Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

2 Pages12>
Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline alonso231gery  
#1 Posted : 31 January 2006 03:04:53(UTC)
alonso231gery

Greece   
Joined: 24/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,957
Location: Hellas (Athens)
I would like to know the top pulling locos.
The first i guess is the Big Boy.
I wonder if the 37990 and 37991 have the same pulling capability?
The power can be of course measured by the number of wagons a loco can pull.
An outsider.
I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!
Offline verheyen  
#2 Posted : 31 January 2006 03:15:28(UTC)
verheyen


Joined: 25/01/2004(UTC)
Posts: 639
Location: ,
Level track, uphill (What % grade), or downhill (What % grade)? Straight or through curves? What weight of train?

p.

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by alonso231gery
<br />I would like to know the top pulling locos.
The first i guess is the Big Boy.
I wonder if the 37990 and 37991 have the same pulling capability?
The power can be of course measured by the number of wagons a loco can pull.
Offline mrmarklin  
#3 Posted : 31 January 2006 07:57:50(UTC)
mrmarklin

United States   
Joined: 27/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 900
Location: Burney, CA
AFAIK the BB is the top puller among Marklin loks. Some of the double loks, like the F7 combos properly tuned will out pull it.
From the People's Republik of Kalifornia
Offline john black  
#4 Posted : 31 January 2006 12:54:24(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by verheyen
<br />Level track, uphill (What % grade), or downhill (What % grade)? Straight or through curves? What weight of train?

In your book you forgot about kind of track (M, K, C), and also about their relative condition (brand new, middle aged, old & worn out), is it heavily oiled or just slightly dusted, what about rust and other debris ... ??? And then there might be humidity, plus a myriad of other factors ... [xx(]

Nikos: Simple question - simple answer. <u>Out of the box</u> - I, too, vote for the BIGBOY Smile
I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline alonso231gery  
#5 Posted : 31 January 2006 15:57:14(UTC)
alonso231gery

Greece   
Joined: 24/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,957
Location: Hellas (Athens)
the Big Boy can pull more than 150 wagons?
An outsider.
I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!
Offline john black  
#6 Posted : 31 January 2006 17:12:42(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Got only 41 freight and 7 passenger cars. Plus that mini layout [xx(]
But should I ever win in the lottery I'll tell you ...
I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline perz  
#7 Posted : 31 January 2006 21:02:20(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote: the Big Boy can pull more than 150 wagons?

I guess it can, but I don't have a Big boy so I can't test it.

When I was a kid I saw a "gator" pull 100 cars around a "dogbone" track with 360 mm radius at the ends. This was with M track of course, it was in the 60's.
Offline alonso231gery  
#8 Posted : 31 January 2006 21:06:14(UTC)
alonso231gery

Greece   
Joined: 24/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,957
Location: Hellas (Athens)
200?
300?
the 2 rail BB can pull 130..according to its' manufactor.
An outsider.
I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!
Offline hmsfix  
#9 Posted : 31 January 2006 21:43:31(UTC)
hmsfix


Joined: 06/02/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,383
Location: Darmstadt,
Don't have a BB either, nor do I have 150 cars to test. So can't test it. But I guess you are right: the BB will beat out them all.

Did the test the other way. I asked: Do I have any lok that is *not* able to pull all my cars (45 in total) or at least those 29 4-axle freight cars that I get on my tracks simultaneously ? The answer is: no, all my loks pulled that 3.5 m train (no grades, of course, and only slim turnouts to pass): beginning with my analogic BR 89 (3000), the E 63 (3001), even BR 24 (3003, well, some wheel slipping when accelerating, but finally it pulls), up to # 37490, the GG-1. Result: a complete disaster, none of my loks satisfied the wheel slipping condition ! Any ideas ? biggrin

Hans Martin
Offline john black  
#10 Posted : 31 January 2006 22:23:59(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by hmsfix
<br />... none of my loks satisfied the wheel slipping condition ! Any ideas ? biggrin

Sand ... biggrin
I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline steventrain  
#11 Posted : 31 January 2006 22:58:40(UTC)
steventrain

United Kingdom   
Joined: 21/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 31,610
Location: United Kingdom
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by alonso231gery
<br />200?
300?
the 2 rail BB can pull 130..according to its' manufactor.


