Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline sirgawain123  
#1 Posted : 28 July 2004 22:49:57(UTC)
sirgawain123


Joined: 28/07/2004(UTC)
Posts: 21
Location: ,
After 25 years frozen,and now being a father of a 4 year old kid, my marklinism reappeared a couple of months ago as the kid convinced (was he, or was i?)me to buy a delta start set. So , in this months the illness is getting bigger, and i have converted to delta/digital the lokos i kept from when i was young, and am building a mixed C/M layout.
The greatest advantage i find in digital is being able to drive several lokos in the same track. But having only one 4f,its either me or the kid, but not both of us simultaneously, controlling one loko each of us.In order to do that, the marklin route would be buying a delta pilot.but delta pilot a/is hard to find at dealers.
b/is expensive for what it does c/is limited to controll lokos only at a given address (80?).
Now to the question:
AS its easy to find cheap 4fs at ebay:is ther a way to interconnect two 4fs (even by connecting their insides, not external connections)so they run simultaneously on same track, given the same delta loko adress is not selected at same time by both 4fs?
That would provide much more playability for me and the kid

Best regards from Spain

Offline Webmaster  
#2 Posted : 29 July 2004 00:14:50(UTC)
Webmaster


Joined: 25/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 11,165
Hi, and welcome to the forum.

To interconnect 2 66045 units is not "doable"...
And certainly not connecting them to the same electrical track circuit...

You can make your own "Delta pilot" easily, but the address 80 limitation is of course still there.

What would be perfect for you, would be an Intellibox (2 throttles), but it is a bit on the expensive side...

I am sure our member Lars will tell us about Daisy as an alternative. In fact, I myself would like to know more about the Uhlenbrock Daisy as alternative to Delta...
Juhan - "Webmaster", at your service...
He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Old Chinese Proverb]
Offline sirgawain123  
#3 Posted : 29 July 2004 01:59:23(UTC)
sirgawain123


Joined: 28/07/2004(UTC)
Posts: 21
Location: ,
thanks for welcome and answer:
by "not doable", you mean its not doable, or what you mean is "not doable without opening/tinkering/solding...inside the 66045 ´s?
how can i make a delta pilot?url? Lars, please.........
i NEED a 2nd CHEAP throtle now (better if not limited to address 80), but happy keeping in Delta until all the hype regarding M systems settles down and the real (if any) advantages get clear from the marketing.I see the future with 2 mobile stations....(so i dont want to dump big cash on this stop-gap 2nd throttle)!!
Offline Webmaster  
#4 Posted : 29 July 2004 02:59:14(UTC)
Webmaster


Joined: 25/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 11,165
UserPostedImage
Juhan - "Webmaster", at your service...
He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Old Chinese Proverb]
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#5 Posted : 29 July 2004 07:10:56(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:I see the future with 2 mobile stations

Hmmmmm.... two Mobile Stations in the same layout?
It would be the first time two digital systems can work together without damaging each other... I wouldn't bet...
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline john black  
#6 Posted : 29 July 2004 11:35:38(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Welcome, Sirgawain123 Smile

I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline kgsjoqvist  
#7 Posted : 29 July 2004 11:53:34(UTC)
kgsjoqvist

Sweden   
Joined: 04/06/2002(UTC)
Posts: 754
Location: Täby
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:It would be the first time two digital systems can work together without damaging each other... I wouldn't bet...


Shouldn't be a problem, because one of the Mobile Stations is the master, and the other just sends its instructions to it. The only problem would be if both try to run the same loco, but I suppose that the loco address is "locked" to prevent that.

You can get the same functionality with a Daisy combined with Fred, if you prefer Uhlenbrock equipment. I doubt that it would be cheaper, however...

A much cheaper solution would be to divide the layout in two halves, connect a Delta 4f to each part and run them separately. When the loco leaves the area, you have to change to the other trafo (just in the good old analogue days). I would recommend a transition track fed with "pure AC" between the digital circuits, to avoid confusing the signals. With this setup you can be two simultaneous users, as long as you stay on your own side of the layout. And you can have 4 locos on the layout - having 2 of them under immediate control and 2 standing still or rolling in constant speed.
K-G / H0 and Z model train user
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#8 Posted : 29 July 2004 15:23:23(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Shouldn't be a problem, because one of the Mobile Stations is the master, and the other just sends its instructions to it.

Afaik, one Mobile Station could be slave to a Central, not sure if it can be a slave to another Mobile Station. Anybody can answer?

