Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Poll Question : You use your trains mainly...;
Choice Votes Statistics
  Total 40 100%
Guests can't see poll choices and poll results. Try login or register. Guests can't vote. Try login or register.
Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline hxmiesa  
#1 Posted : 29 April 2010 11:17:54(UTC)
hxmiesa

Spain   
Joined: 15/12/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,587
Location: Spain
I know I'm not the greatest topic-starter, but in the light of the decreasing activity noticed by some people, I take the opportunity to air a topic that really interrest me;

Obviously the pure analog running is on the decline (some members here even think it is totally extinct...), so I would like to see what the division currently is.
The "poll" is not the main interrest for this posting, it´s just an additional benefit. The posted comments (if any) are what really counts!

I am looking for opionions about why stick to analog. Why switch to digital, why not, why yes, etc...
Comments are alwso welcome about; Should analog backward-compatibility be totally abollished? Should M. get out of digital, and leave it for the end-user to decide?
Does it matter for collectors (who never actually RUN their trains) if the models are fully digital with all the bells and whistles (litterally speaking)?
Best regards
Henrik Hoexbroe ("The Dane In Spain")
http://hoexbroe.tripod.com
Offline Bigdaddynz  
#2 Posted : 29 April 2010 11:40:26(UTC)
Bigdaddynz

New Zealand   
Joined: 17/09/2006(UTC)
Posts: 18,763
Location: New Zealand
My trains are mainly (95%) digital. I have a few that I'm yet to convert. I do however intend to start a collection of older models from the 60's/70's that have the blue boxes with the cool drawings. I will probably keep those locos in their original state. To that end, my layout can be switched to run conventional analog locos, but retain the digital control of turnouts and signals, and automated control.

I like the digital locos because of the load control present in the propulsion systems, also the added sounds that come with them. And the fact that I can control multiple locos on the same piece of track independently of each other. As for backward compatibility, this means that I can run my digital locos on friends analog layouts (providing they don't use blue transformers). I wouldn't like to see backward compatibility removed.
Offline Ian555  
#3 Posted : 29 April 2010 11:41:55(UTC)
Ian555

Scotland   
Joined: 04/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 20,288
Location: Scotland
Hi Henrik,

Great topic,but I run both digital and analog on my layout.

Maybe you could put that in as a third choice.

Thanks.

Ian.
Offline hxmiesa  
#4 Posted : 29 April 2010 11:44:02(UTC)
hxmiesa

Spain   
Joined: 15/12/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,587
Location: Spain
Here are my own comments to some of the raised questions;

Some ppl here should know by now that I am mainly an analog user.
I originally decided to stick to analog running because of the COST for digitalizing my big layout.

Later -especially following discussions here on this forum- I have become quite convinced that I have no need or wish for digitalizing my layout at all, EVER!;
Faulty digital components. The trouble of changing all motors and all lamps simply doesnt seem worth it for me.
Of course I sometimes look with wonder at the "singing and dancing" locos, but quickly realize that most ppl turn off the sound after a short time, or that having more than one of these running at a time is quite obnoxious.
The problems with burned out decos and speakers many ppl seem to have, is not really attractive to me. I really wish to simplify things. Not complicate them. Also I prefer to have my locos completly servicable by me, where wear-and-tear part cost only cents to replace. Not electronic circuitboards costing up to a 100 € in case of failure.
I certainly dont want to have to claim warranty repairs for my equipment, sending it back and forth to dealers and factory. Yikes!

Obviously I would personally prefer not to have to pay for expensive computerized locos, but I reallize and accept that I am part of a true minority, and that market (must) dictate the product offers.
A simple standardized swap-in module would be a good option, instead of individually taylored circuit-boards for each model.
A common, open standard (DCC) would be preferred, although again; I must accept that commercially it is more lucrative for M. keeping their system separate from the rest of the world. To put it blunt, I think ppl are "stupid" for playing into the hands of M. using their digital system. Sorry if this offend somebody. It´s just a personal point of view. Of course I realize, that if you read here, it is because you are definatly NOT stupid! ;-)
Best regards
Henrik Hoexbroe ("The Dane In Spain")
http://hoexbroe.tripod.com
Offline Bigdaddynz  
#5 Posted : 29 April 2010 12:02:24(UTC)
Bigdaddynz

