Joined: 09/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,343 Location: Southwest Ohio
|
|
Matt Era 3 DB lokos, coaches and freight cars from across Europe But I do have the obligatory (six) SBB Krocs ECoS 50200, all FX and MFX decoders replaced with ESU V4s, operated in DCC-RailCom+ with ABC brake control. With the exception of the passenger wagens with Marklin current conducting couplers, all close couplers have been replaced with Roco 40397. |
 24 users liked this useful post by biedmatt
|
Armando, H0, vilithejou, RayF, grnwtrs, tfk, kimballthurlow, steventrain, PhredD, PJMärklin, foumaro, Mark_1602, Mark5, Joseph Meiring, lglarsson, JKJ, mbarreto, jlopez, NS1200, Andrey, esgovipa, LA2019, 3rail4life, BrandonVA
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
Hi, Matt! Thanks for the review. Originally Posted by: biedmatt  Apparently there is something poisonous in the tender. I guess it is bad to eat coal. There is no drinking water in the tender. The added water softener is not good for the health. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 4 users liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 09/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,343 Location: Southwest Ohio
|
Originally Posted by: H0  Hi, Matt! Thanks for the review. Originally Posted by: biedmatt  Apparently there is something poisonous in the tender. I guess it is bad to eat coal. There is no drinking water in the tender. The added water softener is not good for the health. Thanks Tom, now I see it better "nein trinkwasser". |
Matt Era 3 DB lokos, coaches and freight cars from across Europe But I do have the obligatory (six) SBB Krocs ECoS 50200, all FX and MFX decoders replaced with ESU V4s, operated in DCC-RailCom+ with ABC brake control. With the exception of the passenger wagens with Marklin current conducting couplers, all close couplers have been replaced with Roco 40397. |
|
|
|
Joined: 18/10/2015(UTC) Posts: 17 Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
|
Beautiful locomotive!
The sign indeed says "Kein Trinkwasser" which translates to "No drinking water".
Cheers! |
TFK
 |
|
|
|
Joined: 21/10/2004(UTC) Posts: 31,689 Location: United Kingdom
|
Thanks for the review. I note the front of loco bit open at last picture. |
Large Marklinist 3- Rails Layout with CS2/MS2/Boosters/C-track/favorites Electric class E03/BR103, E18/E118, E94, Crocodiles/Steam BR01, BR03, BR05, BR23, BR44, BR50, Big Boy. |
|
|
|
Joined: 09/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,343 Location: Southwest Ohio
|
Originally Posted by: steventrain  Thanks for the review. I note the front of loco bit open at last picture. I noticed that too after I posted the photos. So I went back and took a look at the loko, Marklin made it that way. There is a tit between the front skirt and the loko frame. Actually four tits, but only two touch the frame.  Edit: Have to push the skirt back so the tits drop behind the frame.  |
Matt Era 3 DB lokos, coaches and freight cars from across Europe But I do have the obligatory (six) SBB Krocs ECoS 50200, all FX and MFX decoders replaced with ESU V4s, operated in DCC-RailCom+ with ABC brake control. With the exception of the passenger wagens with Marklin current conducting couplers, all close couplers have been replaced with Roco 40397. |
 7 users liked this useful post by biedmatt
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
On picture 4 in post #1 you can see two holes. Maybe the two small pegs should be in those holes - and the gap will be closed. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 1 user liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC) Posts: 8,472 Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
|
Originally Posted by: H0  On picture 4 in post #1 you can see two holes. Maybe the two small pegs should be in those holes - and the gap will be closed. Sure looks like it to me. was picture 12 in the first post taken before disassembling the loco? It looks like they may be sitting in the holes there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: 09/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,343 Location: Southwest Ohio
|
Originally Posted by: H0  On picture 4 in post #1 you can see two holes. Maybe the two small pegs should be in those holes - and the gap will be closed. That was fast Tom, you saw and posted even before my edit of post #6 timed out and showed as an edit at the bottom of the post. |
Matt Era 3 DB lokos, coaches and freight cars from across Europe But I do have the obligatory (six) SBB Krocs ECoS 50200, all FX and MFX decoders replaced with ESU V4s, operated in DCC-RailCom+ with ABC brake control. With the exception of the passenger wagens with Marklin current conducting couplers, all close couplers have been replaced with Roco 40397. |
|
|
|
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC) Posts: 14,875 Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
|
I wouldn't remove the shrink tubing unless it says so |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 09/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,343 Location: Southwest Ohio
|
Originally Posted by: river6109  I wouldn't remove the shrink tubing unless it says so Removal is part of the instructions. I am not sure why it is there, you are looking into a black hole and the headlamps are LEDs that would not leak light into the boiler. |
Matt Era 3 DB lokos, coaches and freight cars from across Europe But I do have the obligatory (six) SBB Krocs ECoS 50200, all FX and MFX decoders replaced with ESU V4s, operated in DCC-RailCom+ with ABC brake control. With the exception of the passenger wagens with Marklin current conducting couplers, all close couplers have been replaced with Roco 40397. |
|
|
|
Joined: 08/12/2004(UTC) Posts: 4,430 Location: Attiki Athens Greece
|
Thank you for the nice pictures and review.Enjoy the perfect steamer.
