Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline kimmo  
#1 Posted : 23 March 2004 11:45:14(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Hello all!

One of the three-aspect signals that I got just recently has become defective, and it has burned the 5211 decoder to which it was connected! Both the signal and the decoder had been working for a few weeks now, and I don't know what actually happened. But here is the sequence of events. I am afraid this is going to be long, so bare with me.

When I turned the power on this morning, the delta unit, through which I feed all the 9 pcs of 5211 decoders that I have, started to keep a strange sound, and none of the solenoid devices worked. I guess the delta booster was tripping due to a short circuit somewhere along the line. So I started to disconnect the 5211 decoders one at the time to find out which one was causing the problem, and found it. When this particular 5211 was disconnected, all the rest worked fine, but when it was connected again, nothing worked.

The next step was that I disconnected all the devices that were connected to the outputs of this 5211. They were actually two three-aspect signals. But still the 5211 unit alone caused the delta booster to trip. You know that Viessmann 5211 decoders have a separate power input socket to supply the power for the outputs. This can be connected to a separate trafo, or with a short piece of wire it can be connected to the digital feed coming to the unit. I am using this second option with all my Viessmann decoders. So next I disconnected this small piece of wire from the "E" socket, thus disconnecting the power from all outputs. After that the unit didn't trip the delta booster anymore, and everything else worked, too.

So based on this diagnostics, it seems that the defective signal has fried something in the printed circuit board of this 5211 on the output side, and when connected to the rest of the circuit, it brings the whole accessory circuit down.

And how do I know that it is the signal which is defective, and that it burned the 5211? Well, I didn't know it first, but after I did the steps described above, I wanted to test the two signals that were connected to the burned 5211 were OK. As I am not any genious in electronics, I simply first connected one of the two signals to another 5211, and it worked fine. Then I connected the other one, and after just a few seconds, "click" comes out of this second 5211 and it is burned exactly the same way as the first one. So the real bad guy was found. It is just pitty that I have to learn my lessons the hard way. So I now have two fried 5211's and one somehow defective signal, which was causing all this.

So finally, here are my questions to you experts:

1. Based on what was described above, do you think there is a chance of fixing the decoders by changing the burned components, or is it not feasible? They "only" cost 28 EUR piece.

2. If you think they could be fixed, any suggestions what components may have been burned?

3. Does anyone have a schematic of the printed circuit board of Viessmann 5211, and list of components?

4. What could be causing the problem with the signal (I haven't had time to get it out yet)? I guess it must be shorted somehow, and therefore shorting the output ports of the 5211 as well, causing it to fry?

5. And yes, I disconnected the power between each step above, so I didn't burn the second unit just because of disconnecting and reconnecting things alive.

6. And yes, I know that I was still stupid to burn the second decoder.

I will probably order a couple of new decoders anyway to replace these ones, but if there is a chance of fixing them, they could always be used as spares, if I manage to burn more.

And I don't know yet if I need to order a new signal, too? Or if it is simply that the studs to which the wires are soldered in the bottom of the solenoid cylinder are bent and touch each other or something like that which can be fixed. Or can it be shorted inside in the solenoid maybe?

Any suggestions will be appreciated.

Pff...

PS. The both fried unit are in this picture:

http://personal.inet.fi/...2004%20Signals%20004.jpg
Kimmo
Offline rschaffr  
#2 Posted : 23 March 2004 20:19:27(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,193
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
Kimmo:

I have built several 5211's from the 5291 kit. It has the parts list and board layout. I'll scan the instructions in tonight and e-mail them to you.
-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Offline kimmo  
#3 Posted : 23 March 2004 20:29:13(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Thanks, Ron!

Ron, Lars, Jorge, everybody, considering the sequence of events above, any hints of what exactly may have been burned inside? And what about the signal? Any hints that you may be able to give can be helpful.

