Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline mascagni  
#1 Posted : 02 December 2003 19:22:03(UTC)
mascagni


Joined: 25/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 826
Location: Tallahassee, FL USA

Hi: I just got an Intellibox and some Viessmann 5211 decoders. I was happily using them when all of a sudden the decoders would no longer work. When hooking them back up I noticed some sparking when plugging in to it a second time. After that it did not work, and I suspect it shorted out. My question is, should the decoder be so sensitive, or is this an indication of a faulty decoder?
Michael Mascagni, Tallahassee
If I weren't a Mathematician, I'd be a Violinist.--Albert Einstein
Offline craigericks  
#2 Posted : 02 December 2003 23:46:12(UTC)
craigericks

United States   
Joined: 04/11/2003(UTC)
Posts: 262
Location: ,
Hello,
Sorry I can not answer your question, but I am very interested in the replies you get because i just ordered an IB and some 5211s
Marklin:CS2 and TrainController Gold v10
Offline McLae  
#3 Posted : 02 December 2003 23:53:40(UTC)
McLae


Joined: 16/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 1,575
Location: DeSoto (Dallas area), TX
Did you change the wiring lately?

I am using IB and six 5211 with no problems for about two years.
The McLae
IB digital, DB, OBB, SBB epII-V
Providing a home for little lost 'Gators
Offline KLB  
#4 Posted : 03 December 2003 00:18:22(UTC)
KLB


Joined: 22/09/2001(UTC)
Posts: 639
Location: ,
Hi Michael,all,

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by mascagni
<br />
Hi: I just got an Intellibox and some Viessmann 5211 decoders. I was happily using them when all of a sudden the decoders would no longer work. When hooking them back up I noticed some sparking when plugging in to it a second time. After that it did not work, and I suspect it shorted out. My question is, should the decoder be so sensitive, or is this an indication of a faulty decoder?


You should <u>always</u> disconnect the power supply before you plug in anything.Viessmann recommends this in the leaflet.I have gotten two 'stinkers' 5211,.....[:0]
Kevin!

Moderator,Märklin Bar&Grill

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MarklinBandG/
Offline Chris Vella  
#5 Posted : 03 December 2003 09:19:39(UTC)
Chris Vella


Joined: 12/06/2003(UTC)
Posts: 275
Location: Malta
Hi Michael, all

I strogly agree with Kevin that you should never attemt doing any connections of any kind (especially digital) with power on, that is asking for trouble.

Cheers
Chris
Offline mascagni  
#6 Posted : 03 December 2003 13:16:05(UTC)
mascagni


Joined: 25/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 826
Location: Tallahassee, FL USA

I guess I have been so used to using analog control of swithes, which are not sensitive, to say the least.
Michael Mascagni, Tallahassee
If I weren't a Mathematician, I'd be a Violinist.--Albert Einstein
Offline McLae  
#7 Posted : 04 December 2003 00:27:13(UTC)
McLae


Joined: 16/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 1,575
Location: DeSoto (Dallas area), TX
One tradition with electrical engineers is the "Smoke Test".
1. turn power off.
2. Add some component or circuit (in this case 5211/k83)
3. turn on power and look for smoke[:0].



As a friend said to me once,
"All electronics works on smoke. Let the smoke out, the thing stops working."wink

The McLae
IB digital, DB, OBB, SBB epII-V
Providing a home for little lost 'Gators
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by McLae
Offline Peter Neumann  
#8 Posted : 04 December 2003 05:12:16(UTC)
Peter Neumann

United States   
Joined: 18/12/2002(UTC)
Posts: 251
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Märklin 6021 in use here and NINE 5211 Viessmann controllers powered separately by an old Märklin 280 "big blue" transformer and I have experienced absolutely NO operational problems.

Has anyone out there controlled ROCO relays (which I use to operate Viessmann LED block and distance signals) from the 5211 decoders???? If so, how is the relay wired into the 5211?


