Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login. New Registrations are disabled.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline EB421  
#1 Posted : 11 February 2026 18:20:31(UTC)
EB421

United Kingdom   
Joined: 10/04/2025(UTC)
Posts: 139
Location: UK
...ed six, when I first watched the Thomas the Tank Engine episode where James crashes and gets rescued with rail cranes. Ever since then, I've had the strongest addiction to model railway stuff that does something.

It's not just cranes of course, I want to try all of them. I had some post office coaches once, they were great. Watching the bag disappear off the pole as the coach went past was an amazing feeling, and watching it reappear elsewhere on the layout was great. This one time at a club, I got a hit of wagon hump shunting. It's not really my vibe but it was still a really great feeling. But then this one time there was an archimedes screw lift loading sand into wagons for delivery elsewhere on the layout and honestly I thought I was gonna die. It was amazing.

These cranes though, they're the best. The first was that green one, you know just like a small one to get me started. I need to find some thread to recable it, but I just keep getting tempted by bigger and better things. First I got that Hornby one but it's so annoying to have to do it all by hand on an electric train set and then I got that Hornby Railroad one so I could mock how bad OO vs H0 cranes were but then it turns out it's actually a H0 crane anyway which was even stupider but it looks cool so and then there were the Marklin START-UP cranes that are just peak, they have the slip clutches on the boom drives, they're easy to convert to DCC 2-rail and like they *move* they're just so great but then I used up all my money buying them so I had to switch to a cheaper supplier who keeps cutting the product with like "UNTESTED SOLD AS SEEN" but it's so cheap and I just can't stop and now I have two Roco DCC cranes that work perfectly except one is missing a wheel so I've got a Roco hand-operated crane coming to steal parts off.

I just heard about this really great new one with a waiter who moves around a panoramic car serving drinks and I keep pestering my dealers to try and get me some. They say it's "dangerous", "not their business model" and "basically impossible to modify to run on DCC 2-rail" but I'm gonna keep asking I don't know how they expect me to NOT want to try that.

Anyway, y'all if you know any online therapy that's good for addiction services that'd be really great.

Too many, far too many rail cranes.

Edit: Yes, the writing is meant to be "reddit style unreadable" as a comedic touch, but joking aside help I can't stop buying rail cranes.

I have found out some useful stuff about the Roco cranes, so I should turn this into useful information for people wanting budget cranes rather than just a cry for help - because there seems to be a lot of conflicting data around.

Summary; there are three decoders. 96507, which is hard-wired. This is mainly used by the 41290 portal crane; but I think it's in some rail cranes. This decoder is dual-mode Motorola+DCC but doesn't have DIP switches for address selection in Motorola mode. I'm unclear of it's features in either mode. 96519 is the "AC" decoder, which is replaceable and is used in 46900 and 40111 I've seen versions with DIP-switches and versions with solder pads for address selection. There is also 96518, used in 46800, 40109 and 40110. This is DCC. I believe there were also other variants (46801, 46902, etc) in different liveries. The decoders should be similar to the "round number".

The DCC crane seems to cause some confusion for people because of it's programming limitations. To sum up: It is a pre-railcom decoder. It only supports short addresses. Most confusion comes from the speed step limitations.

The "recommended" method of operation of the cranes is with 10780 (DCC) and 10781 (Motorola), which are interfaces from a 15-pin PC joystick and act as standalone DCC/MM controllers. In the case of DCC, it is this controller that is limited to 14 speed steps, and decoder addresses 6/7/8. This is why from the factory, the decoders are configured at address 8 and 14 speed steps. However, setting CV29 to say, 18, the decoder functions in 28 (but not 128) speed step mode. If you set 28 steps or change the address outside this range you will not be able to use the joystick controller; but you'll have an easier time on modern DCC. Because the cranes have motors, they program normally on a programming track.

Control of the DCC crane (rail or portal) is as follows:

F0: rotate using speed control
F1: raise/lower boom using speed control
F0+F1: raise/lower hook using speed control.

If you have the 46807 excavator shovel or 46807 electromagnet, this is operated with no functions on by sending a "burst" with the speed control. Forwards: on, Backwards: off.

