Joined: 01/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 3
Location: ,
|
Can someone please explain the radius of the Marklin system curves? In the US, a lot of hobbyists believe that 22 or 24 inch curves are the minimum to operate longer cars or locomotives. My question is, how do these numbers like 18 or 24 inch, relate to say the R1, R2, R3 and so on of the Marklin system. Is the R1 curve sharper than an 18 inch curve?
Thanks,
K. Pann
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 31/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 140
Location: Madrid, Madrid
|
Hi Karl, If you want to compare the radius of the curves, Märklin R1 have a radius of 360 mm, so it's more or less like US 14 inch curves. There's no doubt it's too tight for a main line track, so many modellers only use R1 on hidden areas, and in the visible track they only use R2 (437 mm, like 17 inch curves) and even R3 (515 mm, like 20 inch curves). If you have enough space, the wider the curves are, the more realistic a long-coaches train looks  Hope to have helped you. |
Julio Castillo
Madrid, Spain
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC) Posts: 2,578 Location: Sweden
|
It should be noted that all (or at least almost all) Märklin H0 cars and locomotives can be operated on R1 radius. Modellers with lot of space often avoid the R1 radius, but mainly for aestetic reasons. Another reason to avoid R1 could be if you want to use non-Märklin equipment, since not all locos and cars of other brands can negotiate the 360 mm radius.
For C-tracks there are:
R1 = 360 mm (14.17 inch)
R2 = 437.5 mm (17.22 inch)
R3 = 515 mm (20.28 inch)
R4 = 579,3 mm (22.81 inch)
R5 = 643.6 mm (25.34 inch)
And also 1114.6 mm (43.88 inch)
For K-track there are:
R0(?) = 295.4 mm (11.63 inch). Not all Märklin models can handle this, but many anough.
R1(?) = 360 mm (14.17 inch)
R2(?) = 424.6 mm (16.72 inch)
R3(?) = 553.9 mm (21.81 inch)
R4(?) = 618.5 mm (24.35 inch)
And also 902.4 mm (35.53 inch)
For M-track there are:
R0(?) = 286 mm (11.26 inch). Not all Märklin models can handle this.
R1(?) = 360 mm (14.17 inch)
R2(?) = 437.4 mm (17.22 inch)
|
 2 users liked this useful post by perz
|
|
|
|
Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
|
Karl,
please note that this is an international forum, so if you'd be so kind not to use local measures. As well as we normally don't use french or swedish, even if that's also possible to translate.
Regards,
Lars
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 25/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 11,165
|
Karl, welcome to the forum. One inch is about 25,4 mm, so an 18-inch curve radius should be about 457 mm in the metric system, which is somewhere between the R2 and R3 for C-track from Märklin according to perz's table. Lars, I understand the quest for international measures everywhere, but as I understand - that is exactly what Karl is asking us to help him with... |
Juhan - "Webmaster", at your service...
He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Old Chinese Proverb] |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
|
Hi Karl, I work for IBM/USA and know about the difficulties with translation from/to inches/metrics, as well as temperatures in Fahhrenheit or Celsius, Pounds or Kilograms, etc. However, metrics are the standard in Europe ( and in South America too ), so they millimeters to indicate radii. The good news is that Märklin appends the angle in degrees to curved tracks and the lenght in millimeters to the straight tracks.
All tracks are numbered 24nnn. So, 24 can be ignored...
For curved track: the third digit indicates the Radius, the fourth and fifth the degrees.
So a 24530 is R5, 30 degrees.
For straight track: the last three digits indicate the lenght in millimeters, so a 24229 is a straight track 229 millimeters long.
With the conversion table above, you'll find the measurement for any track you want to use.
In regards to radii, my preference is the largest curves possible. I use R5 and R4 for the mains, R3 only for yards. Long turnouts (24711/12) are ideal for non-Märklin locos and 1:87 coaches (Roco & others).
If you plan to use non-Märklin locos and/or American type locos (big boy...) avoid curved turnouts (24672/72) and the double slip 24624, they are derailment prone...
Hope not to have confused you too much... ;-)
Regards from this hot Buenos Aires.
|
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA |
1 user liked this useful post by jorge_vilarrubi
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 3
Location: ,
|
Thanks everyone. I appreciate it.
K. Pann
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Joined: 17/04/2003(UTC) Posts: 997 Location: Netherlands
|
Wasn't there some kind of a satelite or moon probe which crashed last year because the engineers used the imperial value for gravitational constant instead of the metric value?? Slightly worse than a model train derailment... (Although maybe the engineers involved now have plenty of time to enjoy the hobby.... [}:)]) Gregor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 16/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 1,575
Location: DeSoto (Dallas area), TX
|
If I remember correctly, it was a Mars probe. Some number was not converted from Imperial to Metric, resulting in a navigation error.[:(!] I do most MRR calculation in Metric (I even have a metric measuring tape  ). The length combination tables in the Operation Related area do come in handy.  |
The McLae
IB digital, DB, OBB, SBB epII-V
Providing a home for little lost 'Gators |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 25/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 11,165
|
As I understand, the Pathfinder (ie the Rover...) was supposed to do it all in metrics but that thought had not propagated throughout all the channels at NASA...
Ok, we're a bit off topic now - but it shows how lack of respect to international standards can mess it up also in the most advanced projects sometimes... [B)] |
Juhan - "Webmaster", at your service...
He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Old Chinese Proverb] |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
|
A Boeing 767 suffered an accident when ran out of fuel because the fuel load was calculated in Kilograms but loaded in Pounds, 454 grams instead of 1000 per Kilogram... |
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 16/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 1,575
Location: DeSoto (Dallas area), TX
|
I think that was in Canada. There was a story of how the pilot was able to land on an abandoned airfield. |
The McLae
IB digital, DB, OBB, SBB epII-V
Providing a home for little lost 'Gators |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 17/01/2004(UTC)
Posts: 136
Location: ,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
|
Thanks John,
Really amazing story. Thanks for providing the link. I had never read the story before. |
Kimmo |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 16/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 1,575
Location: DeSoto (Dallas area), TX
|
As an interesting tidbit..... Go to the Viessmann web site http://www.viessmann-modell.de/. Click on ProdukteClick on Oberleitungen (catenary), then HO scroll to the bottom of the pate, and click on Zubehorscroll down some to find two tables with Track maker, radius, and Catenaty wire length. Also Viessmann part number of the wire. This handy reference has the track radius of Marklin, Roco, Tillig, and Fleischmann. |
The McLae
IB digital, DB, OBB, SBB epII-V
Providing a home for little lost 'Gators |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/11/2003(UTC)
Posts: 197
Location: Frenchtown, New Jersey USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