New Zealand   
Joined: 17/09/2006(UTC)
Posts: 18,763
Location: New Zealand
I must admit Henrik that the points you raise about the reliability of digital electronics has concerned me, for the same reasons you give. Fortunately, I haven't had any of those problems, and I hope it stays that way. In that regard, buying analog locos and converting them yourself is a good way to go, as the locos still have one of the older commutor motors, for which parts are easily available, and can be user maintained. And decoders in these locos are easily replaced should something go wrong with them.
Offline RayF  
#6 Posted : 29 April 2010 12:06:10(UTC)
RayF

Gibraltar   
Joined: 14/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,870
Location: Gibraltar, Europe
I run trains mainly under digital control, but with the option to change to analog control at the flick of a switch. If I had more room I might have the option of some tracks staying analogue, seperate from the digital tracks.

I have some older locos which I have kept analogue. I might add to these in the future as I like the old classics from the '50s and '60s.

I chose to keep the switching of turnouts, signals and uncouplers under analogue control using switch boxes. Partly this is to economise on decoders, but also because it makes it easier when I run my analogue trains, and also that I like to see a bank of switches. In a panic, the analogue switches are easier to find and activate than the digital equivalents.

I have no plans to automate the running of the layout at any point. If I ever build an exhibition layout I might consider it.

I agree with Henrik that the decoders in locos should be standardised, and not unique to the loco as is currently the fashion for Marklin. However, I think locos should come from the factory with a cheap decoder which would be easily swapped by the user for a better one with more functions if required. This swapping should be accomplished without soldering.
Ray
Mostly Marklin.Selection of different eras and European railways
Small C track layout, control by MS2, 100+ trains but run 4-5 at a time.
Offline river6109  
#7 Posted : 29 April 2010 12:43:21(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,873
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
Henrik,
I have read about your way of thinking and your comments have some merit.
I can understand having followed some of the digital topics, not everything is so rosy at it seems.
My story about digital systems or mine, the original Märklin digital system, has'nt let me down for one day, except for doing something obvious wrong and stupid.
A also admit, it has cost me an arm and a leg to purchase it at around 1984.
I have also followed the thread of digital components from other manufacturers and the changes over the years have been quite dramatic and costly and like some computers, have become obsolete and adding to the overall cost.
When it comes to the running of locos, you may find, older locos have stood up better than some new designs.

Rapair costs, new or old would be pretty much the same and if you bought the locos new you've got a good chance of very rarely having to do any repairjobs.

Digital for me has it's good points and sofar have not had any bad experiences with decoders or sound decoders, except my own faults of destroying them and I must say it is not cheap to replace sound decoders.
We have come a long way with digital decoders and I have noticed the quality and reliability have improved considerable.

I'm still considering (after so many years) and since than, the new digital command stations came on the market, which one to choose from and sofar neither CS's have convinced me of going out to purchase one.
To buy all these other attachments to achieve the things one likes to achieve, is in my opinion, far too expensive and complicated.
Just by looking at the new Märklin system, it has become a digital menu, from appetizers, soups, maincourse and usually you get inticed with some sweets in the end and the endless instructions how to use all these components.

There are some, who have bought the CS 1 & CS 2 and have been happy with it and its functions.
I rather sit on the sideline and listen to all the different problems which have occured without getting myself into the same situation.

There are 2 distinctive differences between the choice of digital and analog.
one is, you prefer analog not because of digital is too expensive or reliability problems but the enjoyment of having an analog layout and operating it the way they were build in the first place: for analog.
Digital in my mind has its advantages if you go about the right way and consider and include all your options abvailable to you.
Regarding sound decoders, it is the sound coming from 2 locos and you can't realy hear one or the other.
It is the speaker that holds the secret of reproducing a sound that is noticable clear and strong in its tone and I hope in future this lack of having a speaker in it's airtight box will dramatically increase the reproduction of a sound.

