Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline mike c  
#1 Posted : 29 February 2008 05:53:45(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,232
Location: Montreal, QC
Hello Everybody:

When I first looked through the 2008 New Items Brochure, I very quickly noticed that the 26544 Cisalpino/SBB/FS Set had a few inaccurate details.
I do not know whether Maerklin will eventually release models based on Trix' announced 185.2, which is much closer to the actual Re 484 as was used by Cisalpino. In any case, the photo of the set that was included in the Brochure includes a normal Re 482 painted in the Cisalpino livery. I am certain that this will be delivered with the decals saying 484.
What concerns me more is that the Set is supposed to contain one Cisalpino (ex-SBB) Apm (like 4368), one ex-FS A (like 41893) and one ex-SBB Bpm (like 4366/42163). There is also an additional ex-FS coach available under 41897. My problem here is that the SBB 2nd class coach should be a Bpm EC (like 4369) and not like the one pictured.
I have already contacted Maerklin and got the standard "thank you for your interest in our products" reply. At least, the message stated that my letter would be forwarded to the corresponding department.
Here is where you all come in... If enough of us write in, we may be able to effect some minor changes, such as ensuring that the set comes with the right coaches.

If you would like to help out, send an email to service@maerklin.de

Regards

Mike C
Offline mascagni  
#2 Posted : 29 February 2008 18:18:31(UTC)
mascagni


Joined: 25/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 826
Location: Tallahassee, FL USA
Mike: If you hang out in the Zuerich HBf, you see many Cisalpino trains per day. It seems that the train set from Maerklin using the Re 484 is not the most common, by far. I recall seeing the ETR 470 much more frequently, and with the new trans-alp tunnel, they are going to start using the ETR 610. Just FYI.--MM
Michael Mascagni, Tallahassee
If I weren't a Mathematician, I'd be a Violinist.--Albert Einstein
Offline mike c  
#3 Posted : 29 February 2008 23:22:43(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,232
Location: Montreal, QC
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by mascagni
<br />Mike: If you hang out in the Zuerich HBf, you see many Cisalpino trains per day. It seems that the train set from Maerklin using the Re 484 is not the most common, by far. I recall seeing the ETR 470 much more frequently, and with the new trans-alp tunnel, they are going to start using the ETR 610. Just FYI.--MM


Hello Michael:

First things first. It is very rare that a Re 484 in Cisalpino livery is seen in Zuerich HB. This is not because the trains do not stop in Zuerich, but because the Re 484 were only used on the Milano-Geneva and Milano-Bern segments of the routes via the Simplon tunnel. The trains between Bern and Basel were pulled by either Re 4/4II or Re 460, as were all of the Cisalpino trains on the Gotthard.
AFAIK, the Re 484s have been returned to SBB Cargo and the trains are now being pulled in Switzerland by Re 460 or Re 4/4II. In Italy, traction is handled by Trenitalia (FS) Loks.
At some point in the future, the ETR 610 will go into service. I do not know whether this means that the 470s will be withdrawn from service or whether there will be a migration with 610s taking over for the 470s and the 470s replacing the locomotive pulled trains.
I guess that we should know more over the next few months.
I already have the ACME Cisalpino coach sets and pull them with one of my Hag, Roco or Maerklin Re 460s or Re 4/4IIs.

Regards

Mike C
Offline MarioFabro  
#4 Posted : 01 March 2008 00:04:27(UTC)
MarioFabro

United States   
Joined: 16/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 793
Location: Pittsburgh,
Mike,

I appreciate your concern about prototypical precision but this is not a high priority for me. I have also ordered the Cisalpino set and, quite frankly, would not be able to appreciate the differences between one coach and the other
UserPostedImageUserPostedImageUserPostedImageEra IV-VI --- "If you have brains you love trains" or "When I grow up, I will play with trains"
Offline frankie  
#5 Posted : 01 March 2008 00:09:50(UTC)
frankie


Joined: 27/10/2006(UTC)
Posts: 692
Location: Italy
It's interesting that two North American members discuss about, in part, Italian rolling stock, Cisalpino is a joint wenture.
On our forum, marklinfan.it, we keep moaning about the fact that Marklin doesn't produce Italian rolling stock from very long time, I mean new tooling, not re-painting of off-the-shelf stuff.
Marklin thinks that the italian market is a very limited one and then has forgotten us, someone says at least until 2012.
From your exchange I understand that they are wrong, an italian locomitive would sell also abroad, not only in Italy.
At least we have Roco, the new Caimano is a nice one.
Sorry if I went OT.
Alessandro
I have a CS1 Reloaded!
Offline laalves  
#6 Posted : 01 March 2008 01:37:49(UTC)
laalves


Joined: 10/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,162
Location: Portugal
Oh well, at least you have some stuff. Just look at my country (ZERO, never ever!) or even neighbouring Spain (I believe only the Spanish ICE - AVE was ever released by M).

