Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline black_pete  
#1 Posted : 13 January 2010 13:59:33(UTC)
black_pete

Australia   
Joined: 09/04/2007(UTC)
Posts: 150
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
I suppose I should start with an apology for talking about Roco here Laugh

Over the Christmas Holidays I had some time to think about my predominantly SBB collection and the holes left by restricting my rolling stock to mainly Marklin items.

I already have 7 Liliput ALUSUISSE era IV wagons which I intend to run in a unit train configuration, a Roco SBB Sputnik and based on pervious postings here I have ordered a Liliput RABe 526 Triebwagon Flirt - my very first non-Marklin Loco. I suppose this is almost like losing my virginity again Blushing

Anyway two Roco "items" took my eye. Firstly the AAE Double Wagon with 2 x 20' Schweizer Post Containers. There are currently two versions available (66564 & 66565) with a third to be added in 2010 (66569).

Secondly the "Exclusive" SBB Bi-Level Coaches. These consist of a 1st Class Coach (45460), a 2nd Class Coach (45462), a 1st Class Coach / Baggage Car (45461) and a 2nd Class Coach / Driving Trailer (45464). Although these coaches were released in 2004 many dealers still seem to have stock.

Does anyone have thoughts or comments about these Roco items.

BTW I also spent sometime looking over my available train room space and mentally filling in the details. The "space" is 7m long x 4m wide with one side being open into a hallway. The open "side" provides an option for "dual" access and would effectively increase the available layout display space. I'm wanting to use a wide radius approach (please Mother Marklin can we have some C-track wide radius turnouts and Flex C-track) and envisage a helix with plenty of storage below.

I'll have to drag WinTrack out again and start doodling Mellow
Regards
Pete

expat Kiwi - now living in Melbourne

SBB Era IV & V - Digital - CS1 - C Track
Offline MarioFabro  
#2 Posted : 13 January 2010 15:42:14(UTC)
MarioFabro

United States   
Joined: 16/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 793
Location: Pittsburgh,
here are some pics for you from another thread of mine:

UserPostedImage

UserPostedImage

You have to add also the restaurant coach under 45470

UserPostedImage



The coaches are in 1:87 and thus 303mm long. For my personal taste, I prefer the shorter ones but when I bought them I did not know about the slighly shorter HAG version (however expensive and hard to find). Coaches are nicely made and fine detail.

You will not be able to run these coaches nicely on any R1 or R2 curves. Also, because of their low profile, they will get "hung" on the R2 turnouts (24611 / 24612 / 24624), specifically on the turn-out light.

I am considering selling them or keeping them for display unless I can take care of the above issue. Also, a semi-prototypical train with loco and 6 coaches (1x45461, 1x45460, 1x45470, 2x45462, 1x45464 is how I was planning to run mine) will make the train 2m long. Consider when planning stations since it will look silly on a short station.
UserPostedImageUserPostedImageUserPostedImageEra IV-VI --- "If you have brains you love trains" or "When I grow up, I will play with trains"
Offline MarioFabro  
#3 Posted : 13 January 2010 15:47:06(UTC)
MarioFabro

United States   
Joined: 16/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 793
Location: Pittsburgh,
black_pete wrote:

Anyway two Roco "items" took my eye. Firstly the AAE Double Wagon with 2 x 20' Schweizer Post Containers. There are currently two versions available (66564 & 66565) with a third to be added in 2010 (66569).


Consider also Piko 57726 and 57738: cheaper for a long consist (I have 11 of them).
UserPostedImageUserPostedImageUserPostedImageEra IV-VI --- "If you have brains you love trains" or "When I grow up, I will play with trains"
Offline rbw993  
#4 Posted : 13 January 2010 16:39:58(UTC)
rbw993

United States   
Joined: 19/08/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,051
Hi Pete,
I agree with Mario. Unless you are only going to use the wide radius turnouts and R3 or better cutves I wouldn't go with the Roco Bi-Level coaches. I have been able to get a hold of 5 of the HAG versions and they work well but not perfectly on R2 turnouts. They pull okay but pushing through an s-curve such as a cross-over between two lines is problematic.

