Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#1 Posted : 07 December 2008 23:24:57(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
Hello,

I've bought two Viessmann signals of the KS type, 4043 and 4046, which use the new multiplex technic. I've figured out (I think) how the masts work; would be happy if anybody could tell more. For example, how other types are layed out. Be careful though to apply voltage without resistors to the mast - that would destroy the LEDs I think.

I'm particularly interested to get information about the "signal bus" as well, but have to oscilloscope to measure.


The mast seems to have theoretically up to 12 LEDs, connected between each of the possible connections,
in both directions, with no resistors in the mast. If a current is applied between two connections
with a LED in correct direction, all current flow through this; passing an alternative way = two LEDs in series is impossible
as the forward voltage would add up to a too high level.

I would guess that the idea is to supply + to 1 for 1/4 of the time, and then - to the ones of 2,3,4 that should be lit.
Then for the next 1/4 of the time, + is supplied to 2, and - to 1,3,4 if corresponding LED should be lit, etc.


Plug has four sockets numbered by me as below, and with a marking tag at 1-2 side:

--
12
34

Which gives the table for KS-signals

+ -
1 2 White LED indicating short distance to next
1 3 -
1 4 Red
2 3 -
2 4 Upper white shunt signal
3 4 Yellow distant speed indicator (next signal shows this speed)
4 3 White speed indicator (if reduced)
4 2 Lower white shunt signal
3 2 -
4 1 Green
3 1 -
2 1 Yellow

/Lars


Offline Tivvy  
#2 Posted : 08 December 2008 11:37:35(UTC)
Tivvy


Joined: 01/02/2008(UTC)
Posts: 414
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Hi Lars,

Great work. I had been considering doing this to see if I could replicate the signal modules function to drive the signals however with this I shouldnt need a module ever biggrin
What voltage does the module supply between the pins? Does it vary with different connections? What size resistors are used internally to sink the LEDs?
Strange that they have the upper and lower shunting signal LEDs isolated and not in parallel.
The only missing LED I can see from that list is the distant signal repeater marker light (scratch that - none of the KS Signals have this which is very dissapointing)

How does the module "automatically detect" the connected signal type? When first connected did all of the lights flicker? Might indicate that every combination was powered and that current detection was used to determine the available aspects.confused

Caillin
Ep IV / V Marklin Layout
6 track dead end station, twin track loop, 4 track through station.
Under construction.
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#3 Posted : 08 December 2008 13:52:49(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
I did just a very simple try with DC+ a resistor; I don't know the voltage. But does it matter? If you do your own module, I think it's good enough to think that there is one LED between each pair of connectors, which I expect of have the ordinary 0.5 V and some ten mA characteristica.
It's not strange that the shunting signals have different connections; if they were in parallell, you would expect one of them to take almost all the current; remember, I don't think there is a resistor in the signal head.

I'm not sure, but think that the "repeater marker" is the same I call "short distance" indicator. White, upper left corner.

I don't know exactly how the current flow is detected inside, but when the signal is initiated the module passes current throw all combinations, seens as "lamp test". It's worth noted that if there is a led "missing" between two points, there are normally alternative ways for the current to flow, passing 2 or 3 LEDs in series. Higher voltage drop - less current though.

/Lars
Offline Tivvy  
#4 Posted : 08 December 2008 14:53:32(UTC)
Tivvy


Joined: 01/02/2008(UTC)
Posts: 414
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
The repeater aspect is shown in the lower left corner instead of the upper left corner for the shorter braking distance marker wink
Interestingly the Viessmann site says "with X white LEDs". Is there a colour filter on each of the LEDs or is that just a general typo in the translation?

I assume that the resistance of the alternate paths means that the current flowing is negligible and you cannot see the other LEDs glowing, even faintly, when an aspect is activated?

