marklin-users.net community | Forum
»
General topics
»
Prototype
»
Era I-II Passenger Trains: 1st Class at the Front, Rear, or Both?
Joined: 05/12/2004(UTC) Posts: 2,978 Location: CA, USA
|
Hi everyone, I know early steam trains in era I-II required a baggage car between the locomotive and any coaches with seating, but was 1st class right behind the baggage, at the end of the train, or does matter? I have heard first class was at the front to avoid smoke coming down from the locomotive after initial output, but I have no idea if this is a myth. Why I ask- I want to install tail lanterns in an Era I passenger set identical to this new item, and wasn't sure whether to put them on a 3rd class coach or a first class coach: https://www.roco.cc/rde/...et-schnellzug-kwste.htmlThe catalogue image also would imply 3rd class at the rear of train. Thanks in advance! |
SBB Era 2-5 |
 3 users liked this useful post by 5HorizonsRR
|
|
|
Joined: 26/03/2019(UTC) Posts: 758 Location: Florida Classic but Successful Swampland City
|
This is an interesting conundrum as the set has a 1st/2nd and a 1st/2nd/3rd as well as the 2nd/3rd and 3rd... And if at any point in the route the train entered a Terminal station, the car order would be reversed unless they went through a great kerfuffle of jockeying the order of the cars. I know that does not help a lot, sorry And caveat time, correct or not, I have heard/read the other way round: The 1st class went at the end of the train to be farthest away from the steam and cinders (hoping that the wind would dissipate all of the undesirable stuff) No doubt I shall find (and welcome) some corrections to my analysis as we tread this thread.  |
Jimmy T Analogue; M-track; KLVM; DDR; Primex; Sarrasani Zirkuswelt There is a Prototype For Everything |
 2 users liked this useful post by Jimmy Thompson
|
|
|
Joined: 10/02/2021(UTC) Posts: 3,928 Location: Michigan, Troy
|
As some coaches had open seating, some compartments, and mixed class sections, were they coupled so the corridors joined on one side? Were the class sections joined with the matching class section of the next coach?
|
 2 users liked this useful post by marklinist5999
|
|
|
Joined: 27/10/2004(UTC) Posts: 941 Location: Burney, CA
|
There are likely no hard and fast rules for coach order, only generalities. Note that on DRG Set #4228 Rheingold there is a baggage car on either end of the rake of coaches. This would allow a baggage car at the head end, even if the train entered a stub end station and was pulled out "backwards". Note that this is true on the new Edelweiss set as well.
In general first class were toward the end of the train, but next to the dining car if possible. Even on modern trains, 1st class tends to be next to dining services. If you are on a 2d class coach next to the dining car, you can kind of "poach" on first class by buying yourself a snack or meal! |
From the People's Republik of Kalifornia |
 4 users liked this useful post by mrmarklin
|
|
|
Joined: 04/02/2011(UTC) Posts: 3,565 Location: Paris, France
|
Hi John I am not sure about Germany (Likely to be the same) but in France, first class coaches are in the middle of the consist and close the the dining car. In many stations, exit on platforms is in the middle of the platform so to avoid 1 class passengers to walk more towards the station building through the underpass.. Cheers Jean |
|
 4 users liked this useful post by JohnjeanB
|
|
|
Joined: 30/12/2023(UTC) Posts: 80
|
that ^^^^ First coaches In the middle of the consist, to avoid a long walk to the station abortion. Fleischmann have put taillights in Era I 3rd class cars, from memory. Diner next to first to avoid contamination with 3rd class You can't use the diner with anything less that a second class ticket-premium being paid. Rheingold, by definition, does this. It was stupid to include Rheingold or CIWL into this discussion as they exclude 3rd class and often include a baggage car at both ends.Edited by user 01 March 2025 04:40:23(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
Fine, young, Tweed salseman that y'are
|
 2 users liked this useful post by Vinedusk
|
|
|
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC) Posts: 8,240 Location: Montreal, QC
|
It was common for trains to have coaches that would branch off from the main train along the way and would then be pulled to secondary destinations. For example, a train from Calais would head to Paris, some coaches would be detached, while new ones would be added and the train would continue to Basel. In Basel, some coaches would be detached, new ones added and the main train would continue to either Italy or Austria. The coaches that were detached would be hung on the end of trains to places like Geneva, Chur (St. Moritz), Zurich or other. Many railways introduced mixed class coaches which were useful for these so-called "Kurswagen" to accommodate all travellers on those routes.