There are two replacement decoder carrier boards for the Roco cranes, both of which are carriers for the LokPilot or Loksound. The first was made by DCCDecoderService, and is discontinued. This decoder did not support the plug-in accessories, but was officially rated for the rail cranes and an LED could be hardwired. The second is a very similar design by andrea-karina on eBay (only shipping to Germany), which is officially only supported on the pluggable portal cranes but does support the magnet and excavator. For the DDS adapter, the controls are:

F0: Light on/off
F1: rotate using speed control
F2: raise/lower boom using speed control
F3: raise/lower hook using speed control.

All versions of the Roco crane do not use full slip-clutches, which means if you grab them and try to rotate them by hand without applying the disengaging lever, you will break the gearing. The rotation gear is also notorious for age-related degradation. Replacement gears are available from DCCDecoderService.

The Roco DCC rail cranes have NEM-compatible coupler pockets on the crane, but not all of the included match wagons are NEM.

The Marklin 46719 and new 46720 set do have clutches (so tolerate some rotational hand-abuse if necessary), but do not rotate infinitely the way the Roco cranes do. The reason is that this means they can be rotated by the track curves - and therefore do not need to be "switched" from one mode to the other when the locomotive stops and you want to pick something up. They don't have Railcom either, but do support long DCC addresses, 128 speed-steps and MFX. These have newer quieter motors, do not require the match truck for pickup, and are the first dual-protocol models.

Review time
========

Honestly, I don't really recommend the Roco rail cranes. They're a pain in the butt because of the programming limitations, and the decoder replacements are great but expensive for what is a minor increase in functionality in practice (and a removal in some cases). Worse though - because the cranes won't rotate by hand with the gears engaged, that means unless your layout is an exact straight line; then the Hand of God has to enter the layout to switch rotation from "travelling" to "operational" which somewhat defeats the point of having a non-mechanical rail crane in the first place. The portal crane is a better buy than the rail cranes. It's much easier to accept the joystick interface if it doesn't require complex track isolation; which means the decoder limitations aren't really important any more. Also, as it's fixed in place - once installed it can be left permanently in "operational mode" unless you're doing maintenance nearby and might knock it. This should also mean less wear on the fragile gear (though honestly anyone with the old Roco cranes should keep a spare gear in stock ready for the day).

The lifting capability of these is broadly similar. Without adding extra stabilisation, the rail cranes *will* fall over with any significant load. You're not going to be lifting a brass-body locomotive with any of these. However they can lift (very) light rolling stock, printed cable drums and crates, etc. Delivering skips is a favourite use of mine. The Roco will manage something like a magnetic 1/87 toy car or a bucket of sand though, which is cool - and obviously the portal cranes are similar but can take advantage of better anchoring. A good use of the portal crane would be in a scrap yard scene, picking up crushed cars etc for dropping in a wagon going to a smelter. It was once actually sold in a set with "scrap cars" and wagons to drop them in - I think this was 41290.

For a mobile crane, the Marklin START-UP is a better choice. It's quieter, more reliable, requires no divine intervention in use, supports modern speeds and addresses, and unless you find cheap "sold as seen" deals like the ones I did - is much cheaper than the Roco. It also doesn't take much to convert to 2-rail + NEM (a few wheelsets, a TRIX pickup plate, four coupler pockets and some conductive acrylic - and only the paint is not a current MARKLIN spare part) so it's superior even for DC use. For a fixed crane - the Roco is obviously worlds above a 7051 crane; not least because you can run trains under it; but also being digital out of the box means it can be carefully integrated into a modern layout. It's no-where near up to the standards of the 76501 travelling gantry crane (66105 for DCC users), but it's also 1/5 of the price. I'd soft recommend it.

Edited by user 11 February 2026 22:35:55(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 6 users liked this useful post by EB421

Wish to join the discussion?! Login to your marklin-users.net community | Forum account. New Registrations are disabled. Or Connect via Facebook  

Offline Jimmy Thompson  
#2 Posted : 11 February 2026 22:01:59(UTC)
Jimmy Thompson

United States   
Joined: 26/03/2019(UTC)
Posts: 905
Location: Florida Classic but Successful Swampland City
And there are quite a few "collective nouns" for cranes, however the most applicable here might be

Construction of Cranes

...or...

