Quote:[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by davidrod
<br />
I'm sorry, but I feel like I have been lied to, I know many of you don't feel this way, but in the advertisents it clearly says that you can control up to 10 locomotives at the same time. Maybe their translators do a poor job and they don't have any lawyers looking at this stuff, but you can't sell a car with power windows, power locks, Air Conditioner, sound system, that goes 200 km/h and then have someone tell you, oh! but you can't use them all at the same time... You see, the car needs to be parked so that you can blast the sound system, but before you do that make sure the windows are down... I mean... It just doesn't make any sense....
Well, this is all just my opinion:
I like the MS. If for no other reason than, I can move about the room with the controller. Sure it has its limitations, but M* is headed in the right direction.
As far as running 10 Loks, …..with the CS you probably can. Lets face it, a lot of things that you would assume the MS would be able to do, you can’t do until the CS comes out. (We hope)
I was in the hobby shop yesterday looking at the 37726 DOUBLE UNIT DIESEL. If you read the advertisements, you are supposed to be able to run the two loks, together in a consist.
My thinking: ah..... a previously undocumented feature
Open the box and read the instructions yes the MS is referenced, (as a limitation). However, you can run them together as long as you do not have the MS. Same scenario with the Sound Post Wagon.
I think that M* suffers from what most business people refer to as: “Not invented here” syndrome. When you look at what is available in DCC, (Lenz, Digitrax, etc.) and compare that to the new MS and what I have heard about the CS, M* is playing catch-up.
I use a Digitrax system for my N-Scale and US HO stuff. Consisting, lots of functions, two lok controls on the hand held controller and Plug and Play decoder replacement right out of the box. As far as consisting is concerned, with Digitrax and I assume with Lenz, and I believe with the IB, is extremely simple.
Sure there will always be backwards compatibility issues, but I have to believe that if M* had partnered with Lenz or Digitrax, they could get a solution to the marketplace faster and cheaper.
I mean 600+ US$ and June delivery, “Maybe………”
If I was running Marklin, I would stick to making loks, rolling stock and track, etc. I would leave the electronics to companies that do this as their primary line of business.
Just my opinion.
Frank