Peter Neumann
Florida



Offline McLae  
#9 Posted : 04 December 2003 07:27:57(UTC)
McLae


Joined: 16/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 1,575
Location: DeSoto (Dallas area), TX
I have no idea about the Roco relays, but the Viessmann 5222 relays work fine with 5211 and k83. Smile

I also used some Atlas snap relays. (2xUM) Worked fine until a lok stopped over a contact track and fried the relay with steady current. [:(]
The McLae
IB digital, DB, OBB, SBB epII-V
Providing a home for little lost 'Gators
Offline mascagni  
#10 Posted : 19 December 2003 20:05:12(UTC)
mascagni


Joined: 25/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 826
Location: Tallahassee, FL USA
A bit of an update. It turned out that I did not fry the Viessmann 5211 decoders, just misinterpretted the instuctions. All is working fine, and in fact, I just ordered 4 more of the 5211's so that I can control all of my M-track switches. In this order I also am getting some Viessmann 5231 decoders for under C-track. I may have more questions when I have those in hand.

Merry Christmas, Happy Chanukah, and Happy New Year to all.
Michael Mascagni, Tallahassee
If I weren't a Mathematician, I'd be a Violinist.--Albert Einstein
Offline Mats P  
#11 Posted : 20 December 2003 01:45:16(UTC)
Mats P

Sweden   
Joined: 28/04/2002(UTC)
Posts: 80
Location: Västra Frölunda
Hi Michael

Good to hear that your 5211 was not fried.About your purchase of the 5231-decoders I have to say that my experience of those decoders could have been better.I bought eight of those decoders two years ago and I have not been satisfied with them.The problem that occured to me was that some of the decoders were setting themselves into programming mode when I was operating <u>another</u> switch.The adress of those decoders are not set by a dip-switch as it is on Märklin-decoders,instead the adress is set from the Keyboard/IB.
Imagine yourself having eighth decoders and when you operate one of them another one is setting itself in programming mode! You just hear three "clicks" from a switch and if you are lucky you know from what switch it came and can type in the right address on the Keyboard/IB immediately since what you type in will be the address for the decoder.If you were not lucky you didn´t find out which decoder that was set in a programming mode,in that case you had to use the trial and error method to find out which of the switches/decoders that needed to be programmed again and take out the decoder from the switch to press the programming mode button on the decoder and then set the right address.As you understand that was very unpractical in the long run so I have replaced all my Viessmann 5231-decoders with Märklin instead.
I don´t know if someone else in this forum have had the same experience as I had with the 5231-decoders.

Regards

Mats P

Offline mascagni  
#12 Posted : 22 December 2003 14:54:21(UTC)
mascagni


Joined: 25/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 826
Location: Tallahassee, FL USA

Mats and All: Well, I must make a slight modification to my comments. I discovered that one of my 4 5211's has a short in the 4th decoder: the green and yellow plugs. Thus, I can use that decoder for things like decoupler tracks, but not turnouts. However, I do think that the device was shorted when I got it.
Michael Mascagni, Tallahassee
If I weren't a Mathematician, I'd be a Violinist.--Albert Einstein
Offline Bart  
#13 Posted : 23 December 2003 02:05:13(UTC)
Bart

Netherlands   
Joined: 13/05/2002(UTC)
Posts: 676
Hi Michael,
I had similar problems with some of my second-hand 5211s. I would guess that replacing the transistor of that particular output may solve your problem. Each red and green output socket is fed by one power transistor, 8 in total. Following the printed circuit from the defective output will easily identify the bad guy.
It's a BD680: a 50 cents repair.
*Bart
Offline Peter Neumann  
#14 Posted : 30 December 2003 07:12:01(UTC)
Peter Neumann

United States   
Joined: 18/12/2002(UTC)
Posts: 251
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Can Viessmann LED (block, advance, etc) signals be controlled / activate through the Viessmann 5211 decoder? I tried plugging a simple red/green block signal into the decoder and nothing happened - no lights, nothing (when activating the decoder function through my 6040 keyboard).

Thank you.

Peter Neumann
Gulf Breeze, Florida

Offline xxup  
#15 Posted : 30 December 2003 09:40:31(UTC)
xxup

Australia   
Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC)
Posts: 9,597
Location: Australia
The 5211 needs a yellow wire from the signal as well as the red/green light change plugs from the signal.

It also needs two reds (one is plugged into the E) and a brown - the wiring diagram is with the 5211.

Also you must have a brown (earth) plugged into the (soleniod type) signal.

