Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline river6109  
#1 Posted : 09 August 2009 10:56:57(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,879
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
I'm surprised that this loco does'nt pull carriages up a hill.
It has 4 rubber tyres.

regards.,
John
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
Offline steventrain  
#2 Posted : 09 August 2009 11:26:31(UTC)
steventrain

United Kingdom   
Joined: 21/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 31,707
Location: United Kingdom
you mean 39020?
Large Marklinist 3- Rails Layout with CS2/MS2/Boosters/C-track/favorites Electric class E03/BR103, E18/E118, E94, Crocodiles/Steam BR01, BR03, BR05, BR23, BR44, BR50, Big Boy.
Offline pab  
#3 Posted : 09 August 2009 13:30:03(UTC)
pab

Netherlands   
Joined: 03/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,764
If you mean the 39020, mine hasn't any problems pulling a 5 carriages long Rheingold set.
Offline river6109  
#4 Posted : 09 August 2009 13:40:28(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,879
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by pab
<br />If you mean the 39020, mine hasn't any problems pulling a 5 carriages long Rheingold set.

yes 39020
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
Offline steventrain  
#5 Posted : 09 August 2009 14:21:51(UTC)
steventrain

United Kingdom   
Joined: 21/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 31,707
Location: United Kingdom
I have the 39020 with five cars 41928 up the hill without slipping on straight track but bit slipping on curved.
Large Marklinist 3- Rails Layout with CS2/MS2/Boosters/C-track/favorites Electric class E03/BR103, E18/E118, E94, Crocodiles/Steam BR01, BR03, BR05, BR23, BR44, BR50, Big Boy.
User is suspended until 24/11/2846 07:19:16(UTC) Bigdaddynz  
#6 Posted : 09 August 2009 14:38:53(UTC)
Bigdaddynz

New Zealand   
Joined: 17/09/2006(UTC)
Posts: 18,778
Location: New Zealand
Also note the parallel thread 'Mechanical problem with my BR 18.3- 39020'.
Offline river6109  
#7 Posted : 09 August 2009 15:04:25(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,879
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Bigdaddynz
<br />Also note the parallel thread 'Mechanical problem with my BR 18.3- 39020'.

that's right, I did'nt want to divert from the Topic "Mechanical problem".

John
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
User is suspended until 24/11/2846 07:19:16(UTC) Bigdaddynz  
#8 Posted : 09 August 2009 15:09:54(UTC)
Bigdaddynz

New Zealand   
Joined: 17/09/2006(UTC)
Posts: 18,778
Location: New Zealand
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by river6109
<br />that's right, I did'nt want to divert from the Topic "Mechanical problem".

John



Too late! That thread is also about the pulling power (or lack thereof) of the 39020.
Offline river6109  
#9 Posted : 09 August 2009 15:31:02(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,879
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
David,

Mechanical problem with my BR 18.3- 39020

nothing about pullingpower

there is a difference between a mechanical problem and pullingpower.
Pullingpower could be caused by:
insufficient weight
uneven track
loose Traction tyres
lack of traction tyres

I resent your remark: too late

If you have any problems with me posting topics of any kind on this forum, please let me know.
It also has come to my notice and apparrant most the time I've posted a topic, you are counter posting an answer (and not a topic) from previous questions or postings.

John
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
Offline Davy  
#10 Posted : 10 August 2009 02:38:36(UTC)
Davy


Joined: 29/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,915
Location: Netherlands
My version has no problem with 5 coaches and a marklin cleaning van on my hill off max 5%.

M-track with a CS2.
User is suspended until 24/11/2846 07:19:16(UTC) Bigdaddynz  
#11 Posted : 10 August 2009 03:09:40(UTC)
Bigdaddynz

New Zealand   
Joined: 17/09/2006(UTC)
Posts: 18,778
Location: New Zealand
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by river6109
<br />I resent your remark: too late

If you have any problems with me posting topics....