|
|
|
|
Joined: 29/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,422 Location: Montreal, Canada
|
This is a beautiful lok, Matt, and so great to see the details, all the way to the footplate between the tender and lok moving up and down.
I see these DR loks and often wonder if one could get away with this livery if modeling the DR in the DRG around 1955. Would they have written out the name in full at that time, or ever lettered in capitals; "DR" on the loks as they did on cars.
- Mark
|
DB DR FS NS SNCF c. 1950-65, fan of station architecture esp. from 1920-70. In single point perspective, where do track lines meet?
|
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
Originally Posted by: Mark5  I see these DR loks and often wonder if one could get away with this livery if modeling the DR in the DRG around 1955. GDR, not DRG. Or do you mean 1925 or 1935? The first BR 01.5 locos were built in 1962. Would be a bit futuristic for a 1955 layout. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 1 user liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 09/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,343 Location: Southwest Ohio
|
Hi Mark, I was going back over the first post and saw "Deutsche Reichbahn" on the side of the cab and freaked out for a moment, I always see Deutsche Bundesbahn on my lokos, then I quickly remembered this is era 3 DDR and not the DRG. I am not sure how the DR lettered their wagens since this is my first, but it appears wagens, both freight and passenger, got "DR" and the lokos received "Deutsche Reichbahn." |
Matt Era 3 DB lokos, coaches and freight cars from across Europe But I do have the obligatory (six) SBB Krocs ECoS 50200, all FX and MFX decoders replaced with ESU V4s, operated in DCC-RailCom+ with ABC brake control. With the exception of the passenger wagens with Marklin current conducting couplers, all close couplers have been replaced with Roco 40397. |
 1 user liked this useful post by biedmatt
|
|
|
Joined: 12/08/2006(UTC) Posts: 9,277
|
What decoder is it? Same old or the new mSD3? |
H0 DCC = Digital Command Control
|
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
Originally Posted by: biedmatt  but it appears wagens, both freight and passenger, got "DR" and the lokos received "Deutsche Reichbahn." There was a simple political reason: after WW II the allied forces agreed that the Deutsche Reichsbahn was responsible for the railway traffic in all four sectors of Berlin. If they had changed the name, this would have led to new negotiations - and they might have lost their control of railway traffic in Western Berlin. |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 3 users liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 09/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,343 Location: Southwest Ohio
|
Originally Posted by: Goofy  What decoder is it? Same old or the new mSD3? I believe it is the old decoder. It looks like the old one and it doesn't support DCC like the earlier release Br 18.5 39030. |
Matt Era 3 DB lokos, coaches and freight cars from across Europe But I do have the obligatory (six) SBB Krocs ECoS 50200, all FX and MFX decoders replaced with ESU V4s, operated in DCC-RailCom+ with ABC brake control. With the exception of the passenger wagens with Marklin current conducting couplers, all close couplers have been replaced with Roco 40397. |
|
|
|
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC) Posts: 8,472 Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
|
Originally Posted by: biedmatt  Originally Posted by: Goofy  What decoder is it? Same old or the new mSD3? I believe it is the old decoder. It looks like the old one and it doesn't support DCC like the earlier release Br 18.5 39030. I was told at the Treff in September that it would have the old decoder. The new decoders will not come fitted to locos until next year. I expect the new decoder to be a 'feature' of some locos in the NI brochure.