After you get the lights to work then you need to play with the minimum button press duration to get the decoder to change the lights from red to green etc..
Adrian
UserPostedImage
Australia flag by abFlags.com
Offline McLae  
#16 Posted : 30 December 2003 09:43:46(UTC)
McLae


Joined: 16/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 1,575
Location: DeSoto (Dallas area), TX
Decoders cannot directly control signals. You need a relay also. The decoder controls the relay, the relay controls the lights/track. The decoder will give a pulse of power, up to one second. This is enough to cause relay (or turnout) to flip, but not enough to have light on steady (or burn out turnout motor).

There should have been instruction diagram with the light signal. The relays are shown as rectangles. The 5211 (or K83) are connected to these. If you like, I can send you a photo showing how to connect properly. (will take some setup time)
The McLae
IB digital, DB, OBB, SBB epII-V
Providing a home for little lost 'Gators
Offline KLB  
#17 Posted : 31 December 2003 04:34:54(UTC)
KLB


Joined: 22/09/2001(UTC)
Posts: 639
Location: ,
Hi McLae,all,

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by McLae
<br />Decoders cannot directly control signals. You need a relay also. The decoder controls the relay, the relay controls the lights/track.


This only applies to light signals,...not the old timer oneswink
Kevin!

Moderator,Märklin Bar&Grill

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MarklinBandG/
Offline craigericks  
#18 Posted : 31 December 2003 17:20:49(UTC)
craigericks

United States   
Joined: 04/11/2003(UTC)
Posts: 262
Location: ,
Hello,
Personal Update. I recieved my IB and 5211s the other day. Connected my 6021 to the IB via the adapter and am running the signal/power from the 6021 directly to the 5211s as suggested in the IB manual. so far have 2 5211s connected running 8 swithches. Working great. 5211s are "daisy-chained together. have 3 more 5211s and one k83 to go.
Question: Is daisy chaining the 5211s the right way to go? or should I be running the signal to a central distribution strip and hooking the individual 5211s up from the strip? My concern is loss of signal strength as the signal travels through each 5211 until it reaches the 5th 5211?
Marklin:CS2 and TrainController Gold v10
Offline Peter Neumann  
#19 Posted : 01 January 2004 03:47:43(UTC)
Peter Neumann

United States   
Joined: 18/12/2002(UTC)
Posts: 251
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Update on my earlier question about Viessmann LED signals and the 5211 decoder.

I just have had a case of the stupids! [xx(]
The Viessmann 4000 series LED signals OF COURSE have to have solenoids to operate. Plugging them straight into the Viessman 5211 decoder did nothing, since the decoder only provides momentary contacts.

As I went to bed thinking about my posting on this site, I realized the obvious answer: the next morning I connected my ROCO relay to the Viessmann decoder, connected the ROCO relay to ground, connected the yellow lead to power, and the two green's to the ROCO relay and IT WORKED - including the read switch in the track.

So, NEVER MIND and have a Happy New Year. I resolve to be a smarter modeller in 2004biggrin

Peter Neumann
Florida
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#20 Posted : 01 January 2004 11:23:58(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
Peter,
Viesmann also make the electronic "Signalsteuerbaustein" which both latches the state of the signal as a relay, make the shifts of light slowly, and handles complicated signal asepects as distant signals etc. Recommended.

/Lars

Offline Lars Westerlind  
#21 Posted : 01 January 2004 11:27:47(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
Craigerics,
electrically, the 5211 aren't "Daisychained" also if they physically are. Red to red and brown to brown are connected inside. But it's a good idea to keep the length of cable the current must travel short.

/Lars
Offline kimmo  
#22 Posted : 02 January 2004 08:22:48(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by craigericks
<br />should I be running the signal to a central distribution strip and hooking the individual 5211s up from the strip?
I have installed my 5211's this way. I have 5 of them.
Kimmo
Offline craigericks  
#23 Posted : 02 January 2004 17:17:39(UTC)
craigericks

United States   
Joined: 04/11/2003(UTC)
Posts: 262
Location: ,
Lars and Kimmo,
thank you for the timely responses.
Lars: if I keep the current configuration (daisy-chained), if one 5211 becomes inoperable, does that effect the connection too the subsequent 5211s down the chain? if so, maybe the distro strip is the way to go?
thanks
Craig
Marklin:CS2 and TrainController Gold v10
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#24 Posted : 02 January 2004 20:17:44(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
Do I understand you correctly? You have red and brown cables from the Cu to the first 5211, than from that one to the next and so forth? In that case I see no danger in any "inoperable" 5211, except if they should cause a short. Which I never heard of, and would cause the whole layout to close down anyway.