I have quite a few Roco freight cars and am happy with them. SOme require attachment of fine details that would break off in shipping. I have nevber bothered to switch the wheelsets.

Roger
Modeling Immensee, mile/km 0 on the Gottard. SBB Era V.
Offline MarioFabro  
#5 Posted : 13 January 2010 20:57:53(UTC)
MarioFabro

United States   
Joined: 16/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 793
Location: Pittsburgh,
Yes, Roger is right. I forgot to mention that my consist is practically impossible to run when pushing through any type of turn-out. The train is basically good only when pulling. I was planning the change of all wheels and fine adjustement of the cars etc.
UserPostedImageUserPostedImageUserPostedImageEra IV-VI --- "If you have brains you love trains" or "When I grow up, I will play with trains"
Offline mike c  
#6 Posted : 13 January 2010 21:36:10(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,227
Location: Montreal, QC
MarioFabro wrote:
The coaches are in 1:87 and thus 303mm long. For my personal taste, I prefer the shorter ones but when I bought them I did not know about the slighly shorter HAG version (however expensive and hard to find). Coaches are nicely made and fine detail.

You will not be able to run these coaches nicely on any R1 or R2 curves. Also, because of their low profile, they will get "hung" on the R2 turnouts (24611 / 24612 / 24624), specifically on the turn-out light.

I am considering selling them or keeping them for display unless I can take care of the above issue. Also, a semi-prototypical train with loco and 6 coaches (1x45461, 1x45460, 1x45470, 2x45462, 1x45464 is how I was planning to run mine) will make the train 2m long. Consider when planning stations since it will look silly on a short station.


Mario makes a few good points here.

The Roco IC2000 coaches cannot be used on R1 and R2 is likely problematic.
I have been running my two consists on Maerklin C4 and C5 and K4 and K5 without a problem, both in push and in pull operation.

If you are worried about the consist being too long, you can remove the Restaurant or Bistro coach from the consist. Shortened trains with 5 coaches (1 AD, 1A, 2B and a Bt) were being run from Zuerich Airport to Luzern and on other routes. A full list of actual and recent consists can be found at www.reisezuege.ch (see my post under Prototypes).

As far as the train looking silly in a short station. The Swiss rail network is replete with smaller stations where the IC2000 and other trains roll through without stopping, so, having a smaller station than where a mainline Intercity would not stop should not be a problem.

I originally went with the Hag coaches. I was disappointed with the first batch, which had problems with windows popping out, blue LEDs and a poor design for the coupling shaft mechanism. The window and LED issues have since been resolved.

I love my IC2000 Coaches and am sure that you will as well.

Roco also makes very nice models of the EC, EWIV and EWII coaches in 1/87. Models that are not current can still be found in many Swiss and European shops and on eBay. You can also find the classic EWI coaches from Hag, Lima and Liliput. These mix very well with the Roco EWII and Maerklin Lightsteel coaches.

Other companies like ACME and LS Models have also announced or released Swiss models, like the very nice SBB-FS EN "Luna" Set or the announced UIC coaches (LSM).

If you want some inspiration on what Roco and other 1/87 coaches look like on a layout, check out this website:

http://modellbahnen.cado...viewcategory&catid=4

Regards

Mike C
Offline TimR  
#7 Posted : 13 January 2010 21:37:15(UTC)
TimR

Indonesia   
Joined: 16/08/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,752
Location: Jakarta
Having seen these Roco IC2000 coaches in the flesh recently - gotta admit that they looked really beautiful..

Maybe one day if I have a properly designed layout with larger radius curves (need it anyway to ensure models like BR45 can ran smoothly).
Now collecting C-Sine models.
Offline mike c  
#8 Posted : 13 January 2010 21:43:18(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,227
Location: Montreal, QC
I have pretty much decided that any layout that I eventually build will contain two parallel mainline tracks, likely with R4 and R5 on the outside of the layout. I will then have a local or regional line using R3 and maybe R2 and then maybe also a HOm narrow gauge line on the inside of the layout.

