Joined: 15/12/2015(UTC) Posts: 523 Location: Maryland, Baltimore
|
Being a Yank, I not very familiar with European Prototype Practices. Does the baggage car go behind the engine or at the rear of the train? If their's two baggage cars, is it one at the front and one at the rear? What is the protocol? Does the dinning car come next and then the sleeping cars? Thanks! Chuck
|
 2 users liked this useful post by skeeterbuck
|
|
|
Joined: 18/01/2016(UTC) Posts: 33 Location: Centurion
|
Mostly the baggage cars are at the rear of the trains, and the resturant car is normally between the first and second class coaches
Regards Carsten
|
 3 users liked this useful post by Swimmer
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
Hi, Chuck! Originally Posted by: skeeterbuck  What is the protocol? That varies from state to state and from era to era. In early era II there had to be a car without passengers between the locomotive and the first coach with passengers. Back then the Rheingold always had a baggage car right behind the loco - and between Frankfurt and Mannheim (both terminus stations) there were two baggage cars on the train. Later baggage cars could be anywhere in the train - sometimes even between coaches. Dining coaches were sometimes at the end or near the end of the train - e.g. if they weren't going the full way. Coaches carried on, but loco and dining car were taken off the train. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 9 users liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 29/07/2007(UTC) Posts: 1,435 Location: Switzerland
|
Originally Posted by: skeeterbuck  Does the baggage car go behind the engine or at the rear of the train? If their's two baggage cars, is it one at the front and one at the rear? What is the protocol? Does the dinning car come next and then the sleeping cars?
Here the baggage car is/was normally either just behind the engine or at the rear of the train. If a train exceptionally had two baggage cars, then they would probably have been together (this facilitates loading and unloading because the crew and the platform vehicles can be positioned at more or less the same place). Dining cars were indeed usally between the first and second class coaches, but Tom correctly mentioned the alternative that was very common for instance on the St. Gotthard route.
|
 7 users liked this useful post by Unholz
|
|
|
Joined: 01/03/2015(UTC) Posts: 127 Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
|
Hello Everybody.
I had the same question as Chuck did, so all your feedback was very helpful to me also. Thank you for that.
I have one more similar question though (I am fairly new to our hobby). Is there a front and a back side on the baggage cars? And the same question goes for passenger cars also. I have some lovely "Hechtwagen" era II cars, but don't know which is the front and which is the back of the car (silly ... I know!!!). Finally its the same on freight cars with a brakeman's cab. Where does the cab go? Looking to the front or to the back?
Kind Regards
Paris |
Era I and Era II German and Swiss Steamers and E-Loks. Proud owner of a Challenger (-; |
 1 user liked this useful post by ParisTsirchoglou
|
|
|
Joined: 01/03/2008(UTC) Posts: 2,883 Location: South Western France
|
Originally Posted by: H0  Hi, Chuck! Originally Posted by: skeeterbuck  What is the protocol? That varies from state to state and from era to era. In early era II there had to be a car without passengers between the locomotive and the first coach with passengers. Back then the Rheingold always had a baggage car right behind the loco - and between Frankfurt and Mannheim (both terminus stations) there were two baggage cars on the train. Later baggage cars could be anywhere in the train - sometimes even between coaches. Dining coaches were sometimes at the end or near the end of the train - e.g. if they weren't going the full way. Coaches carried on, but loco and dining car were taken off the train. You already have the answers to your questions. I'll just add that you'll find about any combination possible, especially in the days where long distance / international trains would often change composition along the way Baggage cars would not just carry passengers luggage but also mail, parcels and express deliveries, long before FedEx and ups had invented the concept. Before ww II, the CIWL famed Orient express would carry one or two baggage cars, along with sleeping car, Pullman salon car and restaurant car. Since not all cars were going for the whole Paris Istanbul run ( some would stop in Prag for Example) the cars were arranged to facilitate the change of locos when the train was being split. So, if there was baggage car limited to Prag, it's position could have been in middle of the consist where it would have been separated from the Istanbul bound section. Another interesting case was the postwar Rheingold, with