Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline pmgsr  
#1 Posted : 21 January 2008 12:52:36(UTC)
pmgsr


Joined: 01/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 200
Location: Lisbon, Lisbon
Hi there.

It's been some time since i wrote the last message, but one allways come back to the forum :-)

My question...

I'm making a L shaped layout (4,50 x 1,25, and 3 m on the L side).

Is it better to put the digital acessories (like Viessmann relays, k83, s88, etc) near each other, in one location - the wirings are much longer with this solution...
... or, spreading the acessories near turnouts, signals, etc (below the baseboard)? (much less wiring).

I have this doubt in the shadow station, but this will be the same for other locations (main station, etc).

I think i like much better the second solution, but i can be missing something.

Thanks.
Pedro Rosa.
Linda-a-Velha / Lisbon, Portugal.
My Layout (Marklin, C-Track, Digital)
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#2 Posted : 21 January 2008 13:40:53(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
IMHO, it's good to spread them, at least somewhat. But with most control equipment, it could be a good idea to keep turnouts and/or signals that logically belong to each other, at the same decoder. And I like my decoders to be available for maintenance.

But it's a good question. I'm hopeless with wiring, partly because I love to have all kinds of functions. Now I'm in house and street lights; the street lights are simulated gas lamps with the Viessmann-module, and I'm thinking of random control of house lights. All put on and off digitally, to let my Intellilight decide when it's time. So it takes some wiring neverheless. For some reason, either economical, or the abvious amount of planning time it takes, I don't want to do very systematic wiring. But I always regret it halfway.

But I go towards having some order in my chaos, like this:

- All trafos at a central place.
- Thick wires with common circuits, going to all parts of the layout.
- Decoders spread about, but as said, longer wires then neccessary to collect accessories that logically belong to each other.
- I use train control, but nowadays not directly. Contact tracks report to the LocoNet, which issue commands to decoders and signals.
- LocoNet is also distributed, and use it more and more.

/Lars
Offline RobertMcDowell  
#3 Posted : 21 January 2008 18:45:10(UTC)
RobertMcDowell


Joined: 04/10/2006(UTC)
Posts: 157
Location: Salinas, CA
Although relatively small, the layout I am currently building has the decoders positioned throughout the layout: some to the left, some in the middle. I did this for two reasons:

- keep turnouts, uncoupler tracks, and signals on the same decoder as Lars mentioned
- allow for expansion

As I am using C-track, it is relatively easy to do on a small scale.
Rob
CA, USA
Offline pmgsr  
#4 Posted : 21 January 2008 23:44:04(UTC)
pmgsr


Joined: 01/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 200
Location: Lisbon, Lisbon
Hi Lars
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:
- All trafos at a central place.
- Thick wires with common circuits, going to all parts of the layout.
- Decoders spread about, but as said, longer wires then neccessary to collect accessories that logically belong to each other.
- I use train control, but nowadays not directly. Contact tracks report to the LocoNet, which issue commands to decoders and signals.
- LocoNet is also distributed, and use it more and more.


Just about the same things i was thinking about.

I'll use S88, and with those i think that it's very good to spread them around but better to have them closer to the central unit / central station. For those i'll use "long" wires.
Pedro Rosa.
Linda-a-Velha / Lisbon, Portugal.
My Layout (Marklin, C-Track, Digital)
Offline DaleSchultz  
#5 Posted : 22 January 2008 04:54:25(UTC)
DaleSchultz

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,997
a bit of both. This is what I concluded and did and I have not regretted it.

I have one large power supply. (3 x 100W 16V AC) I positioned it far away from the computer because I used to use a CRT monitor and the power supply would interfere with the screen. I run heavy duty household wiring around under the layout to distribute that raw power and the digital signal from the IB and boosters.
http://layout.mixmox.com...plywithdistributionpanel
I tap into those wires wherever needed:
http://layout.mixmox.com...ringandpigtailconnectors


I placed my 'PC power 12V DC supply' next to the big AC power supply.
http://layout.mixmox.com/1/5_Volt_power (originally 5.15V but now 12.2V)

I placed all my ss8 modules close to the computer interface (Intellibox). This allows easy daisy chaining but means that I do have to run long cables from the track contact areas back to the s88 farm. I used shielded multi-strand (25?) cable for s88 feedback wires. By starting at the furthest point away, one can work back towards the s88 farm. When all the wires in the cable are used, rune the next cable from that point back to the s88 farm - thus minimizing the cable and effort needed. (I am cheap and lazy.)

