Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline White Buffalo  
#1 Posted : 31 March 2025 21:35:43(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota






I have been able to get 5 Blocks setup with an "enter" and "in" sensor (top of the photo - I need to rename a few). Thank you for all the help with this......

What I was wanting to do was have an "enter" , "in" and "exit" sensor for each of the sidings for these blocks as well. Unless you suggest something otherwise. This is a railyard and just need to get the Trains in their sidings - using BBT.

As a test, I was able to use one of the ECoS track detectors (this detects track occupancy for the switch ladder) as a Rocrail sensor and this is labeled Sensor 2.

After reading the Wiki am I correct that I can not use Sensor 2 for multiple blocks? I was thinking about using sensor 2 for the "enter" sensor for the 5 sidings in the top of the photo.

Thank you in advance....

Best regards,

Rich Siegmann
Offline White Buffalo  
#2 Posted : 31 March 2025 21:37:17(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Another question I have is, for the 5 lower sidings (labeled SB 1-5) the block symbol I used - is this acceptable to use in this way? Or is this designed for terminal stations?

The rectangle block symbol allow the block to be entered from either direction. one being the + side and the other the - side.

Perhaps the one I chose for the 5 lower blocks specifically identifies the direction of travel?

Is there reference explaining the different block symbols?




I was able to locate the Block State colors in the Bocks explanation, but not the explanation of the symbols themselves.

Edited by user 06 April 2025 22:27:13(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline White Buffalo  
#3 Posted : 31 March 2025 23:40:11(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
I really like the software and its capabilities, I am just fumbling with some of the details...... Confused

hhoping that the smart folks like JohnJean, Martti, applor, MCS51 and the others can guide me.BigGrin
Offline Martti Mäntylä  
#4 Posted : 01 April 2025 21:56:03(UTC)
Martti Mäntylä

Finland   
Joined: 15/11/2018(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Uusimaa, Helsinki
Hi Rich,

Yes, Rocrail allows a sensor to be shared by several blocks in this kind of a setting. Just define "Sensor 2" as the "enter" sensor for all five blocks and tick the box "Ignore events if not reserved". By this, only the block where the train is heading will see the "enter" event.

Likewise, the blocks sb1 ... sb5 could share a single "enter" sensor.

I am not sure if you really need the "exit" sensors. Rocrail documentation says that they are a safely measure covering the case that a train does not stop properly ad the "in" sensor.

I see that two pieces of track are not defined as blocks at all: the top track that bypasses the upper sidings and the track on the left. I think they should be defined as blocks with their own "enter" and "in" sensors to make things work.

The arrow-like block symbol is for setting "staging blocks" where you can park several trains, see https://wiki.rocrail.net...eblock:stagingblocks-en. This probably is not what you had in mind.
- Martti M.
Era III analog & digital (Rocrail, CAN Digital Bahn, Gleisbox/MS2, K83/K84), C & M tracks, some Spur 1
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Martti Mäntylä
Offline Martti Mäntylä  
#5 Posted : 01 April 2025 22:41:06(UTC)
Martti Mäntylä

Finland   
Joined: 15/11/2018(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Uusimaa, Helsinki
I forgot to mention that the "block with embedded sensors" (block symbol with small squares in the corners) is just a shorthand for a block with default "enter" and "in" sensors. As you have inserted regular sensors in these blocks, they are not needed, and indeed they clash with the idea of using "Sensor 2" as the shared "enter" sensor.
- Martti M.
Era III analog & digital (Rocrail, CAN Digital Bahn, Gleisbox/MS2, K83/K84), C & M tracks, some Spur 1
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Martti Mäntylä
Offline White Buffalo  
#6 Posted : 01 April 2025 22:46:09(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Thank you sir!ThumpUp


I started testing staging blocks since I was having a problem with the locomotives moving in the wrong direction. For some reason (sure it was something I did not set up correctly) I would occasionally experience the Locomotive changing direction even after swapping the locomotive direction. The Loc would then change direction at each sensor. I was struggling with the ESU Command Station and RocRail showing the same direction.

Trying to ensure the Locomotives would only move in one direction was a struggle. Selecting block enter side and logical direction does not seem to help in this situation. After more testing last night I came to the conclusion (what you stated above) that using staging blocks was not the solution to my problem of reversing direction, but I did learn some neat aspects about Rocrail & staging blocks. Mostly about watching the locomotive wait in the staging block until the destination block was clear. BigGrin.


