marklin-users.net community
| Forum
Welcome to the forum
Home
Community Forum
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please
Login
or
Register
.
Forum
Active Topics
Login
Register
Notification
Error
OK
marklin-users.net community | Forum
»
General topics
»
H0-scale
»
CLACK
2 Pages
<
1
2
Go to Page...
CLACK -
-> C-Track + LACK furniture
Share
Email this topic
LinkBack Topic URL
Retweet this Topic
Share Topic on Google+
Like this Topic
Share on Facebook
Digg this Topic
Reddit this Topic
Share on Tumblr
Options
Watch this topic
Print this topic
View
» Normal
Threaded
Previous Topic
Next Topic
EB421
#51
Posted :
08 December 2025 15:02:29(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 10/04/2025(UTC)
Posts: 76
Location: UK
Here's an example showing a CLACK550 module with a fork, with the new 15mm margin. Technically the straight is out of spec as it's 0.1mm short of flush. I'm optimistic it will work in practice as even the CLACK300 module has a longer overhang.
2 users liked this useful post by EB421
marklinist5999
,
Jimmy Thompson
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
EB421
#52
Posted :
09 December 2025 12:34:36(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 10/04/2025(UTC)
Posts: 76
Location: UK
My 24236+24064 have arrived for the first modules. No one has demurred so the ayes have it. Road cross-section is now 60*10, edge margin for both C-Track and road is now 15mm.
2 users liked this useful post by EB421
Jimmy Thompson
,
marklinist5999
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
EB421
#53
Posted :
09 December 2025 14:12:16(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 10/04/2025(UTC)
Posts: 76
Location: UK
And there - here's a side-by-side of the OG CLACK300 design and the final version. As I said, I'll be putting glue down now I have the "dual-mode" track here - so this will become the official standard for interconnects! :)
4 users liked this useful post by EB421
marklinist5999
,
Bogenschütze
,
xxup
,
Jimmy Thompson
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
EB421
#54
Posted :
16 December 2025 12:22:25(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 10/04/2025(UTC)
Posts: 76
Location: UK
I put glue down! And my genius modular system... doesn't work.
The track connectors don't have enough flex in them to decouple without forcing the track off the boards - and I'm left very confused. I've been assuming this would work based on the existence of the C-TRAK standard which must be able to decouple in order to have existed for - but based on this, I have no idea how it could. What do the MSCD in the Netherlands know, which I don't?
Right now I'm somewhat frustrated, and I'm re-evaluating Unitrack for this; which is 2-rail only and has another annoying compromise on LACK boards (10mm -> 15mm -> 40mm) - but is designed from the start to be modular, and also meets the "readily available worldwide" clause. Mainly - it disconnects the same way it connects, so there's no issue with it pulling the track off the board.
Edit: The obvious question is. "Is anybody else seriously invested in this"?
If not, then just scrapping CLACK in favour of a 2-rail-only Unitrack based design (LUCK) would be the simplest option, and I can re-use all my 3-rail C-Track for playing with Tri-ang stock that doesn't work on TRIX/KATO Code 83.
1 user liked this useful post by EB421
Jimmy Thompson
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
Alsterstreek
#55
Posted :
16 December 2025 19:37:07(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 16/11/2011(UTC)
Posts: 6,036
Location: Hybrid Home
Call me old-fashioned, but I would heed this 1956 advice regarding track connection.
Source: "101 Track Plans for Model Railroaders" by Linn H. Westcott
Greetz - Ak
My current "layout":
https://www.marklin-user...aigne-Project#post592818
2 users liked this useful post by Alsterstreek
Jimmy Thompson
,
EB421
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
EB421
#56
Posted :
16 December 2025 20:52:57(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 10/04/2025(UTC)
Posts: 76
Location: UK
Originally Posted by: Alsterstreek
Call me old-fashioned, but I would heed this 1956 advice regarding track connection.
Source: "101 Track Plans for Model Railroaders" by Linn H. Westcott
Sadly doesn't solve the problem, as now disconnecting the short-piece pulls the track up; instead of disconnecting the next board.
1 user liked this useful post by EB421
Jimmy Thompson
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
xxup
#57
Posted :
16 December 2025 21:06:11(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 15/03/2003(UTC)
Posts: 9,728
Location: Australia
I am no expert on model railway modules, but it looks to me that the two rail guys cut their track where it crosses the edge of a module and electrically connect the tracks by connecting wires under the module. A Dremel would make short work of C-track - I used this approach on Nevw's layout for him many years ago.
