Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline kbvrod  
#1 Posted : 12 July 2013 18:37:37(UTC)
kbvrod

United States   
Joined: 23/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,597
Location: Beverly, MA
thanks 3 users liked this useful post by kbvrod
Offline petestra  
#2 Posted : 12 July 2013 21:50:09(UTC)
petestra

United States   
Joined: 27/07/2009(UTC)
Posts: 5,862
Location: Leesburg,VA.USA
Terrible wreck during a very busy holiday time. Crying Peter
Offline jvuye  
#3 Posted : 13 July 2013 06:45:26(UTC)
jvuye

Belgium   
Joined: 01/03/2008(UTC)
Posts: 2,883
Location: South Western France
Originally Posted by: petestra Go to Quoted Post
Terrible wreck during a very busy holiday time. Crying Peter


And scary too: our family uses that line on a regular basis between Paris and Cahors!
It is the Paris Toulouse main line, once traveled by the famed Capitole TEE.
But I am sorry to say that it was just waiting to happen!
The TEOZ / Intercity coaches are mostly dating back to the early 1970's and are the oldest of the SNCF has in main line passenger service.
They are still operated daily at 200km/h (125 mph)
The line itself, further south is largely antiquated with, in some areas, catenary poles dating back to the 1930 original PO electrification(Paris Orleans RR company)!
Improvements have been delayed in many places causing endless delays in traffic...
I am not saying that these are the causes of the accident, but stating a simple fact that SNCF has favored the TGV lines in the last 30 years, to the expense of "classical" lines...!
Let's hope the death toll doesn't get heavier...
Jacques Vuye aka Dr.Eisenbahn
Once a vandal, learned to be better and had great success!
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by jvuye
Offline NS1200  
#4 Posted : 13 July 2013 08:31:54(UTC)
NS1200

Netherlands   
Joined: 10/08/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,443
Very tragic and disturbing,my sympathy is with the victims and their families.
All we do in life holds a certain risk,even sitting at home holds the risk of a plane crashing on your house,we are living close to the airport of Rotterdam and a lot of landing planes pass over our area,also at night.
Sitting in a train is no different,there comes a day you just have bad luck,knowing that in general our transport systems are very safe.
The cause of the crash could be various,ranging from a broken axle to miscommunication about the allowed speed.
Despite of electronic systems a lot of communication is still on paper or expressed verbally.
Only recently a Dutch train driver drove a train with loaded chemical tank cars from Rotterdam to Antwerp,driving at 100 km/h where only 40 km/h was allowed,the train derailed and some cars burst open,results were disastreous,innocent people killed in their sleep.

Over the next hour we will be travelling by train to Middelburg for the weekend.
I am not scared.
Have more than you show,speak less than you know (Shakespeare).
Offline kbvrod  
#5 Posted : 13 July 2013 13:39:49(UTC)
kbvrod

United States   
Joined: 23/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,597
Location: Beverly, MA
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by kbvrod
Offline xxup  
#6 Posted : 13 July 2013 14:12:36(UTC)
xxup

Australia   
Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC)
Posts: 9,594
Location: Australia
It is a familiar story all over the world.. When times are hard, maintenance is the first thing that is cut..

It is a shame that the decision makers are not the victims of their own cuts..

My old CEO told us a story about a company (I think that it was du Pont).. There used to be lots of accidents in the factory making explosives - so it was decided to move the management and their families closer to the factories. Amazingly, there was a huge improvement in the standard of safety after that decision.. BigGrin

The really sad thing is that it takes a tragedy like this, before there is an amazing injection of funds into maintenance..
Adrian
UserPostedImage
Australia flag by abFlags.com
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by xxup
Offline kbvrod  
#7 Posted : 14 July 2013 15:08:17(UTC)
kbvrod

United States   
Joined: 23/08/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,597
Location: Beverly, MA
Offline jeehring  
#8 Posted : 14 July 2013 15:40:08(UTC)
jeehring


Joined: 25/09/2003(UTC)
Posts: 2,786
Location: ,
3.00 PM today the result is: 4 persons were dead. 8 injured persons remain hospitalized, some of them very seriously wounded
.....
At the time of the derailment the train was traveling at 139km / h ..., about 10 km / h below its normal speed. The driver is not to blame, his train was supposed to travel at 150Km/h...
The cause of the derailment seems to be the unstowing of a splice bar on a switch ....but....a fast train passed 20 minutes before without problem.
Switchs are regularly inspected...
The last maintenance visit of this turnout was on July 4th (last week). At this stage of investigation it is said that the inspection team didn't notice anything wrong...nothing was mentionned...
Offline NS1200  
#9 Posted : 14 July 2013 18:41:00(UTC)
NS1200

Netherlands   
Joined: 10/08/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,443
Perhaps the switch was pulled whilst the train was still over the switch?
It would not be the first time......
Have more than you show,speak less than you know (Shakespeare).
Offline Yumgui  
#10 Posted : 16 July 2013 10:26:26(UTC)
Yumgui

United States   
Joined: 20/03/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,660
Location: Paris, France
To put speculation aside, the investigation has narrowed the cause of the derailment to a loose 10Kg fishplate jammed into the frog of a point located just before the station ...
They are wondering how 4 huge bolts could loosen/shear all at the same time like that, intentional "vandalism" has not been ruled out ...