Thanks again.
Kimmo
Offline rschaffr  
#4 Posted : 23 March 2004 20:35:26(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,193
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
Most probably the output transistor. According to the list it is a BD680. I do have a question, though. What type of signals are you powering with it? The light signals constantly draw current. The 5211 (and K83) are meant for intermittent powering of magnetic items (such as points and mechanical signals). I use the Viessmann 5213 for my signals which has a bistable relay for the output. The signal switches the relay then goes away and the relay keeps the signal powered in the appropriate state.

-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Offline kimmo  
#5 Posted : 23 March 2004 20:50:45(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Ron,

All signals which are directly driven by 5211's are form signals, Viessmann 4500, 4502, and 4531. The defective one is 4502.

The light signals which I have (4011's) are all driven through Viessmann 5221 module, which takes the pulses from 5211 to change state. I guess 5211+5221 is pretty much like 5213, but it gives smooth transition of the lights from one state to the other.

And the lights in all signals, even in the form signals, are directly fed by a separate light feed, not through 5211's.

Question Ron: If it is output transistor, could that one output transistor trip the whole digital circuit? I mean it is not just that output which is blind, it is that when this fried 5211 is connected to the booster (delta unit), together with all other 5211's, none of them work, and the delta unit gives a clicking sound every few seconds like if it is tripping from over-current or something. As soon as the feed to this 5211 is disconnected, everything else works again. Can one burned output transistor in one 5211 cause this? Even when there is nothing connected to that output, or to the whole 5211?
Kimmo
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#6 Posted : 23 March 2004 21:49:00(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
I'm not very knowledged in this area, but I think everything said so far seems OK. The things that are destroyed are normally the output transisitors; and I wouldn't be surprised if a burnt one could cause the E socket to be grounded, causing the symtoms you describe. Which in turn means that taking the transistor away would allow the other 7 (!) ports to work, and if replaced, cure the whole thing...

Regards,
Lars
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#7 Posted : 23 March 2004 23:45:58(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Hello Kimmo, I agree with Ron and Lars, the BD680 (could be BD682) are normally fried under short circuits. Strange, however, that the protection didn't work. You need some soldering skills to replace the damaged transistors and an Ohmmeter to find out the damaged ones. Each transistor has 3 pins: one of them is connected to the printed track that comes from the "E" input thru a big resistor and a diode. Another pin goes to the output connector. You should measure in the Ohm scale between these two pins. The damaged transistors will show nearly 0 (zero) ohms. Invert the ohmmeter wires (black and red) and will find 0 ohms again, indicating a fried transistor. Have them replaced by new ones.
Hope this can help you to recover your decoders.
In regards to the problem signal, you'd search for a bad connection or short circuit in it.
To avoid to get your decoders fried again, insert a 10 Ohm resistor on the yellow wire before testing the signal. This will limit the current fed to the signal under the limits of the transistors.
Regards,
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline kimmo  
#8 Posted : 24 March 2004 08:27:32(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Thanks to All!

I will let you know how things progress and post more questions if needed.
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Lars Westerlind
<br />I wouldn't be surprised if a burnt one could cause the E socket to be grounded, causing the symtoms you describe. Which in turn means that taking the transistor away would allow the other 7 (!) ports to work, and if replaced, cure the whole thing...
If this is true, I will simply remove the transistor for now. Couple of the ports in these units were still unused anyway, so there is no immediate need to get every port work, if the rest works.

Thanks!
Kimmo
Offline kimmo  
#9 Posted : 24 March 2004 20:11:21(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by jorge_vilarrubi
<br />To avoid to get your decoders fried again, insert a 10 Ohm resistor on the yellow wire before testing the signal. This will limit the current fed to the signal under the limits of the transistors.
Jorge,

Should the 10 Ohm resistor be left in permanently, or just during testing? And what is the color code of such resistor? In fact, I just noticed that I have several 50 Ohm resistors. I quess such a resistor does the job, too?

