Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline xxup  
#1 Posted : 15 June 2003 12:13:19(UTC)
xxup

Australia   
Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC)
Posts: 9,473
Location: Australia
I have two 460s.. One is a C-sine (39607) and the lights don't flicker, but the 37637 lights flicker at all speeds.. When the tracks were in analogue mode the 40 year old Santa Fe's lights didn't flicker, but it would never go slow (stop or 50% throttle +)!

It's no big deal from my perspective, but I just want to be sure that it is not a sign of some impending doom..



Adrian
UserPostedImage
Australia flag by abFlags.com
Offline perz  
#2 Posted : 15 June 2003 16:19:15(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
According to http://www.stummi.de/ the 37637 is a Delta loco ! Is this really true ? If it is a Delta dispite its 37xxx number it is quite normal that the lights flicker.

Offline xxup  
#3 Posted : 16 June 2003 12:03:34(UTC)
xxup

Australia   
Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC)
Posts: 9,473
Location: Australia
Na... I've had the top off and it is definately digital.. It's address 37 and there are two potentiometers for max speed and braking delay.. It does only have one function though...

This message http://www.scintilla.utw...November00/msg00989.html seems to suggest that there were two versions.. So does the manual that came with the lok..

Adrian
UserPostedImage
Australia flag by abFlags.com
Offline PeFu  
#4 Posted : 16 June 2003 13:28:27(UTC)
PeFu

Sweden   
Joined: 30/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 1,210
Hi Perz, all,

Also this site...

http://www.bahn.hfkern.d...aerklin/CH_Loks_460.html

...confirms that there was a 3763 with a Delta. Strange, I have never seen a 37xxx engine before, without a 6090x decoder at original outfit.

<img src=icon_smile_shock.gif border=0 align=middle> Peter

Andreasburg-Mattiasberg Bahn is inspired by Swiss railways |Forum Thread |Track Plan |Youtube | C and K track | CS2 | TrainController Gold V10
Offline perz  
#5 Posted : 16 June 2003 22:48:14(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
OK, it's a 6090x motor then. Flickering lights in 6090x models are usually the result of using chassis as return for the light instead of the decoder function return. I think the function return output was added in the 60901 and wasn't there in the older 6090 (correct me if I am wrong).

There are 37xxx engines that don't have 6090x decoders. My dear 37645 is one example, the early Württh. C is another.

Offline xxup  
#6 Posted : 28 June 2003 02:07:42(UTC)
xxup

Australia   
Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC)
Posts: 9,473
Location: Australia
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face="Verdana" id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>I think the function return output was added in the 60901 and wasn't there in the older 6090 <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face="Verdana" size=1 id=quote>

Perz... Do you recommend that I upgrade to the 60901?




Adrian
UserPostedImage
Australia flag by abFlags.com
Offline Webmaster  
#7 Posted : 28 June 2003 02:22:25(UTC)
Webmaster


Joined: 25/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 11,161
The easiest way would be to wire it to the 6090 decoder plus as lights return, aka the "Waterstone Terminal" (named like that after a tip on the MML from Mr Desmond Waterstone)... See it at http://www.pallund.dk/convert2.htm#m4.
This of course assumes that the lamps and the "swiss lighting board" are not electrically connected to the chassis.
Juhan - "Webmaster", at your service...
He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Old Chinese Proverb]
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Webmaster
Offline perz  
#8 Posted : 28 June 2003 02:25:30(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
No, don't upgrade to 60901 just to get a function return output. There are better ways to solve that. One method (that I don't recommend, but I have seen it used) is to find the point on the decoder that corresponds to the function return, i.e. the "Waterstone terminal" , and solder a wire to it. Another method which is safer is to create a function return with two diodes:

<img src="http://home.swipnet.se/perz/funcret.gif" border=0>

UserPostedImage

Use diodes with sufficient current rating, e.g. 1N4002.

Edited by moderator 03 April 2011 18:24:29(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline Webmaster  
#9 Posted : 28 June 2003 02:30:23(UTC)
Webmaster


Joined: 25/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 11,161
Perz,
Why would you not recommend the "Waterstone Terminal"? Have used it on a few 6090 loks with great success myself...

Juhan
"Webmaster", at your service...
Juhan - "Webmaster", at your service...
He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Old Chinese Proverb]
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Webmaster
Offline perz  
#10 Posted : 28 June 2003 02:35:43(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Yes. I think The "Waterstone terminal" can be used if you are handy with the soldering iron and you don't draw too much current through the terminal. However, the diodes on the decoder are rather tiny and I do not know how much extra current they can handle without frying. And I have seen just too many boards destroyed by unskillful soldering.