ran combined with the Rheinpfeil with number of split/ recombination of the coaches. And yes, it had a (partial) baggage car in the set: the famous DB dome car had a baggage compartment on the lower deck.  next to the zugfuhrer office. After the war the same orient express was no longer pure CIWL material and would see a number of local French, German, Austrian, etc. equipment joining the composition for some or part of the run. Net result is that almost any imaginable combination has been seen one day or another. For a model railroader this is a license to freely combine equipment and/ or conceive switching sessions with passengers consists rather than only with freight cars. Hope this gives you the idea that you have lots of freedom!! |
Jacques Vuye aka Dr.Eisenbahn Once a vandal, learned to be better and had great success! |
 14 users liked this useful post by jvuye
|
foumaro, H0, esgovipa, skeeterbuck, Janne75, kimballthurlow, Legless, Dreadnought, xxup, Mark5, glight1, dickinsonj, Brakeman, Gilbert_Ives
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
Apropos Rheingold 1962: the dome car and the dining car had a "fixed" combination (fixed by convention) where the kitchen of the dining car was next to the bar of the dome car. Thus they could easily serve snacks to visitors of the bar. So on your layout place the hump of the dining car next to the bar (note the missing window) of the dome car. Originally Posted by: ParisTsirchoglou  I have some lovely "Hechtwagen" era II cars, but don't know which is the front and which is the back of the car With terminus stations on the route, trains went in one way and came out in reverse. Hechtwagen can run in both ways and that's how they were used. And AFAIK freight cars were used as they came. I don't think they turned them around to bring the cab into a certain position. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 6 users liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 15/12/2015(UTC) Posts: 523 Location: Maryland, Baltimore
|
Originally Posted by: H0  Hi, Chuck! Originally Posted by: skeeterbuck  What is the protocol? That varies from state to state and from era to era. In early era II there had to be a car without passengers between the locomotive and the first coach with passengers. Back then the Rheingold always had a baggage car right behind the loco - and between Frankfurt and Mannheim (both terminus stations) there were two baggage cars on the train. Later baggage cars could be anywhere in the train - sometimes even between coaches. Dining coaches were sometimes at the end or near the end of the train - e.g. if they weren't going the full way. Coaches carried on, but loco and dining car were taken off the train. I model Era II mainly up to WWII which I guess Using hindsight I should have mentioned in my original post. I'm running 42757 Marklin set. In the instructions with the set it shows the baggage car first, then dinning car, then both sleeping cars. With no indication of which end the loco is, I wasn't sure because I know that the baggage cars do come at the end sometimes. Now, if I could just figure out how to order a spare handrail for the one I'm missing and get some replacement RTS couplers, I'll be set. 
|
 1 user liked this useful post by skeeterbuck
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
They say 1925 for the 42757 set. I'd run the baggage car behind the loco. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 2 users liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 15/12/2015(UTC) Posts: 523 Location: Maryland, Baltimore
|
Originally Posted by: H0  They say 1925 for the 42757 set. I'd run the baggage car behind the loco. Thanks Tom, Yea, like this: loco+baggage car+dining car+green sleeping car+teak sleeping car Chuck
|
 2 users liked this useful post by skeeterbuck
|
|
|
Joined: 09/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,343 Location: Southwest Ohio
|
Great thread with a lot of good input. Thanks everyone! |
Matt Era 3 DB lokos, coaches and freight cars from across Europe But I do have the obligatory (six) SBB Krocs ECoS 50200, all FX and MFX decoders replaced with ESU V4s, operated in DCC-RailCom+ with ABC brake control. With the exception of the passenger wagens with Marklin current conducting couplers, all close couplers have been replaced with Roco 40397. |
|
|
|
Joined: 14/01/2015(UTC) Posts: 55
|
Thanks everyone,
I was wondering the same thing. Great help!
Lance
|
|
|
|
Joined: 24/12/2008(UTC) Posts: 422 Location: Niagara, Ontario
|
When the baggage car is in the centre of the train, as mentioned by Jaques, could passengers walk through it? I have seen pictures from the fifties where it is, with a delightful mix of sleeping cars, CIWL, and DSG, along with a restaurant car, and some dy coaches. I like to think my passengers can get to the dining car, no matter where it is relative to them.