Thanks again,
Kimmo
Offline kimmo  
#10 Posted : 25 March 2004 09:59:08(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by jorge_vilarrubi
<br />You should measure in the Ohm scale between these two pins. The damaged transistors will show nearly 0 (zero) ohms. Invert the ohmmeter wires (black and red) and will find 0 ohms again, indicating a fried transistor.
I had a friend of mine to measure the transistors, and he says that they are all OK.

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:the printed track that comes from the "E" input thru a big resistor and a diode.

He also measured the big resistor, and it shows 0 Ohms resistance. Can that be correct? I will have him to measure one working unit tomorrow to compare, but your expert opinion is still appreciated.

Thanks,
Kimmo
Offline kimmo  
#11 Posted : 25 March 2004 20:17:02(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
I think I have found the burned component in the failed decoders.

When I measure the resistance between the E-socket and any of the yellow DC-outputs in the fried units, it shows 0 Ohms resistance. When I measure the same in any of the working units, it shows high (infinite) resistance.

When I measure the first component in the trace coming from the E-socket (I think it is a diode), the fried units show 0 Ohms here as well, but working units show high resistance. So it seems that this component (diode?) is burned.

I also think that I know where the short circuit is in the troubled three-aspect signal. As you know, in a three-aspect signal there are four wires which are connected to 5211 decoder: yellow DC-input, and red, green and yellow pulse inputs. When I measure any of the working three-aspect signals that I have, there is no connection between any of the three pulse input wires when measured against each other, the meter shows infinite resistance in all cases. But in the trouble signal it shows a low resistance of 40 Ohms between the red and yellow pulse input wire, but infinite resistance between all others. So in this signal the red and yellow pulse input wires must be in contact somehow. I don't know how this could have burned the decoders, though, but that seems to be the only difference between working signals and the trouble one. Maybe this has caused two solenoids to pull constantly against each other, and thus drawing constant power from the DC-output causing an over-current situation in the decoder output? I don't know if this is possible.

Any comments on these findings, Jorge, Lars, Ron, others?

Thanks!
Kimmo
Offline rschaffr  
#12 Posted : 25 March 2004 21:04:21(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,193
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
Kimmo:

I don't have a board in front of me to see what the traces are, but diodes D3 - D10 on the board layout appear to be associated with the outputs, so if it is one of those, it very well could be the problem. Cheap enough to change it out and see. They are 1N4148 diodes and should be readily available.
-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Offline kimmo  
#13 Posted : 25 March 2004 21:16:13(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
It is D12, the first one after the E-socket, and the only diode between the E-socket and all DC-outputs (yellow output ports). Its type is 1N4936.

Diodes D3-D10 are the ones associated with each pulse output as you say (red/green output ports), but these diodes are all OK, or at least they show infitite resistance also in the fried units, unlike D12.
Kimmo
Offline rschaffr  
#14 Posted : 25 March 2004 21:30:37(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,193
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
Did you measure the resistance in D12 the same way on both boards? It will show low resistance in one direction and high in the other. Also, when a diode burns, it clearly looks like it (discolored, even melted).
Also, D12 would not affect only one signal path. Is the 5211 totally failed or just one output?
-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#15 Posted : 25 March 2004 21:49:44(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Hi Kimmo, I'm at the office now but tonight when I arrive home I'll take a still-not-assembled 5291 and try to tell you something about components, tracks and possible measuremets you can take.
See you later...
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline kimmo  
#16 Posted : 25 March 2004 21:49:50(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Yes, the whole 5211 is dead, and it even brings the whole digital circuit down when connected to the booster.

Yes, I did measure the diodes both ways. D12 in the working unit show infinite resistance in one direction and low (about 50 Ohm) resistance in the other direction. D12 in the fried units show 0 Ohms in both directions. And in the burned units D12 is discolored, compared to the working one. Grey or almost black colors, while in the working ones it is red and brown.

