Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline Mr. Ron  
#1 Posted : 23 December 2022 08:56:10(UTC)
Mr. Ron

United States   
Joined: 05/07/2020(UTC)
Posts: 311
Location: Mississippi, Vancleave
During the steam era in the U.S. there would be double header, and even quadruple header trains. How in the world would the engineers of the locomotives syncronizethe engines so each engine would contribute equql power and not become a drag. Later on during diesel, the locomotives would syncronize so all power was being used. I've noticed in videos of double header steam that one engine would be putting out more black smoke indicating that loco was doing more work than the other.
Offline H0  
#2 Posted : 23 December 2022 09:23:32(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,254
Location: DE-NW
Originally Posted by: Mr. Ron Go to Quoted Post
I've noticed in videos of double header steam that one engine would be putting out more black smoke indicating that loco was doing more work than the other.
How does black smoke relate to work done by the loco?

The more work a loco does, the more white steam should be coming out of the smoke stack.
AFAIK the black smoke only indicates that the fire is not burning efficiently and that coal (or oil) is being wasted.

In Germany AFAIK one loco would give a signal with the whistle and all locos would apply power.
And AFAIK pushing locos are still not synchronized, so loco drivers still must apply power at the same time. But I think voice communication is used now instead of whistle signals.
Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
Offline Copenhagen  
#3 Posted : 23 December 2022 12:50:51(UTC)
Copenhagen


Joined: 23/04/2019(UTC)
Posts: 369
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
I googled double header steam locomotives.

One answer:
"Although mostly as long as both throttles are open and both engines are working okay, they should both be contributing drawbar thrust. These locomotives aren’t just rolling freely on the track, they are both attached to a train weighing thousands of tons, so even if the lead locomotive isn’t as powerful as the trailing one, it should still be helping the other one to pull. It doesn’t mean each is doing 50% of the work, but neither should be holding the other back either. That said, there certainly are stories of locomotives being assigned helpers that aren’t in proper working order, where the crew was certain the other was actually hurting more than helping, for example, a helper engine hooked onto the head, and the crew swearing that the drawbar was pushed tightly together the entire time, since even with the train attached, the other engine was pushing the helper ahead of it. But these are anecdotes."

From: https://www.quora.com/In...ulling-one-of-the-other-

There are several other search results worth looking into.
Offline kiwiAlan  
#4 Posted : 23 December 2022 14:35:59(UTC)
kiwiAlan

United Kingdom   
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC)
Posts: 8,082
Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
I have quoted this story here before, where UK drivers thought that a helper loco at the back of a train wasn't 'helping', when they entered a tunnel would get the coal shovel nice and hot in the fire, then take it out and pee on it. The fumes would hang around in the tunnel, being drawn along by the train. It would certainly cause the helper loco to stoke up and try and get out of the tunnel sooner ... BigGrin
thanks 3 users liked this useful post by kiwiAlan
Offline Toosmall  
#5 Posted : 26 December 2022 12:23:25(UTC)
Toosmall

Australia   
Joined: 26/07/2021(UTC)
Posts: 609
Location: Sydney
Blue Mountains Australia triple header steam and two diesels on the back. From about 1m 30s

thanks 4 users liked this useful post by Toosmall
Offline Mr. Ron  
#6 Posted : 28 December 2022 05:49:59(UTC)
Mr. Ron

United States   
Joined: 05/07/2020(UTC)
Posts: 311
Location: Mississippi, Vancleave
What is the reason for diesels at the end of the train? My guess is: to provide backup in case of engine failure or because the steam engine cannot refuel due to lack of refueling facilities such as coaling towers or water tanks.
Offline Toosmall  
#7 Posted : 28 December 2022 07:08:28(UTC)
Toosmall

Australia   
Joined: 26/07/2021(UTC)
Posts: 609
Location: Sydney
Through the Blue Mountains is a main line so it can't be blocked if avoidable. My guess it was probably a condition for operating the steam locos.

Coal & water in the area is not an issue, might need the help of the fire brigade to pump water from a tanker & a few wheelbarrows for the last few metres for coal.
Offline kiwiAlan  
#8 Posted : 28 December 2022 13:10:09(UTC)
kiwiAlan

United Kingdom   
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC)
Posts: 8,082
Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
Originally Posted by: Mr. Ron Go to Quoted Post
What is the reason for diesels at the end of the train? My guess is: to provide backup in case of engine failure or because the steam engine cannot refuel due to lack of refueling facilities such as coaling towers or water tanks.


That is one possible reason, but another reason is that many steam locos cannot haul a 'normal' size train at modern mainline speeds. I had occasion to take a train trip from Charlottenburg, Berlin to Hannover and return to celebrate 21 years of the reunification of Germany.

The organisers started off thinking maybe they would end up with a half dozen coaches comfortably full. They ended up with a maximum length 15 coach train fully booked and a second train the following day for the overflow.

The steam loco they were using could not haul a 15 coach fully loaded train at mainline speeds, so a diesel loco was attached at the rear to ensure there was enough horsepower available to get up to speed so the train could be slotted into the normal timetables without holding up the other trains.

Offline H0  
#9 Posted : 28 December 2022 17:39:14(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,254
Location: DE-NW
Originally Posted by: Mr. Ron Go to Quoted Post
What is the reason for diesels at the end of the train?
They are at the end to keep them out of sight. Often they are required to supply pressurized air to the train (e.g. automatic doors). Often they help to push the train, so the steam loco does not have to do all the work to prevent it from wear and damages.

Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by H0
Offline Mr. Ron  
#10 Posted : 28 December 2022 18:42:21(UTC)
Mr. Ron

United States   
Joined: 05/07/2020(UTC)
Posts: 311
Location: Mississippi, Vancleave
Originally Posted by: H0 Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: Mr. Ron Go to Quoted Post
What is the reason for diesels at the end of the train?
They are at the end to keep them out of sight. Often they are required to supply pressurized air to the train (e.g. automatic doors). Often they help to push the train, so the steam loco does not have to do all the work to prevent it from wear and damages.


I saw this 14 months ago when the "big boy" passed through. They had a diesel right behind the tender and I understand the reason was the availability of fuel during the 1000 mile tour and to reduce wear and tear.
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Mr. Ron
Offline Toosmall  
#11 Posted : 28 December 2022 19:24:20(UTC)
Toosmall

Australia   
Joined: 26/07/2021(UTC)
Posts: 609
Location: Sydney
Through the Blue Mountains is not that long. Main line speed is about the pace of a small, I have been on this route a few times on a modern train and it is painfully slow. Twice, Sydney to Orange return (254km one way) with about a couple of hours turn around, and said Sydney to Dubai (14 hours) is quicker! Some of the track radiuses are as little 240 metres. Used to be down to 160 metres until they "straighten" the worst of the track.

It probably only did Sydney to Lithgow (141 km one way) and returned.
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.352 seconds.