It also has come to my notice and apparrant most the time I've posted a topic, you are counter posting an answer (and not a topic) from previous questions or postings.


John, I don't have a problem at all with you or your topics.

I'm just merely pointing out that another thread is dealing with or has dealt with the same or similar subjects. In a forum of this nature, it can be that topics have been dealt with or discussed before. If I make a reference to another thread in this way, it is only to point people to the previous discussions, which may be of help to other members. And also to help you so that you are aware of the previous discussions, so that you don't waste your time saying things that have already been said!

It certainly is not intended to hijack or desecrate your threads!
Offline estacioncocule  
#12 Posted : 10 August 2009 06:07:18(UTC)
estacioncocule


Joined: 18/03/2008(UTC)
Posts: 52
Location: Santiago,
Hello:
I also own a 39020 locomotive, beatiful model, but I agree it has a modest pulling power.
Also, at low velocities, it slips and stops when cruising over 24624 crossings.
What happens in this crossings is that because of insufficient weight, the central wheels loose contact with rails.
Maybe the solution is to add extra weight inside this locomotive.
¿Any idea?
Thanks in advance.
Julio
Offline efel  
#13 Posted : 10 August 2009 10:39:52(UTC)
efel

France   
Joined: 23/02/2005(UTC)
Posts: 801
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by river6109
<br />that's right, I did'nt want to divert from the Topic "Mechanical problem".

John


Thanks, John.
In fact it's not the same problem. Unfortunately, some "off topic" appeared in my topic "mechanical problem with my BR 18.3". I hope they are going to stop.

Fred
Offline monster134  
#14 Posted : 11 August 2009 23:56:32(UTC)
monster134

South Africa   
Joined: 23/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 705
Location: ,
Its the same old story.Marklin not testing the bloody things on anything other than a loop on some blond girls table....

biggrin

Anycase,the problem is the rear bogie.The springpacks sit on top of this bogie and when she does a transition from straight into incline,or a heavy incline,the total lack of suspension in that rear bogie takes weight from the drivers.The springpacks catches the bottom of the chassis under the engineers cab.You will find if you remove the rear bogie's axle,everything is fine.I took a pencil grinder and shaved about a half a millimeter out the chassis just infront of the chassis number.This solved the problems.

Otherwise,you will need to cut the springpacks off,which wasnt an option here.

She outpulls 37052 now,which is good.
If at any stage in the defusing of a bomb,you should see a bomb technician running,try your utmost best to keep up with him-Army magazine of preventative action.
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by monster134
Offline river6109  
#15 Posted : 12 August 2009 13:05:08(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,879
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by monster134
<br />Its the same old story.Marklin not testing the bloody things on anything other than a loop on some blond girls table....

biggrin

Anycase,the problem is the rear bogie.The springpacks sit on top of this bogie and when she does a transition from straight into incline,or a heavy incline,the total lack of suspension in that rear bogie takes weight from the drivers.The springpacks catches the bottom of the chassis under the engineers cab.You will find if you remove the rear bogie's axle,everything is fine.I took a pencil grinder and shaved about a half a millimeter out the chassis just infront of the chassis number.This solved the problems.

Otherwise,you will need to cut the springpacks off,which wasnt an option here.

She outpulls 37052 now,which is good.

Its good you've found a way of dealing with it.