For turnouts, I placed k83 modules close to the turnouts, as I could tap into a digital, ground and 16VAC easily at any place from the 'bus' wires.
http://layout.mixmox.com/1/20011230K83inplace

When it came to driving my signals however, I worked out that it would be best to groups the k83 modules and the signal modules together in one place. This was for a number of reasons:
1) economic. Each signal module needed 3 K83 modules and each k83 module has 4 pairs of outputs, so 4 signal modules can be driven with 3 k83 nodules. So it made sense to group the signal modules in multiples of 4.
2) I could mount and wire them all up on one big board and plug the whole thing in under the layout.
3) if k83 outputs fail, a single additional k83 module can (easily) be used to compensate for any 4 failures across all the signal k83s.
4) using multi-strand cables I could run multiple signals together in a single cable back to the array of modules. (Still cheap and lazy.)
http://layout.mixmox.com/1/signals-1

other tips:
a) use Velcro to attach the modules.
b) If you have lots of k83 modules, make yourself a k83 tester: http://layout.mixmox.com/1/k83-module-tester

Use Viessmann or other modules - better specs and cheaper than Märklin.
Dale
Intellibox + own software, K-Track
My current layout: https://cabin-layout.mixmox.com
Arrival and Departure signs: https://remotesign.mixmox.com
Offline clapcott  
#6 Posted : 22 January 2008 08:41:43(UTC)
clapcott

New Zealand   
Joined: 12/12/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,435
Location: Wellington, New_Zealand
I opt for k83s out on the layout, s88s together close to the CU.

Control for Accessories (including yellow for 16V AC) is dedicated bulk cable and from totally different transformers/boosters than track circuit.

I prefer not to use k84s, and add a latching relay to the k83 as required.
- relay is DPDT rather than k84s SPDT
- less waste of outputs (if not fully utilising all 4 k84 outlets.
- cheaper

for s88 conection to layout I use Cat5 (with RJ45 connectors) laid direct to the module/area for distributuion in groups of 8. While the plugs may be an overkill the versatility comes in handy if your control desk (always separte from layout and on casters) needs to be located to different ends of the layout.


Peter
Offline Lars Westerlind  
#7 Posted : 22 January 2008 09:20:22(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
DPDT = Double Pole Double Throw, or what?
I agree that this should be standard, but I also want integrated solutions when possible. I like Viessmanns relais; there it's also easy to open the box and make some internal wiring as prefered; for example, I made some brake units with the diode and capacitator + some connections inside. But I would have prefered screw connections.

I can't even make up my mind for cable colouring, as I don't want to buy km's of new cable either. My common cables available at most places, however, are:
- Brown - 0
- Yellow - AC
- Red - digital from central (IB) to accessory decoders
- Orange - digital from boosters (Delta control) to track
- Green - DC - power to Viessmann k83, and usable with electronics.
I'm thinking of another colour for variable AC (lights).

/Lars
Offline pmgsr  
#8 Posted : 23 January 2008 15:57:01(UTC)
pmgsr


Joined: 01/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 200
Location: Lisbon, Lisbon
Well, like i thought initially i think i'm going for a mixed solution.
Like Dale said, i'll spread decoders/relay below the layout (more or less at the same place, this is, same distance from the edge) and put the s88 all in the same place.

One more question: now i'm only thinking about the shadow station, how about those acessories for the above layers? Do you think i put them on the edge of the layout, right below that layer, or all of them below the first layer (shadow station)?

Thanks.
Pedro Rosa.
Linda-a-Velha / Lisbon, Portugal.
My Layout (Marklin, C-Track, Digital)
Offline DaleSchultz  
#9 Posted : 23 January 2008 16:07:01(UTC)
DaleSchultz

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,997
if you have multiple layers, put them under the lowest layer and runs the wires from the upper layes down to them like this:
http://layout.mixmox.com...Multilevelwiringsolution
Dale
Intellibox + own software, K-Track
My current layout: https://cabin-layout.mixmox.com
Arrival and Departure signs: https://remotesign.mixmox.com
Offline dntower85  
#10 Posted : 23 January 2008 16:40:10(UTC)
dntower85

United States   
Joined: 08/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,218
Location: Shady Shores, TX - USA
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by DaleSchultz
<br />
Each signal module needed 3 K83 modules and each k84 module has 4 pairs of outputs, so 4 signal modules can be driven with 3 k83 nodules.


Dale, I confused on what you mean by a signal module and why you use 3 k83's, my confusion my be coming from the fact that I have the old semaphore signals
DT
Now powered by ECoS II unit#2, RocRail
era - some time in the future when the space time continuum is disrupted and ICE 3 Trains run on the same rails as the Adler and BR18's.
Offline DaleSchultz  
#11 Posted : 23 January 2008 16:53:08(UTC)
DaleSchultz

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,997
I just noticed a small typo where I said k84 and meant k83 so that may have contributed to the confusion... sorry.
I used the Viessmann Signal modules. Each module can drive two signals or a one very complex one(such as a main with distance signal). These modules are switched using momentary impulses (k83 type) rather than latched on/off inputs (a la K84).
Each module needed 6 possible inputs (aspects 0 and 1 for one signal and 4 aspects for a second signal) - 6 inputs can be achieved from three pairs of k83 outputs, hence 3/4 of each K83 module is needed to drive each signal module. So each set of 3 k83 modules have one pair spare - thus being able to drive a 4th signal module - giving a ratio of 3 k83 modules to 4 signal modules.
Dale
Intellibox + own software, K-Track
My current layout: https://cabin-layout.mixmox.com
Arrival and Departure signs: https://remotesign.mixmox.com
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.651 seconds.