Thank you for the explanation and use of the exit block, the exit sensor I had setup for Block 1 is actually wired to a ECoS Detector for track occupancy, So I assume I can switch that to track occupation to show the switch ladder is occupied, like the ESU Command Station shows in it's track plan.

and that is great to know now how to setup Sensor 2 (track ladder for Blocks 1-5) for multiple Blocks - thank you!

Offline White Buffalo  
#7 Posted : 01 April 2025 22:53:16(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
"I see that two pieces of track are not defined as blocks at all: the top track that bypasses the upper sidings and the track on the left. I think they should be defined as blocks with their own "enter" and "in" sensors to make things work."

I definitely need to do this when I remove the ESU Braking modules from the top 4 yards (if that is the correct term) next week.
Offline White Buffalo  
#8 Posted : 01 April 2025 23:01:42(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Originally Posted by: Martti Mäntylä Go to Quoted Post
I forgot to mention that the "block with embedded sensors" (block symbol with small squares in the corners) is just a shorthand for a block with default "enter" and "in" sensors. As you have inserted regular sensors in these blocks, they are not needed, and indeed they clash with the idea of using "Sensor 2" as the shared "enter" sensor.



If I chose to use a Block diagram with imbedded sensors - is it found in "Block Properties" to assign these imbedded sensors? Sorry for the multiple questions & posts..... you are a wealth of information and I still have a lot to learn. Appreciated all your help........

https://wiki.rocrail.net/doku.php?id=block:block-embededfb-en


Perhaps this is how - go to "BK_2" properties, then under the "Route" tab assign the sensor - select BK_2- or BK_2+?

Edited by user 06 April 2025 23:33:53(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline Martti Mäntylä  
#9 Posted : 02 April 2025 01:52:58(UTC)
Martti Mäntylä

Finland   
Joined: 15/11/2018(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Uusimaa, Helsinki
I have not used blocks with embedded sensors, so I have no experience to report on. It seems that with this feature Rocrail just saves you from the burden of defining the sensors yourself, and also fills the Route tab for you.

I think the track panel is more informative if all sensors are displayed in the same manner. I also prefer to assign names to the sensors myself.
- Martti M.
Era III analog & digital (Rocrail, CAN Digital Bahn, Gleisbox/MS2, K83/K84), C & M tracks, some Spur 1
Offline White Buffalo  
#10 Posted : 02 April 2025 03:12:32(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Thank you Martti,

I feel the same, with my eyes I like the separate sensor on the track plan as well. The red dot is much easier for me to recognize when it senses a contact.

Which type command station are you using? I ask because I was wondering if anyone else has experience in using the , ECoS Command Station (ESU) ECoS Detector and Detector Railcom combination. I have been able to implement the Detector and Detector RailCom's feedback into Rocrail thankfully. So, no need for contact tracks, just isolating the center rail (I a'm using Märklin C-Track).

Plus I am still trying to figure out how I corrected or the system corrected the reversing of the Locomotives, I was clicking away too much & too fast last night BigGrin



Offline Martti Mäntylä  
#11 Posted : 02 April 2025 21:13:23(UTC)
Martti Mäntylä

Finland   
Joined: 15/11/2018(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Uusimaa, Helsinki
Hi Rich,

I don't use a command station at all: in my setup, the Märkin trackbox 60166 serves as the "central station". It implements the essential function of converting incoming protocol commands to track format and serving digital power to the tracks. I use a CAN Digital CC-Schnitte to hook the trackbox to a computer and CAN Digital Gleisreporter boxes to handle feedbacks. Rocrail does all the rest. I can also control digital locomotives with a MS2 if I wish.

If I were in the business of converting locomotives to digital with sound, I would probably get a CS2 for CV editing, but so far I have been able to tinker CV's using the MS2 with the DCC protocol.

As to reversing the locomotives, I ended up writing two pieces of XML triggered with the "in" event to implement it. The other simply issues the "swap" command and the other invokes a 24V power source to reverse analog locomotives. This has the benefit that I can set a timer to delay the execution of the code to make sure that digital locomotives with a long braking delay come to full stop.
- Martti M.
Era III analog & digital (Rocrail, CAN Digital Bahn, Gleisbox/MS2, K83/K84), C & M tracks, some Spur 1
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Martti Mäntylä
Offline White Buffalo  
#12 Posted : 02 April 2025 21:26:53(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Very interesting, when you have time I would love to learn writing an .xml script!BigGrin

I'll have to read up on this subject:

https://wiki.rocrail.eu/doku.php?id=xmlscripting-en
Offline White Buffalo  
#13 Posted : 02 April 2025 21:45:57(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
perhaps my issue could be resolved within the block properties, ensuring the + or - in the block needing to be set on a specific side of the block.

example: putting the "+" on the block enter side and ensuring the block enter side in the block properties is specifically set to "+" or "-" instead of "+/-"

perhaps this will only allow traffic in one direction?