D3 to D10 on the other hand show infinite resistance in both directions in the OK units, but in the fried units they show infinite in one direction and about 10 MOhm in the other direction. I don't know what this means? Coloring of these diodes look exactly the same both in the fried and good units??
Kimmo
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#17 Posted : 25 March 2004 21:51:34(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Hi Kimmo, it's me again... Your D12 is fried, no doubt, but you could have more components to replace...
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline kimmo  
#18 Posted : 25 March 2004 21:58:41(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
I know that there may be more than just D12 to replace, Jorge. But can you explain my finding about the other diodes (D3-D10, next to each output transistor)? Why the good unit shows infinite resistance both ways, but the failed one shows infinite one direction and very high but still measurable (10 MOhm) resistance the other way? The transistors themselves show infinite resistance when measured the way you adviced earlier in this thread, so they should be OK?

How about the finding about the short-circuit in the signal?
Kimmo
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#19 Posted : 25 March 2004 22:07:30(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
10MOhms when testing a diode is not important. You know, you are 4 hours ahead of mine, but I need to look at the unassembled PCB before giving you more info and this I'll be able to do at about 22:00 today. Will try to explain you how to test all candidate components. If you are awake at 2:00 tonight, you can contact me at jorge_vilarrubi@msn.com for a direct chat in an attempt to shorten the time for having this problem resolved. At your choice.
Regards,
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline kimmo  
#20 Posted : 25 March 2004 22:12:09(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
I appreciate your help, and I am aware of our time difference. I won't be awake at 2AM, so I will take a look of your advices in the morning. All this help is more than I can ask for!
Thanks again,
Kimmo
Offline rschaffr  
#21 Posted : 25 March 2004 22:14:37(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,193
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
Kimmo:

Sounds like a plan. I don't have a disassembled one to look at, so if Jorge does, that is the best approach. Good luck.

Let me know what you find out.
-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#22 Posted : 26 March 2004 00:31:45(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
Kimmo,
the D3-D10 surely are protective diodes, protecting the transistor from induces spikes when the current to the coils is interrupted. But diodes are diodes; you can't possibly have measured the resistance correctly IMHO, if you say infinite in both directions. To my knowledge, a burnt diode has 0 resistance in both direction, and if one could be an exception, I don't think 8 could. And remember, a diode doesn't have resistance in the forward direction, it has a voltage drop. So, if the resistance measurement was performed with a too low voltage (which I doubt) there would be no current at all.

About the signal; I think all blue cables have a diode to, as the ones marked orange influence both coils, and the green only one of them, and you don't want any back current. And there is end shutoff contacts inside, meaning that for example green OR red may have contact with it's coil, which has contact with the yellow cable, but not both at a time.

But you describe your findings of the signal insufficiently. It's normal that the blues doesn't show any finite resistance between them. And that yellow to one cable shows no contact in one direction, and either contact or not contact in the other direction, due to the position of the signal. When the signal shows Hp0, there should be no contact at all with the red marked cable.
And with the green marked, and orange, it should have a finite "resistance", I guess in the magnitude of 100 ohm, possibly less.

Regards,
Lars
Regards
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#23 Posted : 26 March 2004 03:21:15(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Hi Kimmo, Lars is right about diodes, they show low R (30-50 Ohm) when tested with the red wire connected to the marked end (white or silver band) and the black wire to the other end. When you reverse the wires, they show high R. As Lars says, D3 to D10 protect the BD680s against voltage from coils when current is shut off.
Let's talk about the PCB: current from CU RED enters the decoder at J17 (E connector) and goes thru D12 to the external track (which feeds the yellow wires of signals/turnouts). This puts a negative voltage on all yellow wires. Current from CU BROWN enters thru J2/J10 to R15 (0,39 Ohm, 2 Watt) which is expected to protect the BD680s by limiting the max. current, then goes to feed the Emitters of BD680s. Collectors of BD680s are connected to the outputs for GREEN/RED wires of signals/turnouts.
How to check BD680s: each one has 3 pins, from left to right (as seen from the lettered face, pins pointing down) they are ECB (Emitter, Collector, Base). These transistors are used as switches, connecting E to C when driven from B.
Put RED wire of your Ohmmeter to B (right side) and alternatively test E and C with BLACK wire. You should see low Resistance (40-100 Ohm). Now put the BLACK wire to B and repeat the test to C and E with RED wire. You should see high R in both pins.
Put RED wire to C (center) and Black wire to E (left), you should see high R. Reverse the wires and you'd see low R, this is an internal protective diode built inside the transistor.
A fried transistor normally shows very low R (same as diodes) in all of the previous tests.
I believe you are using the Ohmmeter correctly, since you've found 0 Ohm on D12.
Verify all diodes and transistors and tell us about your findings. We already know your D12 is bad, so you can replace it anyway. Any other bad component you can find, replace it and then try a test with no signals connected to the decoder. The best testing device I know of is a couple of Brawa lights.
Have fun and good luck, tomorrow we talk again.
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline kimmo  
#24 Posted : 26 March 2004 08:51:42(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Thanks Jorge, Lars, Ron!

