Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline aclassifier  
#1 Posted : 17 July 2024 11:07:44(UTC)
aclassifier

Norway   
Joined: 18/03/2012(UTC)
Posts: 156
Location: Trondheim
On the Märklin 55681 the hatches are wrongly positioned. They should have been placed "to the right", but the model has them "to the left".

If this is old wisdom I'd like to know where it's described. To Pietro who reported it to me, and to me, this was in any case new knowledge.

This only goes for the SBB Ce 6/8 III versions, not the II versions. The latter has no hatches.

UserPostedImage
Pair of hatches on the left side wrongly position. Arrows show travelling «ahead» in direction I

I can confirm that this is so on these Märklin scale 1 models: "55688" and " 55686".

But since I have not been able to inspect the left side of the other Märklin scale 1 SBB Ce 6/8 III versions, it would have been interesting to hear from those of you who would know about the others.

I have described all of this more detailed in a chapter in a blog note: "Hatches wrongly positioned"

Øyvind
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by aclassifier
H0
Offline Wolfram_Stn  
#2 Posted : 17 July 2024 12:46:19(UTC)
Wolfram_Stn

France   
Joined: 14/02/2024(UTC)
Posts: 59
Location: Grand-Est, Alsace
I might be in error, but in my very humble opinion, this loco IS a Ce 6/8 III... but I must say, I do not see the problem you are speaking of for the simple reason that I do not know how to differenciate "right side" and "left side", since besides the housing on central bridge, the loco seems symmetric to me.

Can you give some light on my lantern? ;)
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Wolfram_Stn
Offline aclassifier  
#3 Posted : 17 July 2024 13:37:48(UTC)
aclassifier

Norway   
Joined: 18/03/2012(UTC)
Posts: 156
Location: Trondheim
Since I also had the same problem in trying to explain this, I did actually try to do my home work on this one:

* See the photo, where I have defined the sides

* Plus the text "Arrows show travelling «ahead» in direction I"

* Just think of it as running in direction I, which is painted on the loco. II is the other end

* Going in direction I then is "ahead" and II "reverse" (for the duration of this thread at least)
Offline Unholz  
#4 Posted : 17 July 2024 15:29:42(UTC)
Unholz

Switzerland   
Joined: 29/07/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,435
Location: Switzerland
I have now been looking at these pictures for a veeery long time, and I still don't understand.Huh Which "pair of hatches" should be where...? I also took a look at the separate "blog note", but that didn't help me either. Confused What do you mean with your expression "the left side's box"?

Sorry, probably I am just too stupid to see it.
Offline aclassifier  
#5 Posted : 17 July 2024 15:36:32(UTC)
aclassifier

Norway   
Joined: 18/03/2012(UTC)
Posts: 156
Location: Trondheim
Upper part of the photo. I have indicated the problem with a yellow square and an arrow;-)

When it comes to "stupidity" I probably beat you. It took me at least a day to figure this out, and another day to (try to) digest and explain it.

I admit that the yellow dashed square is too thin to see. Since there is no promise on my behalf to purposedly make this difficult, I will increase the thickness of the dashed lines. Stay tunedBlink

Here it is. Rev 3, since I also flunked on Rev 2. Now I hope it's clear what Pietro and I (at least) agree on!

Pair of hatches on the left side wrongly position.

Edited by user 17 July 2024 19:12:57(UTC)  | Reason: New figure

Offline aclassifier  
#6 Posted : 17 July 2024 19:21:40(UTC)
aclassifier

Norway   
Joined: 18/03/2012(UTC)
Posts: 156
Location: Trondheim
Pietro sent me this link, with a lot of nice pictures I hadn't seen before: https://scalaenne.wordpr...i-e-iii-be-6-8-ii-e-iii/
Offline kiwiAlan  
#7 Posted : 17 July 2024 20:39:15(UTC)
kiwiAlan

United Kingdom   
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC)
Posts: 8,455
Location: ENGLAND, Didcot
Originally Posted by: aclassifier Go to Quoted Post
Pietro sent me this link, with a lot of nice pictures I hadn't seen before: https://scalaenne.wordpr...i-e-iii-be-6-8-ii-e-iii/


That is a nice site with a great history of the Crocodile. Translates nicely with Google translate in my browser.