But if the total length of cable to the last 5211 is long, and the cable is poor, you could get a voltage drop. And why risk that?

On the other hand; your connection is there already; if you don't have any problems, I wouldn't change it. But as soon as you get turnouts that don't throw properly, I would see if the cables could be shortened, or enhanced.

/Lars
Offline Bart  
#25 Posted : 03 January 2004 00:57:58(UTC)
Bart

Netherlands   
Joined: 13/05/2002(UTC)
Posts: 676
Hi all,
If you use the 5211's E-socket for feeding separate power to the turnouts, I would not be worried at all about signal strength for the electronics of the decoders when daisy-chained. A separate yellow wire to each E-socket (which can't be daisy-chained anyway) from a distributor may be a better investment than rewiring red & brown.Smile
*Bart
Offline craigericks  
#26 Posted : 03 January 2004 04:49:27(UTC)
craigericks

United States   
Joined: 04/11/2003(UTC)
Posts: 262
Location: ,
Lars, Kimmo and Bart,
thanks for the help. I do have the red and brown from the 6021 to the first 5211, then then a red/brown from the first to the second 5211 and so on. The IB controls the digital to the track. Seems to be working fine. will keep all of your suggestions in mind as i continue.
craig
Marklin:CS2 and TrainController Gold v10
Offline kimmo  
#27 Posted : 06 February 2004 11:40:37(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
I am using this thread to post another question about 5211.

I bought several Viessmann signals, and four more 5211's to drive them digitally. Everything is now wired and works fine. But the following question crossed my mind.

I have a separate 32 VA trafo + booster (old delta unit) for accessories like turnouts and signals, all via 5211's. Viessman signals like 4500 have a separate feed for lights (separate from the solenoid feed). So what I did was to wire the solenoid feed from 5211 output, but the light feed directly from the yellow output of that 32 VA trafo. Since all 5211's are also fed from that same trafo, but through the booster, I understand that I am not actually "saving" any digital power, since it still loads the same trafo.

So my question is, was there any advantage/disadvantage to do it this way, rather than simply connecting the light feed also to the yellow output of the 5211, together with the solenoid feed of the same signal. One thing that I was worried was that while the solenoids only draw power through 5211 when they move, the lights would have drawn power all the time. So I didn't know if that was OK or not with 5211.

But the main reason why I did it this way was that in the future I may need more lighting power and may get yet another trafo for that purpose alone. When that happens, I can now just move the main wire feeding the signal lights from the current trafo to the new one, and get the lights really separated from the digital feed at that time, without rewiring anything.
Kimmo
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#28 Posted : 06 February 2004 11:52:10(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
You do right Kimmo, and you think right as well. It's true that you don't save "trafo power" either; but it's not that which is expensive. The booster is also limited; in this case the booster limits to about the same level as the trafo, around 2A. But say, that you replace the trafo with a stronger one, the present wiring makes sense as well.

/Lars
Offline kimmo  
#29 Posted : 06 February 2004 12:07:53(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:The booster is also limited; in this case the booster limits to about the same level as the trafo, around 2A. But say, that you replace the trafo with a stronger one, the present wiring makes sense as well.
That is actually an interesting point. Now I have one 52VA trafo for the track via 6021, and one 32VA trafo for the accessories via delta booster. And as mentioned, in the future I may add third trafo for lighting circuit. All have common ground.

Could all these trafo's be replaced with one big trafo, let say 150VA, by directly connecting it to all three circuits (6021, delta booster, lights distribution bar)? Or does the trafo output first need to be divided into three separated outputs with some electronics to limit the power in each output to the level the corresponding equipment can take (I am thinking the max amps of 6021 and delta unit here)?
Kimmo
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#30 Posted : 06 February 2004 13:50:06(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
Well,
I wasn't to the point I think. Yes you can, but no, in my thinking it's better to have separate circuits, including several smaller transformers; including the fact that they are cheap as second hand items. Forgot to say, that when you have one or several light circuits, you may reduce voltage too; just connect it to the red of the trafo.