That would be find but coupling getting cracking.
Large Marklinist 3- Rails Layout with CS2/MS2/Boosters/C-track/favorites Electric class E03/BR103, E18/E118, E94, Crocodiles/Steam BR01, BR03, BR05, BR23, BR44, BR50, Big Boy.
Offline mrmarklin  
#12 Posted : 01 February 2006 04:23:59(UTC)
mrmarklin

United States   
Joined: 27/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 900
Location: Burney, CA
See my review of the BB to get an idea of the load it will pull. My guess is that it would pull 150 wagons.
From the People's Republik of Kalifornia
Offline franciscohg  
#13 Posted : 01 February 2006 05:02:19(UTC)
franciscohg

Chile   
Joined: 10/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,275
Location: Patagonia
Has somebody tried the Br 53
I have not enough cars to test it, nor a big layout right now.
BTW, i am very happy with the pulling power of my croc and my old BR 01, also my old BR 23 with its new engine is a great puller too.
UserPostedImage German trains era I-II and selected III, era depends on the mood, mostly Maerklin but i can be heretic if needed XD, heresy is no longer an issue.. LOL
Offline jango  
#14 Posted : 01 February 2006 12:24:13(UTC)
jango


Joined: 27/10/2005(UTC)
Posts: 79
Location: ,
My BR53 does not pull as well as its looks imply, however my BR50 & BR52 are both very strong.
Offline jerdenberg  
#15 Posted : 01 February 2006 13:23:45(UTC)
jerdenberg

Netherlands   
Joined: 10/01/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,011
Location: Den Helder, Noord-Holland
Hi all,

About a year ago some pulling data about the BB and other engines appeared in a thread about 37991 (all is forgiven Herr Adams).

When I tested my 37990 with 71 cars (271 axles) the BB had no problem, but the car couplers were strained to full extension, even causing derailments in 24188-24130 connections (I did not have R4/R5 then) so the real limit may be the couplers.

Jeroen
Figomima division, UP; mostly figment of my imagination yet.
Offline alonso231gery  
#16 Posted : 01 February 2006 14:54:29(UTC)
alonso231gery

Greece   
Joined: 24/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,957
Location: Hellas (Athens)
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by mrmarklin
<br />See my review of the BB to get an idea of the load it will pull. My guess is that it would pull 150 wagons.


where is your review?confused
An outsider.
I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!
Offline mrmarklin  
#17 Posted : 01 February 2006 19:04:20(UTC)
mrmarklin

United States   
Joined: 27/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 900
Location: Burney, CA
In the Model Review section of this website. Look for Lok # 37990.
From the People's Republik of Kalifornia
Offline alonso231gery  
#18 Posted : 01 February 2006 19:47:00(UTC)
alonso231gery

Greece   
Joined: 24/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,957
Location: Hellas (Athens)
you are Mario?
An outsider.
I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!
Offline mrmarklin  
#19 Posted : 01 February 2006 19:58:15(UTC)
mrmarklin

United States   
Joined: 27/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 900
Location: Burney, CA
No, I'm Dave Pryor. Mario did the photo.
From the People's Republik of Kalifornia
Offline alonso231gery  
#20 Posted : 01 February 2006 23:05:17(UTC)
alonso231gery

Greece   
Joined: 24/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,957
Location: Hellas (Athens)
u got the weathered version?
An outsider.
I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!
Offline jerdenberg  
#21 Posted : 01 February 2006 23:10:53(UTC)
jerdenberg

Netherlands   
Joined: 10/01/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,011
Location: Den Helder, Noord-Holland
Hi all,

Gathering all the cars I could, I coupled 119 cars with 421 axles to my BB 4015 (that train took up the outer track plus half the inner track of my temporary 6x2.6m double oval with 24430 and 24530 curves). Apart from a clicking sound produced by some couplers when entering a curve there was no problem at all. It even pushed the whole thing back easily. However, more than half of the cars are "modern" ones (e.g. the US material of the last several years) with rather lower rolling friction(?) than older cars. I would guess even 200 boxcars would not be a problem, but the limit might be much lower with the old 2-axle hobby cars.

Jeroen



Jeroen
Figomima division, UP; mostly figment of my imagination yet.
Offline Hoffmann  
#22 Posted : 02 February 2006 00:41:26(UTC)
Hoffmann

Canada   
Joined: 25/11/2004(UTC)
Posts: 1,106
Location: Guelph, Ontario

Hi all,

The only way to know for sure is to check the draw pull with a Spring scale (Federwaage).
My money is on the PA-1 dual powered Diesel ( was tested by Model-Railroader).

