Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline caldude53@att.net  
#1 Posted : 24 September 2024 00:54:17(UTC)
caldude53@att.net

United States   
Joined: 24/05/2024(UTC)
Posts: 11
Location: California, Hollywood
Hello all,

I recently pre-ordered Marklin's #88651 V60 Diesel Hydraulic 0-6-0 switching loco from ZscaleHobo.com. I was told that this would come with a "can motor." Also, browsing Marklin's website for new models, I noticed that some of them are being equipped with "bell-shaped armature" motors. Then on top of this, I've learned that there are some models that have "coreless" motors.

I know nothing about these new designs! Confused Blushing

Can anyone give me a quick primer on these? Or if anyone knows of a YouTube video on this subject, or information from another source, I'd really appreciate getting a link. (BTW, I just now hit on trying Wikipedia; I doubt I'll find anything.)

Many thanks in advance!!

Sam Robertson
Hollywood Low-Speed Rail Authority
Offline H0  
#2 Posted : 24 September 2024 08:34:14(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,432
Location: DE-NW
"Coreless motor" means "motor with bell-shaped armature" and vice versa. Usually these are good motors.

"Can motor" usually means "maintenance-free motor". Sounds good, but when the brushes are worn, you throw the motor away and buy a new motor.
With H0 gauge, Märklin uses dozens of different motor types and there is no guarantee spares will still be available five or ten years after the purchase. I hope they'll stick to fewer motor types with Z gauge.

Technically speaking, those "coreless motors" are a special case of "can motors".
Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
thanks 3 users liked this useful post by H0
Online marklinist5999  
#3 Posted : 24 September 2024 13:34:30(UTC)
marklinist5999

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2021(UTC)
Posts: 3,866
Location: Michigan, Troy
Except in the Roco older can motors. The instructions show how to replace the brushes. Also my Mehano GG1 from the former Yugoslavia.
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by marklinist5999
Offline Zme  
#4 Posted : 27 September 2024 02:30:48(UTC)
Zme

United States   
Joined: 02/10/2013(UTC)
Posts: 842
Location: West Texas
Hello hope all is well

You will be happy to know there has not been a vast variety of motors for Z scale locomotives. The motor introduced in 1972 was the same basic motor of the period a three pole winding, magnetic cage, and brushes. In about 2000, this motor was upgraded for smoother and quieter operation . The motor had a five pole winding and was otherwise the same as the three pole. Here is a photo of this motor:

UserPostedImage

This motor is an example which could be found in a locomotive like a Br 110. Of course steam locomotives had a a different appearance. It was easy to change a three pole to a five pole, by just switching it out. The frame would accommodate the new motor without changes.

Just a few years ago, the locomotive motor was upgrade for even more smooth and quiet operation. This is known as the cordless or can motor. Here is an image of this motor for the same type locomotive as indicated above.

UserPostedImage

The difference in the motor are obvious. Installing this motor would require more significant changes. A special motor holder or frame modifications might be needed. Many Marklin models have been updated to the can motor. I expect eventually all models will be changed. Most like this new motor for its smooth quiet operation.

Hope this help understand this topic as related to our z scale locomotives.

Take good care.

Zme
thanks 3 users liked this useful post by Zme
Offline Toosmall  
#5 Posted : 27 September 2024 11:48:47(UTC)
Toosmall

Australia   
Joined: 26/07/2021(UTC)
Posts: 635
Location: Sydney
Or one could do a twin engine. I only have 3 pole motors, so could only do a "6 pole" motor. Rotated 60° relative to each other. Nice & smooth with lots of torque.

DSC_1772~2.JPG
Cut two locos in half.
thanks 3 users liked this useful post by Toosmall
Offline H0  
#6 Posted : 27 September 2024 12:50:35(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,432
Location: DE-NW
Originally Posted by: Zme Go to Quoted Post
This is known as the cordless or can motor.
In H0 gauge, not all can motors are also coreless motors.
In H0 gauge, some can motors are only three-pole motors. The Märklin CEO said that five-pole motors would not fit into the boiler of an H0 gauge steam locomotive.

For Z gauge, Märklin indicates coreless motor for all models in the new items brochures 2022, 2023, and 2024 except for the ALCO Pa-1 model.
They didn't use the five-pole symbol for any of these locos.

Does anyone know if the ALCO Pa-1 motors are also coreless?
Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by H0
Offline caldude53@att.net  
#7 Posted : 29 September 2024 01:46:48(UTC)
caldude53@att.net

United States   
Joined: 24/05/2024(UTC)
Posts: 11
Location: California, Hollywood
Thanks for all the helpful information guys!

I brought up this subject with Frank Daniels, ZscaleHobo.com. He was kind enough to send me this helpful image:
Marklin Coreless Motor explode view.jpg
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by caldude53@att.net
Offline parakiet  
#8 Posted : 29 October 2024 09:13:21(UTC)
parakiet

Belgium   
Joined: 20/02/2017(UTC)
Posts: 298
Location: Flanders!
What are you guys addresses to obtain these small motors?
Offline Manga  
#9 Posted : 29 October 2024 11:12:47(UTC)
Manga

Australia   
Joined: 22/07/2022(UTC)
Posts: 62
Location: New South Wales, Sydney
On this topic, in Z-scale we have 3 generations of motors:

3-pole
5-pole
"can" style motor

There is some confusion with the "can" style motor.
Is it actually brushless ?
What I mean with that is, does the magnet spin, but the windings are fixed in place around the magnets (opposite to the 3 and 5 pole variety where the windings spin) ?
It looks to be maintenance free, ie: no brushes to replace.