/Lars
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#31 Posted : 06 February 2004 21:26:21(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Hi everybody,
In regards to power for turnout decoders, this is my opinion:
With C turnouts fed by AC there is an inherent risk of damage to the output transistors of the IB / 6021, should the metal box of the turnout touch the pukos plate of the turnout AND the track corresponding to the yellow wire on the printed circuit board (at the connector's end) of the motor. This happened to me and I had to replace both output transistors of my IB.
So now I have all my 5211s fed thru an old 6015 booster, but there is still a cheaper solution: use an old Delta Control as a booster to feed the turnout decoders.
Take into account that when you have digital turnouts, they are driven ONE AT A TIME by the system, so a Delta fed by a 32VA trafo is enough. I implemented this option in a layout of a friend of mine and it works very well.
However, those who prefer to use AC for turnouts (digitally or conventionally driven) should isolate the turnout motor from the pukos plate to avoid a potential damage to the system.
Hope this could help.
Regards,
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline kimmo  
#32 Posted : 07 February 2004 12:42:07(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:use an old Delta Control as a booster to feed the turnout decoders.
This is what I have done, too. Works well.
Kimmo
Offline kimmo  
#33 Posted : 07 April 2004 17:10:40(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Lars Westerlind
<br />You do right Kimmo, and you think right as well. It's true that you don't save "trafo power" either; but it's not that which is expensive. The booster is also limited; in this case the booster limits to about the same level as the trafo, around 2A. But say, that you replace the trafo with a stronger one, the present wiring makes sense as well.
Hello everybody,

I am bringing this old thread back again, as I plan to change my layour wiring as Lars suggested in the quote above. But I would like to hear your comments on the following.

The reason of the change is, that I am now adding street and building lights, so I want to create own circuit for them. And I got two extra trafos with a bargain price, one 32VA with voltage regulator, and one 52VA without voltage regulator. And as mentioned earlier in this thread, I currently have one 32VA trafo with voltage regulator feeding all solenoid asseccories via a delta booster. So I plan to do following:

Put the new 52VA trafo to feed the delta booster. By doing that I can use two 32VA trafos to create two lighting circuits, which can be dimmed separately, as both of these 32VA trafos are equipped with voltage regulators. This gives a total of 4A power for lighting, which is enough for my current needs.

But my question is, that since the delta booster is limited to 2A current, and the new trafo can supply more than that, do I need to add a fuse or some other protection between the new 52VA trafo and delta booster? In principle, the fact that the trafo has more capacity than is needed by the delta booster is good, as this trafo also feeds the signal lights via a separate cable, which doesn't go through the booster.

And another question: When creating the lighting circuit, is there any point to connect these two lighting trafos to the common ground with everything else, or should I keep them separate?

Thanks,
Kimmo
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#34 Posted : 07 April 2004 18:16:46(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Hello Kimmo! I see you're plenty of trafos...
Don't worry about giving to the Delta more power than it can handle.
Delta Controls are thermally protected, same as trafos, so in case you have a short circuit or an overload, the protection will cut power off.
Have fun...
Regards,
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline kimmo  
#35 Posted : 07 April 2004 18:41:37(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Thanks for the info, Jorge. My dependable friend!

Any comment on the common ground question? Does it add any value in the lighting circuit, which will have nothing else connected than light bulbs?
Kimmo
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#36 Posted : 07 April 2004 19:58:03(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
Common ground doesn't add any value to the lighting circuit; some people think it's easier to think of though. But that's mainly when we speak about contact tracks, M-track accessories and the like. And common ground has no drawback either, so you can do just as feel. Ah, well, if you don't replace/isolate your plugs with the screws, it could be a good idea to have the lights circuit separated; this will limit the risk of shorts a bit :-)


Regards,
Lars

regards,
Lars
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#37 Posted : 07 April 2004 21:10:16(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
I agree with Lars, keeping a separate circuit will reduce shorts risk. Remember that if you have by chance an AC wire connected to the RED wire of your Digital Central, it will get fried, provided both grounds are connected together. The output transistors will burn.
Regards,
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Similar Topics
Viessmann 5211 question (Digital)
by gachar001 16/03/2009 22:34:18(UTC)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 1.322 seconds.