Do you have a detailed photo of the inside of the module? Or have you kept it sealed for the warranty?
Ep IV / V Marklin Layout
6 track dead end station, twin track loop, 4 track through station.
Under construction.
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#5 Posted : 08 December 2008 21:22:13(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
A LED typically has a voltage drop in the forward direction of about 0.5 V. With less voltage, practically no current flows at all. If you take two LEDs in series it takes 1 V to get current flowing. Hence, if the current has alternative ways, and one of them has only one LED in series, there will be 0.5 V over the net of LEDs, so no current will flow in the other ways.

I haven't opened it. Most because of lack of time.

/Lars
Offline Tdl  
#6 Posted : 20 February 2009 11:32:03(UTC)
Tdl

Netherlands   
Joined: 30/03/2006(UTC)
Posts: 71
Location: Amsterdam
Lars,

do you use the Viessmann 5229 multiplexer to control the Ks signals ?
If so, what is your experience ?

I have just got these delivered.
Yesterday I have made a test setup: one multiplexer 5229 with a Ks signal 4046 connected to the IB.
Switching aspects conventionally through a keyboard functions as expected.

Next I have programmed the multiplexer to respond to Motorola addresses 1-4.
Using the IB keyboard the signal switches apects reliable on addresses B (1) or B+1 (2) red and green.
However is does not switch reliable on addresses B+2 (3) or B+3 (4) red and green.
The signal incidentally changes aspect on activating adresses B+7 en B+8, that are out of the range.
Reprogramming the multiplexer to respond to Motorola adresses 9-12 do not lead to a more reliable aspect switching.

My first thought is that the multiplexer does not correctly interpretate the Motorola commands.

In the weekend I will set up more multiplexer's and signals, and do futher testing, including DCC adresses.

Would appreciate to share experiences.
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#7 Posted : 21 February 2009 09:12:04(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
I've had similar problems, and sent my for repair. Drop Viessmann a mail first I suggest.
I've tested my two 5229 on both Intellibox and Daisy system, and one of them is extremely unreliable; just can't see any pattern in what is working or not. The other is much better, especially after reset, but it seems to be worse over time.

Hopefully Viessmann will be able to reprogram them; I find the functionality of 5229 very much to my liking (when/if they work)
/Lars
Offline Tdl  
#8 Posted : 23 February 2009 11:22:35(UTC)
Tdl

Netherlands   
Joined: 30/03/2006(UTC)
Posts: 71
Location: Amsterdam
Lars, thank you for the information.

I have connected the 5229 multiplexer to my DCC system (Lenz v3) and programmed it to respond to the addresses 5-8. Then all signal aspects can be switched reliably.

Next I have made a setup with two 5229 multiplexers, the second one programmed to respond to the addresses 9-12.
Also on this signal all aspects can be switched reliably.

Next I have also connected the multiplexers via the signal bus.
Aspects switching is reliable and the home signal aspect now is also based on the distant signal aspect.

Next on the IB I have set the addresses 5-12 to output DCC, and have connected the setup to the IB.
The multiplexers do not reliably respond to the IB DCC keyboard commands.
Note: the IB concerned was updated by Uhlenbrock in November 2008.

My conclusions are:
- The 5229 multiplexers do not respond correctly and reliably to Motorola commands issued by my IB
- They do respond correctly and reliably to DCC commands issued by my Lenz Digital system
- They do not respond reliably and correctly to DCC commands issued by my IB.

I could not find any version information on the 5229 multiplexers.
I assume that my multiplexers have bugs in the firmware and will consult Viessmann.
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#9 Posted : 23 February 2009 20:54:35(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
Just a stupid theory/feeling of mine: it could be that the processor can't process all information it gets in Mixed Motorola/DCC; "not reliable" points into that direction. Sometimes it works, sometimes not. Sometimes press switch several times, and it works for example seventh time. I have tested with both Motorola and DCC on my layout too, but I can't repeat a clear case where it malfunctions every time.

Hope Viessmann solves it, again, the functionality is just what I want (well, I would not mind a LocoNet connection...)
/Lars
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Similar Topics
Question Regarding Viessmann Multiplex Signals (Digital)
by Mike M 03/03/2014 20:48:19(UTC)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.424 seconds.