6 deaths, 14 injured including 2 in critical condition ...
Experienced train engineer credited with limiting the damage by instinctively setting off all necessary alarms to shut down the site, thus avoiding any other trains colliding into the wreck.

Some video simulations can be seen here (narrative is in French):
http://www.francetvinfo....ine-du-drame_369336.html

Photos of the fishplate published by SNCF below :

UserPostedImage

UserPostedImage

UserPostedImage

Nasty ...

Y ThumbDown

Edited by user 16 July 2013 18:56:01(UTC)  | Reason: spelling : "shear" (thanks jvuye ;)

If your M track is rusted ... DON'T throw it out !
Working on: https://studiogang.com/projects/all
My heavy train station renovation: https://youtu.be/QQlyNiq416A
Inspired by: http://www.nakedmarklin.com/... Am not alone in this universe, phew.
thanks 6 users liked this useful post by Yumgui
Offline jvuye  
#11 Posted : 16 July 2013 16:36:03(UTC)
jvuye

Belgium   
Joined: 01/03/2008(UTC)
Posts: 2,883
Location: South Western France
Thanks for this info, very clear.
No why did these bolts come loose?
If the bolts are not severed, it means they were not tightened properly, and the question becomes: was it intentional or not, or did they come loose from the vibrations?.
If the bolts however were sheared, it could probably come from the rails vertical movement (acting as a guillotine) .
If not properly supported from underneath, the rails could have moved under the weight of passing trains.
When one knows that there were previous report of such a vibration problem after the road tunnel underneath had been rebuild/ enlarged..I'd be willing to speculate that the answer is near!
Cheers
Jacques Vuye aka Dr.Eisenbahn
Once a vandal, learned to be better and had great success!
Offline Yumgui  
#12 Posted : 16 July 2013 18:33:17(UTC)
Yumgui

United States   
Joined: 20/03/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,660
Location: Paris, France
Originally Posted by: jvuye Go to Quoted Post
No why did these bolts come loose?
...
If the bolts are not severed, it means they were not tightened properly, and the question becomes: was it intentional or not, or did they come loose from the vibrations?.
If the bolts however were sheared, it could probably come from the rails vertical movement (acting as a guillotine) .
If not properly supported from underneath, the rails could have moved under the weight of passing trains.

Yes Jacques,

As you probably know from constant news reports here, and according to the SNCF, that specific fishplate and point were checked 10 days before the crash.

So, three subjects of inquiry (with both technical and legal aspects) are underway:
- Faulty maintenance; badly tightened bolts or insufficient sub-support
- Material fatigue (partly explaining the shearing effect you describe); which theoretically should have been observed by maintenance
- A malicious act

Haven't heard about the vibrations from the underpass ... but many facts are being brought to light in real time with surprises everyday ...
According to the SNCF, facing accusations from all sides of pouring money into TGVs at the expense of standard routes, an accident of this magnitude hasn't happened in over 30 years ... train travel remains safe overall.

As you say, we'll know soon I think.

Y
If your M track is rusted ... DON'T throw it out !
Working on: https://studiogang.com/projects/all
My heavy train station renovation: https://youtu.be/QQlyNiq416A
Inspired by: http://www.nakedmarklin.com/... Am not alone in this universe, phew.
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Yumgui
Offline NS1200  
#13 Posted : 17 July 2013 18:19:24(UTC)
NS1200

Netherlands   
Joined: 10/08/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,443
Looking at the pictures of the switch type,i would not dare to pass it with a speed of say 140 km/h.
Is that common in France?
Have more than you show,speak less than you know (Shakespeare).
Offline kariosls37  
#14 Posted : 19 July 2013 10:14:21(UTC)
kariosls37

New Zealand   
Joined: 02/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,067
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
The train was passing through the points in the trailing direction.(i.e. the lines were converging from the point of view of the train) Points traversed in the trailing direction do not pose any guidance challenges for the wheelsets, and it is common all over the world to pass through them at road speed. Facing points are a different matter, and depending on the type and construction of point there are usually restrictions in place for traversing diverging points in the curved drection. There may or may not be restrictions in place for the "straight through" route.

It would certainly have a very bad impact on travel time and fue economy if trains had to slow down for every point they came across...

Cheers,
Rick
Offline Chook  
#15 Posted : 19 July 2013 11:39:46(UTC)
Chook

Australia   
Joined: 15/08/2012(UTC)
Posts: 234
Location: Perth, Western Australia.
Note the right hand "pinch bar" has only three shiny compression marks on its face. Also note that there are 4 holes and only three of them would appear to have bolts in them.
Also of note is the shiny mark (where the washer would have been) on the closest hole to the camera is not as stressed as the 2 holes after it.

Perhaps the leading edge of the compression plate (closest to the camera) was just out far enough for a wheel (?) to capture it as it was traveling past and shear the remaining bolts away and forcing the plate into the "V" section and lifting the subsequent wheels away from the line as they passed over it.

Regards....Chook.
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Chook
Offline NS1200  
#16 Posted : 19 July 2013 13:13:07(UTC)
NS1200

Netherlands   
Joined: 10/08/2009(UTC)
Posts: 3,443
Rick,

You surely must agree with me that not all switches (points) can be passed with high speeds.
On Dutch mainlines it is very uncommon to build in switches which can be passed at high speeds,for obvious reasons.
Even for switches intended to change lanes from say right to left there will be a speed limit in force.

Paul.

Have more than you show,speak less than you know (Shakespeare).
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.607 seconds.