The only mainstream manufacturers ever to get interested in Portugal is Roco, Mehano and Electrotren, even so with quite a scarce offering.

On the other hand, Roco is releasing year after year, fantastic new Spanish items, both 2 and 3-rail. If I were a Spaniard I would ignore most Märklin stuff and go for Roco 3-rail.
Offline mmervine  
#7 Posted : 01 March 2008 02:38:59(UTC)
mmervine

United States   
Joined: 30/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,893
Location: Keene, NH
laalves:

Mehano has announced a new Eurospinter for CP for 2008. It is now posted on their website:

http://www.mehano.si

r/mark
Märklin C-track, Marklin Digital & ECoS, multi-era French & Swiss
http://www.ete-ene.org/m...mervines-layout-gallery/
Offline mmervine  
#8 Posted : 01 March 2008 17:50:56(UTC)
mmervine

United States   
Joined: 30/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,893
Location: Keene, NH
Mike:

Although I didn't order this set, It really doesn't bother me that Marklin used existing molds for it. In fact, they need to do more of this in order to be profitable. I was surprised that they have made new (plastic) molds for the BR185 as the metal hobby lok is pretty good and Railtop and Roco already have plastic models on the market.

Once a set like this is on the layout, equipped with lights and people, no one will notice the small inaccuracies!

r/mark

Märklin C-track, Marklin Digital & ECoS, multi-era French & Swiss
http://www.ete-ene.org/m...mervines-layout-gallery/
Offline mike c  
#9 Posted : 02 March 2008 01:13:24(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,232
Location: Montreal, QC
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Hemmerich
<br />Hi Allesandro,

ROCO has failed for many years to offer Italian locos for AC - guess why? wink

Maybe if they had done it earlier, Märklin would play in that field as well much more. Cool

You're in general right.

I've for example those fine sets #41893, 41895 and 41896 and the two Riviera sets #42941, 42942; not even to mention the glorious #4189. I can nicely pull them with my BR111's or ÖBB 1044's to/from the Brenner or with some of my Swiss locos, but as soon as the train gets into "Bella Italia" there is not much left; regardless from whatever model train supplier.

Well, not a big problem for me as this is just a nice hobby - it would be much worse if the REAL trains were w/o the "right" locos!!! biggrin


Hey Lutz,

ever heard of Gieffeci? They are Roco's distributor in Italy. For many years, Roco has produced models for Gieffeci, many of which are not available in the Roco International Catalog. This was also in addition to any Italian models in the "International Collection".

So, I would not say that Roco has failed in Italy.

Until the demise of Lima and Rivarossi, they were the two main Italian Model Train Brands. Since then, there have been quite a few new companies to come on the scene, including ACME and VI Trains. Add to this the reborn Hornby-Lima-Rivarossi and you definitely have one of the busiest markets in terms of models being released right now.

It would be nice to see Maerklin put out a version of the E64F4 or Traxx loks for Italy. Maybe an Angeltrains 186 or a FNM Dispolok. There is already a model of the SBB Re 474. How about the same livery but with DFG markings?

The one thing that I really would love to see is a Set with 3 or 4 Eurofima coaches in the original orange livery. That would make a lovely train for Italian, Swiss and German or Austrian modellers. Another nice model would be a UIC-X as a Cuccette (Couchette) coach.

The other thing that I would like to see is a Maerklin version of the Trix 23414, but in the red and gray colours like 4189.

Oh, and bring back the classic Italian box car!

Regards

Mike C
Offline mike c  
#10 Posted : 02 March 2008 01:24:19(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,232
Location: Montreal, QC
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Hemmerich

Neither relevant for the Märklin line nor this CISALPINO train set.
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Once a set like this is on the layout, equipped with lights and people, no one will notice the small inaccuracies!