Edited by user 06 April 2025 23:34:34(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline Martti Mäntylä  
#14 Posted : 03 April 2025 02:01:40(UTC)
Martti Mäntylä

Finland   
Joined: 15/11/2018(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Uusimaa, Helsinki
According to Rocrail documentation, the "Block enter side" setting only relates to whether or not a loco coming from a certain direction will stop and wait in a block.

If your problem is that occasionally a locomotive gets confused about forward / backward directions, then it sounds like a decoder issue outside the scope of Rocrail. I also occasionally experience this with my BRE 19 (Märklin 3769) that has a fairly early version of the 6090 decoder.

For some kind of immediate relief, you can try issuing both of "swap logical direction" and "swap block enter side" commands from the block pop-up menu, effectively making Rocrail believe that the locomotive has been reversed.

- Martti M.
Era III analog & digital (Rocrail, CAN Digital Bahn, Gleisbox/MS2, K83/K84), C & M tracks, some Spur 1
Offline White Buffalo  
#15 Posted : 03 April 2025 06:19:26(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Will try that as well when it occurs again. thank you👍🏻. It has not done it tonight after I ran the route cleanup and deleted the routes that would allow it to run in the opposite direction.
Offline JohnjeanB  
#16 Posted : 03 April 2025 10:46:15(UTC)
JohnjeanB

France   
Joined: 04/02/2011(UTC)
Posts: 3,555
Location: Paris, France
Hi Rich
Originally Posted by: White Buffalo Go to Quoted Post
What I was wanting to do was have an "enter" , "in" and "exit" sensor for each of the sidings for these blocks as well. Unless you suggest something otherwise. This is a railyard and just need to get the Trains in their sidings - using BBT.

Block signals
There are only ENTER, IN, ENTER2IN, ENTERSHORTIN etc to chose from
No exit signal, the exit (make the block free) is when the train reaches the designated destination block (IN)

Sidings: for those where the full train is stored, only ENTER2IN is needed
for those where the loco, leaves the cars, you need:
- one virtual block with ENTER and IN
- one slave block attached to the block above with a ENTER2IN (same signal as the ENTER of the virtual block

General remark on Rocrail
Rocrail allows HUGE possibilities but when starting do try to make things simple and add complications later

Staging blocks
- I have one (7 sections of various lengths) it works well but can be easily be affected especially at start of day or following a short circuit. In that case, the easiest is to empty the block (remove all locos and reset / clear all sections) and fill it again
- if a loco enters a staging block the normal way (being controlled by Rocrail since a few blocks before) then - in my experience - it will NEVER go the other way EXCEPT with old decoders that do not receive the direction bit (MM protocol and not MM2 / MFX)
- of course the train length must be verified and a gap between train must be set (I selected 3 cm)
- staging blocks are great for a long strech of track (2 to 5 m) to store multiple trains
- staging when in competition with normal block will always NOT HAVE precedence: when a choice is possible, RR will always send the train to the normal block

Direction change of trains
My experience is when I started using Rocrail, I did not fully understand the 3 concepts with train direction:
- block exit side : the little arrow in the block must point to the destination direction. Attention, it may change when you do manual controls
- loco logical side: RR remembers if you are using the loco forwards or reverse. When the loco control block and when the direction button shows a double arrow to the right then the locos headlights must be lit on the GOOD side, otherwise you need to perform a loco LOGICAL change (of direction)
- the loco orientation

In version version of RR, train change direction ONLY IF EXPLICITLY ASKED (by an XML action or equivalent "swap" command) and NEVER have I observed a train changing direction by itself.

I have observed that when you try to control the train direction by the doubble arrow button (now pointing to the right) the order may be executed but after a while when passing over a sensor, RR or your Central Station may send a "keep alive" message including the direction (RR's direction) thus causing the loco to change direction.
Conclusion: with RR, NEVER use the direction change button or your central station direction change (RR is controlling so, sooner or later it wil FORCE a direction change) but rather use the direction logical change button followed by pressing TWICE on the direction button and you will be fine.

