 Joined: 15/10/2006(UTC) Posts: 2,319 Location: Washington, Pacific Northwest
|
So I have been following Pin Nuckel's N scale modular build hand in episode 49 today he installed a Seuth smoke generator in a factory chimney and was lamenting the smoke fluid and that it stinks and indicates on the box that the liquid is a smoke liquid, a cleaner and a lubricant. So he said he discovered an alternative that's less bad for you to breath and doesn't smell so horrible. E cigarette nicotine free fluid. They come in scents of course. Seems like a brilliant option no? Ok e cigarette fluid probably doesn't come in spruce or such a smell but maybe a scent less or light sandlewood may be better than the Seuth stank and oily harm. But does it work long term. I'll be curious to see what Pin finds out. Thoughts?  |
|
 3 users liked this useful post by Minok
|
|
|
|
 Joined: 08/11/2005(UTC) Posts: 3,528 Location: Mullerup, 4200 Slagelse
|
|
If you can dream it, you can do it! I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. This applies worldwide. In case this is not legally possible: I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.  |
2 users liked this useful post by Purellum
|
|
|
|
 Joined: 30/08/2016(UTC) Posts: 636 Location: Brussels
|
A smell of burning carbon with a dash of SO2 thrown in would be really authentic  |
I heard that lonesome whistle blow. Hank Williams |
1 user liked this useful post by Jabez
|
|
|
|
 Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC) Posts: 9,594 Location: Australia
|
|
Adrian Australia flag by abFlags.com |
1 user liked this useful post by xxup
|
|
|
|
Joined: 15/10/2006(UTC) Posts: 2,319 Location: Washington, Pacific Northwest
|
The cancer causing risk question is not clear. For one thing, e cigarette are designed that the user purposely inhales the smoke deep into their lungs. So it's going to be studied. And pretty much by definition anything that isn't pure air (and even ozone may be a carcinogen ) will increase the probability of getting cancer. The the studies are a bit of a mixed bag: http://scienceblog.cance...e-wildly-misleading/amp/But more importantly none of those matters. What matters is if the e cig fluid is a greater risk than the Seuth fluid. Has a study been done on deeply inhaling Seuth smoke? Then we can compare to e cig fluid. Or at least using Seuth the way they did in the cancer studies dor the ecig fluid. But that's not how we expose ourselves. In our case it's second hand sinthe study would have to be the 2nd hand exposure to ecig smoke and the 2nd hand exposure to Seuth oil. Your not sticking your smokestack up your nose and breathtaking by it in. So the cancer risk aspect has little science evidence to be concerned with at the moment. From a seat of the pants analysis I'd say that ecig fluid, designed to be deeply inhaled and to NOT cause damage to the user, would likely be safer than a lubricant/cleaner/fluid that is not at all designed to be inhaled directly. |
|
1 user liked this useful post by Minok
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