Sure and fully agreed - except for those "bean counters" as mentioned before. biggrin

For a "normal" model railroad fan the composition of a CISALPINO with a regular RE482 (aka #36851) would be no problem at all (Brig, spring 2006). Smile

UserPostedImage


Nice photo, but it is a 484 and not a 482.

Why does a person become a bean counter just because they make a suggestion to make a model more realistic?????

The description of the set was as follows:
E-Lok Re 484 as two system locomotive with four pantographs. 1 Open Seating Coach 1st class, 1 compartment coach 1st class and 1 Open Seating Coach 2nd class of Cisalpino AG, registered with the SBB.

Based on that info, there was no way of knowing that the 4224 was supposed to represent a Trenitalia BH, as those coaches would not be registered with the SBB.

The only information about any FS coaches for this set was the 41897 additional second class compartment coach (Eurofima type).

Glad to see that you saw pre-release models of this set, and thanks for the additional info. Please don't assume that we all have the same access to this kind of info. Many of us live too far away to go to all the train shows, so show some respect for the overseas modellers.

As far as beans, I am spending an awful lot of them on this hobby of ours, so yes, I want to make sure that I am getting the most value for my beans.

Regards

Mike C
Offline mike c  
#11 Posted : 02 March 2008 02:59:13(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,232
Location: Montreal, QC
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by MarioFabro
<br />Mike,

I appreciate your concern about prototypical precision but this is not a high priority for me. I have also ordered the Cisalpino set and, quite frankly, would not be able to appreciate the differences between one coach and the other


Mario:

If your trains are pure toys, then that is fine.
My collection consists of trains that I have either ridden on or seen during my travels in Europe. The trains are not just playthings, but also recollections of memories associated with that train and things seen or experienced on those trips.

I am not saying that every model has to be exact to the point of being fanatical. All that I ask for is that the models be "as prototypical as possible".
If not, Marklin could make one model of coaches and just repaint it as close to every other livery out there. If I wanted that, I would just buy Piko.
I don't understand how models that have "glow through" bodies ever make it past quality control, nor how small details that could be corrected for a few pennies per model are left incorrect (see windshield wipers on the 189/474 or the SNCF decals on the skirting of the 4266 SBB Coach.)
More than that, I do not understand modellers who accept everything as it is delivered.
I have for many years submitted a yearly list of desired models to Marklin. Over the years, a few of those model suggestions have actually been released. I am proud to say that I have participated, and hope that my suggestions have indeed helped Marklin decide on new items to release.
If you will buy just anything, that's fine. I don't have those resources, so I want to make sure that when I buy a model, that it is at least worth the money I am spending on it.

Respectfully yours,

Mike C
Offline WelshMatt  
#12 Posted : 02 March 2008 22:14:36(UTC)
WelshMatt


Joined: 06/10/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,345
Location: ,
I too would like to see a triple pack of orange Eurofimas (slowly assembling a fleet of the older ones). That said, I suspect Marklin may be considering 1:93.5 scale length Eurofimas. Certainly it would be worthwhile to do so given the sheer number of liveries and countries that operated them.

Is that a coach pack or a set assembled from single vehicles Lutz?
Matt from Wales.

When you pay Range Rover prices, don't accept Lada quality
Offline laalves  
#13 Posted : 03 March 2008 02:04:41(UTC)
laalves


Joined: 10/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,162
Location: Portugal
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by mmervine
<br />laalves:

Mehano has announced a new Eurospinter for CP for 2008. It is now posted on their website:

http://www.mehano.si

r/mark


Just a renumbering of last year's. It's a bad model.

I have a Lima version that is shorter than it should be (the Mehano is correct in that bit) but looks much better than Mehano's.
Offline Larry  
#14 Posted : 03 March 2008 05:48:33(UTC)
Larry

United States   
Joined: 14/11/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,443
Location: Northeast Ohio
So, Lutz, you have more powers and information at your fingertips than any group of 100 experts in this area. Amazing. Simply amazing.

No question you'd be from B-W!
Offline mike c  
#15 Posted : 03 March 2008 06:06:22(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,232
Location: Montreal, QC
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Hemmerich

Lots of people know that the CISALPINPO pool contains both "genuine" and Eurofima type SBB Apm's/Bpm's; especially those who have ridden on this train or who see and observe it regularly. wink

UserPostedImage

Bean counters in particular are expected to know also that a number of CISALPINO Eurofima cars are registered both with SBB and FS. Cool


A few issues here:

1) AFAIK there are no Eurofima coaches in Cisalpino livery. The SBB coaches that were repainted for this use are SBB EC coaches (1993). The Italian coaches that were repainted in the Cisalpino livery are Italian UIC-Z A, B and BH coaches and Grand Comfort Dining Car and UIC-X Baggage coach. These coaches look remarkably similar to the Eurofima coaches they were based on, but like the SNCB and OBB variants, they too have slight differences that can be used to tell them apart.

