Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline Choobacca  
#1 Posted : 26 February 2012 11:29:53(UTC)
Choobacca


Joined: 26/02/2012(UTC)
Posts: 8
Hi

I've been using Trix HO C Track (Märklin's poor cousin!) for just over a year and have to say I'm very impressed with it. It looks good and fits together really well.

The only thing that I find slightly annoying about 'C Track' geometry is that points or turnouts require a shorter 172mm straight piece of track instead of the standard 188mm straight track.

Using points to connect a Radius 1, Radius 2 and Radius 3 oval of track together can also be quite expensive as it requires 8 turnouts! It's even more expensive if you want to fit decoders and turnout motors to all of them.

So, I had an idea for a 'Scissor' track or 'Hosenträger' track that would allow the 3 ovals of track to be connected without the 172mm short straight track pieces. It would also reduce the number of turnouts required to connect 3 ovals of track together to just 2 points or turnouts.

Another advantage of the 'Scissor' or 'Hosenträger' point is that it would only require 1 turnout motor and decoder on each side instead of 2.

I wrote to Märklin about the idea and was hoping that a few positive comments from forum members might encourage Märklin to make it. What do you think?

Here's a picture of what it might look like:

UserPostedImage
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Choobacca
Offline H0  
#2 Posted : 26 February 2012 13:11:30(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,488
Location: DE-NW
Hi!

Here's my Hosenträger:
UserPostedImage

Currently I use the wider space between the tracks for a platform at a station.

A Hosenträger for 77 mm distance and a slim Hosenträger for 64 mm would be nice - but I'd prefer them to have turnout motors so I can control them individually.

IMHO a slim Double Slip Switch would be more important (not likely to come in the near future).


Originally Posted by: Choobacca Go to Quoted Post
The only thing that I find slightly annoying about 'C Track' geometry is that points or turnouts require a shorter 172mm straight piece of track instead of the standard 188mm straight track.
I'm afraid I don't get your point. By using two different lengths they avoid the need for short 8 mm pieces of tracks that would be difficult or impossible to make for C track.
Clever idea, not annoying for me - but for complicated track plans I need a computer to make it fit perfectly. I take this as a challenge.
Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by H0
Offline GSRR  
#3 Posted : 26 February 2012 13:24:09(UTC)
GSRR

United States   
Joined: 01/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,339
Location: USA
Also have a look at the post from Caplin.

General MRR H0 Scale My--Hosentrager


https://www.marklin-user...260_My--Hosentrager.aspx




r/Thomas




ETE UserPostedImage ECoS iTrain TouchCab C-Gleis German Era Id & IIIb USA Era IIIb SBB Era III SJ Era IV GC Era V
Offline GSRR  
#4 Posted : 26 February 2012 13:38:45(UTC)
GSRR

United States   
Joined: 01/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,339
Location: USA
Originally Posted by: H0 Go to Quoted Post
Hi!

Here's my Hosenträger:
UserPostedImage

Currently I use the wider space between the tracks for a platform at a station.

A Hosenträger for 77 mm distance and a slim Hosenträger for 64 mm would be nice - but I'd prefer them to have turnout motors so I can control them individually.

IMHO a slim Double Slip Switch would be more important (not likely to come in the near future).


Originally Posted by: Choobacca Go to Quoted Post
The only thing that I find slightly annoying about 'C Track' geometry is that points or turnouts require a shorter 172mm straight piece of track instead of the standard 188mm straight track.
I'm afraid I don't get your point. By using two different lengths they avoid the need for short 8 mm pieces of tracks that would be difficult or impossible to make for C track.
Clever idea, not annoying for me - but for complicated track plans I need a computer to make it fit perfectly. I take this as a challenge.




Tom,

For part numbers?

2*24611
2*24612
2*24077
1*24649



r/Thomas


ETE UserPostedImage ECoS iTrain TouchCab C-Gleis German Era Id & IIIb USA Era IIIb SBB Era III SJ Era IV GC Era V
Offline H0  
#5 Posted : 26 February 2012 13:49:01(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,488
Location: DE-NW
Hi, Thomas,
2*24094, not 24077.
Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
Offline GSRR  
#6 Posted : 26 February 2012 16:28:09(UTC)
GSRR

United States   
Joined: 01/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,339
Location: USA
Originally Posted by: H0 Go to Quoted Post
Hi, Thomas,
2*24094, not 24077.




Thank you Tom.



r/Thomas


ETE UserPostedImage ECoS iTrain TouchCab C-Gleis German Era Id & IIIb USA Era IIIb SBB Era III SJ Era IV GC Era V
Offline Choobacca  
#7 Posted : 07 April 2012 14:24:55(UTC)
Choobacca


Joined: 26/02/2012(UTC)
Posts: 8
Originally Posted by: H0 Go to Quoted Post
Hi!

Here's my Hosenträger:
UserPostedImage

Currently I use the wider space between the tracks for a platform at a station.

A Hosenträger for 77 mm distance and a slim Hosenträger for 64 mm would be nice - but I'd prefer them to have turnout motors so I can control them individually.