What about performance of the "can" style motor ?
It looks even smaller than the already small 3 and 5 pole variety.
What sort of torque does it give compared to 3 or 5 pole motors ?

I have a mix of 3 and 5 pole motors, here is what I have noticed between the two varieties:

slow speed operation
3-pole: jerky start, but can run slow enough after that
5-pole: very smooth start, and can run even slower than the 3-pole

torque (pulling power)
3-pole: good, can easily pull 4x passenger wagons
5-pole: equally as good as 3-pole, can easily pull 4x passenger wagons

I'd be interested to know how the "can" style motor performs against these two older motors
Offline H0  
#10 Posted : 29 October 2024 17:50:08(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,432
Location: DE-NW
Originally Posted by: Manga Go to Quoted Post
On this topic, in Z-scale we have 3 generations of motors:
3-pole
5-pole
"can" style motor
There were straight-wound and later skew-wound 5-pole motors, so IMHO that makes at least 4 generations.


Originally Posted by: Manga Go to Quoted Post
There is some confusion with the "can" style motor.
Is it actually brushless?
What I mean with that is, does the magnet spin, but the windings are fixed in place around the magnets (opposite to the 3 and 5 pole variety where the windings spin) ?
It looks to be maintenance free, ie: no brushes to replace.
Coreless motors are different from brushless motors.
Coreless motors normally have brushes, but they are not meant to be replaced by the customer. So, when the brushes are worn, a new motor is needed.
It's the same for "maintenance free" motors in H0 gauge: Instead of buying new brushes, buy a new motor. Replacing the motor may involve soldering. Modern times...

Not all "can motors" are coreless motors.
Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by H0
Offline Zme  
#11 Posted : 01 November 2024 05:45:14(UTC)
Zme

United States   
Joined: 02/10/2013(UTC)
Posts: 842
Location: West Texas
Hello everyone, hope all is well.

I believe the forum was offline for a time and then restored using an older backup device,and some of the posts are missing.

This comment is posted referring to the other comments on this subject which are now missing.

I believe that most failures to pull a string are most often not the fault of the motor regardless which one it is. I have always believed the three poles were slower to move, perhaps had a bit more noise but might be better able to pull a few more wagons. The five poles start earlier, are more quiet but perhaps have a bit less torque. The can (coreless) motors are quieter than any other and can pull on equal par to anything that is available. Technology had to move forward and Z had to benefit from improvements in the other scales Marklin sells. All this was to their and our good fortune.

A locomotive which cannot pull usually has something else which influences this. The track is dirty or the locomotive is on to steep an incline and has too many wagons attached. When these conditions exist, the motor doesn’t stop and burn out. Rather the drive wheels just spin and spin.

I believe we all have discovered what makes a difference is the weight of the locomotive and how traction is applied to the rails. The plastic/metal shell BR 232 can pull many wagons despite the fact that some of the what look like drive axles are actually cosmetic. The BR 94 is stronger than expected perhaps because it has all the weight of a metal shell centered over 5 drive axles. I have the BR 64 in both five pole and the new can motor and they are very similar is performance and capability.

I think it is not the motor which lets down the locomotive, but the locomotive weight and how it is able to use the power of the motor to move down the track. If you want or need to pull long strings of wagons, keep your layout flat and clean then buy some big and heavy locomotives. The more the merrier you won’t be disappointed.

I am certain others have some valuable comments to add on this topic.

Just trying to provide my opinions. I have searched for the best locomotives to pull long strings too.

Take good care

Zme

Edited by user 01 November 2024 20:43:10(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

thanks 2 users liked this useful post by Zme
Offline Poor Skeleton  
#12 Posted : 01 November 2024 21:24:35(UTC)
Poor Skeleton

United Kingdom   
Joined: 09/10/2015(UTC)
Posts: 581
Location: England, Cambridge
Originally Posted by: Zme Go to Quoted Post
I believe that most failures to pull a string are most often not the fault of the motor regardless which one it is. I have always believed the three poles were slower to move, perhaps had a bit more noise but might be better able to pull a few more wagons. The five poles start earlier, are more quiet but perhaps have a bit less torque. The can (coreless) motors are quieter than any other and can pull on equal par to anything that is available. Technology had to move forward and Z had to benefit from improvements in the other scales Marklin sells. All this was to their and our good fortune.

A locomotive which cannot pull usually has something else which influences this. The track is dirty or the locomotive is on to steep an incline and has too many wagons attached. When these conditions exist, the motor doesn’t stop and burn out. Rather the drive wheels just spin and spin.




I wholeheartedly agree, I have never had a loco stall, no matter now many coaches I put behind it or however steep the gradient is. Always what happens first is that the wheels loose traction on the rails and spin madly! As Dwight says, there are a number of factors that influence this - weight being one of the most important - but even my heaviest locomotive will suffer wheel spin rather than motor stall when overloaded.

By and large I agree that the modern coreless motors run more smoothly than their predecessors, but the single biggest influence seems to be how freely the mechanisms run which varies enormously from model to model and even between identical models. I have found that being careful not to overtighten fixing screws in the chassis can help but there also seem to be a lot of other variables you can't control. I suspect that manufacturing tolerances can make all the difference between a model than runs sweet as a nut and one that runs like a bag of nails. I have both in my collection!

Cheers


Chris
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by Poor Skeleton
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.689 seconds.