Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline laalves  
#1 Posted : 05 July 2006 03:53:24(UTC)
laalves


Joined: 10/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,162
Location: Portugal
"Originally these two Trix H0 items T21333 SBB train set and T22337 loco class 59 SNCB should be equipped with a DCC/SX decoder. For technical reasons the locos can be supplied with DCC/mfx decoder only. This means the locos cannot be operated with Selectrix but the acceleration/braking delay can be switched off with this decoder version"

Noooooooooooo comments............ I wonder if this indicates a DCC/mfx Märklin and/or Trix CS..... What other sense would one make of a combined DCC/mfx decoder for the DCC world?

Luis
Offline digilox1  
#2 Posted : 05 July 2006 18:11:07(UTC)
digilox1


Joined: 28/05/2003(UTC)
Posts: 719
Location: ,
Luis, can you give us the source of your findings, please?

TIA,
regards,
Manfred
Offline laalves  
#3 Posted : 05 July 2006 18:13:26(UTC)
laalves


Joined: 10/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,162
Location: Portugal
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by digilox1
<br />Luis, can you give us the source of your findings, please?

TIA,
regards,
Manfred


An email update that dealers got together with the price increase notice, so it's official and direct from Märklin.

Luis
Offline digilox1  
#4 Posted : 05 July 2006 18:35:26(UTC)
digilox1


Joined: 28/05/2003(UTC)
Posts: 719
Location: ,
I guess, "DCC/mfx" should read "DCC OR mfx", does anybody know of a
bilingual DCC/mfx decoder?

AFAIK, the LokPilot 3 is trilingual, understanding DCC/Mot*/SX, but to the best of my knowledge there`s no DCC/mfx bilingual decoder.

But still, why would a bilingual DCC/SX decoder be a technical problem?

Did Mrs. Withers join the ranks at Kingsbridge/Märklin after attending a whine tasting party?

I`m with Casey: " The stupidest regulation ever..."
Nobody in the DCC-world is waiting for Märklin/Trix stepping off the mfx-dime.

On the other hand, if Märklin were releasing a bilingual, even better
a trilingual decoder, understanding DCC/mfx/Mot*, this would certainly be a sign of the rapid end of the mfx adventure. But, said decoder would make sense only for the AC-world.

Regards,
Manfred



Offline john black  
#5 Posted : 05 July 2006 19:04:57(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Manfred, do you think that whole MFX thingy is a fluke ?
I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline David Dewar  
#6 Posted : 05 July 2006 19:13:31(UTC)
David Dewar

Scotland   
Joined: 01/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 7,343
Location: Scotland
Maybe its just me but what does mfx do other than recognise a loco when placed on the track. This does appear to be useful and I would have thought all decoders should be able to do this. In itself it is hardly earth shattering but as I say maybe i am missing something.

David
Take care I like Marklin and will defend the worlds greatest model rail manufacturer.
Offline laalves  
#7 Posted : 05 July 2006 19:27:39(UTC)
laalves


Joined: 10/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,162
Location: Portugal
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by digilox1
<br />On the other hand, if Märklin were releasing a bilingual, even better a trilingual decoder, understanding DCC/mfx/Mot*, this would certainly be a sign of the rapid end of the mfx adventure. But, said decoder would make sense only for the AC-world.


I agree, unless a DCC/mfx Central Station will be out and mfx decoders lower their prices down to DCC levels.

My dealers tells me that a smashing majority of people in the AC world prefer mfx to anything else, guess what, because it's easier to use, and are even willing to pay a premium. If Trix comes out with mfx/DCC decoders and a compatible Central Station, I believe mfx may have a BIG possibility of shoving DCC to the side in the bigger share of the market of the technically uninterested people.

From what I've seen in my dealer, we, the technically interested people, are a very small minority.

Luis
Offline john black  
#8 Posted : 05 July 2006 19:52:08(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
I've to confess M does react to some of our complaints in a most positive way ...

Remember, when the mfx GG-1 #37490 was released last year ? With your CU6021 premium controller ya couldn't get a single whistle sound out of this €400 premium loco [xx(][xx(][xx(]
It was our Guru Hans Martin Cool who did M's job and discovered and taught us how to program that important 2nd address, then ...

