Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline nevw  
#1 Posted : 13 November 2005 00:47:00(UTC)
nevw

Australia   
Joined: 27/08/2005(UTC)
Posts: 11,071
Location: Murrumba Downs QLD
In Layman (Not too Technical) Terms what is the difference between FX and MFX??
[xx(][xx(]
NOt wearing the Pink Pinny, which is hard to see and now I have a white Pinny which also is hard to see against MY pure white Skin Still have 2 new shiny tin Hips that is badly in Need of Repair matching rusting tin shoulders
and a hose pipe on the aorta
Junior member of the Banana Club, a reformist and an old Goat with a Bad memory, loafing around
Offline viragoLDR  
#2 Posted : 13 November 2005 00:55:09(UTC)
viragoLDR


Joined: 12/01/2005(UTC)
Posts: 703
Location: ,
in the marklin catalog you mean? I think fx is the regular digital system, and mfx is the new systems stuff.
- Martijn
(early planning : H0-scale Era I K.Bay.sts.b)
(active planning : N-scale mixed late Era Japanese)
(possibly something Z-scale as well ;))
Offline nevw  
#3 Posted : 13 November 2005 01:23:12(UTC)
nevw

Australia   
Joined: 27/08/2005(UTC)
Posts: 11,071
Location: Murrumba Downs QLD
Martin, Had some idea that was the case, but threre must be some technical difference and was interested in finding out,

I guess that the two systems, in loks, can run together
Nwinkwink

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by viragoLDR
<br />in the marklin catalog you mean? I think fx is the regular digital system, and mfx is the new systems stuff.
NOt wearing the Pink Pinny, which is hard to see and now I have a white Pinny which also is hard to see against MY pure white Skin Still have 2 new shiny tin Hips that is badly in Need of Repair matching rusting tin shoulders
and a hose pipe on the aorta
Junior member of the Banana Club, a reformist and an old Goat with a Bad memory, loafing around
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#4 Posted : 13 November 2005 09:49:58(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by nevw
<br />In Layman (Not too Technical) Terms what is the difference between FX and MFX??
[xx(][xx(]


Hello,
in order to explain things, I think we must be more precise. When you see "mfx" in the catalog, it probably is about a loco. This means that the loco can speak both the old language (protocol) Motorola, with old 6021 and the like, and the new language, which I prefer to call mfx-protocol. The Moible Station and the Central station are both able to speak both languages, but if for example an old booster is put between central and track, the mfx might no longer be possible.
And the language is the clue to understanding.
- no sign means that the loco can be run by Motorola, but not much extra functions. Possibly light can be controlled, 15 or 80 adresses, 14 speed steps. Most is enough IMHO, except there are no extra functions. The decoder might be a cheaper one, with bad slow speed behaviour, but you can't tell.
- FX means that there are up to 4 functions f1-f4 beside directional light. Still Motorola only, which is no limit. There is reason to believe that run behaviour is good.
- MFX means that there are up to 16 functions in total, 9 if run by Mobile Station or 6021. Most of those we've seen are just different sound effects, and are heard spontaneously also if no button is pressed. Mfx locos are easier to start play with; as soon they are placed on a track controlled by MobStat or CS, thet make themselves known to the central. But thet also tend to be more sensitive to dirt on track (which they share with some FX locos).

I hope you can sort those words out that you find too technical, and keep some. On problem is when you do this, that different people would summarize in different ways, possibly different from your needs. If you ask Märklin for example, they would say that mfx is the real new thing, new technology etc, a must for the future, just as marketing people tend to do. But there is very little new, very little needed in mfx IMHO. If the market will adopt this mfx protocol however, you might in 10 years or so, get a situation where Motorola is no longer supported, not because it's bad but because it's not new. But we haven't seen the success of mfx yet.

Regards,
Lars
Offline nevw  
#5 Posted : 13 November 2005 10:39:56(UTC)
nevw

Australia   
Joined: 27/08/2005(UTC)
Posts: 11,071
Location: Murrumba Downs QLD
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Lars Westerlind

Regards,
Lars


Lars,

Thanks things are now clear, the Finance Director is buting me a 29795 Ice Train Starter Set for Christmas and I was convcerned that there may be a clash with the Loks that I now have which are MFX.

Thanks again.

NevSmileSmile
NOt wearing the Pink Pinny, which is hard to see and now I have a white Pinny which also is hard to see against MY pure white Skin Still have 2 new shiny tin Hips that is badly in Need of Repair matching rusting tin shoulders
and a hose pipe on the aorta
Junior member of the Banana Club, a reformist and an old Goat with a Bad memory, loafing around
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.362 seconds.