|
 2 users liked this useful post by Dreadnought
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
Originally Posted by: Dreadnought  When the baggage car is in the centre of the train, as mentioned by Jaques, could passengers walk through it? Some baggage cars have a sidewalk, allowing passengers to walk through it. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 5 users liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 18/03/2007(UTC) Posts: 6,764 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Originally Posted by: Dreadnought  When the baggage car is in the centre of the train, as mentioned by Jaques, could passengers walk through it? I have seen pictures from the fifties where it is, with a delightful mix of sleeping cars, CIWL, and DSG, along with a restaurant car, and some dy coaches. I like to think my passengers can get to the dining car, no matter where it is relative to them. Well of course anything goes on a model train layout. But in reality, train compositions often had rules. For example, the dining car may have had a baggage car between it and part of the train, because day passengers were not allowed access to the diner. In some trains, it was reserved for those who paid a premium fare, and so on. But certainly I have seen pictures (post 1946) where baggage cars are in different parts of the train. regards Kimball |
HO Scale - Märklin (ep II-III and VI, C Track, digital) - 2 rail HO (Queensland Australia, UK, USA) - 3 rail OO (English Hornby Dublo) - old clockwork O gauge - Live Steam 90mm (3.1/2 inch) gauge. |
 4 users liked this useful post by kimballthurlow
|
|
|
Joined: 11/05/2013(UTC) Posts: 488
|
I recall reading somewhere the baggage car was usually put behind the lok for the comfort of the passengers as soot and ciders fell more on the first car then others.
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/08/2009(UTC) Posts: 3,443
|
Do recall that in older Marklin catalogues,say mid sixties,the coach set pulled by the steamer series 01 (3048) was having the bagagecoach just after the loco. Have never seen two bagagecoaches in expresstrains. The Rheingold before WW2 was having one after the loco and the other at the end,this because the train needed to go in the reverse direction at Hook of Holland (Hoek van Holland),it saved shunting of the bagagecoach to the other end. |
Have more than you show,speak less than you know (Shakespeare). |
 1 user liked this useful post by NS1200
|
|
|
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC) Posts: 8,476 Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
|
|
 3 users liked this useful post by kiwiAlan
|
|
|
Joined: 19/09/2009(UTC) Posts: 841 Location: Lidingö, Sweden
|
Originally Posted by: SteamNut  I recall reading somewhere the baggage car was usually put behind the lok for the comfort of the passengers as soot and ciders fell more on the first car then others. There was also a safety aspect. In era II many passenger coaches were still wooden constructions built on a steel frame. This meant that such a coach could easily be turned into toothpicks in case of a train crash (and you can figure out yourselves what the fate of the passengers would be), in particular if squeezed between a solidly built steam engine and the rest of the train pushing forward. For that reason, a baggage coach or a freight wagon was between the engine and the passenger coaches. These rules could be removed when all coaches were built from steel and that is a reason for why train on photos from era III and later eras can have the baggage coach(es) at other positions in the train. For the restaurant coach, it was if possible located in the middle of the train for the comfort of the passengers who had fewer coaches to walk through compared to when it is first or last coach (not counting any baggage coaches).
|
 4 users liked this useful post by Western Pacific
|
|
|
Joined: 10/08/2009(UTC) Posts: 3,443
|
Originally Posted by: kiwiAlan  I never travelled on the Orient Express,that was a bit before my time........ |
Have more than you show,speak less than you know (Shakespeare). |
|
|
|
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC) Posts: 8,476 Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
|
Originally Posted by: NS1200  Originally Posted by: kiwiAlan  I never travelled on the Orient Express,that was a bit before my time........ Nowadays we have the Venice-Simpleon Orient Express, using refurbished orient Express coaches, that externally look very similar to the ones in last years sets.
|
 1 user liked this useful post by kiwiAlan
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
Originally Posted by: Western Pacific  There was also a safety aspect. Until 1933 or 1934 a baggage car or such was required between loco and first passenger coach in Germany. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 2 users liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 10/08/2009(UTC) Posts: 3,443
|
Originally Posted by: kiwiAlan  Originally Posted by: NS1200  Originally Posted by: kiwiAlan  I never travelled on the Orient Express,that was a bit before my time........ Nowadays we have the Venice-Simpleon Orient Express, using refurbished orient Express coaches, that externally look very similar to the ones in last years sets. The Marklin model reflects the train as it was in 1921. |
Have more than you show,speak less than you know (Shakespeare). |
 1 user liked this useful post by NS1200
|
|
|
Joined: 21/10/2004(UTC) Posts: 31,692 Location: United Kingdom
|
|
Large Marklinist 3- Rails Layout with CS2/MS2/Boosters/C-track/favorites Electric class E03/BR103, E18/E118, E94, Crocodiles/Steam BR01, BR03, BR05, BR23, BR44, BR50, Big Boy. |
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