I have now made very quick measurements again, as per your instructions, and haven't found anything else wrong than D12 in both fried units. I will now get a bag of those and get them changed. I will get back to this thread later tonight and let you know the results. I will also give more info about the signal then.

See you later!
Kimmo
Offline rschaffr  
#25 Posted : 26 March 2004 15:24:09(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,193
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
Kimmo:

Hopefully you got lucky and the D12 failed before the current could affect anything else. If that is true, it is good to know.
-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Offline kimmo  
#26 Posted : 26 March 2004 17:31:30(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
After replacing D12 in both failed 5211's, they work again as good as new !! All ports are OK. I purchased 25 pcs of those diodes with 1 EUR, so it was a 4 cent fix! I don't know how I can thank you enough, guys! Thanks Jorge, Ron, and Lars.

But in fact, this is not over yet. I will come back with more details about that bloody signal. It is not connected now, and I won't connect it until I am sure that it won't burn the decoder again (although now I have plenty of replacement parts ready...)

Thanks, I will be back shortly regarding the signal!
Kimmo
Offline rschaffr  
#27 Posted : 26 March 2004 17:37:58(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,193
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
Glad it worked.
-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Offline kimmo  
#28 Posted : 26 March 2004 20:35:06(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Now more info about the bad three-aspect form signal.

Let's use Lars's notation here regarding the wires:
- Blue wires, with red, green and orange markings
- Yellow wire

And I have made the same measurements on two GOOD signals, which I have, and the BAD one. All signals were in Hp0 position when measured, and disconnected from the decoder. Below I explain what these measurements show.

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Lars Westerlind
It's normal that the blues doesn't show any finite resistance between them.
GOOD signals don't show any "finite" resistance between any of the blues. The BAD one shows 40 Ohm resistance between blues of red and orange marking, but infinite resistance between other blues.
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:When the signal shows Hp0, there should be no contact at all with the red marked cable. And with the green marked, and orange, it should have a finite "resistance", I guess in the magnitude of 100 ohm, possibly less.
When all blues are measured against the yellow wire, GOOD signals show infinite resistance for red marked, and "finite" resistance for green and orange marked, as you say. But for the BAD signal, all blue cables show "finite" resistance when measured against the yellow wire, also the one with red marking.

What I read from this is, that the blue with the red marking is somehow in contact with one of the other blues, most probably with the one with orange marking.

Lars, Jorge, Ron, what do you think?
Kimmo
Offline rschaffr  
#29 Posted : 26 March 2004 20:56:26(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,193
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
Sounds like you have either a problem in the device or cables abraded and touching. You said this just happened suddenly. Were you doing any work in that area where you might have stressed or otherwise damaged the wires going through the board?

Try doing the measurements on the bad blue wires while moving them around as much as you can within the signal column.
-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Offline kimmo  
#30 Posted : 26 March 2004 21:24:31(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by rschaffr
<br />You said this just happened suddenly. Were you doing any work in that area where you might have stressed or otherwise damaged the wires going through the board?
When this happened, I had just pushed the whole layout about one or two feet to one direction. Thats all. And it was very slow and smooth movement. But it must still be the reason, some small shock in the baseboard, causing the wires to get damaged.

