Welcome to the forum   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post in this topic Go to first unread post in this topic
Offline dntower85  
#1 Posted : 31 January 2011 19:07:53(UTC)
dntower85

United States   
Joined: 08/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,218
Location: Shady Shores, TX - USA
DT
Now powered by ECoS II unit#2, RocRail
era - some time in the future when the space time continuum is disrupted and ICE 3 Trains run on the same rails as the Adler and BR18's.
Offline sebastian  
#2 Posted : 31 January 2011 19:20:17(UTC)
sebastian

Canada   
Joined: 01/02/2007(UTC)
Posts: 729
Location: Ontario
That is something which could definitely work. The question is if it has the capability to distinguish between two locos which are close together. Interesting nonetheless.
Thanks for sharing.
DRG, DB and SBB
Era II, III and IV
Sincerely,
Sebastian
Offline DaleSchultz  
#3 Posted : 31 January 2011 19:22:27(UTC)
DaleSchultz

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,997
funny they say: GT-Position technology is patent applied.

yes this solution was raised in model trains forums many years ago and they would have to have applied for the patent before that.

If the API to obtain the data is good enough and the cost of the senders in every train is low enough it may have a chance.
Dale
Intellibox + own software, K-Track
My current layout: https://cabin-layout.mixmox.com
Arrival and Departure signs: https://remotesign.mixmox.com
Offline dntower85  
#4 Posted : 31 January 2011 20:04:43(UTC)
dntower85

United States   
Joined: 08/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,218
Location: Shady Shores, TX - USA
Originally Posted by: sebastian Go to Quoted Post
The question is if it has the capability to distinguish between two locos which are close together.


Or if there is two or more parallel tracks could it distinguish which track a train is on. I know my car's GPS sometimes thinks that I on a service road when I have just entered onto the freeway.
It could easily switch a train on to a occupied track if it was a little off. " Recalculating "Scared
DT
Now powered by ECoS II unit#2, RocRail
era - some time in the future when the space time continuum is disrupted and ICE 3 Trains run on the same rails as the Adler and BR18's.
Offline DaleSchultz  
#5 Posted : 31 January 2011 21:16:01(UTC)
DaleSchultz

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,997
they address the resolution on the page - they claim 10mm so inter-track distances would be OK

You would however need to record where each track is in the room so that you can know what the data means...
Dale
Intellibox + own software, K-Track
My current layout: https://cabin-layout.mixmox.com
Arrival and Departure signs: https://remotesign.mixmox.com
Offline kimballthurlow  
#6 Posted : 31 January 2011 21:17:58(UTC)
kimballthurlow

Australia   
Joined: 18/03/2007(UTC)
Posts: 6,669
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Originally Posted by: DaleSchultz Go to Quoted Post
funny they say: GT-Position technology is patent applied.

yes this solution was raised in model trains forums many years ago and they would have to have applied for the patent before that.

If the API to obtain the data is good enough and the cost of the senders in every train is low enough it may have a chance.



Hi Dale,

The meaningful words are "patent applied for", which in my reading, does not mean they will be granted a patent.

The technology for systems like this is readily available. It could be a mix of bluetooth, RFID (radio frequency identification), or something else of which I am not aware. Of course GT positioning may be completely new stuff, and they are to be congratulated on the applicaiion of it anyway. Studies done recently have confirmed that mobile phone users can plot one another by applying algorithms to the bluetooth connections, which might have applications in knowing where you are in a dark room (firefighters etc. spring to mind).

The global positioning system (GPS) is different, and receivers are incapable of positioning themselves better than about 1cm in the best scenarios, and those systems cost about $40k minimum. That is assuming they get the signal in the first place, which is impossible indoors in most cases.

I could not glean enough from the article, but this GT positioning might work in one of two ways.

1. A trigonometric solution, where signals received from three or more locations in the room can fix the position of the receiver. I would think that the ideal would be four locations, because firstly, the locations would have to talk to one another to calculate their position relative to one another, and then settle on what would be called fixed positions. Then the receiver would calculate a position from radiating signals from those four, using trigonometry.

2. There might be some radiating technology from a single source, which has discrete enough signal to determine position in a receiver, but I don't know anything about that sort of stuff.

regards
Kimball
HO Scale - Märklin (ep II-III and VI, C Track, digital) - 2 rail HO (Queensland Australia, UK, USA) - 3 rail OO (English Hornby Dublo) - old clockwork O gauge - Live Steam 90mm (3.1/2 inch) gauge.
Offline DaleSchultz  
#7 Posted : 31 January 2011 21:48:26(UTC)
DaleSchultz

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,997
indeed, as a holder of a few patents myself I am aware that applying for and obtaining patents are very different. And they don't say what their claim actually is...

