Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline jeehring  
#1 Posted : 13 January 2007 18:22:30(UTC)
jeehring


Joined: 25/09/2003(UTC)
Posts: 2,786
Location: ,
A Commodore Vanderbilt could be one of the next US model from Marklin .



Offline PierreGILLARD  
#2 Posted : 13 January 2007 19:06:57(UTC)
PierreGILLARD


Joined: 09/11/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,346
Location: Longueuil, Quebec
That one ?

UserPostedImage

Pierre.
Offline MärCo  
#3 Posted : 13 January 2007 19:26:43(UTC)
MärCo


Joined: 06/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,159
Location: The Netherlands
It once was part of the collection before WW2. It should be a great idea to let it return in HO.
Absolutly AFB-NOHAB fan ;-)
Offline jeehring  
#4 Posted : 13 January 2007 19:38:53(UTC)
jeehring


Joined: 25/09/2003(UTC)
Posts: 2,786
Location: ,
I must say that I have just read it on a french forum from a guy who has announced it as the next US Model from Marklin , it doesn't come from any professionnal or officials....

I love it . marklin has been making this model a long time ago, so ...



BTW, did the C. Vanderbilt belong to other railways than NYC ?

Offline jonquinn  
#5 Posted : 13 January 2007 20:56:49(UTC)
jonquinn


Joined: 15/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 1,591
Location: Pennsylvania
I'd rather see a NYC 20th Century Limited streamlined Hudsons
much better looking
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:NYC_Hudson2.jpg

I think each RR in the USA back then had its own shops do the streamlining. there were many varieties.
here's a very nice one from the PRR (S-1 , a 6-4-4-6) - a raymond loewy design
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:PRR_S1.jpg
Offline 5HorizonsRR  
#6 Posted : 13 January 2007 21:08:44(UTC)
5HorizonsRR

United States   
Joined: 05/12/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,991
Location: CA, USA
I would love to see one. I am a fan of that loc, but perhaps the more exciting news behind it is that is just a J3A hudson with bodywork, w.hich means it wouldn't be hard to produce a second (and imho much more attractive) model- the regular NYC J1E or J3A- the model Lionel is so famous for.

I"ve heard from a reliable source what we are getting this year is the Tuscan Red GG1 though biggrin
SBB Era 2-5
Offline JeffVT  
#7 Posted : 13 January 2007 21:51:01(UTC)
JeffVT


Joined: 25/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 72
Location: Shelburne VT
This would a gread engine and I agree that the core chassis could be used to produce either the non-streamlined version or as the basis for the Henry Dreyfus 20th Century Limited of 1938. Some changes in the driving wheels might be necessary to produce an accurate model of the 20th Century loco, though. The J series 4-6-4s were handsome engines and it is sad that they all went to scrap. Though the New York Central was the archrival of the Pennsylvania RR, they both introduced the streamlined versions of their flagship trains around the same time. Both trains used smooth-sided passenger cars built by the Pullman Company. Maybe this would enable Marklin to justify the investment in manufacturing the dining and sleeping cars that could accompany this engine as well as the GG-1. Smooth sided rolling stock would also suit the Union Pacific diesels.

I fully expected that at some point Marklin would begin offering GG-1s in the many paint schemes used over nearly 50 year of operation, but it sounds like 2007 may be an expensive year for us US equipment enthusiasts. Good news, or at least good rumors, all the same.
Jeff
Offline hxmiesa  
#8 Posted : 14 January 2007 00:36:56(UTC)
hxmiesa

Spain   
Joined: 15/12/2005(UTC)
Posts: 3,595
Location: Spain
I suppose a re-use of the BR05 chassis will be in the works then?
(-or maybe more scrapped BR61's to get rid off still in stock? ;-)
Best regards
Henrik Hoexbroe ("The Dane In Spain")
http://hoexbroe.tripod.com
Offline jeehring  
#9 Posted : 14 January 2007 02:55:57(UTC)
jeehring


Joined: 25/09/2003(UTC)
Posts: 2,786
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by 5HorizonsRR
<br />I would love to see one. I am a fan of that loc, but perhaps the more exciting news behind it is that is just a J3A hudson with bodywork, w.hich means it wouldn't be hard to produce a second (and imho much more attractive) model- the regular NYC J1E or J3A- the model Lionel is so famous for.

I"ve heard from a reliable source what we are getting this year is the Tuscan Red GG1 though biggrin


They could make a Hudson later, like for the streamlined BR 05....
Very good!
Offline jeehring  
#10 Posted : 14 January 2007 02:59:00(UTC)
jeehring


Joined: 25/09/2003(UTC)
Posts: 2,786
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by hxmiesa
<br />I suppose a re-use of the BR05 chassis will be in the works then?
(-or maybe more scrapped BR61's to get rid off still in stock? ;-)


I don't think they have similar lenght....
The Commodore Vanderbilt looks "bigger"....
Wheels are 2003mm diameter
Offline xxup  
#11 Posted : 14 January 2007 04:07:04(UTC)
xxup

Australia   
Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC)
Posts: 9,601
Location: Australia
I don't collect US trains, but this beauty looks good... What colour is it? I also like the other variants posted by Jon.. Perhaps this is an opportunity for Marklin to release a series?
Adrian
UserPostedImage
Australia flag by abFlags.com
Offline Webmaster  
#12 Posted : 14 January 2007 04:13:56(UTC)
Webmaster


Joined: 25/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 11,165
I think a Loewy designed streamliner would be a real gem... The PRR loco is designed by him if I am not totally mistaken...