2) The Cisalpino Loks were only used on the Simplon-Loetschberg and Simplon-Rhone Valley routes. Most of those routes saw those loks pulling repainted SBB EC material or Trenitalia XMPR stock (Milano-Geneva). The main trains with FS CIS liveried stock were the Canaletto and the Cinque Terre over the Gotthard to Chiasso and points south.

3) On the Gotthard route, the Cisalpino trains were pulled by either Re 4/4II (often MU) or by Re 460, depending on which Fahrplan. The 484s were used between Milano and Geneva and between Milano and Bern. Re 4/4IIs or Re 460s were used on the stretch from Bern to Basel and back.

4) ACME's set was composed of entirely Italian rolling stock. The matching lok would have been used to pull ex-SBB stock, which was at one point available from Wabu.

I am not a bean counter. My collection represents trains I have been on or have seen on my trips in Europe. It is at once a hobby, it is a collection of toys, and a remembrance of things seen, people met and experiences on that particular trip. Ever so often, I look at my display, and the trip comes back to me.

If you don't care about your models being prototypical, then why doesn't Maerklin just make a 185 and a 182 and then just repaint them for every country? Wouldn't you rather have a realistic (but still playable) model? That is all I ask for.

As far as the original posting, I have already stated that the information contained in the New Items Brochure referred to all three coaches in the Set being registered with the SBB. The add-on coach was identified as Italian. Mr. Hemmerich's photo shows that one of the coaches in the set is identified as a ex-FS BH. That information was not available to anybody reading the New Items Brochure, and could only be gleaned by visiting the Messe or inside info from Maerklin.

As with the Gottardo, we rely on information contained in the New Items Pages. If that info later changes, we are not always in the know.

As far as the Set, I had deduced that the Eurofima A was a Trenitalia (FS) coach, because the SBB has not provided any of this coach type for Cisalpino use. One coach could be clearly identified as a SBB A type EC coach, leaving the other as the "open seating second class coach registered with the SBB" (see 4366) which would not be prototypically accurate.

If it is in fact a FS BH, then it is a little closer to the actual model, but still not entirely prototypical. But then it is the text in the New Items Brochure that is not correct, so once again, the inaccuracy is the result of sloppy preparation at Marklin.

This whole issue was caused by either incorrect models or incorrect description, and I as a Marklin customer have the right to bring it up in a forum about Marklin trains without being branded a bean counter.

Regards

Mike C
Offline RayF  
#16 Posted : 03 March 2008 11:09:12(UTC)
RayF

Gibraltar   
Joined: 14/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,870
Location: Gibraltar, Europe
I'd like to add my opinion to this thread.

I think, when Lutz (and others here), talk about "bean counters", they really mean "rivet counters". A bean counter is one who only looks at the financial or monetary implications, whereas a rivet counter is one who is perceived to focus too much on the fine detail.

Although I agree with Mike that Marklin should make every effort to correctly describe their models in their literature, I also think that, as a "Hobby" set, it is understood that the Cisalpino set might contain compromises to achieve a low price.

I personally think the set looks great, and I have been thinking of getting it, though there are higher priorities at the moment for my budget. Part of it's attraction is its relatively low price. If it were a perfectly accurate model costing maybe 100 to 200 euro more, I would not consider it.

The issue of accuracy in a model has been with us as long as I can remember. The phrase "rivet counters" comes from modellers once complaining about incorrect numbers of rivets on a locomotive. Most "average" modellers consider this going a bit too far. I guess that the amount of detail acceptable to an individual is a very personal thing and varies widely, so there is no such thing as "the correct amount of detail". Similarly, if a model were made 100% accurate to scale, it would fall apart if you tried to pick it up!

Lets try to find common ground here folks!

Ray
Ray
Mostly Marklin.Selection of different eras and European railways
Small C track layout, control by MS2, 100+ trains but run 4-5 at a time.
Offline mike c  
#17 Posted : 04 March 2008 03:13:44(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,232
Location: Montreal, QC
Lutz,

I started this theme based on a concern about the contents of this set, which according to the information contained in the New Items Brochure, did not correspond visually to that description.