I would guess that the 2 or 3 sensors are receivers that are electrically connected with a high speed connection. The chips in the trains are probably constant emitters. The time delay discrepancies of the arrival of the signal at the receivers can then be used to calculate the position. I suggest it is this way around because you need a very strong baseline to compare the times and the noisy digital track current would make that very hard for the train modules to perform. It much easier to let them just keep broadcasting their address - easy to do with available track current.
Dale
Intellibox + own software, K-Track
My current layout: https://cabin-layout.mixmox.com
Arrival and Departure signs: https://remotesign.mixmox.com
thanks 1 user liked this useful post by DaleSchultz
Offline Webmaster  
#8 Posted : 31 January 2011 22:02:02(UTC)
Webmaster


Joined: 25/07/2001(UTC)
Posts: 11,161
So, is it that ever present guy Pat Pending who owns this technology too?

Sorry, couldn't resist... Blushing BigGrin
Juhan - "Webmaster", at your service...
He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Old Chinese Proverb]
Offline Nielsenr  
#9 Posted : 31 January 2011 22:16:29(UTC)
Nielsenr

United States   
Joined: 06/10/2010(UTC)
Posts: 883
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
I have been keeping on eye on this company for the last year or so. The main drawback for me is that you apparently have to have the transmitters in the cars or locos "exposed" by cutting a hole in them. At least that is the way they show it. I am not sure I want to go around cutting holes in my cars and locos. This product also integrates with their GT Command program where you can control the trains by speaking commands thru a microphone connected to the computer running the software. The good news is that it works with most of the popular control stations including Marklin's. And S88s would be a thing of the past ... a lot less wiring. I am waiting to see someone actually use it. I keep watching for YouTube videos.

Robert
Offline nilkram58  
#10 Posted : 31 January 2011 22:25:53(UTC)
nilkram58

Greece   
Joined: 18/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 158
Location: Athens, Greece
Hi to everybody,
actually I had a long presentation of this system during the IMA Exhibition at Cologne last year, at their Booth, and I was really very impressed. The system even draws the layout by itself !! You just run for the first time a train in all the length of your layout and the track plan is drawn !!! Together with the other program, I think the GT Monitor, it does the whole job done: Knowing exactly where are all your locos, and which one where, so, location and Loco ID simultaneously. So, no more need for wires, s88, and track occupancy systems. Of course, if I remember correctly, it is not so cheap.
But the overall performance was very impressive and innovative.

Akis
Offline jeehring  
#11 Posted : 31 January 2011 22:28:36(UTC)
jeehring


Joined: 25/09/2003(UTC)
Posts: 2,786
Location: ,
Originally Posted by: DaleSchultz Go to Quoted Post
indeed, as a holder of a few patents myself I am aware that applying for and obtaining patents are very different. And they don't say what their claim actually is...

I would guess that the 2 or 3 sensors are receivers that are electrically connected with a high speed connection. The chips in the trains are probably constant emitters. The time delay discrepancies of the arrival of the signal at the receivers can then be used to calculate the position. I suggest it is this way around because you need a very strong baseline to compare the times and the noisy digital track current would make that very hard for the train modules to perform. It much easier to let them just keep broadcasting their address - easy to do with available track current.


....as you already have said, this solution was raised on train forum a few years ago.....
Weren't there an evocation by Marklin of a kind of wireless positionning system, already , around 2004/2005 ?
I believe myself , that many theoretical solutions exist.....the winner could be the cheaper to implement & the more practical ( to allow different games + a wide range of SW scenarii ..)...
Offline nilkram58  
#12 Posted : 31 January 2011 22:30:05(UTC)
nilkram58

Greece   
Joined: 18/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 158
Location: Athens, Greece
Also, now I remember, and to enlarge further on Nielsenr comments, the other drawback was that you might need also <<satellite>> tranceivers in covered areas such as tunnels and hidden staging yards.
Akis
Offline GSRR  
#13 Posted : 31 January 2011 22:32:35(UTC)
GSRR

United States   
Joined: 01/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,339
Location: USA
For comparison you can look at Littfinski DatenTechnik (LDT) RFID solution.



http://www.ldt-infocente.../english/rfid-home_e.htm





r/Thomas



ETE UserPostedImage ECoS iTrain TouchCab C-Gleis German Era Id & IIIb USA Era IIIb SBB Era III SJ Era IV GC Era V
Offline nilkram58  
#14 Posted : 31 January 2011 22:35:17(UTC)
nilkram58

Greece   
Joined: 18/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 158
Location: Athens, Greece
the difference being that with GPS-like solutions you have continuously minitoring of all vehicles, whereas with RFID the detection is at a predetermined point only.
Akis
Offline dntower85  
#15 Posted : 31 January 2011 22:57:07(UTC)
dntower85