IMHO a slim Double Slip Switch would be more important (not likely to come in the near future).


Originally Posted by: Choobacca Go to Quoted Post
The only thing that I find slightly annoying about 'C Track' geometry is that points or turnouts require a shorter 172mm straight piece of track instead of the standard 188mm straight track.
I'm afraid I don't get your point. By using two different lengths they avoid the need for short 8 mm pieces of tracks that would be difficult or impossible to make for C track.
Clever idea, not annoying for me - but for complicated track plans I need a computer to make it fit perfectly. I take this as a challenge.

Looks good ThumpUp

Does anybody else like the idea of a Scissor track? I thought we might be able to convince Märklin to make one with a 77mm spacing and maybe an Express version with 64mm spacing.

Offline petestra  
#8 Posted : 07 April 2012 16:42:05(UTC)
petestra

United States   
Joined: 27/07/2009(UTC)
Posts: 5,862
Location: Leesburg,VA.USA
I have the same as Tom's on my layout, at the upper level station. I also liked the idea for the wider platform. PeterThumpUp
Offline Mark5  
#9 Posted : 08 April 2012 23:09:17(UTC)
Mark5

Canada   
Joined: 29/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,422
Location: Montreal, Canada
Originally Posted by: Choobacca Go to Quoted Post


Does anybody else like the idea of a Scissor track? I thought we might be able to convince Märklin to make one with a 77mm spacing and maybe an Express version with 64mm spacing.



Its a great idea for close track.
I think it would be worth it for Marklin to make it, but its quite a special item and would be costly.
I am finding DIY solutions as I make my plans, but doing so with switches gets rather complicated.
Still toying with ideas for "under the table" turn-out mounts for K track.

I would say Marklin should work first on cheaper and simpler solutions for under-the-table mounts and then engineer ways that things can fit together and synchronize easily.

- Mark

DB DR FS NS SNCF c. 1950-65, fan of station architecture esp. from 1920-70.
In single point perspective, where do track lines meet?
Offline mike c  
#10 Posted : 08 April 2012 23:33:54(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,269
Location: Montreal, QC
I would like to see this with the spacing for the various radii, so it could be used between R1 and R2 but also between the larger radii.
As far as 172 vs 188mm, ideally, such a switch would require two 180mm sections so that the overall length of the track was 360mm, the equivalent of one 172mm and one 188mm segment.

This could also be offered as a curved switch, which would allow modellers for more straight track space for use as a station area or as a mainline or even to allow for multiple switches coming into the station area.

Regards

Mike C
Offline Mark5  
#11 Posted : 10 April 2012 00:57:00(UTC)
Mark5

Canada   
Joined: 29/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,422
Location: Montreal, Canada
One quick comment. I have been spending a lot of time reading online about hand-laid track and so been fantasizing about doing it myself... some day. It would wonderful to see any examples of a hand-laid 'Hosenträger' for 3-rail and especially for curved switches or a curved 'Hosenträger' where the scissors is on the curve itself. Of course, I realize I am totally running ahead of myself, but its nice to think about.

A bit off-topic but ...
Check out these crazy hand-laid curved turn-outs with what appear to be copper sleepers.
I am guessing he is using battery powered locos that don't require the track to conduct to the train.
Have no idea yet....


Edit: Ok, found Tim's company page, very interesting stuff...
... now how to adapt this to Marklin or for a Hosenträger:
http://www.handlaidtrack.com/
DB DR FS NS SNCF c. 1950-65, fan of station architecture esp. from 1920-70.
In single point perspective, where do track lines meet?
Offline Loadmaster  
#12 Posted : 10 April 2012 01:11:50(UTC)
Loadmaster

United States   
Joined: 03/02/2010(UTC)
Posts: 898
Location: So Cal
MM,

Check out this layout for hand laid track & 3rd rail.
Wolfie passed away last year and was a member of the ETE group in San Francisco Chapter.

http://www.wmlcs.com/wml-layout/wmls_layout.htm

He was quite a fellow and would help anyone that asked even if you were not a customer.

Rob
HOac and Z scale running SBB/BLS Era IV-V
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Loadmaster
Offline Mark5  
#13 Posted : 10 April 2012 06:06:23(UTC)
Mark5

Canada   
Joined: 29/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,422
Location: Montreal, Canada
You can download a template to hand lay a Hosenträger here:
http://www.handlaidtrack...Template-p/tt-ho-c-8.htm

Let me know if anyone can manage to do this with a marklinized plan.... would love to see how!
- Mark
DB DR FS NS SNCF c. 1950-65, fan of station architecture esp. from 1920-70.
In single point perspective, where do track lines meet?
Offline Western Pacific  
#14 Posted : 10 April 2012 08:19:19(UTC)
Western Pacific

Sweden   
Joined: 19/09/2009(UTC)
Posts: 841
Location: Lidingö, Sweden
Originally Posted by: MM-MarkMontreal Go to Quoted Post
You can download a template to hand lay a Hosenträger here:
http://www.handlaidtrack...Template-p/tt-ho-c-8.htm

Let me know if anyone can manage to do this with a marklinized plan.... would love to see how!
- Mark


Mark, have you seen this Weichen-Walter?