Martin
marklin-eh
Offline alonso231gery  
#23 Posted : 02 February 2006 14:46:10(UTC)
alonso231gery

Greece   
Joined: 24/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,957
Location: Hellas (Athens)
BTW i believe that that extreme power some model have has no use
since most of us do not own more than 150 wagons
and since the couplers cannot stand that pressure...
An outsider.
I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!
Offline john black  
#24 Posted : 02 February 2006 15:11:59(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by alonso231gery
<br />since most of us do not own more than 150 wagons

48 cars only. I definitely belong to a minority [xx(] ... Any tax deductions [:p] for me ???
I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline HueyCE  
#25 Posted : 03 February 2006 02:16:57(UTC)
HueyCE


Joined: 12/01/2003(UTC)
Posts: 2,528
Location: Groton, Connecticut
If only I could claim tax deductions for my M stuff, my CFO would be giving me purchase authorizations left and right.
Ira
Building German Era I-II layout(Mk IIIc).UserPostedImage

Offline McLae  
#26 Posted : 03 February 2006 04:37:37(UTC)
McLae


Joined: 16/07/2002(UTC)
Posts: 1,575
Location: DeSoto (Dallas area), TX
After 32 cars, the top of the hiss has too many derailments.biggrin

The long-base steam loks have trouble at the top of the hill (GT 2x4/4 and BBO 659)[:p]

Most of my Loks have enough power for my layout, and that is what matters.biggrin
The McLae
IB digital, DB, OBB, SBB epII-V
Providing a home for little lost 'Gators
Offline Davy  
#27 Posted : 03 February 2006 19:24:30(UTC)
Davy


Joined: 29/08/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,915
Location: Netherlands
My top pullars are still a br 44 steamengine nr 34881 with a 60901 decoder with a 140 axles train analoog on a k-track modular bahn of the trainclub from which I'm a member.
And my V140 nr 37210 at home, which has pulled without much trouble a train off 174 axles more then 8 meters of train.
M-track with a CS2.
Offline mrmarklin  
#28 Posted : 03 February 2006 21:32:56(UTC)
mrmarklin

United States   
Joined: 27/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 900
Location: Burney, CA
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by alonso231gery
<br />u got the weathered version?


Yes, I recently obtained it.

Dave
From the People's Republik of Kalifornia
Offline mrmarklin  
#29 Posted : 03 February 2006 21:39:51(UTC)
mrmarklin

United States   
Joined: 27/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 900
Location: Burney, CA
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by alonso231gery
<br />BTW i believe that that extreme power some model have has no use
since most of us do not own more than 150 wagons
and since the couplers cannot stand that pressure...


Many people I know have more than 150 cars. But rather than cars, were really talking about the number of axles. The limitations I suspect, are more in having enough layout room to run enough cars, and another is the close couplers on the more modern cars. Over 100 cars would certainly be prototypical.biggrin

The test run I condicted some years ago used the older Marklin cars without the close couplers. At some point there is certainly a limitation there.
From the People's Republik of Kalifornia
Offline mrmarklin  
#30 Posted : 03 February 2006 21:44:12(UTC)
mrmarklin

United States   
Joined: 27/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 900
Location: Burney, CA
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by franciscohg
<br />Has somebody tried the Br 53
I have not enough cars to test it, nor a big layout right now.
BTW, i am very happy with the pulling power of my croc and my old BR 01, also my old BR 23 with its new engine is a great puller too.


The BR 53 would seem to be a candidate to be a good puller, but a couple of things prevent it from being so. One is that not all driving axles are actually driven! Only four are. Second is that other axles and wheels on the lok take some of the weight from the driven axles, thereby reducing its effectiveness. Nevertheless, I've seen the lok pull 74 cars. Certainly enough for most of us.


Dave Pryor
From the People's Republik of Kalifornia
Offline alonso231gery  
#31 Posted : 03 February 2006 22:56:57(UTC)
alonso231gery

Greece   
Joined: 24/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,957
Location: Hellas (Athens)
what is so special about close couplers?
An outsider.
I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!
Offline perz  
#32 Posted : 03 February 2006 23:18:05(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:what is so special about close couplers?