I am not sure if I convered all the issues but this is my first try.
Cheers
Jean
Offline White Buffalo  
#17 Posted : 03 April 2025 16:51:04(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
„ I have observed that when you try to control the train direction by the doubble arrow button (now pointing to the right) the order may be executed but after a while when passing over a sensor, RR or your Central Station may send a "keep alive" message including the direction (RR's direction) thus causing the loco to change direction.
Conclusion: with RR, NEVER use the direction change button or your central station direction change (RR is controlling so, sooner or later it wil FORCE a direction change) but rather use the direction logical change button followed by pressing TWICE on the direction button and you will be fine.“

I believe this is exactly what I was doing and experiencing with direction control. If the arrows in the Rocrail Locomotive throttle control were not facing the correct direction (or on the ESU), I would change direction with the ESU Mobile Controller, then the train would leave the block in the correct direction. when the train would hit the first sensor (enter) it would reverse direction. I would change the direction again via ESU or Rocrail throttle control screen. Then it would do it again when the train hit the next sensor (in).

Plus I had my blocks „+“ and „-„ symbols not facing consistently in the same direction.

Thank you for the insight and thorough explanation!

You both have helped & educated me - very grateful!

Offline White Buffalo  
#18 Posted : 07 April 2025 18:38:35(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Originally Posted by: Martti Mäntylä Go to Quoted Post
Hi Rich,

Yes, Rocrail allows a sensor to be shared by several blocks in this kind of a setting. Just define "Sensor 2" as the "enter" sensor for all five blocks and tick the box "Ignore events if not reserved". By this, only the block where the train is heading will see the "enter" event.

Likewise, the blocks sb1 ... sb5 could share a single "enter" sensor……,.


Danke sehr! Thank you, worked like a charm….and using the WIKI Demo mode sure speeds up the testing & learning process…
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by White Buffalo
Offline White Buffalo  
#19 Posted : 08 April 2025 01:20:28(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Question for physical sensor location and using Rocrail BBT (block brake timer)

Physically on the layout, what would be your recommendation for the sensor location for "in" block (siding_1). Currently I have the "enter" sensor at sensor 2. Should I put it near blue or red circle (or perhaps another location)?

Since the way I understand BBT, the train will slow from "V_min" to "stop" as soon as the "in" sensor is activated. Unless I enter the block & lengths - if I understand BBT correctly.


Offline applor  
#20 Posted : 08 April 2025 07:57:01(UTC)
applor

Australia   
Joined: 21/05/2004(UTC)
Posts: 1,768
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Each block should have its own Enter sensor after the turnout and it should be the majority of the block (or at the start only if not using detection for the whole track length), the In sensor should be near the end, about 20-30cm.

You will set BBT delay to slow the locomotive down at the right time after Enter so that it is at minimum speed by the time it reaches the In sensor, which is when it sets speed to 0 (after a short timer if required)
modelling era IIIa (1951-1955) Germany
Offline White Buffalo  
#21 Posted : 08 April 2025 08:23:11(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Thank you applor BigGrin , very much appreciated !
Offline JohnjeanB  
#22 Posted : 08 April 2025 10:23:22(UTC)
JohnjeanB

France   
Joined: 04/02/2011(UTC)
Posts: 3,555
Location: Paris, France
Hi Rich
Originally Posted by: White Buffalo Go to Quoted Post
Physically on the layout, what would be your recommendation for the sensor location for "in" block (siding_1). Currently I have the "enter" sensor at sensor 2. Should I put it near blue or red circle (or perhaps another location)?

On a single direction block;, I recommend 18 cm before the signal for the IN and all the rest of the block for the ENTER.
One bi-directional block, I recommend 18cm in front of each signal (IN for each direction which is also the ENTER for the other one) and the central section is the ENTERSHORTIN
Cheers
Jean

Offline White Buffalo  
#23 Posted : 08 April 2025 13:41:30(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Thank you! This forum is great, I would not be were I am without your help.
Offline White Buffalo  
#24 Posted : 08 April 2025 15:15:20(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
for my records

Offline White Buffalo  
#25 Posted : 08 April 2025 16:24:36(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
If there is something anyone sees that does not make sense or you would recommend I do differently, please feel free to let me know. You all have been extremely helpful and have continuously guided me in the right drection ThumpUp
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by White Buffalo
Offline marklinist5999  
#26 Posted : 08 April 2025 17:57:43(UTC)
marklinist5999

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2021(UTC)
Posts: 3,877
Location: Michigan, Troy
I am am of no help, sorry. I'm worse than you at programming things. Rocrail is excellent, but still requires knowledge and work. It's still challenging for me setting up events with the CS3.
Offline White Buffalo  
#27 Posted : 08 April 2025 19:29:04(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Originally Posted by: marklinist5999 Go to Quoted Post
I am am of no help, sorry. I'm worse than you at programming things. Rocrail is excellent, but still requires knowledge and work. It's still challenging for me setting up events with the CS3.



