Originally Posted by: CCS800KrokHunter3 
Hello again Marklin friends,
I am sorry I think I have been too rash in saying that the locomotive is "100% original" before seeing all the photos and looking carefully. I have noticed two additional things: the tender is actually for an SLR 700/800 LNER and not the R 700 LNER (note the red strip versus the gold stripe). This changes all my dating analysis because the pieces are from different years. So anywhere from 1937 - 1940. I cannot say whether the side frame (orange paint) is original or not without inspection, but since it does not quite match the red buffer paint, I would suspect repainting.
Regards,
Paul
Frank/Paul, if I may make some more observations....
On the Dutch forum which Frank refers to and has placed some photos, I noted the two plain brown boxes. Or more specifically I noted the labels. We have...
1 x "2St 430" (2 pieces, 430)
1 x "1St 2682M/2" (1 piece, 2682M/2)
Now these are interesting in themselves, especially the 2682.
"430" are Telephone poles, "2682" is a Station Trolley and trailer with Porter and both loaded with two Milk Cartons (catalogue images below).
Personally, I find item 2682 almost as captivating as the Loco. These are EXTREMELY hard to find, complete and with original carton.
2682 was available in the 1937 catalogue but not 1938. 430 was in the 1938 catalogue but not the 1937 one. In 1937 there is a similar item "2402" but this is 25cm high, the 430 is 10 cm high which would suit H0. 25cm implies either 0 or 1 gauge. 2682 may be an 0 gauge item.
Either way, I would be paying closer attention to these items as well.
But it raises obviously the question of the label for the LNER box and of course the other items.
At this stage I can only suggest two things.
1: A FULL inventory of what there is
2: Photos of everything - the items and their boxes, particularly the labels.
We would love to see them of course, but it will also help with confirming dates and values.
I also note your comment that Grandfather (your Dad or your Grandfather?) received these as a child, and from what you says, they were played with for a bit and then put into the attic.
This being the case, if there were left undisturbed over this time, the possibility of any repainting as Paul suggests is less-likely. If the Tender and Loco do not match any documented examples, it could have been a factory or dealer error. And given that these were gifted in 1940, and we all know of the turmoil that must have been going on then, really nothing is beyond possibility.
I think if Grandfather were to state without question that these items are un-altered since new (apart from play-wear) then that needs to be accepted in good faith and the known facts altered to fit the item rather than the item questioned to fit known information (if that makes sense)
Sometimes it is 'attic finds' just like this that introduce a new variant.
This is absolutely NO criticism of Paul, he is bang on with many observations and is highly respected here. He also has some information regarding other overlooked markings on carton labels which may narrow the items down even further - hence the request for more photo's (apart from curiosity).
Fascinating topic and thanks for sharing Frank.
Cheers
Steve (actually an N.Z. Kiwi here 'under duress' while the lovely Nadine does her overseas role)
Melbourne
cookee_nz attached the following image(s):