May I express my thoughts about it.
If you have any trouble with the loco further down the line, Your repair job, may cancels your warranty.


regards.,
John
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
Offline monster134  
#16 Posted : 12 August 2009 15:52:35(UTC)
monster134

South Africa   
Joined: 23/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 705
Location: ,
Its an easy decision.There is nothing on any loco i cant fix myself.So you either have a lovely white elephant with a warranty,or a running train without.Took me 5 seconds to decide.
If at any stage in the defusing of a bomb,you should see a bomb technician running,try your utmost best to keep up with him-Army magazine of preventative action.
Offline davemr  
#17 Posted : 12 August 2009 18:12:12(UTC)
davemr


Joined: 09/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 983
Location: ,
Monster you are the Man ! and I bet if it cant be fixed you drop it from a great height on to concrete.
davemr
Offline dntower85  
#18 Posted : 12 August 2009 18:28:13(UTC)
dntower85

United States   
Joined: 08/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,218
Location: Shady Shores, TX - USA
Similar problem with my 39010 Br01 and others had it also. On the BR 01 the rear bogie wheels make contact with the frame and lift the drivers off the track. In the thread where this was discussed Lutz recommended another set of rear wheels that were a little bet smaller so no modifications would be needed to the chassis.
DT
Now powered by ECoS II unit#2, RocRail
era - some time in the future when the space time continuum is disrupted and ICE 3 Trains run on the same rails as the Adler and BR18's.
Offline monster134  
#19 Posted : 12 August 2009 21:11:03(UTC)
monster134

South Africa   
Joined: 23/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 705
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by davemr
<br />Monster you are the Man ! and I bet if it cant be fixed you drop it from a great height on to concrete.


Lol,no.I did have that sort of notion with the BR45...but i never did it.If there is 1 train that had me beat,it was that one.

Yeah,on the BR01's i fitted the rear wheelset of the 18.1,but it didnt really solve the problem.Its the actual bogie bottoming out on those too.Im in the process of getting rid of them and getting 2 Roco BR01's
If at any stage in the defusing of a bomb,you should see a bomb technician running,try your utmost best to keep up with him-Army magazine of preventative action.
Offline ziggypig321  
#20 Posted : 02 September 2009 10:54:01(UTC)
ziggypig321


Joined: 02/09/2009(UTC)
Posts: 51
Location: santa ana, ca
can you guys show a pic of the rheingold train on your layouts?
Offline river6109  
#21 Posted : 02 September 2009 14:31:37(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,879
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by monster134
<br />
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by davemr
<br />Monster you are the Man ! and I bet if it cant be fixed you drop it from a great height on to concrete.


Lol,no.I did have that sort of notion with the BR45...but i never did it.If there is 1 train that had me beat,it was that one.

Yeah,on the BR01's i fitted the rear wheelset of the 18.1,but it didnt really solve the problem.Its the actual bogie bottoming out on those too.Im in the process of getting rid of them and getting 2 Roco BR01's


Roco Locos have nice details but the driving wheels are in the tender.

some have 3 or 4 axles with rubbertyres and als a cardan shaft through to the loco's drivingwheels, although there are no rubber tyres on the Loco's drivingwheels.
I have written to Roco about changing the locos drivingwheel with Rubbertyre but sofar have had no positive answer back.
I've even suggested it as an option but they're refusing to come to the party, saying it coul;d effect the brakepads.

so be aware of the pullingpowers of Steam tender locomotives.
If you buy 2 and use them on 1 consists of wagons, you should'nt have any probels at all.
Look at my video of the 18201:



regards.,
John
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
Offline river6109  
#22 Posted : 02 September 2009 14:34:39(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,879
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by ziggypig321
<br />can you guys show a pic of the rheingold train on your layouts?


http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rheingold_%28Zug%29
or just go to google and type in "Rheingold Zug"

regards.,
John
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
User is suspended until 24/11/2846 07:19:16(UTC) Bigdaddynz  
#23 Posted : 02 September 2009 14:47:55(UTC)
Bigdaddynz

New Zealand   
Joined: 17/09/2006(UTC)
Posts: 18,778
Location: New Zealand
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by ziggypig321
<br />can you guys show a pic of the rheingold train on your layouts?


Must admit, to my shame, that I haven't had the Rheingold coaches out of their boxes yet! [:I][:I]
Offline monster134  
#24 Posted : 05 September 2009 15:39:04(UTC)
monster134

South Africa   
Joined: 23/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 705
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by river6109
<br />
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by monster134
<br />
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by davemr
<br />Monster you are the Man ! and I bet if it cant be fixed you drop it from a great height on to concrete.