Dance of Cranes

Your choice my friend! Drool
Jimmy T
Analogue; M-track; KLVM; Wine Barrels; Primex
Dr Dirt's Rule #1 and
There is a Prototype For Everything
thanks 3 users liked this useful post by Jimmy Thompson
Offline EB421  
#3 Posted : 11 February 2026 22:26:44(UTC)
EB421

United Kingdom   
Joined: 10/04/2025(UTC)
Posts: 139
Location: UK
Originally Posted by: Jimmy Thompson Go to Quoted Post

Dance of Cranes


Oh definitely this one!
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by EB421
Offline Jimmy Thompson  
#4 Posted : 11 February 2026 23:14:23(UTC)
Jimmy Thompson

United States   
Joined: 26/03/2019(UTC)
Posts: 905
Location: Florida Classic but Successful Swampland City
I wait with abated breath for the video thereunto pertaining! LOL LOL LOL
Jimmy T
Analogue; M-track; KLVM; Wine Barrels; Primex
Dr Dirt's Rule #1 and
There is a Prototype For Everything
thanks 3 users liked this useful post by Jimmy Thompson
Offline EB421  
#5 Posted : 12 February 2026 03:47:27(UTC)
EB421

United Kingdom   
Joined: 10/04/2025(UTC)
Posts: 139
Location: UK
Originally Posted by: Jimmy Thompson Go to Quoted Post
I wait with abated breath for the video thereunto pertaining! LOL LOL LOL


Hit that like button and subscribe? LOL

I have a longer-form instructional video planned on converting the Marklin crane to 2-rail - the stuff is literally sat set-up on my filming rig waiting for me to get more than 4-hours sleep in a night.

For the other cranes; the repairs to the first 46800 are going to be difficult and awkward enough with full concentration, so I don't plan to film that. The repairs to this...

DCC Crane no. 5,

Might get filmed as they're probably going to be much easier. I'd also like to do something of a review/demo across all these cranes (including the 7051) that explores how to actually make them into something of interest on a layout.

But there will probably be some silly short-form demos like the "Dead or Alive AMV" LOL coming up too. Someone did a silly video with a portal crane a while back but for some reason missed the obvious punchline so that must be rectified. A parody of the original Thomas the Tank engine scene that started this would also be fun. And I'm sure I can find something of actual use to make these do. How much Ag solder could I wind onto a laser cut cable drum, before the START-UP cranes couldn't lift it? Maybe some loading capacity tests would be a good idea!
thanks 3 users liked this useful post by EB421
Offline Jimmy Thompson  
#6 Posted : 12 February 2026 12:33:46(UTC)
Jimmy Thompson

United States   
Joined: 26/03/2019(UTC)
Posts: 905
Location: Florida Classic but Successful Swampland City
And when you are successful and the crane fires right up and lifts that load...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VkrUG3OrPc

And then comes play time! Woot

https://ttte.fandom.com/wiki/Lift,_Load_and_Haul
Jimmy T
Analogue; M-track; KLVM; Wine Barrels; Primex
Dr Dirt's Rule #1 and
There is a Prototype For Everything
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by Jimmy Thompson
Offline bph  
#7 Posted : 12 February 2026 17:49:27(UTC)
bph

Norway   
Joined: 04/08/2018(UTC)
Posts: 1,296
Ah, yes i know the feeling, thanks for sharing. Cool

I used to have an analogue yellow Roco crane, but I sold it off when märklin anounced a digital crane.

And when Märklin launched the 46719 i got one of those, and sold off my old 46715. And as you write, the new one seems to be better in several ways. (I also have an old yellow 4671)

Came across a few photos of the Krupp-Ardelt 6t 103 prototype.
Ardelt 6t 103.jpg
Krupp-Ardelt-BA-103-1-61532f8024724.jpg

And this image shows a slightly stronger 10? or 15t? version working together with an Ardelt 57t crane
https://eisenbahnstiftung.de/images/bildergalerie/67215.jpg

So I now have the 46719 together with my 49570 Ardelt 57t crane

I made a short video of my digital cranes back in 2021: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxj9gzeu51Y

Edited by user 13 February 2026 13:50:27(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 5 users liked this useful post by bph
Offline EB421  
#8 Posted : 12 February 2026 19:06:07(UTC)
EB421

United Kingdom   
Joined: 10/04/2025(UTC)
Posts: 139
Location: UK
Originally Posted by: bph Go to Quoted Post
Ah, yes i know the feeling, thanks for sharing. Cool

I used to have an analogue yellow Roco crane, but I sold it off when märklin anounced a digital crane.

