United States   
Joined: 02/10/2013(UTC)
Posts: 412
Location: West Texas
Hello, Hope all is well.

I guess you had a great weekend! That is good!

I don’t understand how a locomotive with so much weight doesn’t have more pulling power. If only all three wheel sets were driven. So much for the dream.

I guess this could confirm weight is not the only factor. It is still hampered with the location of the weight over the drive/traction wheels.

I have noticed on my layout, some of the scenics get into the path of my longer passenger wagons as they track around the curve. I have gone around checking side clearance and moving or removing “bushes” or “fences” so they clear. This has made a difference. Sometimes the gotchas are just the simple solutions you find.

Take good care.


Dwight
Offline Poor Skeleton  
#11 Posted : 23 November 2021 22:06:55(UTC)
Poor Skeleton

United Kingdom   
Joined: 09/10/2015(UTC)
Posts: 392
Location: England, Cambridge
Originally Posted by: Zme Go to Quoted Post
Hello, Hope all is well.

I guess you had a great weekend! That is good!

I don’t understand how a locomotive with so much weight doesn’t have more pulling power. If only all three wheel sets were driven. So much for the dream.

I guess this could confirm weight is not the only factor. It is still hampered with the location of the weight over the drive/traction wheels.

I have noticed on my layout, some of the scenics get into the path of my longer passenger wagons as they track around the curve. I have gone around checking side clearance and moving or removing “bushes” or “fences” so they clear. This has made a difference. Sometimes the gotchas are just the simple solutions you find.

Take good care.


Dwight


New toys are always fun - looking forward to more playing this weekend!

This evening I attempted to get a more scientific result by altering the gradient of a length of straight track with a fixed number of coaches. The results were broadly in line with my previous ones, but not consistent enough to publish here.

Hope yours arrives soon so you can join in the fun!

Cheers


Chris


Offline MegaBlackJoe  
#12 Posted : 24 November 2021 14:59:05(UTC)
MegaBlackJoe

Belarus   
Joined: 12/11/2021(UTC)
Posts: 2
Location: Minskaya voblasts', Minsk
Thanks for posting fotos, indeed, although your model looks better than mine, there are still molding defects which is a shame
Offline Poor Skeleton  
#13 Posted : 24 November 2021 23:13:39(UTC)
Poor Skeleton

United Kingdom   
Joined: 09/10/2015(UTC)
Posts: 392
Location: England, Cambridge
I rigged up a more elaborate traction test with a pulley and set of precision scales. The results seemed fairly consistent, so here they are :

Model.............Weight........Haulage
88786 BR218.... 24g............ 4.2g
8874 BR218...... 37g............ 6.2g
88132 Ludmilla.. 34g............ 7.3g
88136 Ludmilla.. 54g............ 9.5g

These are measured on straight level track and the old surprise of the Ludmilla out-hauling the heavier BR218 remains! I am increasingly feeling that is due to the silver coloured wheels of the 8874 BR218. All of the other locos have modern dark plated wheels.

Hope this is of interest.


Chris
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by Poor Skeleton
Offline Mman  
#14 Posted : 03 December 2021 11:18:04(UTC)
Mman

United Kingdom   
Joined: 23/05/2021(UTC)
Posts: 128
Location: England, Guildford
Finally got around to a simple haulage test for the metal filled plastic Ludmilla 88136, it managed 24 two axle tankers around the Noch Tessin.
I located my Rokuhan BR181 with two traction tyres and although weighing a mere 28.32 gram easily walked away with the 24 tankers. The Rokuhan has drawbacks though, not least the awful dummy pantographs. It hesitates on certain parts of the layout jerking its consist causing buffer locking and with the simple built in controls of the Tessin there are no gradual take offs or stops - again jerking the consist. The pantographs are truly terrible, I’m tempted to look for a couple of mini-club ones to fit instead.
Whilst I had a lot of tankers out I tried out the recently delivered AW Cotbus class 218 88807 which at 26.26 gram managed a creditable 15 of the tanks.
I am now eagerly awaiting delivery of 88545 class 103 loco also with metal filled plastic body to see how well or otherwise it is made and what it will haul.
ChrisG
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Mman
Zme
Offline Zme  
#15 Posted : 03 December 2021 17:21:39(UTC)
Zme

United States   
Joined: 02/10/2013(UTC)
Posts: 412
Location: West Texas
Hello, hope all is well.

That is impressive. That is load of wagons. I still have not received any word on the Ludmilla. It should be a real puller by all accounts.

I have often wondered about the 181. That pantograph is a real eyesore, I am sure the decision to go with plastic was profit driven. To me that one was relatively expensive and I never seem to see it on EBay. I guess that is why I never picked one up. It is otherwise, a nice looking model. Would look much better with a “realistic “ pantograph, but I have not seen someone attempting this modification.

Perhaps you will be the first.

Take good care.

Dwight

Users browsing this topic
OceanSpiders 2.0
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2021, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.754 seconds.