Joined: 17/04/2003(UTC) Posts: 997 Location: Netherlands
|
Hi all, Just a thought: Would it be possible to feed the stator field coil of an existing AC motor straight from pick-up shoe to mass, through a diode bridge + capacitor ? This would eliminate the need for a permanent magnet (at the cost of power consumption). What is the magnetic field strength that needs to be achieved  Gregor
|
|
|
|
Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC) Posts: 655 Location: Buenos Aires,
|
Hi Gregor, you should limit the max. current flowing thru the field coils to avoid them to get burned. You should find a method to cut current fed to the coils when the Loco is stopped. The best alternative I know is to install an Uhlenbrock 75200 which was especially designed for that task: load control with AC motors. Regards, |
Jorge Vilarrubí Buenos Aires ARGENTINA |
|
|
|
Joined: 17/04/2003(UTC) Posts: 997 Location: Netherlands
|
Thanks Jorge,
Why should the current be cut when the train stops ? The magnet can be enabled all the time (like the real permanent magnet). It will have some power consumption, but that shouldn't be a problem.
Is there a way to measure the field strength of the permanent magnets ? This would enable me to create the same strenght using the old stator assy.
Best regards, Gregor
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/03/2002(UTC) Posts: 217 Location: ,
|
Hi!
There have been reports of burned out field coils that have been continuously fed by digital track power via diodes. In analog those coils rarely experince 16V all the time as they would do in digital. Uhlenbrock feeds about 250 mA current to the field coil (about 4Watts). So turning off the coil is a substantial power savings if you have only a 32W trafo. In analog, the field coil is in series with the rotor. So maybe by adding a resistor of similar resistance as the rotor would reduce the current to the field coils to a safer level, as Jorge suggested.
I, too, would suggest 75200 or similar (the 76200 is coming out) or replace the coil with a Hamo magnet.
Hans |
Hans ... Epoch I to V, M-track, IB with MS |
|
|
|
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC) Posts: 2,578 Location: Sweden
|
Quote:[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:In analog, the field coil is in series with the rotor. So maybe by adding a resistor of similar resistance as the rotor would reduce the current to the field coils to a safer level, as Jorge suggested. If you just measure the DC resistance of the rotor and add a corresponding resistor, you will get a too low value (too high current). In analog, the motor is fed by AC, and the AC impedance is higher than the DC resistance. (Impedance and resistance isn't exactly the same thing, but for this purpose you can consider them equivalent.) Also, there is a backward EMF generated in the rotor when it rotates. This effectively reduces the voltage over the field coil, and thus the current. With a given rotor voltage, the strength of the motor is proportional to the field strength of the field magnet, which is proportional to the field coil current up to a saturation point. When the iron is saturated, further increase of the field coil current will increase the field strength very little. The speed of the motor is inversely proportional to the field strength. So, higher field coil current will give a stronger but slower motor.
|
|
|
|
Joined: 17/04/2003(UTC) Posts: 997 Location: Netherlands
|
Hi All,
Per, thank you for your explanation. I understand it up to the last sentence. Why is the speed inversely proportional to the field strength ? I thought that rotor momentum is proportional to rotor current and field strength. The load line of the driven equipment links the momentum to the speed. For a higher field strength and equal rotor current, the momentum would increase, and with that the speed, I would have thought. What am I missing here ????
Gregor
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC) Posts: 2,578 Location: Sweden
|
The fact that the speed is inversely proportional to the field strength may seem confusing at first. It is of course only valid at ideal conditions, but generally it is true that decreased field strength gives a faster motor, unless the load is very heavy.
So, why ? The rotor generates a backward EMF (Ve) which is proportional to speed (n) and field strength (f): Ve = k x n x f , where k is a constant specific to a certain motor. If the motor runs with low load, it accelerates until the EMF balances the applied voltage (V) on the rotor. Thus, if we ignore the losses in the motor, so that V = Ve, we get: n = V / (k x f), i.e. speed is inversely proportional to field strength.
I noted that I had made an error in my previous post: I wrote "With a given rotor current", it should be "With a given rotor voltage". I have edited the previous post to correct it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/03/2002(UTC) Posts: 217 Location: ,
|
I knew I should have been more specific :).
Hans |
Hans ... Epoch I to V, M-track, IB with MS |
|
|
|
Joined: 19/03/2004(UTC) Posts: 976 Location: Gorizia, Italy
|
A very good technical explanation perz!
Infact in Italy where locomotives are DC voltage fed (3000 V) to increase the speed the field strength is reduced as the running characteristics of such a motor has a hyperbolic behaviour (less speed=more torque; more speed=less torque). The field strength reduction is achieved reducing the current flowing through the field coil of the stator by means of shunt, i.e. short-circuiting some coils of the field coil. In this type of motor the field coil is connected in serie with the rotor winding (yes as in older Marklin AC motors).
One thing more: in AC fed circuits in addition to resistance and impedance also the so called inductance is present, due to the fact that the coils are made of many turns of isolated copper wire on a magnetic circuit. If you remember the Pitagora's law, you can consider the impedance as the longest side of a rectangular triangle, where the other sides are the resistance and the inductance (so 90 degrees turned one in respect to the other). A drawing would explain better what I said, but you can pick up a geometry book and refresh your school knowledge (I think this doesn't apply to perz).
Renato
|
|
|
|
Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC) Posts: 655 Location: Buenos Aires,
|
Quote:[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Hans_Dietrich <br />Hi!
There have been reports of burned out field coils that have been continuously fed by digital track power via diodes. In analog those coils rarely experince 16V all the time as they would do in digital. Uhlenbrock feeds about 250 mA current to the field coil (about 4Watts). So turning off the coil is a substantial power savings if you have only a 32W trafo. In analog, the field coil is in series with the rotor. So maybe by adding a resistor of similar resistance as the rotor would reduce the current to the field coils to a safer level, as Jorge suggested.
I, too, would suggest 75200 or similar (the 76200 is coming out) or replace the coil with a Hamo magnet.
Hans
Uhlenbrock 75200 limits the current by means of a constant current circuit. It has a parameter used to adjust the value of the current. Regards, |
Jorge Vilarrubí Buenos Aires ARGENTINA |
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.