And when Märklin launched the 46719 i got one of those, and sold off my old 46715. And as you write, the new one seems to be better in several ways. (I also have an old yellow 4671)



Well my analogue yellow Roco crane should be here by monday, and is headed for a quick death, with all the parts I plan to steal from it for the portalkran and the old digital kranwagen! I was going to cheap out and buy one for £10, but then I saw one for £30 which had a NEM match wagon and figured the cost of the NEM conversion would offset it instantly. Ironically I'm buying it from the same seller I bought the first digital one from. He might get a positive review this time! Last time after seeing the damaged bogie I decided "if you can't say anything nice, say nothing". The seller of the second one certainly has nothing to complain about in that review. By the end of this I plan for the analogue one to have:

One bogie
No buffers
No roof
No cabside rollers
No match wagon
No box


When I first discovered the 46719 I did think about getting a 4671 and going digital+analog, but the fixed metal couplers put paid to that very quickly. NEM or nothing!

I feel like this year's catalog justified my decision to get two - I really like the new livery, but at an extra £60 or so for a wagon that would be way harder to convert to DC; better off buying them solo as I did.

Quote:

Came across a few photos of the Krupp-Ardelt 6t 103 prototype.
Ardelt 6t 103.jpg
Krupp-Ardelt-BA-103-1-61532f8024724.jpg


In the immortal words of Keanu Reeves: JESUS CHRIST THAT THING'S REAL!? I thought I'd bought something fictional but pretty! That's so awesome! Thanks for sharing this!

Quote:

And this image shows a slightly stronger 12t? version working together with an Ardelt 57t crane
https://eisenbahnstiftung.de/images/bildergalerie/67215.jpg


And now I have prototype to mix and match my four cranes freely. Useful!

Quote:
I made a short video of my digital cranes back in 2021: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxj9gzeu51Y


Liked and subscribed!

I'm assuming you've seen this already on the other thread where I posted it but just for comedy one more time:



As I said, I'm aiming to come up with some more useful videos before long. Another fun idea from today, I went hunting to try and find the original RRP of the Roco DCC cranes, and in either the 1998 or 1999 catalog found a great marketing photo of using one to lift track panels. Which is both very obvious in retrospect and a great idea! A little fermi estimation has a British Rail 60ft track panel work out at about 5T, so loading 20cm track lengths on the little K-A's should be perfectly "scale" (even if it's a ridiculous prototype).

The 46715 is fantastic, but the new one is definitely quieter. I also have envy on your tool coach. As I mentioned, I'd like to make tool coaches for these that have sounds attached.

Unfortunately, I made my life difficult on the Roco cranes by getting the Lokpilot. Not an issue when I just had one (in fact it would have been easier since I could have just asked DDS for a sound decoder) but now I have two, one with the old control layout and one with the new. Which means only one crane can be consisted with a DDS sound decoder; and since I bought DDS's last adapter board I won't be getting another!

Still; the question for me is if DDS would program a 58219 LokSound FX for me - one crane is better than none. Then again, I'd also like to add some stuff like a replica of the welding and angle-grinding functions in the Marklin coach, so probably better to face up to the challenge and make my own profile. Especially since I want to make F1-3 purely sound and be able to remap the real function pins to something useful like a "welding LED" on F6.

I definitely need more sleep before I try LokProgrammer again.

Oh, and I need to think very carefully about the selection of my tool coach.

A Bulleid Coach with a Roco CraneType F coach with a Roco Crane

This model railway is perfectly balanced with no scale issues.
thanks 5 users liked this useful post by EB421
Offline Bogenschütze  
#9 Posted : 12 February 2026 19:15:57(UTC)
Bogenschütze

United Kingdom   
Joined: 10/09/2019(UTC)
Posts: 152
Location: England, Chichester
Originally Posted by: Jimmy Thompson Go to Quoted Post
And there are quite a few "collective nouns" for cranes, however the most applicable here might be

Construction of Cranes

...or...

Dance of Cranes

Your choice my friend! Drool


How about a "Hoist of Cranes"?

Marklin - "The train set I never had as a child."
Keith Bowman
thanks 3 users liked this useful post by Bogenschütze
Offline kiwiAlan  
#10 Posted : 12 February 2026 20:08:14(UTC)
kiwiAlan

United Kingdom   
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC)
Posts: 8,717
Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
Originally Posted by: bph Go to Quoted Post
...
Came across a few photos of the Krupp-Ardelt 6t 103 prototype.
Ardelt 6t 103.jpg
...


