Originally Posted by: jeehring 
Originally Posted by: M-Classics 
Hi everybody,
(...)... Now there are new owners who really care about their company.
....(...)...
Best regards,
Mark
....the new owners are pure money makers with only one goal : increase profit as much as possible.
their credo is pure and cold industrial logic like that never existed before at Marklin .
They are very happy today with ex "hobby" or "marklin my world " range which, according to sources considered by me as serious, is going to represent half of their turnover .
As a manufacturer of traditional models they are losing their previous knowledge ....For sure: the former workers are gone!
The artistic quality of today's models fell ... because today's management and workers do not understand the meaning and is not interested in the artistic dimension of this work .. .the finish is irregular (more often mediocre and ordinary than neat) We feel that it is done by people who do not care.
coatings, varnishes and paints are bland & ordinary (excepted some weathered paints) .
Why Marklin does not use the same coating products as Micro Metakit (or Lemaco too) ?.... this is not the paint or the varnish that makes the price of Micrometakit models !
I don't even talk about some of their minimalist new designs.
Digital seems promising...they prepare the future : they 'll become software developpers & you'll just have to run those softwares on your own pad or pc..
I'm from the old generation, definitely !
(
each time i'm talking about about the future of Marklin I hope I'm wrong ) 
Hi,
I can agree with some things you write, but others are really doubtful. I've been a Märklin customer since my childhood and got started in the 1970s. Like you, I'm also disappointed by the poor finish of a few models that were delivered to me in 2013. This year's order has been delayed, so I can't comment on that yet.
It also seems to me that the paint coat is more sensitive than it used to be in the past, and sometimes, engines are scratched or have minor defects when they are delivered to the customer. Such problems were the exception in the past, but now they are more common. I also wonder if workers at the factory in Hungary, where most Märklin products are painted and assembled now, are unprofessional, overstretched or do not care. I don't know the answer, but I agree with you that the quality of Märklin products is not always what it should be.
As for the turnover, the lion's share of that is still Märklin H0 professional, not myWorld or Start Up. The new focus on toy trains for children is the only way to build the next generation of Märklin fans. Märklin is the market leader because in the past, Märklin trains were suitable for children. The kids of the 1950s, 60s or 70s are todays's customers, so the Siebers' toy offensive is the right thing to do, and it's the same thing Märklin used to do in the past. Books about the history of the company reveal that Märklin's strategies have not changed a lot in the last 100 years!!
The Siebers have invested so much money into Märklin. Can you blame them for wanting to make a profit? I'm sure you would also want a return on your investment if you were in their shoes. It's just a fact that it will take a long time until their investment really pays off, especially in a difficult and shrinking MRR market.
Let's make a historical flashback. Who were the previous owners, and how much did they care about Märklin products?
The three families that used to own the company until 2006 (Märklin Safft, and Friz) did very well until the late 1970s, when the last co-owner who worked as CEO, Herbert Safft, retired. After that the old owners increasingly disagreed and cared less and less about the company until they finally sold it to make a fast buck. Even back in the 1970s, when Herbert Safft was still co-CEO, the quality of Märklin products was compromised in some ways. They applied a thinner paint coat on engines to save money, some steam engines like the S 3/6 or the Br 03.10 were only powered on one axle, Primex products were simplified, the Br 03.10 (3094) got the wrong undercarriage (from the S 3/6) at first, etc. This was all done to increase sales and profits by lowering prices, so there's a historical precedent for what they are doing now. The worst profitmakers were Kingsbridge, who bought Märklin in 2006, but ironically, the company didn't make any profits then. Only Mr Pluta brought back profitability. If you like, you may call him a moneymaker because that's what he was supposed to do! The Siebers care a lot more about Märklin than most previous owners.
I know that quality was better in the 1990s than it is now, but if adjusted for inflation, prices were significantly higher back then as compared to 2014. As in the 1970s, Märkin is adapting to a market that demands lower prices. Real incomes are not rising any more, but have fallen slowly in many countries.
However, the historical perspective also reveals that today's quality problems are unprecedented. In the 1970s they made some compromises, but the overall quality and reliability of Märklin products was still very good as compared to now. The engines I used to play with as a child could run on dusty tracks on our unheated attic for hundreds of hours with very little servicing. They were much sturdier, true. I agree with your last point that today's focus on electronics is exaggerated and is partially responsible for some problems, but not most. Cost-cutting has been pushed too far, so some customers have stopped buying. I also order less now ... Every book about Märklin I have says that this company triumphed over its competitors in the past because of the superior quality of its products, but for the first time in history, that's not true any more.
Yesterday I watched a one-hour movie that was made by Hagen van Ortloff, the expert for railways on German TV, for Märklin's 140th anniversary in 1999. It showed the highly skilled and reliable workers Märklin used to have in Göppingen, but by now most of them have either retired or been sacked and production in Göppingen is the exception, not the rule ...
Best regards, Mark