So far I have just measured the wires from outside. But after this week-end I will dig the signal out, and then I can visually see what it is all about, unless it is something inside the solenoids.
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Try doing the measurements on the bad blue wires while moving them around as much as you can within the signal column.
I have moved the wires around quite a bit during this process, but the measurements remain the same.
Kimmo
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#31 Posted : 26 March 2004 21:25:48(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Hello task force, good to know the decoders are alive again, will be good too when we discover what has caused the damage.
I don't have a Viesmann three aspect signal but I've repaired two of them.
They have a PCB included in the wiring, covered by a shrink tube.
Both signals I've repaired had problems with diodes within the shrinking tube, so this is a point to be checked. I don't know what has caused the damage on these signals.
Another signal I've repaired presented a problem in the motor, some wires were in touch with others and the isolating paint was damaged, so they had electrical contact and impeded the correct operation of the motors. To open and disassemble the motor is not an easy task, But Kimmo has prooved to be very patient...
Dear Kimmo, you have the whole weekend to investigate... Have fun!
Regards,
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline kimmo  
#32 Posted : 26 March 2004 21:30:20(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
This weekend is my sons birthday, we have some parties all weekend long! So it may be distracting this important task a little... That's why I said that I will take the signal out after the weekend...
Kimmo
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#33 Posted : 26 March 2004 22:01:46(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Happy birthday to your son, Kimmo!
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline rschaffr  
#34 Posted : 26 March 2004 22:28:40(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,193
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
Yes. Have a fun weekend. I don't know how old he is, but enjoy your children while you can...they grow so quickly. My younger son is going on 32!
-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Online xxup  
#35 Posted : 27 March 2004 00:03:36(UTC)
xxup

Australia   
Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC)
Posts: 9,612
Location: Australia
Guys,

There has been some exceptionally valuable knowledge shared in this post. We need to capture this in a more explict way so that others who have a similar problem can find the knowledge and solve the problem.

I suggest that with some editing, this particular posting is a prime candidate for the material that Lars and Thanos were discussing a few months ago. We could structure as -&gt;
- Sympton
- Test procedure
- Repair
- What else to look for..
- Some credit for the original participants in the solution.
- A link to the original posting..

What does everyone think?
Adrian
UserPostedImage
Australia flag by abFlags.com
Offline kimmo  
#36 Posted : 27 March 2004 08:59:58(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Regarding the miracle recovery of the dead 5211's, everybody's contribution was important. But if I name two most important things, I would say that they were the step-by-step instructions given by Jorge, and the component list and board layout provided by Ron (a copy of 5291 kit document). These enabled even me, Mr. Total Dummy in electronics, to make the right measurements correctly and buy the right parts. Soldering part in the end was easy.

I don't mind if we extract the key pieces of information from here and post it as a troubleshooting guide for Viessmann 5211 decoder. It probably applies pretty much to Märklin 6083 as well.

But I think we need Johan's consensus and help to do that.

One technical remark though. 5211 board layout has changed during the past few months. I bought my first 5211's last fall, and the board layout and components in these units are exactly like in 5291 kit. The board even has the same component labels, like D12, printed on it. But the second set which I purchased in January with the signals has slightly redesigned board layout, components are in different places, they look different, and the board uses surface mounting technology. And there are no component labels printed anymore! Both of the failed units were of this new type. But since I had also the older versions and could compare and measure them both, I was able to talk to you guys with the terminology and component labels of the old version, which corresponds to the documentation of the 5291 kit, and still know which is the corresponding component in the new module. This is probably something that should be noted.
Kimmo
Online xxup  
#37 Posted : 27 March 2004 10:30:17(UTC)
xxup

Australia   
Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC)
Posts: 9,612
Location: Australia
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by kimmo
<br />But I think we need Johan's consensus and help to do that.