Offline Unholz  
#8 Posted : 17 July 2024 21:19:24(UTC)
Unholz

Switzerland   
Joined: 29/07/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,435
Location: Switzerland
Originally Posted by: aclassifier Go to Quoted Post

When it comes to "stupidity" I probably beat you.

Certainly not - I'm still trying to figure out what is wrong, although you have narrowed the area down. But I still have about half a day (or night)... BigGrin

Is the small inserted picture one of a different model or even the prototype?
Offline aclassifier  
#9 Posted : 17 July 2024 22:51:27(UTC)
aclassifier

Norway   
Joined: 18/03/2012(UTC)
Posts: 156
Location: Trondheim
I shot all the photos of the same locomotive, my 55681 from the shop, not a prototype.

I hope some out there understand by now. And that some may fill in on the initial question.

Edited by user 18 July 2024 10:30:42(UTC)  | Reason: typo

thanks 1 user liked this useful post by aclassifier
Offline mike c  
#10 Posted : 17 July 2024 22:51:36(UTC)
mike c

Canada   
Joined: 28/11/2007(UTC)
Posts: 8,216
Location: Montreal, QC
The author seems to be saying that the two hatches should be situated a little further to the right
https://www.bahnbilder.d...-ce-68-14305-1265874.jpg
https://www.bahnbilder.d...storic-ce-68-1180670.jpg

Regards

Mike C
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by mike c
Offline aclassifier  
#11 Posted : 18 July 2024 10:29:14(UTC)
aclassifier

Norway   
Joined: 18/03/2012(UTC)
Posts: 156
Location: Trondheim
Originally Posted by: mike c Go to Quoted Post
The author seems to be saying that the two hatches should be situated a little further to the right
...

Exactly

thanks 1 user liked this useful post by aclassifier
Offline Unholz  
#12 Posted : 20 July 2024 10:07:15(UTC)
Unholz

Switzerland   
Joined: 29/07/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,435
Location: Switzerland
Originally Posted by: mike c Go to Quoted Post
The author seems to be saying that the two hatches should be situated a little further to the right


Aaaaahhh... - so THAT seems to be the problem. Blink ThumpUp Well, it only took me about three days to understand that the author's observation actually concerns the upper inspection flap/maintenance door.

Please permit me to add two more detailed pictures in case there are more people like me here who had the same translation and understanding problem: Wink

revisionsklappe1.pngrevisionsklappe2.png
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by Unholz
Offline mvd71  
#13 Posted : 20 July 2024 10:20:06(UTC)
mvd71

New Zealand   
Joined: 09/08/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,916
Location: Auckland,
It’s hard to tell from internet photos of the prototype as the are all shots taken at an angle which affects our perception. Does anyone live close enough to the museum to check?
Offline aclassifier  
#14 Posted : 20 July 2024 10:43:15(UTC)
aclassifier

Norway   
Joined: 18/03/2012(UTC)
Posts: 156
Location: Trondheim
Originally Posted by: Unholz Go to Quoted Post

Please permit me to add two more detailed pictures in case there are more people like me here who had the same translation and understanding problem: Wink

Great! Are these from some Märklin models (in case, which?) or from 1/1? To to be precise.

Offline Unholz  
#15 Posted : 20 July 2024 10:50:49(UTC)
Unholz

Switzerland   
Joined: 29/07/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,435
Location: Switzerland
Originally Posted by: aclassifier Go to Quoted Post

Great! Are these from some Märklin models (in case, which?) or from 1/1? To to be precise.

I just stole (er, borrowed... Wink ) the pictures from the web. Left picture is from the 1/1 prototype 13302 (still existing), right picture is from a Märklin gauge 1 model 55681.

Offline aclassifier  
#16 Posted : 20 July 2024 10:59:56(UTC)
aclassifier

Norway   
Joined: 18/03/2012(UTC)
Posts: 156
Location: Trondheim
Originally Posted by: mvd71 Go to Quoted Post
It’s hard to tell from internet photos of the prototype as the are all shots taken at an angle which affects our perception. Does anyone live close enough to the museum to check?

Agree. However, I do have quite a few books and magazines.

Plus SBB has posted lots of photos at Wikimedia.