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:You can get the same functionality with a Daisy combined with Fred, if you prefer Uhlenbrock equipment. I doubt that it would be cheaper, however...

Motorola and DCC, 256 turnouts, 9999 Loks, but no feedback from still-to-be-seen Mfx Decoders.

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:A much cheaper solution would be to divide the layout in two halves, connect a Delta 4f to each part and run them separately. When the loco leaves the area, you have to change to the other trafo (just in the good old analogue days).

Anyway you are limited to 5 addresses that are the same in both systems

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:I would recommend a transition track fed with "pure AC" between the digital circuits, to avoid confusing the signals. With this setup you can be two simultaneous users, as long as you stay on your own side of the layout. And you can have 4 locos on the layout - having 2 of them under immediate control and 2 standing still or rolling in constant speed.

Whenever AC current gets into the Digital Central, all of them, the output stage of the unit gets fried. At least one, sometimes both Darlington transistors get damaged. I don't know what method could be used for the isolation segment. In old times, when Märklin= was launched, they recommended a car light bulb in series with the DC fed track section used to resolve the DC-loop problem. The risk of a failed experiment is a couple BDX33/BDX34 transistors put into orbit...
Regards,
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline john black  
#9 Posted : 29 July 2004 15:45:04(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by jorge_vilarrubi
<br />Afaik, one Mobile Station could be slave to a Central, not sure if it can be a slave to another Mobile Station. Anybody can answer?


Hi Jorge Smile: I asked the very same question some days ago in another topic and Dikken knew the solution - when running two Mobile Stations that on Port I of Ugly Box is always the Master.

Best Regards
John

I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline sirgawain123  
#10 Posted : 29 July 2004 23:47:16(UTC)
sirgawain123


Joined: 28/07/2004(UTC)
Posts: 21
Location: ,
in fact, my statement that i could see two mobile stations in the future was led by Dikken post. But this future has not arrived yet, and i want a stop-gap device.
Two electrically isolated circuits is not what i want. i want to drive a loko through the whole layout while my kid drive his own one. The QnD Delta pilot would be a right solution if it wasnt for the adress only nr.80 limitation.
pitty the grey connection on 4f is an analog input only.
thanks n regards
today sunny although windy.
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#11 Posted : 30 July 2004 00:55:02(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote: when running two Mobile Stations that on Port I of Ugly Box is always the Master.

This could resolve the addressing problem, power consumption remains pending. The power stage from the slave unit will not feed the track, since the Ugly Box is the only connection to the track. Boosters are only a project so far.
Anyway, you can control 2 Loks simultaneously with 2 Mobiles.
Regards,
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline sirgawain123  
#12 Posted : 30 July 2004 01:57:08(UTC)
sirgawain123


Joined: 28/07/2004(UTC)
Posts: 21
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by jorge_vilarrubi
<br /> Boosters are only a project so far.


One more reason to wait longer.

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by sirgawain123
<br />I see the future with 2 mobile stations....(so i dont want to dump big cash on this stop-gap 2nd throttle)!!

Future not yet here, then.[}:)]

Still cant understand how a 4f can talk to a PC, but not to another 4f [:(]

best regards
Offline perz  
#13 Posted : 30 July 2004 02:13:26(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Still cant understand how a 4f can talk to a PC, but not to another 4f


It isn't the 4f that can talk to the PC, it's the PC that can talk to the 4f. There is "direct drive" SW that can drive a booster directly from the PC. Since the 4f can be used as a booster, you can drive your layout from the PC through the 4f.
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#14 Posted : 30 July 2004 04:14:36(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote: Since the 4f can be used as a booster,

Hi Perz, a friend of mine wants to use a D4f as a booster and I don't have the knowhow. Could you please tell me how to do? Thank you!
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline john black  
#15 Posted : 30 July 2004 18:57:50(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by jorge_vilarrubi
<br />Anyway, you can control 2 Loks simultaneously with 2 Mobiles.


Fine that's all I need on a small digital layout. Well, although there's still no delivery of the real mccoy we become wiser every day ... Smile

I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline perz  
#16 Posted : 31 July 2004 01:02:58(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
This describes how to use the 6604 as a booster. It should be the same with the 4f.

http://www.marklin.nl/digital/images/schema-6604.gif

Another interesting link I found shows that it is possible to patch an old 6604 to get the equivalent function of a 4f:

http://www.marklin.com/tech/digital1/images/6604+.jpeg
Offline laalves  
#17 Posted : 31 July 2004 01:28:27(UTC)
laalves


Joined: 10/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,162
Location: Portugal
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by jorge_vilarrubi
<br />
Quote:
Shouldn't be a problem, because one of the Mobile Stations is the master, and the other just sends its instructions to it.