Agreed. My motives are a bit selfish in that I have a few of the 5211s under our layout. Before reading this, my first reaction would have been to buy a new one at A$100.

Thanks
Adrian
UserPostedImage
Australia flag by abFlags.com
Offline kimmo  
#38 Posted : 27 March 2004 10:35:50(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by xxup
<br />Before reading this, my first reaction would have been to buy a new one at A$100.
Yeah, that was my first reaction, too. But in the end the only tangible cost of the fix was the 4 cents diode. Of course, one can not put a price tag on the time everybody spent here in helping me (or one can, but I don't want to think about that...)
Kimmo
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#39 Posted : 28 March 2004 00:59:09(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:
I suggest that with some editing, this particular posting is a prime candidate for the material that Lars and Thanos were discussing a few months ago.

I agree, and I believe Kimmo could take the initial task of describing the symptoms, please feel free to ask me for adding whatever could be of interest.
As time passes, we could build an importante knowledge database.
Regards,
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline rschaffr  
#40 Posted : 28 March 2004 03:10:28(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,193
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
That sounds like a great idea.
-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Offline kimmo  
#41 Posted : 28 March 2004 11:10:18(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by jorge_vilarrubi
<br />I believe Kimmo could take the initial task of describing the symptoms, please feel free to ask me for adding whatever could be of interest.
As time passes, we could build an importante knowledge database
I can certainly do that. But in which form? As a new thread? Under which category? If such database is maintained by the means of this Forum, I think there should be own Forum category for it, named Troubleshooting or similar. In other categories the troubleshooting threads would soon get burried with other threads.

I can open this question under marklin-users.net for Johan to answer. Or what do others think?
Kimmo
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#42 Posted : 28 March 2004 20:26:06(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Hi Kimmo, I think we need our Master's advice...
Juhan, you're a Database expert... what is the best way to handle this?
And, Kimmo, you are not a Dummy in Electronics any longer and I believe you never have been, since you could examine your decoders based on a different unit, using only a schematic and some instructions given by mail. Not good for me to know that Viessmann is using SMCs now, they don't exist in our electronics market for replacement. So I'll recommend to my friends here in Argentina not to buy 5211 and buy 5291 instead.
You see? We are involved in a new project right now!
Could be entitled "Knowledge Database", "Emergency Repairs", "How to Avoid Suicide due to Damaged Components" or something like that... :-)
I can add some instructions to recover damaged CUs / IBs when Yellow wire touches Red Digital ones.
New ideas are welcome, please all members make suggestions...
Regards,
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline kimmo  
#43 Posted : 30 March 2004 20:35:13(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
As the only option to store this troubleshooting knowhow seems to be an ordinary thread, do you guys still think we should create a shorter and cleaner version of this thread, or leave it as it is?
Kimmo
Offline jorge_vilarrubi  
#44 Posted : 30 March 2004 23:48:43(UTC)
jorge_vilarrubi


Joined: 15/12/2003(UTC)
Posts: 655
Location: Buenos Aires,
Hi Kimmo, if there is no another option, I'd leave the thread in it's original format. This is only my opinion.
Regards,
Jorge Vilarrubí
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
Offline rschaffr  
#45 Posted : 31 March 2004 00:35:33(UTC)
rschaffr

United States   
Joined: 03/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 5,193
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
I agree. Sometimes knowing HOW you arrived at a solution is as important and instructive as the solution itself.
-Ron
Digital, Epoch IV-V(K-track/CS3/6021Connect/60216051), Epoch III(C-track/6021/6036/6051)
http://www.sem-co.com/~rschaffr/trains/trains.html
Offline kimmo  
#46 Posted : 31 March 2004 09:44:54(UTC)
kimmo


Joined: 11/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 397
Location: ,
OK. We leave it here as it is. Hope it can help somebody else, too. End of story!
Kimmo
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 1.039 seconds.