John

https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
Offline David Dewar  
#8 Posted : 29 April 2010 13:41:13(UTC)
David Dewar

Scotland   
Joined: 01/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 7,448
Location: Scotland
Hi Henrik. I think you last post answered your own question. Cost is important and unless you are prepared to spend then stick with analogue.
For me that is the only reason to stay where you are. I changed years ago and have never looked back. I have no bother with digital equipment and everything has been working well for years. I think one turnout motor failed and that was all. The MS, CS1 and CS2 all have worked without any faults and completely transform the hobby into something of real interest compared to the old analogue days.
I dont know of anybody who has changed and would prefer to go back to analogue.
Could I suggest a small MS2 start set which you could add to your layout. The sound from steamers is I think very good although diesel and electric I dont think benefit greatly as the noise from the three rail track is sufficient. !!
Converting your older locos is a hobby in itself (expensive of course) but can be done over a period of time.
Other than cost I cant see any reason not to changed .. but again as I said cost is an important factor and if you are happy where you are then that is what counts.

dave
Take care I like Marklin and will defend the worlds greatest model rail manufacturer.
Offline DamonKelly  
#9 Posted : 29 April 2010 15:45:42(UTC)
DamonKelly

Australia   
Joined: 26/03/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,423
Location: Brisbane, QLD
All my locos are digital (except a 3029 -- just lazy, I will convert it eventually...)

I really can't see the attraction of analog. In my youth (early '70s), I used analog obviously, but got frustrated with only being able to control 1 loco.
Cost is an obvious problem, but this business of "preserving the analog" is rubbish IMNSHO...Wink
I've kept all the (old, worn out) parts from my 4 or so analog->digital conversions, so if I ever need to go back to the stone age, I could convert them back.
My memory of analog control was that it was not very smooth (anything less than full speed was jerky), and smooth starts were difficult.

Plus, I like the sound effects, light control, shunting mode, accel/deccel control etc...

So, anyone I haven't offended yet? Wink Wink Wink
Cheers,
Damon
Offline RayF  
#10 Posted : 29 April 2010 15:52:10(UTC)
RayF

Gibraltar   
Joined: 14/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,870
Location: Gibraltar, Europe
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be...BigGrin
Ray
Mostly Marklin.Selection of different eras and European railways
Small C track layout, control by MS2, 100+ trains but run 4-5 at a time.
Offline steventrain  
#11 Posted : 29 April 2010 16:38:42(UTC)
steventrain

United Kingdom   
Joined: 21/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 31,685
Location: United Kingdom
I voted for digital but oval of track under the digital layout are analogue.
Large Marklinist 3- Rails Layout with CS2/MS2/Boosters/C-track/favorites Electric class E03/BR103, E18/E118, E94, Crocodiles/Steam BR01, BR03, BR05, BR23, BR44, BR50, Big Boy.
Offline Frankenbahner  
#12 Posted : 29 April 2010 16:53:14(UTC)
Frankenbahner


Joined: 15/09/2006(UTC)
Posts: 625
Location: Nuremberg, Bavaria
I had hesitated to change to digital operation for a long time.

Cost was an important factor. When I started my hobby in the 1980ies as a child, the locomotives I got as birthday or Christmas presents were, of course, analog. Eventually, when I started to buy locos from pocket money in the early 1990ies, Roco was still a alternative for a reasonable price. Roco, however, was one of the last manufacturers jumping on the digital train, so this rolling stock was analog, too.

As Märklin stuff became more and more expensive and just unaffordable for a student with his pocket money, buying used items became another source for "new" rolling stock. These locomotives were analog too, of course.

Surely, digital systems proceeded and became more interesting, with many new features like sound etc. But then I had the problem that most of my fleet was analog, and a conversion would have required heavy investment.

It must have been somewhere around 2006 when I finally decided to start with conversions of old locos. In that year, Märklin made sell-off of their once heavily overized 60901 conversion kits, which were suddenly available for 40 - 45 €. I didn't run the converted locos digital at once, instead I planned to buy an Intellibox as soon as enough locos would have been fitted with decoders.

Then, a member from our club sold his 6021 for 40 €, and I took the chance and acquired it as a temporary solution, I stil plan to buy something better somewhere in the near future.