Here you can find information about the composition of the Rheingold in 1951: http://www.heinrich-hank...ildung/e3a_rheingold.htmBetween Cologne and Mannheim the baggage car was the third car in the train, from Mannheim to Basel it was the last car in the train. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 3 users liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 01/03/2008(UTC) Posts: 2,883 Location: South Western France
|
Originally Posted by: kiwiAlan  In fact, one of the baggage car was immediately followed by the restaurant car, with the kitchen end towards the baggage car. In the early days of the OE, lots of ( non perishable) supply for the restaurant car was stored in there, and could be taken into the kitchen/ restaurant car on an "as needed" basis , since the space in the kitchen was utterly limited. Still all the cooking was done on board. In today's VSOE (which I rode in 2010) the **3** restaurant cars + the bar-lounge coach are in the middle of the train. (which consists of 17 to 19 coaches) There are no more "true" baggage cars, but rather post-war Lx style coaches that have been modified to carry luggage and supplies and another two have been rebuild as cabins for the train personnel. Cheers |
Jacques Vuye aka Dr.Eisenbahn Once a vandal, learned to be better and had great success! |
 3 users liked this useful post by jvuye
|
|
|
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC) Posts: 8,476 Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
|
Originally Posted by: jvuye  In today's VSOE (which I rode in 2010) the **3** restaurant cars + the bar-lounge coach are in the middle of the train. (which consists of 17 to 19 coaches)
There was a documentary on TV recently about the VSOE, and showed them loading the kitchen supplies in through a window on the kitchen car. I forget the amount of time available to load it, but it wasn't very long, a figure of 40 minutes comes to mind.
|
 1 user liked this useful post by kiwiAlan
|
|
|
Joined: 18/03/2007(UTC) Posts: 6,764 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
I am speaking historically, up to about 1965???
The baggage car is "usually" immediately behind the engine, or at the rear of the train, for one very important reason. These are the extremities of the train, and at those stations where baggage or parcels are loaded, that task can be accomplished with minimal interference to the loading of passengers.
And that is the reason you see parcels offices, and loading carts waiting, at the ends of railway platforms.
Of course in todays' world, baggage cars are not used for passenger workings. Let them all struggle on board with heavy stuff up stairs, with no room allowed for storage, and encourage them to use airlines, where luggage can be booked foward.
regards Kimball |
HO Scale - Märklin (ep II-III and VI, C Track, digital) - 2 rail HO (Queensland Australia, UK, USA) - 3 rail OO (English Hornby Dublo) - old clockwork O gauge - Live Steam 90mm (3.1/2 inch) gauge. |
 4 users liked this useful post by kimballthurlow
|
|
|
Joined: 04/12/2013(UTC) Posts: 2,261 Location: Hobart, Australia
|
Originally Posted by: skeeterbuck  Being a Yank, I not very familiar with European Prototype Practices. Does the baggage car go behind the engine or at the rear of the train? If their's two baggage cars, is it one at the front and one at the rear? What is the protocol? Does the dinning car come next and then the sleeping cars? Thanks! Chuck Hello Charles, I do apologise for repeating my post of Feb 2015..... At least in Epoch II, I understand regulations (ordnung forever !!) required the baggage car to be directly behind the locomotive: see 2nd paragraph of : http://www.dbtrains.com/en/epochII.6Regards, PJ
|
 3 users liked this useful post by PJMärklin
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
Originally Posted by: PJMärklin  At least in Epoch II, I understand regulations (ordnung forever !!) required the baggage car to be directly behind the locomotive: see 2nd paragraph of : http://www.dbtrains.com/en/epochII.6 There were times in era II when this was required, there were times in era II when this was no longer required. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 2 users liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 15/09/2015(UTC) Posts: 107 Location: Queensland
|
Just to add my 2 cents worth
I do believe that for the German railways the placing of the baggage car behind the locomotive was for safety
I think cars carrying flammable liquids were also put at the rear for similar reasons
In Australia I don't think it mattered they just put the baggage car in the most sensible spot
When freight trains had guard vans they could occasionally be behind the locomotive but it was very rare
|
 1 user liked this useful post by Bones
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
Originally Posted by: Bones  I do believe that for the German railways the placing of the baggage car behind the locomotive was for safety This was definitely required for an early part of era II, but not for the late part of era II and later eras. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
|
|
|
Joined: 21/09/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,730 Location: Toronto
|
Originally Posted by: Western Pacific  For the restaurant coach, it was if possible located in the middle of the train for the comfort of the passengers who had fewer coaches to walk through compared to when it is first or last coach (not counting any baggage coaches).  That's where I like to put my dining coach. What about the sleep coach? Should it be in the middle as well? I thought of putting it at the end, but if it comes off the train, when the passengers wake up.... |
|
 2 users liked this useful post by baggio
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
Both restaurant coaches and sleeping coaches sometimes did not go the full way. Therefore it is prototypically correct to have either of those at any end of the train. If restaurants go the full way, they will probably be in the middle - often between first and second class.