United States   
Joined: 08/01/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2,218
Location: Shady Shores, TX - USA
I just like the fact that new things are being tried and commercially produced. The s88 has been around for a long time, and works well, but if something comes out that is better than I'm all for it. With HD video cameras and image recognition getting better. You could possible just point a camera at the layout and let the computer track what train is what and where it is.
And if nobody thought of "An apparatus to automate a model railroad with the use of high resolution video and image recognition to determine a model trains identity, position and speed on a model railroad layout" then I'm "pending a pat", "patting a pend", "inventing a disclosure" or something legal like that.Flapper LOL LOL LOL LOL
DT
Now powered by ECoS II unit#2, RocRail
era - some time in the future when the space time continuum is disrupted and ICE 3 Trains run on the same rails as the Adler and BR18's.
Offline H0  
#16 Posted : 31 January 2011 23:43:40(UTC)
H0


Joined: 16/02/2004(UTC)
Posts: 15,267
Location: DE-NW
This invention was already discussed last year:
https://www.marklin-user...for-2011.aspx#post248440
(see posts 142 through 144)

399 Euro for the starter set (receivers plus sender for one loco), 49 Euro for a loco sender, 79 Euro for an extra receiver.

A Global Positioning System that covers 30m².
In 80 seconds around the world, they say. It's a small world ...

Available in August 2010, they say.
Regards
Tom
---
"In all of the gauges, we particularly emphasize a high level of quality, the best possible fidelity to the prototype, and absolute precision. You will see that in all of our products." (from Märklin New Items Brochure 2015, page 1) ROFLBTCUTS
UserPostedImage
Offline DaleSchultz  
#17 Posted : 01 February 2011 00:05:12(UTC)
DaleSchultz

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,997
my friend Anand has already implemented code and a camera to track the positioning of a loco on the turntable... so prior art !

Having to install stuff on every train moves the complexity from the layout to the rolling stock. Cutting holes - they must be joking!

I really like the fact that s88s work without any modification to the loco and the loco can be pushing commuter wagons and it still all just works. Simple. One wire per point and one module for every 16 points. And it works in tunnels and adjacent rooms....
Dale
Intellibox + own software, K-Track
My current layout: https://cabin-layout.mixmox.com
Arrival and Departure signs: https://remotesign.mixmox.com
Offline GSRR  
#18 Posted : 01 February 2011 01:33:38(UTC)
GSRR

United States   
Joined: 01/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,339
Location: USA
Originally Posted by: DaleSchultz Go to Quoted Post
my friend Anand has already implemented code and a camera to track the positioning of a loco on the turntable... so prior art !

Having to install stuff on every train moves the complexity from the layout to the rolling stock. Cutting holes - they must be joking!

I really like the fact that s88s work without any modification to the loco and the loco can be pushing commuter wagons and it still all just works. Simple. One wire per point and one module for every 16 points. And it works in tunnels and adjacent rooms....



Agreed, tried and true, keep it simple. I don't like the amount of modification it requires to your rolling stock. Track is one thing, 300 - 400 euro lok's is another.

One interesting method is the IR setup Ron (rschaffr) is using.

http://www.sem-co.com/~r.../trains/irifc/irifc.html



r/Thomas







ETE UserPostedImage ECoS iTrain TouchCab C-Gleis German Era Id & IIIb USA Era IIIb SBB Era III SJ Era IV GC Era V
Offline DaleSchultz  
#19 Posted : 01 February 2011 02:45:55(UTC)
DaleSchultz

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,997
Originally Posted by: GSRR Go to Quoted Post

One interesting method is the IR setup Ron (rschaffr) is using.

Indeed, but to be clear - the type of sensor (cut rail or IR pair or magnet) still has to be encoded for the control system via an s88 port
Dale
Intellibox + own software, K-Track
My current layout: https://cabin-layout.mixmox.com
Arrival and Departure signs: https://remotesign.mixmox.com
Offline river6109  
#20 Posted : 01 February 2011 09:45:34(UTC)
river6109

Australia   
Joined: 22/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14,725
Location: On 1965 Märklin Boulevard just around from Roco Square
Originally Posted by: H0 Go to Quoted Post
This invention was already discussed last year:
https://www.marklin-user...for-2011.aspx#post248440
(see posts 142 through 144)


Yes indeed and the respond was by 1 member.

Suppose we can put it down to: missing in actionBigGrin

John
https://www.youtube.com/river6109
https://www.youtube.com/6109river
5 years in Destruction mode
50 years in Repairing mode
Offline DaleSchultz  
#21 Posted : 01 February 2011 20:05:54(UTC)
DaleSchultz

United States   
Joined: 10/02/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,997
Originally Posted by: DaleSchultz Go to Quoted Post
my friend Anand has already implemented code and a camera to track the positioning of a loco on the turntable...


Here is a link to his image work... http://www.coralfringe.com/occupancy.html
Dale
Intellibox + own software, K-Track
My current layout: https://cabin-layout.mixmox.com
Arrival and Departure signs: https://remotesign.mixmox.com
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

| Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.830 seconds.