Afaik, one Mobile Station could be slave to a Central, not sure if it can be a slave to another Mobile Station. Anybody can answer?

Yes, I can, just read the online manual for the Mobile Station. An adapter will be released to connect a Mobile Station to the Central Station plug in the ugly box. This will become the Master Mobile, the other will be the slave. Current limited to the Master's output rating. Further, AFAI could understand, even with two Mobiles, you're still limited to 10 addresses.

Luis
Offline sirgawain123  
#18 Posted : 31 July 2004 04:04:22(UTC)
sirgawain123


Joined: 28/07/2004(UTC)
Posts: 21
Location: ,
is it possible to download the online manual for the Mobile Station?where?
many thanks
Offline perz  
#19 Posted : 31 July 2004 17:05:30(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#20 Posted : 31 July 2004 21:59:10(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by perz
<br />This describes how to use the 6604 as a booster. It should be the same with the 4f.

Thanks for your answer. I've installed several Delta 6604 as boosters. 6604 works as an amplifier, taking the input from the red wire. The problem I see with 66045 is that the red wire is missing, thus I don't know where to input the digital signal.
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline sirgawain123  
#21 Posted : 31 July 2004 22:59:39(UTC)
sirgawain123


Joined: 28/07/2004(UTC)
Posts: 21
Location: ,
I have just spent some time "googling", and only info found related to delta as booster, is about "old" 6604, NOT 66045 new delta 4f. So,m if any1 Knows a URL, please...share
Best regards
Offline perz  
#22 Posted : 31 July 2004 23:59:39(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:The problem I see with 66045 is that the red wire is missing, thus I don't know where to input the digital signal.


There should be a blue connector marked "D" somewhere that replaces the red wire. But I do not know exactly where, since I have never seen a 66045 in real life.
Offline john black  
#23 Posted : 02 August 2004 11:10:38(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by perz
<br />The mobile station manual online:
https://www.marklin-users.net/fo...ault.aspx?g=posts&t=1559


Sorry that link doesn't work, sending you in circles all the time ... [xx(]

Edit: Now it works just fine - many thanks, Per Smile

I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline perz  
#24 Posted : 02 August 2004 15:34:02(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
[url]Sorry that link doesn't work, sending you in circles all the time ... [/url]

The link sends you to another forum topic, that links to the manual. But anyway, here is the direct link:

http://www.maerklin.de/systems/bda-60652.pdf
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#25 Posted : 02 August 2004 15:41:56(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by perz
<br />
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:The problem I see with 66045 is that the red wire is missing, thus I don't know where to input the digital signal.


There should be a blue connector marked "D" somewhere that replaces the red wire. But I do not know exactly where, since I have never seen a 66045 in real life.


Correct. The 66045 should be used exactly as an 6605, using the blue connector for digital input. Meaning, the loco selector should be set in the rightmost "stop" position, and the two grey connector should be connected.

Uhlenbrock Daisy is surely an alternative which I like best in that situation, but it's not that cheap. With two Daisy handles, and one Power2 to connect the track (=one Daisy set, and one extra Daisy) you have a full digital system with two user friendly controls (not comparable with the Delta controls), allowing for f1-f4, DCC, turnout and signal control etc. It allow for 2 A which is skightly more than the expensive Mobile. And the system is rather cheap to extend with it's brilliant LocoNet bus. However, it's about EUR 300, probably more with that setup, and it's not known wether it will be able to control all functions of the new mfx decoders from Märklin.

Regards,
Lars
Offline sirgawain123  
#26 Posted : 02 August 2004 20:16:36(UTC)
sirgawain123


Joined: 28/07/2004(UTC)
Posts: 21
Location: ,
keeping in mind that regardless of the minDIN connection to the ugly box (connection track), at the end of the day, what we get from the ugly box is still the traditional red and brown to the track:
Shall we assume that 66045 (Delta 4f) is still usable as booster for Mobile station?confused
(my knowledge of both electronics & model railroad is sooo short......!!!)[}:)]

About having two daisyS, not time for big investment until mfx two way comms compatibility is achieved.