Since M has made the GG-1, why not more of his designs?
Juhan - "Webmaster", at your service...
He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Old Chinese Proverb]
Offline Jeremy Palmer  
#13 Posted : 14 January 2007 06:32:11(UTC)
Jeremy Palmer

Barbados   
Joined: 15/04/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,464
Location: St. Michael, Barbados
Hi everyone,

This might need some input from someone knowledgeable about US rail-
roads but, does this mean we would get some Pullman Broadway coaches?

Now that would be a treat. If true please, please do it right.

Jeremy.
Jeremy.

1). If at first you don't succeed, bungee jumping mightn't be for you.
2). The early bird may get the worm, but it's the second rat that gets the cheese.
Offline Goofy  
#14 Posted : 14 January 2007 15:14:49(UTC)
Goofy


Joined: 12/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 9,285
Not impossible...!

Just wait until Nurnberg 2007...

Goofy Smile
H0
DCC = Digital Command Control
Offline Sander van Wijk  
#15 Posted : 14 January 2007 17:04:09(UTC)
Sander van Wijk

Netherlands   
Joined: 20/04/2003(UTC)
Posts: 2,248
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands; Göteborg, Sverige,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Webmaster
<br />I think a Loewy designed streamliner would be a real gem... The PRR loco is designed by him if I am not totally mistaken...

Since M has made the GG-1, why not more of his designs?


Yes, the GG-1 is also designed by Loewy. You're right.
Sander
---
Era I(b): K.Bay.Sts.B. and K.W.St.E.
Offline ztrack  
#16 Posted : 14 January 2007 17:16:29(UTC)
ztrack


Joined: 25/11/2005(UTC)
Posts: 124
Location: Dublin, OH
If this is true, then we are getting the Commodore in Z scale this year!

88075 Dampflok Reihe J-2 "Commodore Vanderbilt" NYC mit Vollverkleidung;

Rob
Ztrack Magazine Ltd.
The Magazine For Z Scale Model Railroading.
www.ztrack.com
www.ztrackcenter.com
www.ztrackresale.com
Offline jonquinn  
#17 Posted : 14 January 2007 17:18:23(UTC)
jonquinn


Joined: 15/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 1,591
Location: Pennsylvania
On the GG-1 Loewy had the builders switch to welded sheet instead of rivited, and added the various pinstripe designs. He did not actually design the body. He did design the body of the PRR S-1, as well as the slightly smaller T-1 (only 4-4-4-4). I don't know if he had anything to do with the streamlined PRR K4 locomotive bodies.

nevertheless some more classic US steam would be great. I was not aware that the Vanderbuilt was on the J1 frame, so there would be many iterations possible for marklin down the years.
If they ever make these and price them fairly, I think they would do very well in the USA under the TRIX dc label.
I think for the Pullman cars it would be best to follow the conversion advice of PierreG and Almagik. they would probably make them in plastic anyways, and the Branchline Pullman cars are pretty much top notch. they might be able to use their metal bodied US cars to make the stainless rib sided PRR cars like the congressional series.
Offline Goofy  
#18 Posted : 14 January 2007 19:48:40(UTC)
Goofy


Joined: 12/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 9,285
If you have Ecos central station,you can using both Marklin and or Trix on the same layout...!

The diffirence will been tracks...

So if Trix only shall producing Commodore Vanderbilt locomotiv and not Marklin,then in case just go ahead...!

What diffirence...?

Goofy Cool
H0
DCC = Digital Command Control
Offline JeffVT  
#19 Posted : 14 January 2007 21:53:14(UTC)
JeffVT


Joined: 25/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 72
Location: Shelburne VT
Regarding streamlined steam, Pennsylvania RR modified a very few of their standard class K-4s Pacifics as streamlined locs. They did not make the same commitment as did rival New York Central. There were two or three designs tried, and in my opinion, Loewy's "shroud" was not especially attractive. Others will disagree.

The 6-4-4-6 S-1 (exhibited at the 1939 World's Fair), like the 4-4-4-4 T-1 produced after the end of WW2, was not articulated. Thus, it would be interesting to see what curve radius would be required for model RR operation. The S-1, by the way, was considered unsuccessful and I have read that its operation was limited to the flatter and straighter lines west of Pittsburgh, PA.