I think the general experience is that close couplers do not hold together as safely as the old relex couplers.
Offline verheyen  
#33 Posted : 03 February 2006 23:21:38(UTC)
verheyen


Joined: 25/01/2004(UTC)
Posts: 639
Location: ,
Nothing really except that the cars are coupled together more closely making for more attractive consists. The problem is that they can pull out of the pockets so older wagens where the couplers were actually screwed into the base of the car are more secure. Likewise the loops on the new cars could pull apart under too heavy a load, maybe. The biggest danger is at the very beginning in setting the train into motion. I'm ignoring curves right now, but if the wheels roll freely the whole train will build up momentum and roll along...

p.

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by alonso231gery
<br />what is so special about close couplers?
Offline perz  
#34 Posted : 04 February 2006 16:39:31(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
I have been inspired to do some pull tests:

UserPostedImage

On the picture, I have 80 cars and a BR216 (37744). This is a bit too much. With 70 cars there is some slipping but not disturbingly much. With 80 cars the train falls inwards in the end loops. So I tried to let the loco push 10 of the cars and pull the 70 other, but this was too much. The slipping is severe, although the train is still moving.

I also tried with the BR 290 (37900). The result is the same, 70 cars is OK, 80 cars is too much.

Both the 37744 and the 37900 are rather light locos with plastic bodies. I will try with something heavier as well, e.g. the 39820 or the 39190.
Offline perz  
#35 Posted : 04 February 2006 19:25:30(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
The 39820 pulls/pushes 90 cars without problems. With 100 cars it slips noticeably. My track loop can hold 100 cars, no more.
Offline Guus  
#36 Posted : 04 February 2006 19:37:09(UTC)
Guus

Netherlands   
Joined: 13/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
Hi Per,

That's a great picture.
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:The slipping is severe, although the train is still moving.

So may I conclude if the loc had more weight it would probably pull even more cars?

Kind regards
Guus
Kind regards,
Guus
Offline perz  
#37 Posted : 04 February 2006 19:44:55(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
The 39190 surprisingly only pulls 70 cars nicely, and slips a lot with 80. The 39190 is almost as heavy as the 39820 and much heavier than the 37744 and 37900.
Offline perz  
#38 Posted : 04 February 2006 19:46:58(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:So may I conclude if the loc had more weight it would probably pull even more cars?


Yes, it definitely doesn't seem to be the motor strength that sets the limit in any of the locos I have tried with. I also think I would get better results if I had a longer track so that the train was only into one end loop at a time. Going around curves requires much more pulling power than going on straight track.
Offline alonso231gery  
#39 Posted : 04 February 2006 19:57:24(UTC)
alonso231gery

Greece   
Joined: 24/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,957
Location: Hellas (Athens)
perz some questions
is it difficult to move these wagons with ur hands?
do u have a 39560?

i guess that the V200 and 3956X have beside the c sine a very good motor

i guess that my 39560 can pull 130 wagons
An outsider.
I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!
Offline Guus  
#40 Posted : 04 February 2006 20:48:35(UTC)
Guus

Netherlands   
Joined: 13/10/2004(UTC)
Posts: 2,616
I believe most Märklin loc engines have more than enough torque available to pull long trains.
It's more a matter of how to get all that torque on the track.In the end it's not all that different from real life locos.

So all we need is,what John already suggested earlier:...

Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:originally posted by John:
Sand ... biggrin


Maybe Märklin will install sandpipes in the near future....asigned to F12 on the CS winkbiggrin

All joking aside, I think C-sine locos with some weight on the drive train are likely to be the best in this aspect and I'm with Nikos that a 39560 might very well be able to pull that many cars.

Kind regards
Guus
Kind regards,
Guus
Offline alonso231gery  
#41 Posted : 04 February 2006 21:36:04(UTC)
alonso231gery

Greece   
Joined: 24/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,957
Location: Hellas (Athens)
i doubt if my 39833 can pull as much as the 39560
some locos inspire might
my 39821 is one of that kind also.[^][^][^]
An outsider.
I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!
Offline perz  
#42 Posted : 04 February 2006 21:57:34(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:is it difficult to move these wagons with ur hands?

Not really difficult, but it requires a considerable amount of force. More than I had expected actually.
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:do u have a 39560?

No, I don't. I have an old crocodile from the 60's though, but unfortunately it is not in any good shape so I left it out of the "pulling contest".