The longer trains (TGV, ICE, ICN, IC2000, EWIV Pendel, and longer trains) will operate on the mainline tracks. The shorter regional, commuter and local trains will run on the inside tracks.)

This would not be anything out of the ordinary as this type of operation can be seen throughout Switzerland and in Europe.

I would also love to be able to include a module that would represent a Kopfbahnhof which would extend from one side of the layout to allow for prototypical station operation (and train storage).

Regards

Mike C
Offline Rinus  
#9 Posted : 13 January 2010 22:30:27(UTC)
Rinus


Joined: 20/02/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,729
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands
I'm using quite a number of 1:87 coaches and trains on my layout at te moment. I'm actually replacing my 1:93 coaches, since the 1:87 ones have a much better, real like, appearance. The coaches are from ACME and Roco.

Since my layout was designed and build with 1:93 coaches in mind, operating the 1:87 forced me to make some modifications.
1. Even in K track radius 5 (2251) and 4 (2241)(my smallest radi used on the visible parts) some 1:87 coaches tended to collide with the catenary poles on the in-side of the curve and the stone-like walls on the outher side. I had to replace some of them.

UserPostedImage

2. Operating the hidden station, with radius 3 curves (K 2231) and turnouts is a bit more challanging. Not only the above mentioned problem of hitting the turnouts, but especially the increased chance of derailing forced me to operate the hidden station with a lower speed in the turnout section.

Having made this modifications, I can only stongly recommend these 1:87 scale coaches. Not only do they themself look far better, also the locomotive itself looks much better in proportion.
Offline TimR  
#10 Posted : 13 January 2010 22:57:27(UTC)
TimR

Indonesia   
Joined: 16/08/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,752
Location: Jakarta
Current trends of MRR in demanding greater accuracy had led me to believe that in the future R1 will not provide me with a safe enough margin of error.

Though I still prefer 1/93.5 scale coaches (and don't really mind 1/100 even), the future layout that I planned to built would have to have good enough margin to run even the 1/87 scale coaches. So for one, minimum radius curve allowed would be R2; majority should be R3 and up.

Thanks Evil R and Mike C for sharing your layout concepts..
Now collecting C-Sine models.
Offline mascagni  
#11 Posted : 13 January 2010 23:22:41(UTC)
mascagni


Joined: 25/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 826
Location: Tallahassee, FL USA
I too have these Roco IC2000 coaches, and I do like them. However, all the problems listed above hold. One other problem that is a generic Roco issue that I have in spades with these puppies is how hard it is to open up the bodies. I want to get into the pilot coach, and have still not found the magic word. The diagrams in the supplied literature would be funny if they were not totally useless. The pictures have no captions, undoubtedly to make them multilingual, but then you have no idea what to actually do to crack them open.
Michael Mascagni, Tallahassee
If I weren't a Mathematician, I'd be a Violinist.--Albert Einstein
Offline MarioFabro  
#12 Posted : 14 January 2010 18:52:00(UTC)
MarioFabro

United States   
Joined: 16/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 793
Location: Pittsburgh,
mike c wrote:
[
I have been running my two consists on Maerklin C4 and C5 and K4 and K5 without a problem, both in push and in pull operation.


Mike,

did you change wheels or do any modification to the cars? My problems were when pushing through R2 switches. Unfortunately, I will still have a few in my lay-out design.
UserPostedImageUserPostedImageUserPostedImageEra IV-VI --- "If you have brains you love trains" or "When I grow up, I will play with trains"
Offline mike c  
#13 Posted : 15 January 2010 23:09:37(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,227
Location: Montreal, QC
Mario,

my switches are either K Track wide angle switches or C Track normal switches. In all cases, the switches have the little manual level but do not have the rotating lighted piece attached.
The IC2000 coacjhes are all standard DC except for the pilot coaches, which were ordered from Barp Tech (then Zuba Tech Winterthur). I do not know if they changed the axles or simply installed the slider and bridged the left and right wheel contacts for the ground. I have not had any problems on K or C Track.
I did have to modify my EWIV (IC) Bt as there were two pieces that interfered with the rotation of the bogie closest to the cab.