On my layout, I can switch between analog and digital, so I don't have to convert every analog loco. Due to this, I cannot take part in the poll, as I miss a third choice: both.

Regards,
Florian
H0 3-rail AC with DCC, MM and mfx, 2-rail DC streetcars, and N gauge
Offline petestra  
#13 Posted : 29 April 2010 16:56:18(UTC)
petestra

United States   
Joined: 27/07/2009(UTC)
Posts: 5,862
Location: Leesburg,VA.USA
Hi all, I voted analog. Sure, I would really like to have a digital layout but
I've been a Maerklin collector/operator since age 11 and most of my 26 locs are,
of course, analog. The expense really would be considerable to convert, not to mention the cost of mobil station, etc. I am now spending a-lot building my new layout which
I am enjoying very much since I retired. Cheers! Peter
Offline sudibarba  
#14 Posted : 29 April 2010 18:34:05(UTC)
sudibarba

United States   
Joined: 28/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 880
Location: Augusta, GA USA
I could never give up the individual control of the locomotives. I don't want to go back to having multiple sections of track controlled by separate transformers. I have no interest in digital control of turnouts and sound, while nice, is not a priority. As long as I can get ESU decoders for around $30 I am not to concerned about expense. I never have had one fail yet except when I did something stupid.
Eric
Offline Writhdar  
#15 Posted : 29 April 2010 19:05:20(UTC)
Writhdar


Joined: 19/12/2008(UTC)
Posts: 207
Location: Durango, Colorado
For me, the main reason to run locomotives digitally is to be able to have multiple locos running in the same track block. I find this vastly more enjoyable than analogue (single loco per bloc). A secondary but important factor is smoother low speed running. Sound effects, particularly steam loco sounds, are nice but not a big deal for me.

I do find the lack of wireless remote control capability with Marklin digital to be shortsighted (literally and figuratively). The new ESU Navigator looks promising for this but it appears that the US version may not have Marklin digital capability (sent an email to ESU support to verify the situation). The ESU ECoS central stations do have radio remote capability (new version, 50200, is not available in the US). However, since I don't intend to control switches digitally - for reasons similar to those Ray mentioned - the cost of it plus the radio unit seems too high.
Offline Darren W  
#16 Posted : 29 April 2010 20:56:23(UTC)
Darren W

Canada   
Joined: 01/01/2007(UTC)
Posts: 643
Location: Alberta
The digital control of trains is one of the reasons I got back in to the hobby. I do think that the evolution of the digital systems has made for a lot of confusion. I can see how it would be hard for someone non-technical to navigate the options. I agree with the comments that it would be nice to see new locos come with a "decoder slot" where you could plug in the decoder of choice and not have to do soldering. I think this would simplify things for many and allow easy upgrades. Given the varied designs of some models though I don't know how practical this is.

My frustration is with contollers. I have a MS1 which works well for what is it but I feel it is really handicapped. I think the 6021 was a great design since it did not have any limitations for the time and allowed for modular expansion with keyboards, memory and extra controllers. I have thought about getting one but I am concerned about only having 4 function buttons. The CS2 looks great but the price tag is too much for me right now. It is quite an investment.

To sum it up I respect the guys who do analog but I don't carry the nostalgia with me so digital is the only way to go.

Cheers...
Darren
Offline sudibarba  
#17 Posted : 29 April 2010 21:23:39(UTC)
sudibarba

United States   
Joined: 28/07/2006(UTC)
Posts: 880
Location: Augusta, GA USA
If you buy any new AC locomotives from Marklin or others you are going to get a decoder. It would be nice if they were all plug ins. At any rate, converting the old ones at about $50 US seems reasonable to me. The new ones will be ready anyway.
Eric
Offline Goofy  
#18 Posted : 29 April 2010 21:39:58(UTC)
Goofy


Joined: 12/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 9,273
Digital rules...!!! ThumpUp

Cool
H0
DCC = Digital Command Control
Offline Joseph Meiring  
#19 Posted : 29 April 2010 22:59:16(UTC)
Joseph Meiring