Thanks for these photos. I was never sure that the crane as modelled by Marklin was to scale, but looking at this photo it looks like Marklin have modelled it pretty accurately.

What does amuse me is that Marklin then mounted the same carne on a truck chassis to have a mobile crane in their diecast vehicles range, which are a somewhat larger scale (I think 1:43, similar to Dinky Toys and Corgi), and yet it doesn't look out of scale in that use either.

thanks 3 users liked this useful post by kiwiAlan
Offline Jimmy Thompson  
#11 Posted : 13 February 2026 13:19:25(UTC)
Jimmy Thompson

United States   
Joined: 26/03/2019(UTC)
Posts: 905
Location: Florida Classic but Successful Swampland City
Quote:
Bogenschütze wrote: "How about a "Hoist of Cranes"?"


Brilliant! Woot Wish I had thought of that LOL LOL



How about a name for our group here?

Crane Lovers Anonymous (CLA) Sneaky

Edit: or

Hooked on Cranes Woot

Edited by user 13 February 2026 20:14:38(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Jimmy T
Analogue; M-track; KLVM; Wine Barrels; Primex
Dr Dirt's Rule #1 and
There is a Prototype For Everything
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by Jimmy Thompson
Offline bph  
#12 Posted : 13 February 2026 14:40:30(UTC)
bph

Norway   
Joined: 04/08/2018(UTC)
Posts: 1,296
Originally Posted by: EB421 Go to Quoted Post
Well my analogue yellow Roco crane should be here by monday, and is headed for a quick death, with all the parts I plan to steal from it for the portalkran and the old digital kranwagen!

When I first discovered the 46719 I did think about getting a 4671 and going digital+analog, but the fixed metal couplers put paid to that very quickly. NEM or nothing!

I feel like this year's catalog justified my decision to get two - I really like the new livery, but at an extra £60 or so for a wagon that would be way harder to convert to DC; better off buying them solo as I did.
Good luck with the analogue one, and the repairs of the portalkran and the old digital kranwagen Cool
And yes, the option to replace the couplers on the new 46719 is a nice upgrade. And perhaps there might be other liveries from Märklin in the future?
Originally Posted by: EB421 Go to Quoted Post
Liked and subscribed!
As I said, I'm aiming to come up with some more useful videos before long. Another fun idea from today, I went hunting to try and find the original RRP of the Roco DCC cranes, and in either the 1998 or 1999 catalog found a great marketing photo of using one to lift track panels. Which is both very obvious in retrospect and a great idea! A little fermi estimation has a British Rail 60ft track panel work out at about 5T, so loading 20cm track lengths on the little K-A's should be perfectly "scale" (even if it's a ridiculous prototype).
Looking forward to more videos from you Cool , unfortunately, I lost access to the youtube acount after I switched ISP. (no linked to phone etc)
Originally Posted by: EB421 Go to Quoted Post
The 46715 is fantastic, but the new one is definitely quieter.
Unfortanatly the 46715 and later ones in that series seem to have a high failure rate when they age. Hopefully, the 46719 and 20 are better as they have some upgrades......
Originally Posted by: EB421 Go to Quoted Post
I also have envy on your tool coach. As I mentioned, I'd like to make tool coaches for these that have sounds attached.
Unfortunately, I made my life difficult on the Roco cranes by getting the Lokpilot. Not an issue when I just had one (in fact it would have been easier since I could have just asked DDS for a sound decoder) but now I have two, one with the old control layout and one with the new. Which means only one crane can be consisted with a DDS sound decoder; and since I bought DDS's last adapter board I won't be getting another!

Still; the question for me is if DDS would program a 58219 LokSound FX for me - one crane is better than none. Then again, I'd also like to add some stuff like a replica of the welding and angle-grinding functions in the Marklin coach, so probably better to face up to the challenge and make my own profile. Especially since I want to make F1-3 purely sound and be able to remap the real function pins to something useful like a "welding LED" on F6.
If you should stumble on a second hand 49965 that you would like to convert, note that the early versions don't have DCC, but the later versions have. I have an early version, but I strongly suspect it just has a standard mSD 21MTC decoder, so it should be easy to upgrade. And Märklin are "cheating" slightly and is just using the steam locomotive firebox flickering function to simulate the welding flickering ;) The decoder project is available for download. So it should be reasonably easy to recreate on an ESU decoder etc.
I'm a bit tempted to upgrade my 49965 to mSD3 with more lights and sound functions and a better speaker. but that will be in the future, and I have some other projects to do first.
And you also have the 49967, which has a more extensive sound project, but it doesn't have the welding lights.