Well, look at M's catalog, today. At most mfx locos for 2006 at least the basic sounds are readily accessed with CU6021, now Smile

John
I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline digilox1  
#9 Posted : 05 July 2006 21:12:04(UTC)
digilox1


Joined: 28/05/2003(UTC)
Posts: 719
Location: ,
To: John and Luis,
What I`ve learnt here from PERZ and in other forums from technically
educated people, mfx most probably isn`t as powerful as touted by the Märklin marketing people. The feedback procedure seems to be limited to address registration and decoder parameter read back where time isn`t much of an issue.

I don`t think that these two features are justifying their extra cost.

Add the mfx non-proliferation treaties and the delays of the updates, such as routing capabilities, train control software, the interface, the feed back booster, the ESU/Märklin divorce, the new ownership
and the overall shape of Märklin and the German Economy.

Well yes, in my view a proprietary system of a monopolist is a fluke
under these circumstances.

The CS has certainly ignited the process of rethinking and improving the user interfaces and full text user guidance. This is a serious problem with DCC and it is going to be addressed with the ECoS and the Viessmann Commander.
Tran have released their command station/controller combo with a pretty large display in their handheld and ZIMO have increased their pace during the last couple of months.

Some undesired legacies and upcoming problems in the DCC world might be here to last, the short/long address conflict in connection with the advanced consist address range, the 8/12/20/28 function issues, the need of many different update devices for decoder firmware and sound file updating if you prefer to mix decoders of different brands.

Some of these problems are not purely technical related by nature but do reflect a more generic dwindling of acceptance of authorities like
the NMRA in favor of proprietary solutions, with lawsuits on the horizon like KAM versus Bob Jacobsen, QSI versus ESU, MTH versus QSI, and on another field, MTH versus Lionel, Märklin versus PIKO.

Don`t get me wrong, most of these DCC-problems *could* be solved by improving the user interfaces, so the customers won`t have to care about these underlying consequences of technical evolution, progress
and competition. Competition isn`t an Aspirin curing most every disease but it`s certainly helpful to bring down model train electronics prices.

Regards,
Manfred








Offline john black  
#10 Posted : 05 July 2006 22:04:57(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Thanks for this most detailed information, Guru Smile
I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline digilox1  
#11 Posted : 07 July 2006 00:35:48(UTC)
digilox1


Joined: 28/05/2003(UTC)
Posts: 719
Location: ,
Hi all,

Found this in the EK-Forum (in German):

heute war im Modellbahngeschäft "Gleis 11" am Holzkirchnerbahnhof "Märklin-Info-Tag". Vor dem Geschäft war in einem kleinen Party-Zelt eine Märklin-Demo-Anlage aufgebaut. Ein Mitarbeiter beantwortete Fragen und der Schienenbus drehte seine Runden. Ich bin zwar kein Märklinist - aber vielleicht interessiert manchen folgendes: Das update für die CS (Fahrstraßensteuerung usw.) kommt nicht vor Jahresende(welches Jahr hat der Mitarbeiter nicht gesagt :-))))) ). S 88: "Da muß auf jeden Fall etwas gemacht werden! (nur wann? .-))) ). In absehbarer Zeit gibt es keine Nachfolger für K 83 und K 84 (... die funktionieren ausgezeichnet, so die Aussage). Eine schlanke DKW für das C-Gleis kommt definitv nicht - rechnet sich nicht. Das C-Gleis ist vollständig - ein weiterer Ausbau ist nicht angedacht. Lediglich meine Frage zur Drehscheibe wurde positiv beantwortet: Die GFN-Drehscheibe ist über 20 Jahre alt - da muß wohl etwas geschehen - auch im Hinblick auf das C-Gleis. Am K-Gleis sind zur Zeit keine Änderungen vorgesehen. Die Mobile-Station für Trix (mit dem update) kommt nicht vor Jahresende - Probleme mit der Programmerstellung - die CS-Trix - momentan noch kein Liefertermin in Sicht - desgleichen für Trix-Weichendecoder.
Alles in allem wenig positive Aussagen - irgendwie war es dem Mitarbeiter unangenehm solche Fragen gestellt zu bekommen ....