1) Do you agree or disagree that there was a discrepancy between the image and the description?

2) As a result of the debate as to whether it was important whether the coaches were indeed former FS or SBB stock, did it ever come across to you that this particular fact was important to me or not?

3) My point was simply that the coach illustrated did not correspond to the prototype described in the Brochure. Do you agree that that was my point?

4) You seem to have access to information beyond that to which I (and many other modellers) have access to. If I tried, I could not magnify the image in the Brochure to be able to read the road numbers of the individual coaches. I rely on Maerklin to publish accurate information about the models, and I base my decision on whether to pre-order said item from that information. AFAIK there is no Lutz Hemmerich New Items Brochure, although that might contain more information if such a publication would be made each year.

5) I may in my postings criticize the model or the manufacturer, in instance of an unclear description or other issue pertaining to a new or current model. Your criticism seems limited to criticizing people who criticize Maerklin.

I may, in the future, receive an email from Maerklin in which they reply to my email, stating that the coaches in the set are primarily FS coaches. At that time, my likely response will simply be that I hope that they eventually release the SBB Bpm in the matching livery.

I don't give a rat's ass about how many rivets there are on a lok, as long as the overall impression is correct for that lok type.
The high quality and detail is one of the reasons that my collection is by Maerklin and not by Piko. If ACME would have delivered the 484 in AC, that model would surely be sitting in my display by now.

I was going to order the Hobby Set so that my niece and nephew could play with it, and I probably still will.

In the interim, I continue to be very pleased with my Wabu (Roco) ex-SBB Apm and Bpm and the ACME Sets, which are as nice as any model in my collection.

Thanks for the information. That is appreciated, but the infantile criticism and the quoting out of context, you can keep that. That being said,

greetings and best regards from the other side of the pond.

Regards

Mike C
Offline steventrain  
#18 Posted : 05 March 2008 16:44:17(UTC)
steventrain

United Kingdom   
Joined: 21/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 31,692
Location: United Kingdom
Nice pictures, Lutz.Smile
Large Marklinist 3- Rails Layout with CS2/MS2/Boosters/C-track/favorites Electric class E03/BR103, E18/E118, E94, Crocodiles/Steam BR01, BR03, BR05, BR23, BR44, BR50, Big Boy.
Offline mascagni  
#19 Posted : 05 March 2008 21:34:46(UTC)
mascagni


Joined: 25/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 826
Location: Tallahassee, FL USA
All: Here is a picture of the ETR 470 in Cisalpino markings:

http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~m...auptbahnhof/IMG_6804.JPG

I also have some pictures of the mock-up of the new Cisalpino trainset as shown to people in the Zuerich HB in 2006. I don't actually remember if this is supposed to be an ETR 610 or something even more modern. But it was scheduled to be used only after the new tunnel was open, and was supposed to drop the travel time from Zuerich HB to Milano Centrale by about half. BTW, the people in the picture are mostly my family, and the little still talks about the "Pino cookie" that is shown in the last few frames.--MM

http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~m...in_Switzerland/Cisalpino
Michael Mascagni, Tallahassee
If I weren't a Mathematician, I'd be a Violinist.--Albert Einstein
Offline mike c  
#20 Posted : 06 March 2008 03:56:57(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,232
Location: Montreal, QC
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Hemmerich

I also checked what coach types I had seen (and used) on the different Cisalpino routes. It was no surprise for me to find that both FS coach types were also in use on the Simplon line. Here's actually another picture which I have taken in Brig during one of my multiple journeys to this wonderful town (coaches are 61 83 21 90065-2 and 90384-0, both B as can be seen easily).


UserPostedImage

Nice photo. I presume that this train was on the route Geneva-Brig-Milano. Normally, the trains on this route would be equipped with FS EC (XMPR) or Intercity Plus (XMPR) coaches. You do not specify when the photo was taken. Was it on a special occasion, ie the anniversary of the Simplon tunnel or the inauguration of the base tunnel?

You can consult all current train consists at www.reisezuege.ch. They provide all listings from 2004 through today, which should cover all possible CIS consists. You can look it up by coach type and by other means.

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Regarding "access to information beyond that to which I (and many other modellers) have access to": I simply took the opportunity at the fair to have a closer look at the draft models there - and was again not surprised seeing that their road numbers were what I'd suspected.