Offline Webmaster  
#11 Posted : 28 June 2003 02:46:05(UTC)
Webmaster


Joined: 25/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 11,161
As I see it, the "Waterstone terminal" only moves the "common" point from chassis to the decoder "internal common", meaning you get rectification from both positive and negative voltage the same way you get with your solution... I don't really see why it should draw *more* current, only constant current instead of only having current in half of the voltage span... But you may be right regarding heating of the tiny diodes on the board, you're better at this than I am... <img src=icon_smile.gif border=0 align=middle>

Adrian, as you can see - no need to buy an expensive decoder, 2 good diodes and some soldering is the maximum investment to get it flicker free... <img src=icon_smile_cool.gif border=0 align=middle>

And - the 3763 BLS version of the SBB460 is a digital 6090 version - the Delta version is 3463 so there is obviously an error in that table, Peter...


Juhan
"Webmaster", at your service...
Juhan - "Webmaster", at your service...
He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Old Chinese Proverb]
Offline xxup  
#12 Posted : 30 June 2003 06:39:06(UTC)
xxup

Australia   
Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC)
Posts: 9,473
Location: Australia
Perz and Juhan,

Thanks for that info.. For some reason, the topic did not flag as having new items and I nearly missed the great discussion. (Time zones??)

I will look closer at both options and report back soon..

Thanks again
Adrian
Adrian
UserPostedImage
Australia flag by abFlags.com
Offline perz  
#13 Posted : 08 July 2003 01:32:37(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
I have observed flickering lights in one of my digital models for a much simpler reason. The new lamps with just two tiny wires do not always make so good contact in the lamp socket. The vibrations from the motor can cause the flickering. It is easily cured, just take out the lamps, bend the lamp wire ends a little bit and put the lamps back again.
Offline xxup  
#14 Posted : 08 July 2003 14:24:03(UTC)
xxup

Australia   
Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC)
Posts: 9,473
Location: Australia
In the meantime, the lok died and is at the dealers.. Actually it is now fixed.. It's put me off touching anything on the 6090 (I am now pleased that I didn't have the time..).. It might just be that the flickering lights were a symptom of impending failure.. In any case, I must agree with Perz that soldering little junctions on the 6090 is well beyond my abilities...

Anyway, I will pick it up on Saturday and it will be interesting to find out the cause... My money is on some sort of power surge, but I wonder why it wouldn't take out the IB first?

If the lights still flicker, I might check the bulbs as you suggested Perz.

Thanks to all who replied.
Adrian
Adrian
UserPostedImage
Australia flag by abFlags.com
Offline xxup  
#15 Posted : 17 July 2003 13:25:56(UTC)
xxup

Australia   
Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC)
Posts: 9,473
Location: Australia
My dealer, who seems to watch this site quite a bit, reminded me that I had not provided an update on the repairs. "The story lacks closure", he says.

Well, I am happy to report that not only did Noel fix the problem at no cost to me within a week, he also very kindly fixed the flickering lights for me.. Not many retailers around that look after you like this..

Thanks Noel, Perz, Juhan and to the others who took an interest in the problem I was having with ol' 37637..
Adrian
Adrian
UserPostedImage
Australia flag by abFlags.com
Offline Peter Neumann  
#16 Posted : 21 April 2004 05:52:18(UTC)
Peter Neumann

United States   
Joined: 18/12/2002(UTC)
Posts: 251
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
What is the recommended "fix" for flickering lights if I am using 60901 components and a LokSound2 decoder? The engine in this case is a Marklin E120. Why would I not want to just install a small capacitor for each light?

Your advice, please.

Peter Neumann
Florida
Offline perz  
#17 Posted : 21 April 2004 17:16:22(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
I think the Loksound decoder has a "function return" wire. If it has (I am not 100% sure), use it. If not, you can create a function return with two diodes as I have described in a previous post in this thread.
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#18 Posted : 21 April 2004 23:42:18(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Hello everybody, for testing if the flickering is caused by the lamps connected to ground, enter loco #40 and then #80, this puts in the track the more different pulse bursts in the Motorola protocol. Leave the loco stopped for this test. If the lights flicker, the cause is a ground return and not a bad contact.
My solution for the ground free lamps is to connect the return to the +pole of the decoder's rectifier. Good soldering ability is required.
Regards.
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline perz  
#19 Posted : 22 April 2004 02:23:20(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
My diode solution is functionally equivalent to the +pole of the decoder's rectifier but easier to solder.
Offline laalves  
#20 Posted : 11 December 2004 00:36:48(UTC)
laalves


Joined: 10/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,162
Location: Portugal
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Webmaster
<br />The easiest way would be to wire it to the 6090 decoder plus as lights return, aka the "Waterstone Terminal" (named like that after a tip on the MML from Mr Desmond Waterstone)... See it at http://www.pallund.dk/convert2.htm#m4.
This of course assumes that the lamps and the "swiss lighting board" are not electrically connected to the chassis.



Great forum! The search functionality just solved my newly arrived 3769's flicker biggrinbiggrinbiggrinbiggrin.

I think I got a great ebay deal for a new 3769 @ 150€. It was my first 6090 loco and I didn't even know about this problem, other than with Deltas and 6080s.

I did it with the Waterstone solder pad and a bit of brass strip for distributor: one orange wire from the Waterstone pad and a pair of other orange wires to the lamps. Voila! No flicker at all!

Thanks all!

Luis
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.919 seconds.