Regards

Mike C
Offline black_pete  
#14 Posted : 27 February 2010 14:08:48(UTC)
black_pete

Australia   
Joined: 09/04/2007(UTC)
Posts: 150
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Well the first 3 of my Roco SBB Bi-Level Coaches have arrived and there's 3 to come. I've gone for a full 6 coach consist (1 AD, 1A, 1WRB, 2B and a Bt) but as these items were no longer in production I had to source supply from 4 different vendors (British, American & Belgium) - ain't the Internet a wonderful resource Smile

I've unpacked and have the 3 coaches sitting in front of me - I must admit they do look quite impressive even if they are Roco Blushing

As indicated my eventual layout is planned around a 4m x 7m area which seems to be a reasonable space. As stated I fully intend to utilise wide radius curves and switches but now I'll just have to include a good sized station / platform area as well. Initial thoughts are a Kibri Bonn station (open, airy, nostalgic and sort of Swiss looking RollEyes ) with an extended platform.

Based on Mike C's comments I've recently received my TEE L'Oiseau Bleu sets (41874 & 41875) so I suppose I'm becoming somewhat committed to running more "true length" train sets Cool
Regards
Pete

expat Kiwi - now living in Melbourne

SBB Era IV & V - Digital - CS1 - C Track
Offline river6109  
#15 Posted : 01 March 2010 15:30:01(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,875
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
Evil R wrote:
I'm using quite a number of 1:87 coaches and trains on my layout at te moment. I'm actually replacing my 1:93 coaches, since the 1:87 ones have a much better, real like, appearance. The coaches are from ACME and Roco.

Since my layout was designed and build with 1:93 coaches in mind, operating the 1:87 forced me to make some modifications.
1. Even in K track radius 5 (2251) and 4 (2241)(my smallest radi used on the visible parts) some 1:87 coaches tended to collide with the catenary poles on the in-side of the curve and the stone-like walls on the outher side. I had to replace some of them.

UserPostedImage

2. Operating the hidden station, with radius 3 curves (K 2231) and turnouts is a bit more challanging. Not only the above mentioned problem of hitting the turnouts, but especially the increased chance of derailing forced me to operate the hidden station with a lower speed in the turnout section.

Having made this modifications, I can only stongly recommend these 1:87 scale coaches. Not only do they themself look far better, also the locomotive itself looks much better in proportion.


nice layout.
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
Offline river6109  
#16 Posted : 01 March 2010 15:34:31(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,875
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
mascagni wrote:
I too have these Roco IC2000 coaches, and I do like them. However, all the problems listed above hold. One other problem that is a generic Roco issue that I have in spades with these puppies is how hard it is to open up the bodies. I want to get into the pilot coach, and have still not found the magic word. The diagrams in the supplied literature would be funny if they were not totally useless. The pictures have no captions, undoubtedly to make them multilingual, but then you have no idea what to actually do to crack them open.


You start at the buffers without braking them and while you get hold of both buffers you slightly push the walls outwards and pushing the buffers upwards, it should come loose.

When putting it back together make sure the stairway is properly put into its place.

John
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
Offline black_pete  
#17 Posted : 03 March 2010 12:21:35(UTC)
black_pete

Australia   
Joined: 09/04/2007(UTC)
Posts: 150
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Well all 4 packages have arrived safely so I now have my full 6 coach consist. Just working out which one of my fleet of 460's will inherit the honour at the front on this one - Hmmm, maybe a basic SBB Red unit or perhaps a special Swiss Marklin livery.

BUT - damn it's l-o-n-g OhMyGod

Just sorting out the trackside catenary support clearances for R4 & R5 curves RollEyes
Regards
Pete

expat Kiwi - now living in Melbourne

SBB Era IV & V - Digital - CS1 - C Track
Offline Loadmaster  
#18 Posted : 03 March 2010 22:06:20(UTC)
Loadmaster

United States   
Joined: 03/02/2010(UTC)
Posts: 898
Location: So Cal
Mario,

Is the engine you are using for the train prototypical or does SBB use any engine?