South Africa   
Joined: 27/12/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,165
Location: Western Cape Cape Town
I think i would love digital, but the cost (for a pensioned off teacher) is rather exorbitant, esp here in remote Africa!
But I do SO enjoy analog, and with my small layout (2 x 1,2m) its easy to run sectioned circuits, with dead "parking bays", with lots of the old blue transformers and control boxes. I suppose its also nostalgia - having had Marklin since 1959, the old system kinda stays with you...
Must admit all that wiring, lying on my back under the table does become a bit of a nightmare....but my wife keeps on reminding me...this is what makes model trains FUN!!
Joe M
Offline gachar001  
#20 Posted : 29 April 2010 23:54:16(UTC)
gachar001

India   
Joined: 29/04/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,391
Location: Chennai
Since I started on this hobby only around 2 years ago, my layout is all digital.All my locos have sound (or in the process of being converted). I love digital and I love sound (even when I run multiple locos at the same time).
I also like the idea of setting routes on the CS2 where I can select a certain route and the appropriate turnouts all switch to the correct position. This comes in real handy when I need to back a train into its siding. I don't need to figure which of the many turnouts need to be switched to get to the correct siding. With load regulation, I don't have to worry about my trains flying off the tracks when they come down hill. The advantages are too many to list here.
Apart from some minor glitches, I have not had any issues with my digital equipment (touch wood).
I guess in the end it all boils down to personal preference, cost and the willing ness to take the trouble to digitize the layout and rolling stock. Fortunately for me, I was not faced with the tough decision of 'to convert or not to convert' my beloved old locomotives since I didn't have any.
Gautham
Atlanta, GA USA
Offline pab  
#21 Posted : 30 April 2010 00:41:30(UTC)
pab

Netherlands   
Joined: 03/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,764
I run my trains digitals. Signals, turn-outs and so on still controlled the traditionbal way.
I have a number of not converted locos. Most of those will not be converted in the future.

Most of the digital locs have sound now.

I control my lay-out with an old Intellibox (and 4 power 3 boosters). I already have an Ecos I, which will be the main controller in the near future.
Offline nevw  
#22 Posted : 30 April 2010 03:56:08(UTC)
nevw

Australia   
Joined: 27/08/2005(UTC)
Posts: 11,071
Location: Murrumba Downs QLD
Since i startd 5 years ago all of my locos are digital, 3 from Analogue (2 were M Hamo) On my old table I had a MS1 then a CS1, a Cs2 for one day before it blew up. the points were controlled by switch boxes.

On the new table it is all digital. all of the points are digitally controlled. Currently I am using a ECOS. it is great.
SO no analogue for me.

NN
NOt wearing the Pink Pinny, which is hard to see and now I have a white Pinny which also is hard to see against MY pure white Skin Still have 2 new shiny tin Hips that is badly in Need of Repair matching rusting tin shoulders
and a hose pipe on the aorta
Junior member of the Banana Club, a reformist and an old Goat with a Bad memory, loafing around
Offline rbw993  
#23 Posted : 01 May 2010 01:09:53(UTC)
rbw993

United States   
Joined: 19/08/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,041
I am 100% digital in all my operating layouts, Marklin, Lionel and LGB. Before the advent of Lionel's Trainmaster system I was analogue for those trains but there was no other choice. With Marklin I started out with the 6021 controlled and have only ever run them digitally.

Regards,
Roger
Modeling Immensee, mile/km 0 on the Gottard. SBB Era V.
Offline Breitenfurt  
#24 Posted : 01 May 2010 13:41:10(UTC)
Breitenfurt


Joined: 01/01/2008(UTC)
Posts: 874
Location: Scotland
In Z scale, digital is not really an option (try putting a card in a BR89) so I am operating analogue though I could change to digital control for the signals and pointwork etc.

In N scale I have also stuck with analogue. I do have a Fleischmann digital set with two trains but I didn't get on with it at all well, ending up with collisions when I could not remember which train was was which number. I guess I could get used to it and can certainly see the advantages over analogue.