|
|
|
|
Joined: 28/11/2004(UTC) Posts: 143 Location: San Francisco
|
I ordered this locomotive as well, and am looking forward to running it. Is it just me, or is it about time that Marklin just have their steam locomotives come equiped with smoke generators. I have having to open up some of these locomotives just to but in a generator. I cant understand for the price we pay for them they can not simply included it in the production process. Ok rant over. ;)
|
 1 user liked this useful post by jlopez
|
|
|
Joined: 14/03/2005(UTC) Posts: 15,870 Location: Gibraltar, Europe
|
Originally Posted by: jlopez  I ordered this locomotive as well, and am looking forward to running it. Is it just me, or is it about time that Marklin just have their steam locomotives come equiped with smoke generators. I have having to open up some of these locomotives just to but in a generator. I cant understand for the price we pay for them they can not simply included it in the production process. Ok rant over. ;) Not everyone wants to run them with smoke. I find the smoke generated by model locos to be unrealistic and to me it spoils the illusion of reality instead of enhancing it. We are told that smoke generators should not be run "dry" so if every loco came with one installed I would be forced to open up the loco to remove it before using the loco. |
Ray
Mostly Marklin.Selection of different eras and European railways Small C track layout, control by MS2, 100+ trains but run 4-5 at a time.
|
 1 user liked this useful post by RayF
|
|
|
Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC) Posts: 15,443 Location: DE-NW
|
Originally Posted by: RayF  We are told that smoke generators should not be run "dry" so if every loco came with one installed I would be forced to open up the loco to remove it before using the loco. Only when you run in analogue mode. And the decoder can be programmed to disable the smoke generator for analogue operation. Of course this applies to loco with digitally controlled smoke generators only, but with an mfx decoder there is no reason not to make the smoke generator controllable. There is one big drawback: with Märklin's crippled decoders, the changes for analogue mode cannot be made with 6021, Intellibox, MS1, or MS2. Some "analogue people" have an MS1 or MS2, but that would currently not be enough. OTOH this would be a nice chance for service-oriented dealers to support their analogue customers by adding an extra check box to the order form: "Disable smoke for analogue operation" (besides the "Enable sound for analogue operation" check box they can already use). |
Regards Tom --- "In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS  |
 2 users liked this useful post by H0
|
|
|
Joined: 29/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,422 Location: Montreal, Canada
|
You are right Tom, meant to say GDR or DDR. Yes, I am trying to keep things within two to three years either way of 1955 for now. Although I have several locomotives outside that range, anything that uses a livery that was current or old locomotives or rolling stock that while antiquated still ran on the rails at the time would seem suitable to me, would it not? I am looking, here, primarily at what East and West Germany would have felt and looked like in 1955 to 1959-ish... ...prior to the wall going up at this leg of my layout. So yes, the BR 01.5 would have to wait a bit for photos and film clips of the layout if I follow my own system. Very interesting fact, btw, about the DR running locomotives in the four sectors of Berlin, and the reason for keeping the name in full. However, there were more modern locomotives with DR on them. When, or what date, would it have changed to DR initials? - Mark Originally Posted by: H0  Originally Posted by: Mark5  I see these DR loks and often wonder if one could get away with this livery if modeling the DR in the DRG around 1955. GDR, not DRG. Or do you mean 1925 or 1935? The first BR 01.5 locos were built in 1962. Would be a bit futuristic for a 1955 layout. |
DB DR FS NS SNCF c. 1950-65, fan of station architecture esp. from 1920-70. In single point perspective, where do track lines meet?
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/08/2009(UTC) Posts: 3,443
|
Oh dear,looking at her fragile intestines she reminds me of the very poorly constructed Piko 01.5 i owned earlier this year and which ended up in the bin. I sincerely hope that her metal boiler will make her feel better. She is still on my wishlist but i need to be convinced once more. |
Have more than you show,speak less than you know (Shakespeare). |
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.