|
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 6 users liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC) Posts: 8,230 Location: Montreal, QC
|
For long distance trains, it was common to find the baggage car situated at the front of the train at departure. On many of those trains, the route involved stopping at kopf bahnhofs along the way and in some cases, additional coaches might be added to the train, so the baggage car could find itself at the front, at the rear or somewhere in the middle. Some trains might even have included baggage and mail cars which may have been together or at different places in the train. As far as the restaurant car, my experience has been that it is usually positioned between the first and second class sections, so that passengers from both classes can get there. The other reason for this is so that the second class passengers don't traipse through the 1st class coaches on their way to the diner. Some classic trains even contained separate restaurant coaches for 1st and 2nd class passengers, in which case, the restaurant was in the 1st class part of the train and the other car would be in the 2nd class or between the 2nd and 3rd class sections (before 1957). Many times, the restaurant cars do not travel across certain borders (due to power supply issues, or contracts). In this case, the restaurant might be positioned in a non-standard position. For example, the IC Tiziano and Verdi had the DB Speisewagen at the rear end of the train as it was detached from the train at Chiasso along with one or two coaches while the bulk of the train continued to Milano. The coaches would wait there for the return trip.
Sleeping cars, couchettes would often be attached to other trains for certain routes. They would be attached to the open end of the train and could be found at the front or the rear of the main consist. As the train would be pulled into a kopf bahnhof by a locomotive, that would then be detached and the train then pulled out from the other end, it was complicated to add the coaches at the rear as this would require shunting the train from that track and then backing it into another platform track where the coaches were waiting. I did see this kind of operation once or twice in Switzerland as the sleeper passengers could have more time to embark this way than the usual short stop for the through train.
I also remember an Intercity from Frankfurt(M) to Paris in the 1980s which had the then standard second class - restaurant - first class composition and then had the baggage/bike coach at the lead, behind a couple of French Corail coaches. But that was a long story that involved the Gendarmes on arrival in Paris, so I won't go into too much detail.
Regards
Mike C
|
 5 users liked this useful post by mike c
|
|
|
Joined: 05/12/2008(UTC) Posts: 1,802 Location: Crozet, Virginia
|
Wow - a great thread and it answers a lot of questions that I have had when arranging the coaches on my passenger trains. I have somehow missed this thread until it came back to life recently. It sounds like my somewhat haphazard coach arrangement can be justified after all. Thanks everyone for the excellent input! I have one other type of car to ask about. My Era II Wurttemberg train has a lovely postal car with clearstory windows, which looks wonderful when the lights are on. It is one of my favorite cars. I have often put it in the front, along with my baggage car but I have often wondered what the most prototypical placement for it would be. I know someone here knows the answer to this question - there is so much railroad knowledge floating around this forum. |
Regards,
Jim
I have almost all Märklin and mostly HO, although I do have a small number of Z gauge trains!
So many trains and so little time. |
 1 user liked this useful post by dickinsonj
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
My area of interest is era III and later. Postal cars can be at either end of the train, like the baggage car. Often they do not go the full journey and are added or removed when the locomotive is changed, so they can be right behind the locomotive.
Postal cars can be on the same end as the baggage car, but they can also be at opposite ends. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 4 users liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 05/12/2008(UTC) Posts: 1,802 Location: Crozet, Virginia
|
Originally Posted by: H0  Postal cars can be on the same end as the baggage car, but they can also be at opposite ends. Thanks for the information. Actual railroads had to be flexible in car placement to accommodate efficient operation, so we are more free to arrange the cars on our trains as we like. The one theme I see throughout is that most non-passenger cars were at one end of the consist or the other and not mixed into the middle of the passenger coaches. |
Regards,
Jim
I have almost all Märklin and mostly HO, although I do have a small number of Z gauge trains!
So many trains and so little time. |
 1 user liked this useful post by dickinsonj
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
Originally Posted by: dickinsonj  The one theme I see throughout is that most non-passenger cars were at one end of the consist or the other and not mixed into the middle of the passenger coaches. Many baggage cars have gangways and can be (and were) between coaches. But I think postal cars did not have gangways and I think I never saw them between coaches. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 2 users liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.