I was lost previously and was almost going to give up. These folks on this forum have been extremely helpful. I would still be lost without them. So when you are ready , just ask. I'll pass along what the others have taught me. I do not have the CS3, but a friend does and the events can be a big challenge. I tried to get the precise braking and stopping with the ESU alone previosly but I was spending way too much time programming locomotive stop points and manually setting CV's - was taking the fun out of it. I think Rocrail does a lot of the work automatically once you get the system down.
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by White Buffalo
Offline Martti Mäntylä  
#28 Posted : 08 April 2025 21:44:32(UTC)
Martti Mäntylä

Finland   
Joined: 15/11/2018(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Uusimaa, Helsinki
Hi Rich,

I agree with Jean: the IN sensor should be as far as possible to make most of the block length; placing it 18 cm before the signal is what I do as well. And as you already have experienced, a shared ENTER sensor for the sidings 1-5 is sufficient in this setting.
- Martti M.
Era III analog & digital (Rocrail, CAN Digital Bahn, Gleisbox/MS2, K83/K84), C & M tracks, some Spur 1
Offline White Buffalo  
#29 Posted : 11 April 2025 02:59:07(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Finally getting more comfortable with the program BigGrin - it does take some patience & time. I have to remember not to get carried away with adjusting too many settings at once, too difficult to go back and find what I had mistakenly done. No more clicking away and hoping for the correct response. The demo plan & virtual mode is definitely the tool I should have used from the beginning. It would have saved me a lot of time and aggravation.

Getting the blocks & routes all set up in the Schattenbahnhof. Just need to spend a few days away from the computer and wire up some sensors/contacts.

I am setting this up by using the ECoS Detector in the 10 sidings (since they have already been wired to the ECoS Detector) and contact tracks in other areas. A single wire from the C-Track center rail (sensor locations - block "in" & "enter") to the ECoS Detector. This allows me to have it work as a sensor for Rocrail and for track occupancy & locomotive identification in the ECoS. Also makes it a bit easier in the short term to identify the Addresses for signals, switches & uncouplers. Might be a bit overkill, but it helps when the two systems mirror the same track plan even though they use different means to show it.




Offline White Buffalo  
#30 Posted : 11 April 2025 03:20:38(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Martti & Jean, you might notice I did not use one "enter" sensor for the lower sidings (6-10), like I did for the upper sidings (1-5). Something I need to change to the track plan after finishing the wiring project. Martti, the single "enter sensor" works just like you said. Thank you. I would not have found this without your help.

"Just define "Sensor 2" as the "enter" sensor for all five blocks and tick the box "Ignore events if not reserved". "
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by White Buffalo
Offline White Buffalo  
#31 Posted : 13 April 2025 16:36:16(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
When trying to prevent Rocrail from selecting an alternative open block (have the Loc or train wait until the specific block is open) is

Route table, select route/general/skip finder the appropriate way?
Offline Martti Mäntylä  
#32 Posted : 14 April 2025 17:05:16(UTC)
Martti Mäntylä

Finland   
Joined: 15/11/2018(UTC)
Posts: 431
Location: Uusimaa, Helsinki
Perhaps you can use XML to close those routes that you don't want Rocrail to select.

I found this useful when I tried automating the operations of the old 7186 turntable. For instance, this piece of code would prevent Rocrail from using any routes that enter the turntable bridge from the "-" orientation, thus making sure that a loco can only enter the bridge from the "+" side:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xmlscript>
<st id="[Track_0-]-[Marklin_7186-]" state="closed"/>
<st id="[Track_4-]-[Marklin_7186-]" state="closed"/>
<st id="[Track_12-]-[Marklin_7186-]" state="closed"/>
<st id="[Track_24-]-[Marklin_7186-]" state="closed"/>
<st id="[Track_36-]-[Marklin_7186-]" state="closed"/>
</xmlscript>

What remains is to figure out how to link this kind of code to the relevant Event (or whatever) via a Rocrail Action, and another Event + Action to open the routes again later. See the documentation for XMLScript for some help. Without a specific use case it is difficult to give more precise advice.
- Martti M.
Era III analog & digital (Rocrail, CAN Digital Bahn, Gleisbox/MS2, K83/K84), C & M tracks, some Spur 1
Offline White Buffalo  
#33 Posted : 14 April 2025 17:41:15(UTC)
White Buffalo

United States   
Joined: 29/12/2016(UTC)
Posts: 498
Location: South Dakota
Thank you Martti,

now we are getting in deepThumpUp . I will let you know how it goes after Easter, will need some nights to finish up wiring sensors this week.

Best Regards,

Rich
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by White Buffalo
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.914 seconds.