Regards
Mike C
|
 4 users liked this useful post by mike c
|
|
|
Joined: 30/12/2023(UTC) Posts: 80
|
Originally Posted by: mike c  It was common for trains to have coaches that would branch off from the main train along the way and would then be pulled to secondary destinations. For example, a train from Calais would head to Paris, some coaches would be detached, while new ones would be added and the train would continue to Basel. In Basel, some coaches would be detached, new ones added and the main train would continue to either Italy or Austria. The coaches that were detached would be hung on the end of trains to places like Geneva, Chur (St. Moritz), Zurich or other. Many railways introduced mixed class coaches which were useful for these so-called "Kurswagen" to accommodate all travellers on those routes.
Regards
Mike C Yeah, the kurzwagon issue complicate things. Kurzwagon trains e.g. a baggage and one/two AB coaches are an exception; but most of those passengers would not be alighting anyway. They may have just been added to the end of the main train, or inserted into it; I don't know the answer to that. But the question related to Era I mainly and I think in that context the last car with tail lighting, would likely be a third class. If we're talking international or CIWL routes, then in most cases this would be a baggage car. I don't think these premium service trains actually carried third class cars. My own example for era I would be: Loco:Pw4u:C4u:B4u:A4u:Dining:AB4u:C4u This puts the first class some distance from the loco as some have suggested it should be. Again, third class passengers are distanced from the restaurant, as they should have no access to it. These are likely to be the folks we see buying from platform vendors in those old photos. I have wondered about " were they coupled so the corridors joined on one side" and I would err on doing that, if only to facilitate the vendoring process. But I'm just guessing that. |
Fine, young, Tweed salseman that y'are
|
 3 users liked this useful post by Vinedusk
|
|
|
Joined: 05/09/2014(UTC) Posts: 679 Location: NEW HAMPSHIRE, Somersworth
|
When I asked that question I was told the more expensive the ticket the further from the engine.
|
 2 users liked this useful post by rhfil
|
|
|
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC) Posts: 8,240 Location: Montreal, QC
|
Originally Posted by: rhfil  When I asked that question I was told the more expensive the ticket the further from the engine. I don't think that this was true. For a through station, it may have been preferable to have the 1st class coaches in the middle, as these would then be the ones right in front of the station building. For so-called Kopf Bahnhofs (terminal stations), the preferred option probably would have been to have the first class right behind the locomotive, as this would mean that they would be the closest coaches to the station concourse. This would, on the other hand, mean that the first class coaches would then be at the end of the train when the train departed to it's next station and passengers would have the longest walk at the next station. Perhaps somebody who has Michael Reinhold's Zugbilding Epoches I and II (Miba Verlag) can contribute to this discussion. Regards Mike C
|
 2 users liked this useful post by mike c
|
|
|
Joined: 30/12/2023(UTC) Posts: 80
|
I think this was the model that I referred to. Not lights, but end-of-train markers.  If it were me, I'd be adding the lights/markers to a single Roco 44218/44545 CCu carriage and leaving the coach set intact. |
Fine, young, Tweed salseman that y'are
|
 2 users liked this useful post by Vinedusk
|
|
|
Joined: 05/12/2004(UTC) Posts: 2,978 Location: CA, USA
|
Thanks all. In the end I'm not putting marker lights on any coaches, but I will arrange the set as follows:
Loco- Baggage- Red/Brown coaches 3rd class, then to 2nd class. From there the Green coaches, ending with 3rd class again. I could then flip them either direction and 3rd class will be on the ends, 1/2 (somewhat) in the middle
Thanks for all the input! |
SBB Era 2-5 |
 3 users liked this useful post by 5HorizonsRR
|
|
|
Joined: 21/05/2004(UTC) Posts: 1,768 Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Remember also if there are through wagons / additional train added then those wagons will be at the front or rear, so you find that the classes are all over the place on longer trains. |
modelling era IIIa (1951-1955) Germany |
 3 users liked this useful post by applor
|
|
|
Joined: 30/12/2023(UTC) Posts: 80
|
I actually got the older 44096 set last year and 'padded it out' with some other items.  Marklin 37033 Marklin 42128 Trix 23473 Roco 44218 The Roco 44096 cars are very nicely detailed |
Fine, young, Tweed salseman that y'are
|
 1 user liked this useful post by Vinedusk
|
|
|
Joined: 05/09/2014(UTC) Posts: 679 Location: NEW HAMPSHIRE, Somersworth
|
The manual with the original 4228 Rheingold set says:"As a rule the trains consisted - seen from the end of the train - of the baggage car, one each salon car 1st class with and without a galley as well as one each salon car 2nd class with and without a galley."
