Never heard of, however, I'm not using Tams. Maybe you have played too much with the brake compensation and/or acceleration/deceleration parameters in RR&Co, for the Tams engines? The use of virtual indicators could also cause some interesting features. In case of no success here, I would recommend that you post this issue in the http://www.freiwald.com/forum/?language=english forum ...OK, I can see you have done that already [:p]. Have you set the threshold speed for the Tams engines?

Funck

I have found the cause of the behaviour I described earlier, it has NOTHING to do with tams decoders, that was a pure coincidence.

This is what happens: when the controls of a loco are assigned to my digital system (my marklin 6021 + 6051) and i start a certain schedule for that loco, it starts the first schedule normally but stops when it is supposed to execute a succesor schedule.

When I assign controls of that same loco to RR&co the schedules behave like they should.

Is this intended behaviour or is there something wrong? I would like to permanently assign control to my marklin 6021 because my layout is partially manually controlled (it's a 'kopfbahnhoff' and i have to move the loco to the rear of the train). When control is assigned to the marklin 6021 i can immediately take the loco in manual control, otherwise i have to first deselect it or assign it to the 6021, a lot of hassle. Shunting by dragging the slider on the screen is not so practical.

I hope you understand what i mean.

Another thing I noticed and wanted to know: Does RR&Co support absolute direction control for marklin? All my decoders are capable of that (mot. II) but it doesn't seem to be on in RR&co. Or is this a limitation of the 6051? With my 'kopfbahnhoff' i have to be very carefull in what direction i leave my trains, absolute direction control could help here.

Bert