Returning to rail travel?

Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Error

Returning to rail travel?

Options

View

Previous Topic Next Topic

Rwill		#1 Posted : 10 July 2020 20:15:17(UTC) Retweet
Joined: 04/05/2015(UTC) Posts: 777 Location: England, London		This article by respected travel journalist Simon Calder surprised me. Is it reflected elsewhere in the world or is it the UK being silly? My journalistic colleagues are a responsible bunch. During an online meeting this week I asked a dozen of them, “Who’s been on a train since March?” None had. Neither has Mark Smith, the international rail guru who founded the Seat61.com website. He told me: “I haven’t been on one for four months, possibly the longest train-free period of my adult life. “But feedback from those who have (travelling outside the peaks) suggest a huge amount of fresh air is being shipped around.” The government should be delighted with how successful its persuasion has been. In possibly the most bizarre scenario of this wretched pandemic, the taxpayer is paying train operators to run a virtually full service – with almost no passengers. The Campaign Against Rail Travel (or Cart, as I shall call it) begins even as you contemplate a journey. Before you can begin booking an online journey, Greater Anglia’s website insists that you “read these statements in relation to your planned journey and tick to confirm”. You must affirm that you have considered “all other means of transport before using public transport,” and assert: “My travel is necessary and I need to use the train”. Walk-up passengers face equally strident opposition. “Can you travel another way,” barks a massive billboard at what is normally Europe’s busiest rail station, London Waterloo. It includes a picture of a car, to remind travellers there is a better way to go. The “modal shift” from rail to road has been an outstanding success for its proponents – and a disaster for those of us who believe that rail must be at the heart of travel as something like normal life resumes. Months of urging passengers to stay away from trains has created the impression that the rail network is an option of last resort, to be considered only in extremis by the 12 million of us with no access to a car. Nicky Gardner, co-author of Europe by Rail, says: “This is surely the wrong message. The pandemic has given us a chance to rethink the world, and many see the new start as a chance to make pro-environmental choices. “Many travellers across Europe have resolved not to fly, or to fly less often. Many are exploring rail options for future holidays. But in Britain, quite bizarrely, the government, in collusion with the railways, is urging people to take to their cars.” While U-turns are easy on the roads, they are tricky for railways – but that political manoeuvre from “trains are the last refuge of the desperate” to “rail is the first choice of the discerning” must be made. That is the view of Sir Michael Holden, former chief executive of Directly Operated Railways – which ran trains on the East Coast main line for a while. But, as he told Rail magazine, it may already be too late: “Volume is unlikely to return to pre-crisis levels for many years – if ever. “This has been made so much worse by the ‘trash the brand’ behaviours we have seen actively supported by the industry, leaving the public in no doubt that rail is a dirty, unsafe form of transport to be avoided whenever possible.” Mark Smith concurs: “The government is footing the bill, but this isn’t sustainable in either long or medium term. We need a consistent message, possibly one that recognises the difference between peak and off-peak.” As the UK slides into a recession of unknown depth and duration, the taxpayer will soon learn that running near-empty trains is costing the country £40m per day, with fare revenue virtually nil. That will be the softest of targets for short-term cost-cutting – and the nation will be the long-term loser.


User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks


	Wish to join the discussion?! Login to your marklin-users.net community \| Forum account or Register a new forum account. Or Connect via Facebook

kiwiAlan		#2 Posted : 10 July 2020 21:20:33(UTC) Retweet
Joined: 23/07/2014(UTC) Posts: 8,107 Location: ENGLAND, Didcot		Originally Posted by: Rwill This article by respected travel journalist Simon Calder surprised me. Is it reflected elsewhere in the world or is it the UK being silly? I think it is more likely a cynical view of the attempt to limit cross infection by getting people to use private transport rather than getting infected on public transport. I wasn't in the UK at the time but this sounds like a reaction to a government advertising program.


User Profile View All Posts by User View Thanks

Users browsing this topic
Guest

Forum Jump

You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.