Lol,no.I did have that sort of notion with the BR45...but i never did it.If there is 1 train that had me beat,it was that one.

Yeah,on the BR01's i fitted the rear wheelset of the 18.1,but it didnt really solve the problem.Its the actual bogie bottoming out on those too.Im in the process of getting rid of them and getting 2 Roco BR01's


Roco Locos have nice details but the driving wheels are in the tender.

some have 3 or 4 axles with rubbertyres and als a cardan shaft through to the loco's drivingwheels, although there are no rubber tyres on the Loco's drivingwheels.
I have written to Roco about changing the locos drivingwheel with Rubbertyre but sofar have had no positive answer back.
I've even suggested it as an option but they're refusing to come to the party, saying it coul;d effect the brakepads.

so be aware of the pullingpowers of Steam tender locomotives.
If you buy 2 and use them on 1 consists of wagons, you should'nt have any probels at all.
Look at my video of the 18201:



regards.,
John


I have got a Roco with the driving wheels on the tender.Those small wheels generate a lot of torque.Very few layouts on here have the inclines i do,and with 8 lighted coaches behind it,it pulls smoothly around.Infact,its the only passenger loco i own that can do that.39050 comes close....but 6 is the limit.

With the traction wheels on the tender,the Rocos do not fall victim to the transition on inclines either.Flies over there.

I had a Roco BR01 on my layout,and its pulling power is far far superior to the Marklin 39010,011,015 abortions.

The older oil tender Br01 is fine.I love them.
If at any stage in the defusing of a bomb,you should see a bomb technician running,try your utmost best to keep up with him-Army magazine of preventative action.
Offline TimR  
#25 Posted : 05 September 2009 16:06:35(UTC)
TimR

Indonesia   
Joined: 16/08/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,752
Location: Jakarta
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by monster134
I had a Roco BR01 on my layout,and its pulling power is far far superior to the Marklin 39010,011,015 abortions.


Hi Riekus,
Your find is surprising for me. So far I only heard how Roco steamers lacks torque as opposed to Marklin ones.

By any chance, do you know how their 01 compare to their BR 44/50/52?
I've been tempted by their DR Relok models (Marklin don't have them)..
Now collecting C-Sine models.
Offline river6109  
#26 Posted : 05 September 2009 16:19:07(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,879
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by TimR
<br />
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by monster134
I had a Roco BR01 on my layout,and its pulling power is far far superior to the Marklin 39010,011,015 abortions.


Hi Riekus,
Your find is surprising for me. So far I only heard how Roco steamers lacks torque as opposed to Marklin ones.

By any chance, do you know how their 01 compare to their BR 44/50/52?
I've been tempted by their DR Relok models (Marklin don't have them)..

I'm not completely convinced by Riekus assumptions.

My 18201 could'nt pull 12 carriages (1:87)
My SBB C 5/6 is also lacking in pullingpower.

I know that Roco locos have a greater pulling power than most Märklin locos.
Roco tenders are full and their weight could'nt be altered.
With a Märklin steam loco, you could if desired, to add more weight into the boiler.
every 100g counts.
I rather do that, than buying a second SBB C5/6 to make up for it, although a second C5/6 would'nt do any harm. being a Gotthard loco.
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
Offline monster134  
#27 Posted : 06 September 2009 15:08:45(UTC)
monster134

South Africa   
Joined: 23/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 705
Location: ,
An assumption is something you make when you simply dont know.I can go make a video to proof my point.Ive just done the test.My 18201 pulls 14 carriages over that incline without slipping a wheel.I can actually crawl it over there.So there must be something amiss with yours John.