Since the limit always seems to be set by slipping the heaviest locos will normally be the best pullers. But it also depend on things like the number of driving axles, traction tires, weight distribution etc. The remarkably low pulling capability of the 39190 must have such reasons.
Offline alonso231gery  
#43 Posted : 04 February 2006 22:14:34(UTC)
alonso231gery

Greece   
Joined: 24/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,957
Location: Hellas (Athens)
My V200 39821 is stronger than the 39820?
since mfx c sine are weaker than the fx ones.

u really do not want to put ur finger when she is moving.
An outsider.
I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!
Offline perz  
#44 Posted : 04 February 2006 23:52:07(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:My V200 39821 is stronger than the 39820?
since mfx c sine are weaker than the fx ones.

Motor strength is irrelevant since slipping sets the limit in both cases. If your 39821 is heavier than the 39820 it is also stronger, otherwise not. I haven't ever seen a Märklin loco that stalls its motor before slipping. Maybe you can get that result if you press the loco down to the rails firmly by hand, but I think that would be a stupid test.
Offline hmsfix  
#45 Posted : 05 February 2006 00:32:09(UTC)
hmsfix


Joined: 06/02/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,383
Location: Darmstadt,
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by perz
<br />The 39190 surprisingly only pulls 70 cars nicely, and slips a lot with 80. The 39190 is almost as heavy as the 39820 and much heavier than the 37744 and 37900.


I am impressed, so many freight cars. But what about passenger coaches ? They are much harder to pull, especially the rather heavy tin plate and aluminium cars, when equipped with ski and mass contacts.

I tried a train of 11 such cars: Impossible to move with my three axle shunting locos (3000, 3001, 3078)! 4-axle loks as E 41 (3034) or the F7 are at their limits (wheel slipping), but no problems with E 103, PA-1, Mikado, GG-1. Well, PA has pulled the coupler out of the NEM pocket when the train was at highest speed, and the tenders of the Mikado sometimes deraied in R1 curves.

Probably electric couplers might be a real help when running long passenger trains.

Hans Martin
Offline alonso231gery  
#46 Posted : 05 February 2006 02:14:41(UTC)
alonso231gery

Greece   
Joined: 24/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,957
Location: Hellas (Athens)
so there is a rule perz
the heavier the stronger
An outsider.
I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!
Offline perz  
#47 Posted : 05 February 2006 13:05:21(UTC)
perz

Sweden   
Joined: 12/01/2002(UTC)
Posts: 2,578
Location: Sweden
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote: so there is a rule perz
the heavier the stronger

More or less yes. But as I mentioned before it is influenced by factors like the number of driven axles, weight distribution, number of traction tires, wheel size etc.

Offline Rudi Bekkers  
#48 Posted : 05 February 2006 16:07:44(UTC)
Rudi Bekkers


Joined: 15/02/2005(UTC)
Posts: 132
Location: Vught,
Hello all,

In this context, you might be interested to see this (apparently successful) world record attempt, using Maerklin loco's to pull five (real) train cards with a total weight of 80,000 kilo(!)

UserPostedImage

The loco's are put to sale with a special print, see here.

Another interesting record is that with three large Roco locomotives pulling almost 900 cars for more than 600 meter. See here. Wonder how they managed to have the couplers handling this force!

Best regards, Rudi
Offline john black  
#49 Posted : 06 February 2006 10:14:50(UTC)
john black

United States   
Joined: 22/04/2004(UTC)
Posts: 12,139
Location: New York, NY
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:Originally posted by Rudi Bekkers
<br />Wonder how they managed to have the couplers handling this force

Welded shut ? biggrin
I hope no one visits a poor Southener's layout in Brooklyn. Intruders beware of Gators.
AT&SF, D&RGW, T&P, SP, WP, UP, BN, NYC, ARR, epI-III - analog & digital Marklin Classics only.
CU#6021 FX-MOTOROLA DIGITAL SYSTEM. Fast as lightning and no trouble. What else ...
Outlaw Member of BIG JUHAN's OUTSIDER CLUB. With the most members, worldwide

Offline alonso231gery  
#50 Posted : 09 October 2006 00:34:38(UTC)
alonso231gery

Greece   
Joined: 24/08/2002(UTC)
Posts: 3,957
Location: Hellas (Athens)
Quote:
[size=1" face="Verdana" id="quote]quote:but the limit might be much lower with the old 2-axle hobby cars.

Actually you cannot pull even 10 of them,they cause problems all the time.[xx(]
An outsider.
I'm looking for the owner of that horse. He's tall, blonde, he smokes a cigar, and he's a pig!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Similar Topics
Comparing locos pulling capability (H0-scale)
by alonso231gery 10/04/2007 23:41:09(UTC)
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 1.490 seconds.