After John`s question about the fluky mfx thingy, I thought this posting would match this thread quite nicely.

At a Märklin info event in a Munich based model train shop, the poster
asked the Märklin sales man some questions regarding mfx, C-and K-Track.

In short:
-No CS update this year (routing, etc.)

-S88-bus: Something`s got to be done about it (What?).

-No successors to the tried and proven k83,k84 stationary decoders
in the foreseeable future.

-Definitely no slim double slip turnout for C-Track, due to lack of demand.

-C-track, according to that sales person, ist regarded as complete.

-The turntable might undergo some revisions in respect to its usability in connection with C-Track and also due to its age.

-No changes planned for the K-track line.

-The Trix mobile station won`t be available before this year`s end
with an update due to software design problems.

-No release date for the Trix CS.

-No release date for Trix turnout decoders.

These news call for disaster.

Regards,
Manfred
Offline David Dewar  
#12 Posted : 07 July 2006 01:21:07(UTC)
David Dewar

Scotland   
Joined: 01/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 7,343
Location: Scotland
From the above I would have thought some changes to the CS would have been made this year. The other points are not surprising. In fact if I was M I would give up Trix and stick to three rail as I cant see Trix being profitable. Marklin track is OK for me although a larger straight would be useful for bigger layouts.
I would still expect some changes to the CS to at least be announced if not provided by the year end. Those that dont like the CS can always buy the ECOS when available and I dont think M is too concerned about that which may mean they could control ESU.
Regarding ESU decoders...HAG are unable to supply their models with sound as the ESU sound decoders are not operating properly in HAG models. HAG are waiting on ESU to resolve this in thenext few weeks.

David
Take care I like Marklin and will defend the worlds greatest model rail manufacturer.
Offline john black  
#13 Posted : 07 July 2006 01:41:54(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by digilox1
<br />"Ich bin zwar kein Märklinist" ... "Da muß auf jeden Fall etwas gemacht werden" ... "Da muß wohl etwas geschehen"

biggrinbiggrinbiggrin - unbelievable ... Boy, am I glad I kept my CU
I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline viragoLDR  
#14 Posted : 07 July 2006 01:44:27(UTC)
viragoLDR


Joined: 12/01/2005(UTC)
Posts: 703
Location: ,
I'm starting to think it's a good thing I don't have space to build any H0 layout, I don't have to worry about which digital control to buy yet, or incomplete CS's etc. ;) By the time I get around to actually build my H0 layout, there's probably voice control =)
- Martijn
(early planning : H0-scale Era I K.Bay.sts.b)
(active planning : N-scale mixed late Era Japanese)
(possibly something Z-scale as well ;))
Offline digilox1  
#15 Posted : 07 July 2006 02:19:01(UTC)
digilox1


Joined: 28/05/2003(UTC)
Posts: 719
Location: ,
David,
At several occasions the Kingsbridge people stated that they are strongly committed to strengthen the Trix brand...

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Those that dont like the CS can always buy the ECOS when available and I dont think M is too concerned about that which may mean they could control ESU.


But why letting down their own customership if they are in control of ESU?
And, they didn`t say they would abandon the TRIX CS in favor
of the ECoS which would make sense in the case they actually were in control of ESU.

Regards,
Manfred

Offline laalves  
#16 Posted : 07 July 2006 02:50:53(UTC)
laalves


Joined: 10/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,162
Location: Portugal
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by David Dewar
<br />HAG are unable to supply their models with sound as the ESU sound decoders are not operating properly in HAG models. HAG are waiting on ESU to resolve this in thenext few weeks.


Now that is weird. I have installed Lokpilots v2 and Loksounds v3.5 in a handfull of HAG loks, both new and old style DC motors and all decoders worked great, straight from the box, no tinkering with CVs required.

Where did you get this information from?

Luis
Offline David Dewar  
#17 Posted : 07 July 2006 13:11:05(UTC)
David Dewar

Scotland   
Joined: 01/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 7,343
Location: Scotland
Luis. Info is from HAG where i have two locos waiting for decoders to be fitted before despatch. It only applies to Sound decoders.

David
Take care I like Marklin and will defend the worlds greatest model rail manufacturer.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.521 seconds.