Im not assuming,im telling you that no new BR01 from Marklin will pull with this Roco.Neither will 39020...modified or not.Neither will 39050.The 39010 Br01 147 wont go over there with 6 carriages.Its crap.And its speaker is blown....again.

12 carriages is no problem for the 18201....you showed a video of it running past with 13 carriages,so i dont get the point.Nope,the first Roco BR01 is arriving mid month...then i will sell the 39010.Its useless.
If at any stage in the defusing of a bomb,you should see a bomb technician running,try your utmost best to keep up with him-Army magazine of preventative action.
Offline river6109  
#28 Posted : 06 September 2009 15:41:17(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,879
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by monster134
<br />An assumption is something you make when you simply dont know.I can go make a video to proof my point.Ive just done the test.My 18201 pulls 14 carriages over that incline without slipping a wheel.I can actually crawl it over there.So there must be something amiss with yours John.

Im not assuming,im telling you that no new BR01 from Marklin will pull with this Roco.Neither will 39020...modified or not.Neither will 39050.The 39010 Br01 147 wont go over there with 6 carriages.Its crap.And its speaker is blown....again.

12 carriages is no problem for the 18201....you showed a video of it running past with 13 carriages,so i dont get the point.Nope,the first Roco BR01 is arriving mid month...then i will sell the 39010.Its useless.

Notice my video shows 2 motorized tenders.!!!
Are you using 1:87 carriages ?
I'll wait for your report back of your Roco BR 01.
If this is the case as you describe it, I'll may get more of the Roco Steam locos.

regards.,
John
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
Offline utkan  
#29 Posted : 06 September 2009 17:17:58(UTC)
utkan

Turkey   
Joined: 14/07/2009(UTC)
Posts: 19,116
Location: Istanbul,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by river6109
<br />I'm surprised that this loco does'nt pull carriages up a hill.
It has 4 rubber tyres.

regards.,
John


Hi John,
Can you have alook at the following video?

http://www.akilli.tv/vid...259/maerklin-katar2.aspx
The Loco is 3/6 3602
All of my BR 18's has pulled all these cars.

regards,

mehmet
Do unto others, as you would have them do unto you...
Offline river6109  
#30 Posted : 06 September 2009 17:55:28(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,879
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by utkan
<br />
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by river6109
<br />I'm surprised that this loco does'nt pull carriages up a hill.
It has 4 rubber tyres.

regards.,
John


Hi John,
Can you have alook at the following video?

http://www.akilli.tv/vid...259/maerklin-katar2.aspx
The Loco is 3/6 3602
All of my BR 18's has pulled all these cars.

regards,

mehmet


when I've looked at the sparepart list, as mentioned it had 4 rubber tyres.
So the problem the other member has with his 3/6 must be of an other nature and has nothing to do with pulling power.

regards.,
John
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
Offline TimR  
#31 Posted : 09 September 2009 04:31:44(UTC)
TimR

Indonesia   
Joined: 16/08/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,752
Location: Jakarta
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by river6109
<br />I'm surprised that this loco does'nt pull carriages up a hill.
It has 4 rubber tyres.

regards.,
John


Going back to the original question to this thread;

If owners (with this issue) don't mind me asking;
I'm still a bit baffled with the issue of pulling power of the 18.3 models (as in this thread) - or to strech it a bit - new construction steamers.

I don't have an 18.3, but I do have a BR 01 - which technically built to the same level of construction standard to 18.3 (4-6-2 wheel arrangement, SDS).

My repeated test continue to indicate that the 01 has no problem outpulling a BR 50, at least on a flat surface (I don't have any incline yet).

From stationary; the BR 01 pulls 10 coaches -including 2 older, heavy ones with lighting and own sliders, which probably count as 3 coaches as they're quite difficult to move - AND still pushes another stationary (braked) 400g metal test lok on the track with just occassional wheelslip - mainly due to a delayed tranfer of power through siderods to the other driving axles.