Originally Posted by: kiwiAlan Go to Quoted Post
Thanks for these photos. I was never sure that the crane as modelled by Marklin was to scale, but looking at this photo it looks like Marklin have modelled it pretty accurately.

What does amuse me is that Marklin then mounted the same carne on a truck chassis to have a mobile crane in their diecast vehicles range, which are a somewhat larger scale (I think 1:43, similar to Dinky Toys and Corgi), and yet it doesn't look out of scale in that use either.

yes i was also pleasantly surprised when I found out, as there is not much information out there. It would be interesting to know if something like the truck mounted version was made in real life, also.

Some more info:
https://www.hardconn.de/krupp.htm
https://www.modellbau-wiki.de/wiki/Krupp-Ardelt_Kranwagen_6_t_Bauart_103
https://www.modellbau-wiki.de/wiki/Schienendrehkran
https://www.digital-bahn.de/info_kompo/kran.htm


thanks 3 users liked this useful post by bph
Offline EB421  
#13 Posted : 13 February 2026 16:26:13(UTC)
EB421

United Kingdom   
Joined: 10/04/2025(UTC)
Posts: 139
Location: UK
The King decided not to bother delivering the portalkran this morning, and doesn't do saturday deliveries so that's Monday now. He did bring the 46331 though; so I can give you an after-action report on that.

The starting point is £31, which is the cost of the 46331.

Immediate value, I got a close-coupled flat wagon. Cost of one of those is £25 new, £17 used. So I have £6-£14 of value left to recover. This is of course, where things started to go downhill. The bogies, are way more different than they looked on the low res eBay photos. The only way to use them to repair the DCC crane's bad pinpoint bearing would be to take both bogies out, cut the sideframes off and then weld them back together. Not impossible, but way more problematic than it first looked - and by the time you do that you're possibly better off filling it with epoxy putty, drilling it out and fitting brass axleboxes. Next up, on the mechanical crane, the buffers are moulded. So those are still missing.

The livery is also slightly different with a much brighter silver on the roof. But; it does fit - so the mechanical problem is solved on that side. The wheels are identical, so some from the 46800 with the tyres falling off were swapped out, and I reinstalled one to replace the missing one in the bad bogie so that at least 11 wheels are on the track - it's now working much better, and is at the right height. I'm pretty confident I can salvage the rollers as I originally planned (when the portalkran finally turns up) and the hook and cord also look like useful replacements.

The real bonus though; this crane had Fleischmann couplers on the bogies; and the previous owner wanted to fit it with Roco couplings, so replaced them with NEM363 pockets. Those are about £7-£10 per pair to buy, and I have several bits of Fleischmann stock awaiting NEM conversion so that's a win right there.

So:

  • Axles x3
  • Roof
  • Fleischmann NEM pockets x2
  • Box
  • Rollers
  • Spare hook & cable, and boom cables


The body itself should also fit without too much trouble. The only obvious difference is that it doesn't have a hole for the LED so modification of either the bodyshell or the decoder would be needed. The livery on the "toy" cranes is also quite simplified. I wouldn't do it for an aesthetic redesign, but if you have a DCC crane that got broken; it's nice to have the option available. Other possibly-salvageable parts include the boom itself , and the roller hangers. These are subtly different but should work either unmodified or with slight trimming.

Ironically, the £40 crane is in much better condition than the £90 crane. So that's getting the original 46800 box and the 46331's KKK match wagon. The jankier crane gets the 46331's box and it's original wagon that needs converting.

I got good value from this for £31; but I think that's not really a rule - spending the £60 for a brand new one is not going to be worth it unless you're really desperate. They don't normally come with the NEM couplings on the crane after all (without those, I'd probaby feel significantly less positive about my decision), and while the current flat wagons are still KKK+NEM they're also massively simplified, uglier models. Not being able to salvage the bogie is the biggest pain. Adding a close-coupled NEM match wagon to newer versions; but taking away the close-coupled NEM pockets from the crane itself is certainly one of the choices of all time.
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by EB421
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2026, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.599 seconds.