In German, but if you click "Weichenübersicht", then you can find them for both K and C tracks under 1:87. Perhaps you'll find something that may suit you.
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Western Pacific
Offline mvd71  
#15 Posted : 10 April 2012 12:50:26(UTC)
mvd71

New Zealand   
Joined: 09/08/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,946
Location: Auckland,
Marklin have done this in one gauge, so it is possible that we may see one, but don't hold your breath.

I would love to see one done in K track, but I don't expect it. I even resorted to making in on K track for the entrance to a staging yard.
If I remeber I'll take a photo and try to upload it.

Cheers...

Mike.
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by mvd71
Offline rmsailor  
#16 Posted : 10 April 2012 13:39:50(UTC)
rmsailor

Scotland   
Joined: 20/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 571
Location: Kirkcaldy, Fife
Hi MM,

Using printed circuit board to make sleepers for hand-laid soldered track is an old established technique. The rails are insulated by cutting the copper between the rails. This can be observed in the photographs.

Bob M
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by rmsailor
Offline Token  
#17 Posted : 11 April 2012 08:37:10(UTC)
Token

Australia   
Joined: 25/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 300
Location: Sydney, NSW
Hi all,

I agree with the idea. Having a layout with a 4 track through station, this provided many hours of planning to get right. Working with what I had, I came up with the following;

UserPostedImage

As it turned out, I was able to rather nicely work the extreme width between the tracks into the plan but I suspect I could have done a whole lot more if Marklin had produced a cross-over to suit 77mm spacing.

As you can see, much more work to be done yet BigGrin

Regards,

Token.
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Token
Offline Mark5  
#18 Posted : 16 April 2012 07:53:15(UTC)
Mark5

Canada   
Joined: 29/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,422
Location: Montreal, Canada
Originally Posted by: Western Pacific Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: MM-MarkMontreal Go to Quoted Post
You can download a template to hand lay a Hosenträger here:
http://www.handlaidtrack...Template-p/tt-ho-c-8.htm

Let me know if anyone can manage to do this with a marklinized plan.... would love to see how!
- Mark


Mark, have you seen this Weichen-Walter?

In German, but if you click "Weichenübersicht", then you can find them for both K and C tracks under 1:87. Perhaps you'll find something that may suit you.


Thanks so much, WP, ... Woot these are truly beautiful, there is something about hand-laid track that really gets me jazzed, the slow easy curves and the variety created in thoughtful topography .... now, ah, how to insulate a 3rd rail row of studs (aka pukos) inside the hosentrager track?
hmmm



Originally Posted by: mvd71 Go to Quoted Post
Marklin have done this in one gauge, so it is possible that we may see one, but don't hold your breath.

I would love to see one done in K track, but I don't expect it. I even resorted to making in on K track for the entrance to a staging yard.
If I remeber I'll take a photo and try to upload it.

Cheers...

Mike.


We will have to create our own version of K-track.
Who is in on setting up a little cottage industry for K-track hosentragers? Wink
I could see this pushing any craftsman's ability to the brink... but the challenge of it is there.


Originally Posted by: rmsailor Go to Quoted Post
Hi MM,
Using printed circuit board to make sleepers for hand-laid soldered track is an old established technique. The rails are insulated by cutting the copper between the rails. This can be observed in the photographs. Bob M


Happy to learn about it and thanks for letting me know. Cutting the copper makes perfect sense now that I think about it.
I like how handlaidrail.com has guides to get the rails in a template too, but I can see the limitations of that when doing a variety of radii.


Originally Posted by: Token Go to Quoted Post
Hi all,
I agree with the idea. Having a layout with a 4 track through station, this provided many hours of planning to get right. Working with what I had, I came up with the following.. [image in previous post]

As it turned out, I was able to rather nicely work the extreme width between the tracks into the plan but I suspect I could have done a whole lot more if Marklin had produced a cross-over to suit 77mm spacing.

As you can see, much more work to be done yet BigGrin
Regards,
Token.


Good work, and nice resolution on that. Helps to see how you resolved the situation along with multiple rails and slip switches.

- Mark in Montreal.

DB DR FS NS SNCF c. 1950-65, fan of station architecture esp. from 1920-70.
In single point perspective, where do track lines meet?
Offline Mark5  
#19 Posted : 20 April 2012 21:38:44(UTC)
Mark5

Canada   
Joined: 29/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 1,422
Location: Montreal, Canada
I was looking up concrete sleeper and their history but instead I found some beautiful IRL scissor switches aka Hosenträgers.

There is also a fair bit there on IRL 3-rail systems and track.

To see the Hosenträgers, scroll to the very end of the long page...

....a great little bit of history and fab photos all the same:
http://homepage.ntlworld...russelliott/3rd-4th.html

Worth a look, and with track close, side by side.
- Mark
DB DR FS NS SNCF c. 1950-65, fan of station architecture esp. from 1920-70.
In single point perspective, where do track lines meet?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.711 seconds.