In the similar test environment (same spot on the track); the BR 50 without any train behind it had difficulty pushing the 400g lok, barely able to move it more than a couple cms even as I increased the speed steps. It just wheelspins wildly; while its straining motor hum get so loud that I decided that it's enough.

No, I don't think there's anything wrong with my 50 - as my other DCM loks don't seem to perform that much better, either. One even started to loosened itself out of its traction tyres in this test.

So to my questions;
Is the pulling power problem mainly confined to ability to climb inclines? (due to trailing wheel rubbing off on the chassis?)

Or is it that some model just have specific problem?
(but then Riekus also complain about his BR 01s...)

I know for a fact that these new generation of steamers are tad more sensitive with track designs - they don't tolerate the slightest imperfection (gaps between tracks, etc) as well as the older more hardy models.
Now collecting C-Sine models.
Offline monster134  
#32 Posted : 10 September 2009 00:40:41(UTC)
monster134

South Africa   
Joined: 23/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 705
Location: ,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by TimR
<br />
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by river6109
<br />I'm surprised that this loco does'nt pull carriages up a hill.
It has 4 rubber tyres.

regards.,
John


Going back to the original question to this thread;

If owners (with this issue) don't mind me asking;
I'm still a bit baffled with the issue of pulling power of the 18.3 models (as in this thread) - or to strech it a bit - new construction steamers.

I don't have an 18.3, but I do have a BR 01 - which technically built to the same level of construction standard to 18.3 (4-6-2 wheel arrangement, SDS).

My repeated test continue to indicate that the 01 has no problem outpulling a BR 50, at least on a flat surface (I don't have any incline yet).

From stationary; the BR 01 pulls 10 coaches -including 2 older, heavy ones with lighting and own sliders, which probably count as 3 coaches as they're quite difficult to move - AND still pushes another stationary (braked) 400g metal test lok on the track with just occassional wheelslip - mainly due to a delayed tranfer of power through siderods to the other driving axles.

In the similar test environment (same spot on the track); the BR 50 without any train behind it had difficulty pushing the 400g lok, barely able to move it more than a couple cms even as I increased the speed steps. It just wheelspins wildly; while its straining motor hum get so loud that I decided that it's enough.

No, I don't think there's anything wrong with my 50 - as my other DCM loks don't seem to perform that much better, either. One even started to loosened itself out of its traction tyres in this test.

So to my questions;
Is the pulling power problem mainly confined to ability to climb inclines? (due to trailing wheel rubbing off on the chassis?)

Or is it that some model just have specific problem?
(but then Riekus also complain about his BR 01s...)

I know for a fact that these new generation of steamers are tad more sensitive with track designs - they don't tolerate the slightest imperfection (gaps between tracks, etc) as well as the older more hardy models.


Quite right Tim...with that rear bogie axle removed,the 39010 pulls extremely well.But,with the axle fitted,its simply useless.I measured the actual angle it will tolerate on a transition to an incline...and it was less than the prescribed 1 degree Marklin suggests.

Now,im not the best tracklayer,so i do blame myself as well,but for a train to be this sensitive,is unacceptable.
If at any stage in the defusing of a bomb,you should see a bomb technician running,try your utmost best to keep up with him-Army magazine of preventative action.
Offline TimR  
#33 Posted : 10 September 2009 03:08:41(UTC)
TimR

Indonesia   
Joined: 16/08/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,752
Location: Jakarta
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by monster134
Quite right Tim...with that rear bogie axle removed,the 39010 pulls extremely well.But,with the axle fitted,its simply useless.I measured the actual angle it will tolerate on a transition to an incline...and it was less than the prescribed 1 degree Marklin suggests.

Now,im not the best tracklayer,so i do blame myself as well,but for a train to be this sensitive,is unacceptable.


Thanks for your feedback, Riekus..
I guess with these new models - detailing triumphed over some practical functionalities.

Now collecting C-Sine models.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (5)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.998 seconds.