You have been a member since:: 15/03/2011(UTC) Posts: 1,757 Location: Auckland NZ
|
Originally Posted by: H0  Originally Posted by: NZMarklinist  but it does not have the feed back feature of MFX+ so no realtime game playing With CS2, part of the game takes place in the decoder (diesel, sand, water consumption), rest in the CS2. With Z21 the whole game takes place in the controller. IMHO it makes no difference from the user's point of view (except that any loco can be used, no special decoder needed). A real steamer can run 300 km (200 miles) before it needs fresh water (coal lasts much longer), a diesel can run 1000 km (600 miles) before it needs fuel. So with a "realtime" simulation, you hardly ever need water, coal, or diesel. Yeah well perhaps "real time" is a missnomer, but you know what I mean, we are all operating at 1/87th anyway The Z21/Ipad is just a fancy graphics display, that was born out of the need to create some sort of interface for the IPad screen and whilst it does facillitate control, the MFX+ idea also introduces the need for operator intervention, rather than just watching one's trains go by, not to mention that with a CS we do have a "proper controller", programmer, power booster, et al, as well Whilst designed to capture the interest of the younger generation I can see it as bordom proofing my layout, particularly once it is more or less fully operational and finished scenery wise to a reasonable standard. cause when it comes to operating the trains, I find I get bored with them just circulating ! The need to call into the BTW for fuel, water and sand makes that more purposefull as well ! I will have sand available at the main line as there won't be catenary in the BTW The suggestion of signal interface, also adds a new dynamic to operation, I hope that is the case, but I can see that Marklin have got a dog by the tail with this thing and whilst it will cause some extra investment by current M fans, as a strategy to keep Marklin profitable, I can't blame them for that and think they should be praised, for not just sucking their thumbs when Roco bought out their control cab thing, but surpassing the idea with, what is MFX+, and the required operator intervention, which I hasten to add has optional levels of involvement. I can't help but think again of the words from another thread's posting by young Daniel, who was aluding to the ridicule of younger MRR fans, by their peers, even in a joke book he has, which said; "What do model trains and breasts have in common" ? "They're both designed for children but usually only men get to play with them" Seriously I do hope that guys of his generation do get with this MFX+ thing for what it is, and get into the hobby  , instead of mindless  playstations and the like  If there is any criticism of Marklin it should be for failing to come up with a catchy new name for what is MFX+  Edited by user 03 March 2013 07:55:26(UTC)
| Reason: typo |
Glen Auckland NZ
" Every Marklin layout needs a V200, a Railbus and a Banana car", not to mention a few Black and red Steamers, oh and the odd Elok !
CS1 Reloaded, Touch Cab, C Track Modules, K track layout all under construction. Currently Insider |
 1 user liked this useful post by NZMarklinist
|
|