Robert
HOac and Z scale running SBB/BLS Era IV-V
Offline mike c  
#19 Posted : 04 March 2010 00:32:56(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,227
Location: Montreal, QC
Loadmaster wrote:
Mario,

Is the engine you are using for the train prototypical or does SBB use any engine?

Robert


The IC2000 Double Deck Consists are almost always pulled by Re 460 locomotives. It has occurred from time to time that IC2000 Consists have been pulled by Re 4/4II, but this has been a rare occurrence. AFAIK the Re 4/4II cannot be used in push-pull operation with the IC2000 Coaches and must be coupled to the front of the train.

Full consists of IC2000 Coaches and their routes can be found at www.reisezuege.ch.

UPDATE: The following direct link shows consist by consist. Click on the consist to see details about the coaches, route and more:
http://www.reisezuege.ch/reisezuege/index.php?action=12

Regards

Mike C

Edited by user 04 March 2010 06:05:33(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Offline Loadmaster  
#20 Posted : 04 March 2010 05:49:36(UTC)
Loadmaster

United States   
Joined: 03/02/2010(UTC)
Posts: 898
Location: So Cal
Mike,

Thanks for that link. It is just wonderful and the pictures of the consists shows me several uses for the 460 loco.

Robert
HOac and Z scale running SBB/BLS Era IV-V
Offline black_pete  
#21 Posted : 04 March 2010 14:42:57(UTC)
black_pete

Australia   
Joined: 09/04/2007(UTC)
Posts: 150
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Mike many thanks you beat me to the answer Blink

However I wasn't aware the the ocassional Re 4/4II was seen at the head of these train sets.

I too am finding the www.reisezuege.ch site a very useful reference source - many thanks.
Regards
Pete

expat Kiwi - now living in Melbourne

SBB Era IV & V - Digital - CS1 - C Track
Offline MarioFabro  
#22 Posted : 04 March 2010 18:09:58(UTC)
MarioFabro

United States   
Joined: 16/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 793
Location: Pittsburgh,
Loadmaster wrote:
Mario,

Is the engine you are using for the train prototypical or does SBB use any engine?

Robert



Hag made a nice loco that could be coupled with the consist:

UserPostedImage

Mike is right, any 460 would do. I will use my "red" ones mostly.
UserPostedImageUserPostedImageUserPostedImageEra IV-VI --- "If you have brains you love trains" or "When I grow up, I will play with trains"
Offline Rinus  
#23 Posted : 04 March 2010 23:07:44(UTC)
Rinus


Joined: 20/02/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,729
Location: Wageningen, The Netherlands
river6109 wrote:
Evil R wrote:
I'm using quite a number of 1:87 coaches and trains on my layout at te moment. I'm actually replacing my 1:93 coaches, since the 1:87 ones have a much better, real like, appearance. The coaches are from ACME and Roco.

Since my layout was designed and build with 1:93 coaches in mind, operating the 1:87 forced me to make some modifications.
1. Even in K track radius 5 (2251) and 4 (2241)(my smallest radi used on the visible parts) some 1:87 coaches tended to collide with the catenary poles on the in-side of the curve and the stone-like walls on the outher side. I had to replace some of them.

UserPostedImage

2. Operating the hidden station, with radius 3 curves (K 2231) and turnouts is a bit more challanging. Not only the above mentioned problem of hitting the turnouts, but especially the increased chance of derailing forced me to operate the hidden station with a lower speed in the turnout section.

Having made this modifications, I can only stongly recommend these 1:87 scale coaches. Not only do they themself look far better, also the locomotive itself looks much better in proportion.


nice layout.


The lay-out is no longer there. After I saw yours, I noticed lots of chances to improve mine.

I'm starting on a new one based on the Brennerbahn soon, which will be designed with 1:87 scaled coaches in mind. It will have a minimal Radius of K track 2274's on the visible parts.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.735 seconds.