Hi all,
Sorry, I don't want to hijack this thread, but my question is closely related to L88/S88 and CS2 (not CS3).
As this thread has highlighted me a lot, I'm going to explain my situation there.
I've decided to give a try to new S88 Marklin devices with L88 as a hub. The ultimate goal is to get (completely if possible) rid of spurious feedback in my layout, due to old bus very sensitive to electronic interference.
As a result, I've purchased a power supply (66361), a L88 (60883) and S88AC (60881) in order to test them.
The L88 is connected to the CAN-bus using a terminal (60125). The voltage switch of the L88 is set to 5V.
It is identified in my CS2 with device ID #253.
I've set in the Layout Section of CS2 a feedback icon with device ID=253, and contact number 1.
The "T" plug of the L88 is connected to common ground.
When I connect contact #1 of the L88 to ground, it is detected successfully

so far, so good !
It is also detected successfully with rocrail - my driving software
Now, I add a S88AC to bus #1 of the L88. Setup of the L88, according to the doc, is modified: I add 1 to number of RJ45 devices on bus #1.
Ethernet cable is plugged as explained in the doc.
Then I create a new feedback icon in the Layout section of the CS2, with device ID=253 and contact address #1001 which matches with physical contact #1 of S88AC.
When I connect contact #1 of the S88AC to ground, no change

. Contact #1 of L88 is still OK if I ground it.
I've also tested it on bus #2 with contact address #2001, changes in the setup of L88 (1 RJ45 device on bus #2), same results: no change
My CS2 is a 60214, with software 4.1.2 . It is not the latest version (4.2.1) !
So I come to the conclusion, and my question:
Either the L88 has a problem, or I did bad configuration, or (more probably?) it is the software version of my CS2.
-> My question: Has somebody tested successfully such a configuration with the same CS/Software version ?
I've also tested it with LDT RM88N as per schema here:
http://www.ldt-infocente...sbeispiele/page_1791.pdf . Same error: no change on contact #1 of LDT, but contact #1 of L88 is still OK
Thanks for your feedback.
Cheers
Fabrice
Edited by user 02 February 2018 08:02:58(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified