Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline huttel  
#1 Posted : 27 October 2006 21:14:26(UTC)
huttel

Denmark   
Joined: 11/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 274
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Hi all

I have split my layout up in 3 seperate power supply areas each supplied with its own trafo (70VA) and booster (2 Power 3 from Uhlenbroch and 1 Märklin 6017). I have insulated the power (red) entry tracks between the sections but not the ground (brown). At trafo level I have also connected the brown outlets so there’s common brown.

I was down in my local trainshop today and was told that I have too completely insulate the areas meaning no common booster ground and complete insulation between the sections (both red and brown). Can that really be true? I was told that not doing it could result in damaged boosters and IB. Could this be because I am mixing Märklin and Uhlenbroch boosters? Does anybody have experience to share? It would be quite difficult for me to do the full track insulation as the layout is almost finished – but if I have to I of course will - and would therefore appreciate good adwise.

//Thomas
Carpe Diem!
Märklin HO | Insider | C-Track | Digital | Primarilly DK & D | Era III+IV | PC Control with CS2 (60215), Intellibox & Win-Digipet | http://huttel.dk/marklin
Offline rschaffr  
#2 Posted : 27 October 2006 21:17:56(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,181
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
Thomas: I have an IB with a mix of 4xLDT DB2 and 2x6604 boosters all runing wit common ground. No problem.
-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Offline MHauge  
#3 Posted : 27 October 2006 21:24:20(UTC)
MHauge


Joined: 19/10/2005(UTC)
Posts: 393
Location: Aarhus C, DK
I would say that keeping the ground common would be a good thing, but i'm not sure if mixing Uhlenbrock and Märklin changes anything.
Can't think of why that would be.

Michael
Märklin C-tracks, Mobile Station, Danish Ep 4
Offline rschaffr  
#4 Posted : 27 October 2006 21:29:42(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,181
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
Not unless youare running a CS
-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Offline perz  
#5 Posted : 27 October 2006 22:22:03(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote: Not unless youare running a CS

Not keeping a common ground throughout the track system is a bad idea in any case. Your dealer seems to have got things mixed up.

With the newer Märklin components (MS and CS), the track ground must be separated from the transformer ground. Not so with 6017 and I don't think it should be separated with Power 3 either. But in any case, different segments of track ground should never be separated.

Offline Lars Westerlind  
#6 Posted : 27 October 2006 23:51:56(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
... in 3R.

I guess your dealer has built too much 2Rail Cool.

In Märklin it's easy: common ground for everything except the trafos feeding the digital centrals and boosters.

/Lars
Offline huttel  
#7 Posted : 28 October 2006 00:26:27(UTC)
huttel

Denmark   
Joined: 11/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 274
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Thx all

Is exactly what I thought so you have all saved me from a lot of useless work Smile. The topic came up because of train changing start and running speeds at my layout. I use WDP to control my IB and the layout, and the strange thing is, that I have experienced having just adjusted train start and running speeds and the next time I start the IB up trains are running faster (sometimes slower) again and I have to make new adjustments even though the WDP parameters are the same. The most likely explanation is that I need more power so I will try to split one of the main power zones in two and use one more trafo/booster and see if that helps.

Is there btw an easy way to determine if the power supply is sufficient?

//Thomas
Carpe Diem!
Märklin HO | Insider | C-Track | Digital | Primarilly DK & D | Era III+IV | PC Control with CS2 (60215), Intellibox & Win-Digipet | http://huttel.dk/marklin
Offline clapcott  
#8 Posted : 28 October 2006 01:35:42(UTC)
clapcott

New Zealand   
Joined: 12/12/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,448
Location: Wellington, New_Zealand
Thomas,
I cannot comment more about the 6017 interoperability , and agree whole heartedly with a good and sold TRACK ground bond throughout the layout. Re the transition of the power (Red/Stud) circuit however I make the following observations.

DIRECTLY connecting the outputs of native transformers in order to improve the current/power delivery is still a no-no, However Power Technologies (design and switching management) are today being designed to intellegently manage the joining and shareing of load with balancing circuits. These inevitably filter down to the hobby world.

For example, in a computer datcentre it is common to have N+1 UPS feeding a common bus. This enables a single UPS unit to be serviced while the others pick up the load - and/or - additional UPS to be added incrementally as demand grows (The Cables have to be rated correctly of course).

Likewise with Train digital controllers, if the track circuits of a 6021 and ITs booster are shorted there is little drama. (NB the important thing here is that the boosters signal is in sync with the 6021 so make sure the brown goes to rail and the red to stud - This should NOT be done with 2 seperate 6021 domains)

Here I reference articles, including the schematic that comes with the CS "http://maerklin-info.de/systems/Systemarchitektur2.pdf" , that shows no witches hat between sections like the analoge equivilents used to. Also a quote from the latest "Insider Club News" When you use a standard 6015/6017 booster, you don't. need rocker insulators ..... provided the locomotive-hauled train does not come to a halt on the transition area.
This is about as close as it gets to Marklin sanctioning a practice that people have being 'getting away with' for years.

As to your IB question I can specifically relate that a 1 gauge Modular group I am involved with uses an IB and (currently) 2 Power 6s for areas of the layout. It was found that any transition block (as originally designed) was not necessary. So unlike Marklin HO where the short was only at the ski we have a situation where a short exists potentially along the whole length of the train. Some of these beasts (with 2 motors, lights, sound and camera) can draw a lot of current and I have been monitoring this (risk) with interest, however todate there has been no ill effects (transformer blown or even cutout).
Warning: your milage may vary. The transition I describe above is between two , like rated, Power 6s. I would discourage using boosters with different ratings.
Peter
Offline huttel  
#9 Posted : 01 November 2006 01:19:23(UTC)
huttel

Denmark   
Joined: 11/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 274
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Hi all

Thank you for very precise and good descriptions. I have common ground between the trafo’s feeding the layot and IB. Due to a lot of re-boots of the IB I also established a common ground on the booster side and IB (not connected to trafo ground!). It seems to have helped the problem. Is the common ground on the booster/IB side ok or could it cause problems?

Rgds,
Thomas


Carpe Diem!
Märklin HO | Insider | C-Track | Digital | Primarilly DK & D | Era III+IV | PC Control with CS2 (60215), Intellibox & Win-Digipet | http://huttel.dk/marklin
Offline MarioFabro  
#10 Posted : 07 November 2007 22:54:09(UTC)
MarioFabro

United States   
Joined: 16/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 793
Location: Pittsburgh,
I was looking for info as well on how to separate track ppower and came across this thread. In another thread I had posted some diagrams of components I wanted to hook-up. If I understand this right, if you connect CS with boosters (6017 or 60172) you DONT need to insulate any track..right? But if you connect the CS with a 6021 then you HAVE to insulate circuits?.

I have a mix of components that I am trying to use on a medium size lay-out. Since I would like to run lighted passenger cars etc. I was planning on using several components, such as:
- CS with 60VA trafo for double "passenger" line
- booster (60172 or 6017, have it on order) with 42VA trafo for single "freight" line
- 6021 with 42VA trafo, connected with keyboard, mostly for switches

It gets pretty confusing for me [:(]. What happens when the pick-up shoe goes across two separate power feeding areas? and what in the heck is a rocker insulation? Have not seen one close by Smile
UserPostedImageUserPostedImageUserPostedImageEra IV-VI --- "If you have brains you love trains" or "When I grow up, I will play with trains"
Offline dntower85  
#11 Posted : 07 November 2007 23:15:21(UTC)
dntower85

United States   
Joined: 08/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,218
Location: Shady Shores, TX - USA
Mario,

I'm even more confused, the latest issue of the marklin magazine shows that on the updated CS, a 6021 can be connected directly to the CS, it has two connections on it labeled 6021 O and B. so now there is safe power for the 6021 but it doesn't say how the 6021 should be connected to the track.
DT
Now powered by ECoS II unit#2, RocRail
era - some time in the future when the space time continuum is disrupted and ICE 3 Trains run on the same rails as the Adler and BR18's.
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#12 Posted : 07 November 2007 23:18:19(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
IMHO It's not a good idea to use CS together with boosters. Märklin tells that you must use ski lifters when passing from the CS power district and going into 6015 or 6017 districts, and 60172 is non existent.
The best solution I can thing of (if you insist of using the CS) is to let it power a separate "program track" so to say; when a new mfx loco should be run you place it first on this track, and the lift it and move it to the main layout, powered with only 6017 and 6015 boosters (or Uhlenbrock compatibles). 6021 should be sold, and switched operated on the CS output as well. No need for the keyboard either, as far as I can see.

/Lars
Offline rschaffr  
#13 Posted : 07 November 2007 23:21:03(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,181
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
Mario: I believe that M does not intend you to hook the 6021 to the track at all. It is merely being used as an additional throttle.
-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Offline H0  
#14 Posted : 08 November 2007 00:59:22(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,432
Location: DE-NW
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by dntower85
<br />I'm even more confused, the latest issue of the marklin magazine shows that on the updated CS, a 6021 can be connected directly to the CS, it has two connections on it labeled 6021 O and B. so now there is safe power for the 6021 but it doesn't say how the 6021 should be connected to the track.

The 6021 does not get power from the CS - the output of the 6021 is connected to the CS. You cannot use the output of the 6021 to power your layout (it won't receive commands from the CS).
You need a separate transformer to power the CS.
Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#15 Posted : 08 November 2007 08:55:40(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
Yes,
using 6021 with CS is nearly useless.
- Keyboard doesn't receive info about if the CS switches turnouts.
- Keyboard commands may be lost (has been reported), and are not repeated
- Locos may be controlled, but only with 14 speed steps and 1+4 functions

IMHO, the major reason for this "sniffer" is to make you think that it's no big waste to go from a 6021 to CS system. But I disagree with that :-(

/Lars
Offline MarioFabro  
#16 Posted : 08 November 2007 16:39:21(UTC)
MarioFabro

United States   
Joined: 16/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 793
Location: Pittsburgh,
Ok..I could still operate with this set-up:

UserPostedImage

I have almost all the components (I need the booster) and could use the 6021 and keyboard to control the turn-outs (does it make sense??).
I have not seen a rocker insulation.. is it used to separate the tracks when the pick-up shoe goes over the connection point so that it does not "short" the two circuits? Someone has a picture of it? how much length of track do you need for this connection?

The issue is mainly how many trains do you want to run.. I plan to have at least 4-5 lighted passenger trains and they may "suck" my 60vA .. or maybe not (I am not a "sparky" electrician.. Smile)..

What do you guys think?
UserPostedImageUserPostedImageUserPostedImageEra IV-VI --- "If you have brains you love trains" or "When I grow up, I will play with trains"
Offline David Dewar  
#17 Posted : 08 November 2007 17:48:14(UTC)
David Dewar

Scotland   
Joined: 01/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 7,447
Location: Scotland
It may depend on the number of coaches and the type of lights but I can run 4/5 locos from the CS without any bother. It is fair sized layout and I have no need for anything other than a CS and an MS.

David
Take care I like Marklin and will defend the worlds greatest model rail manufacturer.
Offline dntower85  
#18 Posted : 08 November 2007 22:26:01(UTC)
dntower85

United States   
Joined: 08/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,218
Location: Shady Shores, TX - USA
nice illustration Mario, I wish marklin would make one for every safe and correct combination, allowed the little bit extra that you added like the wire color and transformers would have made there article in the last issue more clear. I can't see that it would be an advantage to run the turnouts from the keyboard unless you have an old 6041 - Switchboard, I think it would be easer to run the switches from the CS, But I think I would rather use a 6021 over a CS to run some of my older delta locos and for things like running around a switching yard
DT
Now powered by ECoS II unit#2, RocRail
era - some time in the future when the space time continuum is disrupted and ICE 3 Trains run on the same rails as the Adler and BR18's.
Offline steventrain  
#19 Posted : 09 November 2007 13:37:55(UTC)
steventrain

United Kingdom   
Joined: 21/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 31,685
Location: United Kingdom
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by David Dewar
<br /> I can run 4/5 locos from the CS without any bother. .

David



Same as here, But 3 locomotives with two sounds on running with some coaches lighting and 763xx signals.
Large Marklinist 3- Rails Layout with CS2/MS2/Boosters/C-track/favorites Electric class E03/BR103, E18/E118, E94, Crocodiles/Steam BR01, BR03, BR05, BR23, BR44, BR50, Big Boy.
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#20 Posted : 09 November 2007 15:58:50(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
Mario,
1. your illustration shows a use of the 24088 "ugly box" AND connection but the wires. Märklin has asked you to avoid using both options at the same time.
2. What you call "isolation", should also include ski lifters.

/Lars
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.540 seconds.