What I really do miss with analogue is the lack of sound. I did buy a noise generator box on eBay and it was a total waste of money with more unwanted hiss than realistic steam sounds. And no whistle. I would love to able to build two speakers into my layout that could reproduce the sounds of trains coming and going - oh well, dream on.

Chris.

Edited by user 02 May 2010 12:12:50(UTC)  | Reason: Corrected penultimate word paragraph 2 from 'of' to 'over'.

Offline Soest  
#25 Posted : 02 May 2010 02:44:47(UTC)
Soest


Joined: 05/09/2009(UTC)
Posts: 201
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
I have rationalized my collection into a digital and an analogue layout. The advantages of digital are self evident - multi locomotive control, accessories etc. My analogue layout has now become my vintage Marklin collection. It is all series 3600 track and switches - some pre-war. I have three analogue locomotive which I run on it - old favourites such as 3003 and 3029. I also recently purchased a 3015 and a 30159 which I will run on the vintage layour in their ceremonial, once yearly exercise. In this way I can enjoy the old and the new that Marklin has to offer. Both have their place.
Why do grown men play with trains?
Their wives insist they are insane
But their dreams they won't let down the drain
'Cause there ain't no thing so hard to lose as those disappearing railway blues.
Offline rrf  
#26 Posted : 02 May 2010 18:02:34(UTC)
rrf

United States   
Joined: 15/11/2009(UTC)
Posts: 300
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland USA
Hello,

I started collecting at age 10 in 1973. When digital first came out, I knew one day I would convert. Unfortunately, the digital control components were well beyond my means at that time. However through the next twenty years on the rare occasions I added a locomotive to my collection, I always purchased the digital version as I could afford that extra cost.

So when my wife gave me a digital starter set a few years ago, I had a reasonable number of digital Loks on hand. The MS1 was immediately hooked up to the Tisch Bahn of the day and life was good ... for a while. I eventually started to miss my old analog Loks and transformers. So the next layout had both a digital and an analog section.

All subsequent layouts, including the long planned permanent layout I'm about to start building have digital sections, analog sections and sections that can be switched between modes. I really like having both digital and analog as part of my Märklin world. I wish I could figure out a good method to allow my switches and signals to transition between digital and traditional analog control Wink

Bye,



Rob
Mackenrode Wende Bahn
Offline john black  
#27 Posted : 05 May 2010 02:54:03(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Hi Henrik,

thanks for a great topic - poll, too ThumpUpThumpUpThumpUp
Well, what can I say. Do love analog (talk about our childhood memories) the very same as digital ... Smile
I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline nevw  
#28 Posted : 05 May 2010 03:21:28(UTC)
nevw

Australia   
Joined: 27/08/2005(UTC)
Posts: 11,071
Location: Murrumba Downs QLD
rrf wrote:
Hello,

I started collecting at age 10 in 1973. When digital first came out, I knew one day I would convert. Unfortunately, the digital control components were well beyond my means at that time. However through the next twenty years on the rare occasions I added a locomotive to my collection, I always purchased the digital version as I could afford that extra cost.

So when my wife gave me a digital starter set a few years ago, I had a reasonable number of digital Loks on hand. The MS1 was immediately hooked up to the Tisch Bahn of the day and life was good ... for a while. I eventually started to miss my old analog Loks and transformers. So the next layout had both a digital and an analog section.

All subsequent layouts, including the long planned permanent layout I'm about to start building have digital sections, analog sections and sections that can be switched between modes. I really like having both digital and analog as part of my Märklin world. I wish I could figure out a good method to allow my switches and signals to transition between digital and traditional analog control Wink

Bye,




Rob,

For Switches the transition is the Marklin K83 or the Viessmann 5211, Each one will handle 4 Sets of points. which can be digitally controlled.

For Signals you can use a Digitaler Signaldecoder für Märklin Hobby-Lichtsignale. this will handle 4 Signals. Cost about 40 Euro. Available from http://stores.shop.ebay....hndiscount__W0QQ_armrsZ1 Prices include VAT which he takes off.
Postage is great.