Adrian
Australia flag by
abFlags
.com
2 users liked this useful post by xxup
EB421
,
Jimmy Thompson
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
EB421
#58
Posted :
16 December 2025 21:47:16(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 10/04/2025(UTC)
Posts: 76
Location: UK
Originally Posted by: xxup
I am no expert on model railway modules, but it looks to me that the two rail guys cut their track where it crosses the edge of a module and electrically connect the tracks by connecting wires under the module. A Dremel would make short work of C-track - I used this approach on Nevw's layout for him many years ago.
Again, that works - but if you're cutting the track and using traditional module joints - there's no value in C-Track. Just use Peco Code 83 and it'll be cheaper and prettier. Or; K-Track. Prettier; I don't know what K-Track pricing looks like. It also makes using IKEA shelves pointless - if you have to drill into the shelves and add alignment dowels and locking clamps - suddenly this is worse than just building a custom baseboard from laser cut parts!
The point of the idea was that it took no skill or effort, and no complexity to use. You just put it on a table, smoosh it together, and put trains on it.
I am really confused by the C-TRAK system being able to pull this off!
I've emailed them to find out their secrets.
So far, no-one's claimed to be invested... can I take this as "EB421 is the only person who went out and bought shelves"? ;)
1 user liked this useful post by EB421
Jimmy Thompson
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
kiwiAlan
#59
Posted :
16 December 2025 22:41:39(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC)
Posts: 8,615
Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
Originally Posted by: EB421
...
It also makes using IKEA shelves pointless - if you have to drill into the shelves and add alignment dowels and locking clamps - suddenly this is worse than just building a custom baseboard from laser cut parts!
Believe me, if you are fixing the track down you will need to dowel between modules. The MRR club I go to uses
ones like these
between modules to ensure minimal misalignment.
The only way to not use dowels is to not fix the track down, but relay it each time you put the modules up.
1 user liked this useful post by kiwiAlan
Jimmy Thompson
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
EB421
#60
Posted :
16 December 2025 23:28:25(UTC)
Retweet
Joined: 10/04/2025(UTC)
Posts: 76
Location: UK
Originally Posted by: kiwiAlan
Believe me, if you are fixing the track down you will need to dowel between modules.
The only way to not use dowels is to not fix the track down, but relay it each time you put the modules up.
So T-TRAK doesn't do this. It uses the Kato bedding-track to hold everything in position, and relies on a solid table to make sure individual modules don't experience unnecessary tension.
CLACK came about because I tried to do Hex-TRAK in H0, decided it was too much work machining modules that large; and then looked at T-TRAK and tried to find an equivalent solution that I could reuse the Marklin track pieces I'd bought to test the H0x-TRAK concept; while not needing to build baseboards from scratch or spend $60 a pop on kits for them; which is what they cost in the UK.
I liked the idea of being mixed 2/3 rail, but I work solely in 2-rail so if the system doesn't work with Marklin track - so be it!
User Profile
View All Posts by User
View Thanks
Users browsing this topic
EB421
,
Guest
Similar Topics
"Clickety-Clack" - Adjustable?
(
H0-scale
)
by
soren36
14/08/2006 17:45:23(UTC)
2 Pages
<
1
2
Go to Page...
marklin-users.net community | Forum
»
General topics
»
H0-scale
»
CLACK
Forum Jump
marklin-users.net community | Forum
General topics
- General MRR
- H0-scale
- Small scale
- Big scale
- Prototype
--- Videos
----- Steam
----- Electric
----- Diesel
----- Training and Instructional
----- Accidents
- Digital
- Model railroad software
- Model railroad photography
- Great layouts I have seen...
- News from Märklin and others
- Events, forum member meets, exhibitions & TV shows
Your layout, your trains and more....
- The Public Gallery by our members
Reviews
- Loco Reviews
- Reviews of rolling stock
- Accessories reviews
- Model kit reviews
- Digital components and Software reviews
Collector's Corner
- Collector's Corner general
- Märklin Sprint
- Construction kits
- Steam engines
- Tinplate toys
- Faller collectibles and other vintage accessories
The Projects & Workshop area
- Track plans
- Painting & Weathering
- Model railroad wiring
- Model kits & layout details, kitbashing and such
The Club Corner
- Model railroad & related club area - general
You
cannot
post new topics in this forum.
You
cannot
reply to topics in this forum.
You
cannot
delete your posts in this forum.
You
cannot
edit your posts in this forum.
You
cannot
create polls in this forum.
You
cannot
vote in polls in this forum.
|
Powered by YAF.NET
|
YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.467 seconds.