Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline pa-pauls  
#1 Posted : 29 September 2007 13:01:00(UTC)
pa-pauls


Joined: 08/06/2002(UTC)
Posts: 1,843
Location: Norway
Hi Smile

I have signal modul 72441 and want to use it. [}:)]

I have locomotive's with 6090x and mfx type dekoder.
Will the signal module work nice with both type of dekoder's confused
Pål Paulsen
Märklin Spur 1 Digital, epoche 3
Offline Alberto Pedrini  
#2 Posted : 29 September 2007 13:39:48(UTC)
Alberto Pedrini

Italy   
Joined: 02/07/2004(UTC)
Posts: 1,448
Location: Italy
Yes, but if your locos have the [:(]1°Csinus compact[:(] the braking behaviour will be this:
light braking - spring forward - hiccup braking [B)]

http://www.marklinfan.net/video/Brake.wmv
Alberto

Marklinfan Club Italia
www.marklinfan.net
Offline pa-pauls  
#3 Posted : 29 September 2007 13:49:22(UTC)
pa-pauls


Joined: 08/06/2002(UTC)
Posts: 1,843
Location: Norway
Hi Alberto Smile

Thank you for fast and a excellent answer with video [:p]

Yes I have also locomotive's with the SDS motor Cool

Really strange to look at this video, it slows down, speeds up and then slow down to stop [}:)]

I think I open my window and through out the 72441 wink
As I think then it is better to just let the loco's stop [B)]

Thank's again Smile

Pål Paulsen
Märklin Spur 1 Digital, epoche 3
Offline hqstu  
#4 Posted : 29 September 2007 14:45:20(UTC)
hqstu

New Zealand   
Joined: 12/04/2002(UTC)
Posts: 429
Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
Ouch, that is ugly...
That's a 39120 with the first of the "compact" c-sines?
Nice integration Marklin...
Cheers

Stuart
New Zealand
Offline perz  
#5 Posted : 29 September 2007 17:56:41(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
I guess this behaviour is due to the transition section with half-wave rectified negative voltage without filter capacitor.

If I remember it right my mfx locos showed quite strange behavior when exposed to such half-wave rectified signals. The mfx decoder will probably not recognize the transition section voltage as a brake signal, but due to the decoder's extreme sensitivity to track voltage, it will brake anyway. Then, when it comes into the real brake section, it recognizes the brake signal. But now it is back to full voltage so the loco accelerates up to its original speed before the braking takes effect. A contributing factor is probably the strange speed regulation curve of the mfx locos, where the "brake delay" to some part is an actual delay before the speed change starts to take effect.

I took a decision long ago to not use the brake modules. I think I have no reason to regret that decision. The brake module has never been well integrated in the Märklin digital system. It doesn't work with older models and now not with newer ones either. It is simply not a good technical solution. The problem is that it is difficult to come up with something better that serves the purpose without adding a lot of complexity to the system.

Offline Lars Westerlind  
#6 Posted : 29 September 2007 20:55:59(UTC)
Lars Westerlind


Joined: 19/10/2001(UTC)
Posts: 2,379
Location: Lindome, Sweden
If you are right perz (I don't doubt it) the essence of the 72441 is still useful, that is, to apply a negative DC to get the loco brake. I use that very much on my layouts, and it works well (have no C-sine motors yet though). But I always apply the DC instantly, when the train is well inside the section in question; when the train passes a contact track a relay is switched which changes the nature of the supplied power to this block section.

The negative DC method I advocate very much; it's well supported by all modern Märklin decoders, and AFAIK all compatible MM decoders as well nowadays. It also work on some (mostly european) DCC-decoders, so the DC method can also be used with multiprotocol. But the idea of transitions have never worked well IMHO. Recently it was discovered that fast schottky diodes could be used passing into this section; much simpler wiring and possibly working also here.