Nev
NOt wearing the Pink Pinny, which is hard to see and now I have a white Pinny which also is hard to see against MY pure white Skin Still have 2 new shiny tin Hips that is badly in Need of Repair matching rusting tin shoulders
and a hose pipe on the aorta
Junior member of the Banana Club, a reformist and an old Goat with a Bad memory, loafing around
Offline TimR  
#29 Posted : 05 May 2010 03:48:40(UTC)
TimR

Indonesia   
Joined: 16/08/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,752
Location: Jakarta
I consider myself a newcomer to MRR.
And I like everything to be easy, so I opt for Digital. I didn't have a lot of history with analog models like many of members do, and by the time I bought my first H0 lok; it is already the MFX era. So it's almost natural for me.

I do understand where Hendrik is coming from... and looking at opinions posted in other forums, one of things that irks them about Marklin is that they don't sell analog things anymore - so while they used to own analog Marklin in the past; these days they made the switch to DC.

river6109 wrote:
Just by looking at the new Märklin system, it has become a digital menu, from appetizers, soups, maincourse and usually you get inticed with some sweets in the end and the endless instructions how to use all these components.


It is somewhat unfortunate that Marklin is probably also one of the biggest digital equipment supplier in the market - solely from the fact that they force you to buy their digital products with every new locomotive. So naturally the digital menu is their main focus.

The lack of choice irked some parts of the market. While I like MFX, it annoys me at times too when they choose to put frustrating, inflexible package.

The more I'm into the hobby, the more I seem to appreciate, at times, envy the freedom of choice that the DCC world would have allowed. And who knows, one day, I might opt to switch my Marklin models to DCC.

river6109 wrote:

Regarding sound decoders, it is the sound coming from 2 locos and you can't realy hear one or the other.


It's true... impressive at first, but get tiresome nowadays that given the choice, I would tend to choose models with no sound.
Now collecting C-Sine models.
Offline hxmiesa  
#30 Posted : 05 May 2010 20:19:55(UTC)
hxmiesa

Spain   
Joined: 15/12/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,587
Location: Spain
@TimR; I agree with your views! Very well put!

TimR wrote:
It's true... impressive at first, but get tiresome nowadays that given the choice, I would tend to choose models with no sound.

I would like to add, that I think there is some self-cheating burried in the statistics about sounds v. non-sound trains:
When you pay a lot of € for a loco, you might as well pay the last additional €50 to get the "full equipped" version. Just in case you one day want to use sounds, or sure it holds its value better in case of a re-sale, etc...
So, the statistics builds up a healthy margin of sounds-loks before non-sound ones.

(Also, I suspect that certain users wouldnt even be caught dead admitting they bought "the little one" instead of the full-equipped one. ROFL!!!)

Anyway, I admit voluntarilly that I am VERY impressed with the sounds these small computerized wonders emit! With time they will eventually sound totally realistic, with random ticks, nicks and variations. (A machine seldom sounds totally uniform all its life)

Best regards
Henrik Hoexbroe ("The Dane In Spain")
http://hoexbroe.tripod.com
Offline RayF  
#31 Posted : 05 May 2010 22:29:18(UTC)
RayF

Gibraltar   
Joined: 14/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,870
Location: Gibraltar, Europe
I agree with Tim. Although the sound is an interesting novelty, I quickly get tired of it. I usually run my sound locos with the operating sounds off, but I like to sound the horn or the whistle occasionally.

I would like the option of locos with a more basic sound module that only has horn sounds.
Ray
Mostly Marklin.Selection of different eras and European railways
Small C track layout, control by MS2, 100+ trains but run 4-5 at a time.
Offline TimR  
#32 Posted : 06 May 2010 02:36:10(UTC)
TimR

Indonesia   
Joined: 16/08/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,752
Location: Jakarta
hxmiesa wrote:

I would like to add, that I think there is some self-cheating burried in the statistics about sounds v. non-sound trains:
When you pay a lot of € for a loco, you might as well pay the last additional €50 to get the "full equipped" version. Just in case you one day want to use sounds, or sure it holds its value better in case of a re-sale, etc...
So, the statistics builds up a healthy margin of sounds-loks before non-sound ones.


I think pricing wise, Marklin do try to nudge their customers to buy full sound models, by giving a sense of perceived better value.