Once more - anyone else could have done this, either her/himself or asking someone to check it for her/him (even here on this forum). So, nothing special restricted to just myself.


You assume that we all have the same level of access to information and to the models that you, as a German, have. This is blatantly false. Most North Americans must contend themselves to flyers and occasional photos and only see the real thing when their ordered item shows up at their door or at their dealer.

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Regarding critique: you demand the right to criticize the work of other people, thus you'll as well have to accept critique upon your "work" or the results thereof (i.e. your own "publication") - just as an example, your "findings" regarding the catenary operation of the Re4/4-II from set #26534. Otherwise you shouldn't publish it. We all know that humans are not free of making mistakes; including a company like Märklin. Here your IMHO second incorrect assumption comes into play: "I rely on Maerklin to publish accurate information about the models". It appears that you demand 100%, even knowing that this is barely realistic. For me the product description of this set was accurate enough; the missing "FS" just a very minor deviation. If you're in doubt, you always have the opportunity to validate the correctness of some questionable information. I did this and was simply pleased with the results. I just criticized those two IMHO wrong assumptions and the conclusions you were drawing from them ("big problem"), especially what I read "between the lines" (simplified): "I'm in favor of the description, so the shown models are wrong and must be changed". Smile


As far as the Re 4/4. I was about to try to change the position of the switch with a screwdriver when I noticed that the switch wasn't there. There was no notification that this had changed, the access whole is still there. The PC board could have been damaged if I hadn't noticed the difference right away. Neither the instructions, nor the catalog/flyer mentioned anything about the modification nor about the fact that the model could be operated from the catenary at all. Even the symbol was missing from the description and the instructions. I only opened up the locomotive later to confirm the details you provided in your reply.

Getting back to the Cisalpino Set. If the Set is intended to represent one of the Gotthard ECs operated by Cisalpino AG, then it would be correct to have Italian coaches with one SBB Apm (Canaletto), but that train would not be pulled by a Re 484. The Cinque Terre uses entirely FS coaches, also not pulled by a Re 484.
The only CIS 484 travel on that route that I am aware of was on the day of the 125th anniversary festivities.
The Loetschberg route CIS IC/ECs use SBB rolling stock (no dining cars) and have either B ex-UIC X or EWIV/B ex-UIC Z as kurswagen. The Trains to Geneva have mostly FS stock in XMPR colors. It is possible that a of those few trains may also have had Cisalpino liveried coaches in them, but this would not be regular assignments.

When I wanted information, I contacted Cisalpino AG, they sent me a nice reply, complete with a courtesy pen and pencil set that is on my desk.

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:To make it short: we all will be offered a quite fine Cisalpino train set which even matches (almost) the prototype. Nothing else counts; at least for me. wink

PS: I'd surely not complain if Märklin would also offer a SBB Bpm in Cisalpino livery in ADDITION to the current set and coach; but personally I doubt that, unless this package sells "like hell" (just realistic expectations).

I've ordered it (even with 3 additional coaches) and I'm sure not only myself, my Children and even Grandchildren will much enjoy playing with it in future. I might even consider changing the road number of one of my two Re482's into a "E484 01x". [:p]

Or, if I think the coaches need some "interior repainting" I might as well do this too. Smile

This hobby bears so much fun, let's simply take it this way! As well greetings from the "old world".


BTW, Instead of repainting one of your Hobby 482s, why don't you check out Roco's 68501, well worth the price for a prototypical 484.

I wanted to attach a photo of one of my Loks in front of my Roco (Wabu) SBB Apm in the Cisalpino livery, but I could not figure out how to do it.

Regards

Mike C
Offline mike c  
#21 Posted : 06 March 2008 03:58:48(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,232
Location: Montreal, QC
please replace the word "whole" in the previous posting with hole. My hand was typing faster than I was thinking.:)

Mike C
Offline mmervine  
#22 Posted : 06 October 2008 03:46:15(UTC)
mmervine

United States   
Joined: 30/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,893
Location: Keene, NH
Soooo....after all of the discussion on this set...did anyone get one? If so, thoughts? Good value or not?
Märklin C-track, Marklin Digital & ECoS, multi-era French & Swiss
http://www.ete-ene.org/m...mervines-layout-gallery/
Offline mike c  
#23 Posted : 06 October 2008 06:02:28(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,232
Location: Montreal, QC
I have received my 26544 Set and I am waiting for two 41897 coaches to go with it. I have been using the coaches with one of my Maerklin Re 4/4IIs (37344) and with one of my Re 460s.
I am not really using the lok because the Gotthard route CIS ECs are not pulled by the 484s. Those loks were used with SBB EC Coaches painted in the CIS livery on the Loetschberg-Simplon and Rhone-Simplon routes.
The Maerklin coaches are nice. I intend to equip them with interior lighting. I find that the Maerklin coaches are easier to illuminate and that the longer consists look better in the dark.