/Lars
Offline H0  
#7 Posted : 29 September 2007 22:19:36(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,441
Location: DE-NW
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by perz
<br />If I remember it right my mfx locos showed quite strange behavior when exposed to such half-wave rectified signals. The mfx decoder will probably not recognize the transition section voltage as a brake signal, but due to the decoder's extreme sensitivity to track voltage, it will brake anyway.

Not correct: mfx decoders are not voltage dependant - the problem exists only with the compact C sine (Almagik is wrong, too: this is not a problem with the 1st C sine motor).

This problem should be fixed with the new SDS (haven't tested it yet).
Can be cured for compact C sine locos by replacing the motor driver PCB that is hooked between decoder and motor - this part is strongly voltage dependant!
Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
Offline Alberto Pedrini  
#8 Posted : 30 September 2007 01:30:46(UTC)
Alberto Pedrini

Italy   
Joined: 02/07/2004(UTC)
Posts: 1,448
Location: Italy
Sorry for my typing mistake [B)]
I meant the 1° Csinus <u>compact</u>.
All the other engines, new sds included, run very well on the brake module.
Alberto

Marklinfan Club Italia
www.marklinfan.net
Offline perz  
#9 Posted : 30 September 2007 02:05:40(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by h-zero
<br />
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by perz
<br />If I remember it right my mfx locos showed quite strange behavior when exposed to such half-wave rectified signals. The mfx decoder will probably not recognize the transition section voltage as a brake signal, but due to the decoder's extreme sensitivity to track voltage, it will brake anyway.

Not correct: mfx decoders are not voltage dependant - the problem exists only with the compact C sine (Almagik is wrong, too: this is not a problem with the 1st C sine motor).

This problem should be fixed with the new SDS (haven't tested it yet).
Can be cured for compact C sine locos by replacing the motor driver PCB that is hooked between decoder and motor - this part is strongly voltage dependant!


I think you are right that the most severe voltage dependency is caused by the compact C-sine motor itself. However, I have observed a similar effect with other mfx models as well. Mainly those with non-C-sine can style motors but also my only DCM model with mfx shows much more voltage sensitivity than my DCM+6090x models. All decoder/motor combinations show some voltage sensitivity but for the DCM+6090x it is definitly below my annoyance threshold.
Offline H0  
#10 Posted : 30 September 2007 02:30:01(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,441
Location: DE-NW
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by perz
<br />I think you are right that the most severe voltage dependency is caused by the compact C-sine motor itself. However, I have observed a similar effect with other mfx models as well. Mainly those with non-C-sine can style motors but also my only DCM model with mfx shows much more voltage sensitivity than my DCM+6090x models. All decoder/motor combinations show some voltage sensitivity but for the DCM+6090x it is definitly below my annoyance threshold.

I must admit I don't have brake modules.
But I tested the voltage sensitivity of the decoder / motor combinations I had at that time (SDS was not yet announced).
The only locos that didn't show any voltage sensitivity were those with mfx and 5-pole engine.
6090x models slowed down, but the slow down was controlled by the acceleration / braking delay and could hardly be noticed without speedometer (this could eben be a feature to allow slow sections by reducing the booster output voltage).
Post-6090x fx locos slowed down for fractions of a second but returned to previous speed even with reduced voltage.
I tested the effect of switching the interior lights of a 8 piece ICE 3 train; I dunno if the behaviour noticed here corresponds to the behaviour noticed with brake modules (but compact C sine shows the worst behaviour in both cases).
Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
Offline Hajime  
#11 Posted : 30 September 2007 09:19:56(UTC)
Hajime

Japan   
Joined: 29/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 88
Location: ,
Hello, all;

This is a result of the voltage sensitivity experiment of each motor.
SDS is improved very much, but SDS has a problem with the brake module.

UserPostedImage
Offline perz  
#12 Posted : 30 September 2007 14:23:09(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:The only locos that didn't show any voltage sensitivity were those with mfx and 5-pole engine.

Mine did. But I admit I only tested one loco, which is a converted one bought second-hand. Maybe the decoder isn't configured correctly.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.656 seconds.