For me, I count my savings when I choose the no sound version. That extra €50 would go towards tracks and/or rolling stocks. It is also an easier on your pocket if you plan to acquire more than 1 of the same model. You had one w/ full sound to impress the visitors, why not pay cheaper for the second one?

Disadvantages for choosing the full sound, IMO is that in the longer term, if the decoder broke (they're very reliable btw, but if it happened, most likely will be after the warranty expires); you'll pay a lot more for replacement.. around €90 if you go with the slightly cheaper ESU equivalent.

This is more expensive than the cost of replacing two Maxon DC motors ... unless you'll be satisfied with a simple Lokpilot or a 60760-type decoder - but then it defeats the purpose of buying a full sound lok in the first place.

Another negative is that the sounds on Marklin decoders are not programmable - so you're stuck with what they gave you. You heard a better, more realistic sound downloadable from ESU website?
Forget it, you won't be able to use it on the full sound loco that you just bought..

Now, getting back to the analog vs digital thing;

I think it is not possible for Marklin to sell old style analog anymore, simply because unlike DC loks, Marklin AC would need AC reversing units; which would no longer be economical to produce considering where the main focus of today's Marklin/Trix offerings are.

But it is possible for them to start offering models from their 37xxx range to analog users by equipping them with 21-pin plug and a simple €5 decoders w/ load regulation. IF they want to attract more traditional customer base, this is the way to go, IMO.

The only problem is, I don't think they will ever contemplate on offering these types of package to Analog users. Why?
It would seriously threatened their MFX offerings; and Marklin would love no better than "encouraging" all digital users that still uses 6021/IB etc to go over to MFX and but their new CS and MS. So why encourage them to stay on with the old system?

Conflict of interest, IMO, for trying to be both a model manufacturer and a digital equipment supplier...
Now collecting C-Sine models.
Offline rrf  
#33 Posted : 06 May 2010 19:26:36(UTC)
rrf

United States   
Joined: 15/11/2009(UTC)
Posts: 300
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland USA
nevw wrote:
rrf wrote:

<stuff deleted>

I wish I could figure out a good method to allow my switches and signals to transition between digital and traditional analog control Wink


Rob,

For Switches the transition is the Marklin K83 or the Viessmann 5211, Each one will handle 4 Sets of points. which can be digitally controlled.

<more stuff deleted>

Nev


Hello Nev,

Thank you for your reply. Unfortunately, it appears I did not state my question correctly. I understand about using the K83 or Viesmann 5211 along with a soon to be acquired CS2 and/or MS2.

What I'm trying to figure out is a good method to keep my beloved blue boxes and analog feedback route controls, while also playing with digital. In my perferect world there would be a big swtich that transitioned my layout from tradtional analog route control to digital route control.

Theoretically, I belive I could do this with a huge number of 7244 universal relays. Obviously that would be rather expensive. So I'm now thinking about digitial relays that could be purchased in bulk.

Do you or another friend from the forum have any advise other than "Don't even bother to try such a silly thing"?Smile

Thanks,
Rob
Mackenrode Wende Bahn
Offline hxmiesa  
#34 Posted : 06 May 2010 19:53:59(UTC)
hxmiesa

Spain   
Joined: 15/12/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,587
Location: Spain
rrf wrote:
Theoretically, I belive I could do this with a huge number of 7244 universal relays. Obviously that would be rather expensive. So I'm now thinking about digitial relays that could be purchased in bulk.

Why (oh why) do it have to be with relays¿?
Actuators with multiple contacts might work equally well. How many lines do you need to cut¿?

If you really need relays, you can use 24V industrial releays. I use them. They cost less than €1 and comes with 4 contacts each. (each contact can be wired either NO or NC individually)
These are of course "live" relays; when you cut power they reset. (Not like the M. UFS´ which are static relays, and maintains their position always)
Best regards
Henrik Hoexbroe ("The Dane In Spain")
http://hoexbroe.tripod.com
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Similar Topics
Analog vs. digital (H0-scale)
by Rocca 19/03/2005 18:05:31(UTC)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 1.735 seconds.