What i (and others) need is a CHEAP (so cheap it doesnt matter if it is not future proof) two throttle, no function, no isolated tracks, solution until the path to the future is clear. Two 66045 4fs would be an answer. pitty it is not. [:(]
¿can the 66045 be opened & manipulated to allow Delta pilot adress to be selectable out of adress 80 to any other of the four delta adresses? finding a feasible way to do that may be a good quest for the summer for those who really know about Marklin electronics.[:p]

Best regards
Offline nico van zon  
#27 Posted : 02 August 2004 20:38:56(UTC)
nico van zon


Joined: 25/07/2004(UTC)
Posts: 202
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by sirgawain123
<br />.....Shall we assume that 66045 (Delta 4f) is still usable as booster for Mobile station?confused
(my knowledge of both electronics & model railroad is sooo short......!!!)[}:)]

I don't think so! Because with the new System, the booster is inside the Mobile station. And this booster is probably of a different type. (H-bridge instead of +/- commutation)
Offline perz  
#28 Posted : 02 August 2004 22:20:39(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:I don't think so! Because with the new System, the booster is inside the Mobile station. And this booster is probably of a different type. (H-bridge instead of +/- commutation)


I don't agree. The booster is inside the Mobile station just as much as the booster is inside the 6021 or the IB. The Mobile station probably uses an H-bridge, but that doesn't stop you from using a 66045 as external booster. It only means you need to use different transformers for the Mobile station and the 66045, and not connect the ground wires of the two transformers together. But you would probably want a separate transformer for your extra booster anyway, wouldn't you ?

Offline nico van zon  
#29 Posted : 02 August 2004 22:57:15(UTC)
nico van zon


Joined: 25/07/2004(UTC)
Posts: 202
Location: ,
Perz, what I meant to say: if the MobStat uses a H-bridge, where other boosters use direct ground connection, the two won't work together. You would need a special interface to transfer the control signal to the fixed grounded booster in order to prevent a short cicuit. (if ever there is a possibility to get a control signal from the MobStat)
The big problem in understanding the new system is that Märklin provides lots of text about the system, but next to no information on how it sticks together technically.
Offline perz  
#30 Posted : 03 August 2004 01:26:43(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Perz, what I meant to say: if the MobStat uses a H-bridge, where other boosters use direct ground connection, the two won't work together. You would need a special interface to transfer the control signal to the fixed grounded booster in order to prevent a short cicuit. (if ever there is a possibility to get a control signal from the MobStat)
The big problem in understanding the new system is that Märklin provides lots of text about the system, but next to no information on how it sticks together technically.


There are two cases:

1. Using 66045 as a booster. This is what we are mainly discussing in this topic. For that specific case, your comment about H-bridge or not is definitely invalid. There is no problem. Look at the link I provided in an earlier topic! The control input to the 6604(5) is taken from the "red" track power, and the ground to the 6604(5) is taken from the "brown" track. The signal is there on the track, and it will look the same, whether the Mobile Station has an H-bridge or not doesn't matter.

The drawback with using the 6604(5) as a booster is that there is a delay through it, which means you can get problems when locos cross over between the "normal" and the boostered section. This problem is however exactly the same whether you use a Mobile Station or a 6021. That's why it is usually recommended to use the 6604(5) as an accessory booster and not as a track booster.

Another drawback (or maybe feature ?) with using 6604(5) as a booster is that an over-current situation on the booster will not feed back a stop signal to the system, as will be the case with a real booster.

2. Using a real booster, such as 6017. In this case you use the 5-wire booster interface. The 6017 has a 0 to +5 V signal referenced to track ground. We do not know anything about the booster interface of the Mobile Station yet. We do not even know if there are any plain booster signals in its interface. My guess is that the master and slave Mobile station use some other more intelligent protocol to communicate. Maybe the future "boosters" will do the same and maybe they will not just be simple amplifiers as they are today.

So probably the 6017 can not be used as a booster to the Mobile station without building some kind of interface. If you accept the same limitations as with the 6604(5) such an interface is very simple: it consists of two resistors to take down the voltage from 20 to 5 V, and a diode to short out the negative pulses so that only the positive pulses remain.






Offline kimmo  
#31 Posted : 07 August 2004 11:42:56(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by perz
<br />Another drawback (or maybe feature ?) with using 6604(5) as a booster is that an over-current situation on the booster will not feed back a stop signal to the system, as will be the case with a real booster.
I am using delta as an accessory booster. I once encountered an over-current situation, when I had a faulty accessory decoder in the circuit. Due to this, the delta unit kept tripping its internal over-current protection, giving a constant "clicking" sound from inside. Nothing got damaged, though, so the inside over-current protection was doing its job OK, even when the situation was permanently on. But it is true that it doesn't shut off the main output from the CU.
Kimmo
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.757 seconds.