I am disappointed that ACME has not yet released the AC version of their model. If they do eventually release it, I will probably get that version, just to have it in my collection.

ACME claimed to have an exclusive deal with Cisalpino AG. If they do, I do not know how Maerklin was able to manufacture their model. I do know that Wabu (Switzerland) stopped producing Cisalpino umbau models after threats of legal action.

All in all, if you are a fan of the 26.4cm Maerklin coaches, and you want an interesting looking consist on your layout, this set is worth considering. It is definitely a good value for the whole train.
If you want to be more prototypical, you will forego the "Re 484" in favor of one of the other loktypes (see above) that actually pulled this train.

You can also add one or two 42162 or 42163 as Kurswagen for the Swiss portion of the route.

Regards

Mike C
Offline mmervine  
#24 Posted : 06 October 2008 16:33:14(UTC)
mmervine

United States   
Joined: 30/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 1,893
Location: Keene, NH
Lutz & Mike:

Thanks for the info and photos. I am seriously considering getting this set.

r/mark
Märklin C-track, Marklin Digital & ECoS, multi-era French & Swiss
http://www.ete-ene.org/m...mervines-layout-gallery/
Offline steventrain  
#25 Posted : 06 October 2008 18:48:07(UTC)
steventrain

United Kingdom   
Joined: 21/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 31,692
Location: United Kingdom
Nice picture, Lutz.
Large Marklinist 3- Rails Layout with CS2/MS2/Boosters/C-track/favorites Electric class E03/BR103, E18/E118, E94, Crocodiles/Steam BR01, BR03, BR05, BR23, BR44, BR50, Big Boy.
Offline kimballthurlow  
#26 Posted : 07 October 2008 13:14:46(UTC)
kimballthurlow

Australia   
Joined: 18/03/2007(UTC)
Posts: 6,764
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Nathans Trains has this set in Brisbane for about AUD$390, which due to falling Australian dollar, may be good value elsewhere.
regards
Kimball
HO Scale - Märklin (ep II-III and VI, C Track, digital) - 2 rail HO (Queensland Australia, UK, USA) - 3 rail OO (English Hornby Dublo) - old clockwork O gauge - Live Steam 90mm (3.1/2 inch) gauge.
Offline RayF  
#27 Posted : 07 October 2008 14:22:39(UTC)
RayF

Gibraltar   
Joined: 14/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 15,870
Location: Gibraltar, Europe
This is such a nice set. I am very tempted!

Ray
Ray
Mostly Marklin.Selection of different eras and European railways
Small C track layout, control by MS2, 100+ trains but run 4-5 at a time.
Offline rbw993  
#28 Posted : 07 October 2008 19:35:10(UTC)
rbw993

United States   
Joined: 19/08/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,051
Yes it is a nice set Ray. I have three additional 2nd class coaches to fill it out. Also took of the front coupler and it looks much better. Unfortunately there is no insert with hoses etc. to make it look as good as the lok in Lutz's picture.
Modeling Immensee, mile/km 0 on the Gottard. SBB Era V.
Offline bmcrae  
#29 Posted : 07 October 2008 21:10:29(UTC)
bmcrae

Canada   
Joined: 17/12/2004(UTC)
Posts: 970
Location: Okanagan Valley, BC
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by mmervine
<br />Soooo....after all of the discussion on this set...did anyone get one? If so, thoughts? Good value or not?


Hi Mark. I have this set and added 2 extra 41897 second class coaches. I like it a lot. It fits in well with all my swiss items, and really is good value for the money. If you are familiar with any of the Hobby series loks you know what you are getting. It's another item I don't mind letting my 8 year old son operate on the layout wink

The look of the train is distinctive on the layout (I think Mike used the term 'interesting'. wink)
It is a worthy/welcomed addition to my collection and I would recommend it to anyone. Smile
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.848 seconds.