Here is a search there: Ce 6/8 III

This is where I found the non-doubt photo that I showed in my blog note: SBB_Ce_6_8_III_14305_2019-10-19.jpg - which also is of the #14305, same as Märklin 55681.

My original question was if any of you are able to inspect that side of any other scale 1 Märklin Ce 6/8 III model (except for 55688 and 55688, which do have that problem), to see whether this error also would be present on any of those.

(I will update in my note with the "upper inspection flap/maintenance door" terms. Thanks, Unholz. Aside: For me, even if understanding "hatch" was difficult (but I looked up the word, it should cover) I asked you for help on terms, since I wasnt' sure. That's why I added the arrow pointing to them on the second picture attempt. But then, for me, after having located the place I didn't cognitively grasp it. Maybe because my brain wasn't expecting it, I guess due to my cognitive bias. So it took me many looks over a day after Pietro had pointed this out before I got the aha experience: ok, that's the problem)

thanks 1 user liked this useful post by aclassifier
Offline aclassifier  
#17 Posted : 20 July 2024 11:14:04(UTC)
aclassifier

Norway   
Joined: 18/03/2012(UTC)
Posts: 156
Location: Trondheim
Originally Posted by: Unholz Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: aclassifier Go to Quoted Post

Great! Are these from some Märklin models (in case, which?) or from 1/1? To to be precise.

I just stole (er, borrowed... Wink ) the pictures from the web. Left picture is from the 1/1 prototype 13302 (still existing), right picture is from a Märklin gauge 1 model 55681.


Strange, it would say Be 6/8 II on the 13302 photo. Very strange! (Have they forgotten to paint the extra 'I' ?)

According to the book Krokodil by SBB Historic / Zellweger the renumbering of SBB Ce 6/8 III 14302 to Be 6/8 III number 13302 was done in 1956.

Also see Remaning crocodiles

And https://www.13302.ch/en/ but more at https://www.13302.ch/de/.

UPDATE: At 0.59 on https://youtu.be/eEaAVglOo6I it's easy to see that now at least, it's Be 6/8 III. Puh! 13302 case closed! (But not the original question)

Edited by user 20 July 2024 14:39:10(UTC)  | Reason: Added detail

thanks 1 user liked this useful post by aclassifier
Offline mvd71  
#18 Posted : 20 July 2024 20:58:28(UTC)
mvd71

New Zealand   
Joined: 09/08/2008(UTC)
Posts: 1,916
Location: Auckland,
It is also possible that there may have been some variation within the class due to modification status over time. But these details really need to be confirmed by someone with first hand knowledge of the type.
Offline steventrain  
#19 Posted : 21 July 2024 13:52:11(UTC)
steventrain

United Kingdom   
Joined: 21/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 31,685
Location: United Kingdom
Originally Posted by: aclassifier Go to Quoted Post
On the Märklin 55681 the hatches are wrongly positioned. They should have been placed "to the right", but the model has them "to the left".

If this is old wisdom I'd like to know where it's described. To Pietro who reported it to me, and to me, this was in any case new knowledge.

This only goes for the SBB Ce 6/8 III versions, not the II versions. The latter has no hatches.


Øyvind


Yes, I see it, Have you contact Marklin to sort out?

Large Marklinist 3- Rails Layout with CS2/MS2/Boosters/C-track/favorites Electric class E03/BR103, E18/E118, E94, Crocodiles/Steam BR01, BR03, BR05, BR23, BR44, BR50, Big Boy.
Offline aclassifier  
#20 Posted : 22 July 2024 10:45:31(UTC)
aclassifier

Norway   
Joined: 18/03/2012(UTC)
Posts: 156
Location: Trondheim
Originally Posted by: steventrain Go to Quoted Post
...
...Have you contact Marklin to sort out?

Yes, 21.7.24 11:51. Stay tuned
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by aclassifier
Offline aclassifier  
#21 Posted : 05 November 2024 17:30:25(UTC)
aclassifier

Norway   
Joined: 18/03/2012(UTC)
Posts: 156
Location: Trondheim
UPDATE 5.11.24

My information to Märklin was via this email.

Märklin now has responded in an email that the shift is an error no one noticed before production. They are sorry and will correct the issue with the next version of the model.
thanks 2 users liked this useful post by aclassifier
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.966 seconds.