|
|
|
|
Joined: 30/12/2023(UTC) Posts: 80
|
Originally Posted by: rhfil  The manual with the original 4228 Rheingold set says:"As a rule the trains consisted - seen from the end of the train - of the baggage car, one each salon car 1st class with and without a galley as well as one each salon car 2nd class with and without a galley." If you'd like to run your 4228 with the second class cars behind the loco, followed by the first class cars and then the baggage car, then that's fine. Protoypically speaking, at some point in the journey, the order would have been reversed and the second class cars would be at 'the end of the train'. |
Fine, young, Tweed salseman that y'are
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/09/2014(UTC) Posts: 679 Location: NEW HAMPSHIRE, Somersworth
|
Nothing to do with how I run my trains. That is from the manual. And high speed express trains did not run forward in one direction and backward in the other. I they took the trouble to relocate the engine perhaps they did that with all the cars. All they needed was a reverse wye large enough to accommodate the entire train which did not have that many cars.
|
 1 user liked this useful post by rhfil
|
|
|
Joined: 29/07/2007(UTC) Posts: 1,437 Location: Switzerland
|
Originally Posted by: Vinedusk  Yeah, the kurzwagon issue complicate things. Kurzwagon trains e.g. a baggage and one/two AB coaches are an exception
May I add to the general confusion by humbly pointing out that the German term for these "through coaches" is not Kurzwagon or Kurzwagen (which would mean "short carriage") but Kurswagen with an "s" in the middle. A liberally modified DeepL translation of Kurswagen sounds like this: Through wagons are one or more railroad passenger carriages with a route that deviates from the rest of the train in some sections. If there are several course wagons, this is also referred to as a course wagon group. The train carrying a course wagon or a course wagon group is referred to as the main train or course wagon carrier.
|
 1 user liked this useful post by Unholz
|
|
|
Joined: 30/12/2023(UTC) Posts: 80
|
Originally Posted by: rhfil  Nothing to do with how I run my trains. That is from the manual. And high speed express trains did not run forward in one direction and backward in the other. I they took the trouble to relocate the engine perhaps they did that with all the cars. All they needed was a reverse wye large enough to accommodate the entire train which did not have that many cars. Goodo then |
Fine, young, Tweed salseman that y'are
|
|
|
|
Joined: 30/12/2023(UTC) Posts: 80
|
Originally Posted by: Unholz  Originally Posted by: Vinedusk  Yeah, the kurzwagon issue complicate things. Kurzwagon trains e.g. a baggage and one/two AB coaches are an exception
May I add to the general confusion by humbly pointing out that the German term for these "through coaches" is not Kurzwagon or Kurzwagen (which would mean "short carriage") but Kurswagen with an "s" in the middle. A liberally modified DeepL translation of Kurswagen sounds like this: Through wagons are one or more railroad passenger carriages with a route that deviates from the rest of the train in some sections. If there are several course wagons, this is also referred to as a course wagon group. The train carrying a course wagon or a course wagon group is referred to as the main train or course wagon carrier. Did you have a position on where the First class coach in an era 1 consist might be located? You're clearly quite knowledgeable. |
Fine, young, Tweed salseman that y'are
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/09/2014(UTC) Posts: 679 Location: NEW HAMPSHIRE, Somersworth
|
A through coach is a passenger car (coach) that is re-marshalled during the course of its journey. It begins the journey attached to one train. https://www.wagons-lits-...bum/ciwl-express-trains/Interesting difference between the German and French consists.
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/12/2004(UTC) Posts: 2,978 Location: CA, USA
|
Originally Posted by: Vinedusk  I actually got the older 44096 set last year and 'padded it out' with some other items.
Marklin 37033 Marklin 42128 Trix 23473 Roco 44218
The Roco 44096 cars are very nicely detailed
The 44096 is actually my exact set! Running with the 37118 Blue Lady Class C :) |
SBB Era 2-5 |
 2 users liked this useful post by 5HorizonsRR
|
|
|
Joined: 30/12/2023(UTC) Posts: 80
|
This is the D59 en-route to Munich. It has an EST fourgon and two A-L cars.  Ignore the colours (or is it colors?), that's an AI malfunction. I'm only posting this as it's another interesting break with normality. |
Fine, young, Tweed salseman that y'are
|
 1 user liked this useful post by Vinedusk
|
|
|
Joined: 30/12/2023(UTC) Posts: 80
|
Here's a C class in basically the same spot.  Both photos might be a bit early for the Roco coaches, which are supposedly 1909, if you believe Roco. I'm sure there's an lovely description attached to this image over at Eisenbahnstiftung. |
Fine, young, Tweed salseman that y'are
|
 1 user liked this useful post by Vinedusk
|
|
|
marklin-users.net community | Forum
»
General topics
»
Prototype
»
Era I-II Passenger Trains: 1st Class at the Front, Rear, or Both?
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.