An unstreamlined K-4 Pacific, of which the Pennsy built and owned hundreds, would be a more accurate steam companion to the GG-1 for modelers during the "Fleet of Modernism" period 1938-46. The last stronghold of the K-4s was the commuter line between South Amboy and Bay Head Junction, NJ. GG-1s hauled the trains from New York City to South Amboy, where steam and later diesels took over. Ironically, this line was also the last stand of the GG-1s, which were operated by NJ Transit at the end.

Since the Pennsy did not have "modern" steam power during the war, it was forced to run many of its heavy long distance passenger trains with doubleheaded Pacifics. The need to replace/upgrade its motive power after the war made it a perfect target for diesel salesmen and in fact the Pennsy hosted diesels of all US manufacturers in its rush to dieselize as quickly as possible.

A Pennsy PA-1 in Loewy pinstripes would be an easy model for Marklin to produce.
Jeff
Offline Hemmerich  
#20 Posted : 14 January 2007 22:33:57(UTC)
Hemmerich


Joined: 15/04/2003(UTC)
Posts: 2,734
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by jeehring
<br />A Commodore Vanderbilt could be one of the next US model from Marklin .


This rumor exists already since many years!

The reason? See pic below! biggrinbiggrinbiggrin

UserPostedImage
Offline foumaro  
#21 Posted : 15 January 2007 09:47:27(UTC)
foumaro

Greece   
Joined: 08/12/2004(UTC)
Posts: 4,430
Location: Attiki Athens Greece
Amazing,one for me please.biggrin
Offline jeehring  
#22 Posted : 15 January 2007 11:10:55(UTC)
jeehring


Joined: 25/09/2003(UTC)
Posts: 2,786
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Hemmerich
<br />
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by jeehring
<br />A Commodore Vanderbilt could be one of the next US model from Marklin .


This rumor exists already since many years!

The reason? See pic below! biggrinbiggrinbiggrin

UserPostedImage


Yes, I know.... Already existing.....A masterpiece of collection!

So they have a technical file somewhere.... the reason why this rumor regularly reappears....But,
it's been few years I didn't heard about it...
Offline john black  
#23 Posted : 15 January 2007 11:46:48(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by jeehring
<br />A Commodore Vanderbilt could be one of the next US model from M

Seeing is believing ...
I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline steventrain  
#24 Posted : 15 January 2007 21:49:40(UTC)
steventrain

United Kingdom   
Joined: 21/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 31,697
Location: United Kingdom
Very interesting one,let's wait and see.
Large Marklinist 3- Rails Layout with CS2/MS2/Boosters/C-track/favorites Electric class E03/BR103, E18/E118, E94, Crocodiles/Steam BR01, BR03, BR05, BR23, BR44, BR50, Big Boy.
Offline jonquinn  
#25 Posted : 21 January 2007 01:02:11(UTC)
jonquinn


Joined: 15/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 1,591
Location: Pennsylvania
I found out today at the Pittsburgh, PA (USA) World's Greatest Hobby train show (a touring train show) from Dr Catherall that Marklin will be making a Commodore Vanderbuilt in 2007, but only in Z scale.
Maybe, in 2008 or later it could come out in mintrix N and Marklin HO. It woudl only be a matter of scaling up the tooling from the CAD. Also something I did not knwo from Catherall is that Marklin is also very involved in making injection mold dies for the auto industry in germany, and is very highly regarded in that line.

a tuscan red GG-1 will also be out sometime in 2007 (more likely later the way stuff gets released). Catherall said Marklin USA regretted the way Marklin issued the Amtrak and Santa Fe extruded aluminum coaches as being much too short for scale. Because of this they did not sell very well in the USA. He said it would be nice for some heavyweight coaches (2 sets of 3 axle bogies) to come out, and was critical of the Walthers/Branchline ones as being all plastic, but anymore so what? - all of marklin's HO coaches are and have been plastic for some time. As long as they look good and are well built, I don't care too much.
I didn't ask what paint scheme the PA-1 would be released in this year.

Once again, I was less than impressed with the stand marklin USA had set up. same format as before. The CS was kept well guarded. Not much products in the way of recent locomotive and cars displayed.
MTH had the nicest display. If it weren't for all this marklin HO I have, know what I would be buying. MTH makes some really nice trains, especially their high rail scale O gauge (3 rail with more scale features and sizing). what I don't care is the lawsiut happy conduct, although they did do some good against the heartless UP RR not long ago.
There was more Lionel/MTH there than anything else. Western Pennsylvania is one of the best areas in the USA to sell O gauge - extremely popular here.
Offline steventrain  
#26 Posted : 24 January 2007 18:19:08(UTC)
steventrain

United Kingdom   
Joined: 21/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 31,697
Location: United Kingdom
It is Z gauge.
Large Marklinist 3- Rails Layout with CS2/MS2/Boosters/C-track/favorites Electric class E03/BR103, E18/E118, E94, Crocodiles/Steam BR01, BR03, BR05, BR23, BR44, BR50, Big Boy.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.982 seconds.