Originally Posted by: LMS800 
Originally Posted by: kweekalot 
Originally Posted by: Webmaster 
I think it's alright with a replica box, better than no box at all... The general public won't see the differences anyway...
HaHa. I find ''replica'' the wrong word.
Replica sounds better, but the box is a forgery.
Do you call counterfeit money also a replica ?
The issue with the box is very correct solved by Wolf with a good compensation !!
Marco
Hi Marco,
I looked up the dictionary and I agree with you.
A replica is marked as such, but without this the item shall appear as an original one - and this is a fake ( forgery ).
Wolf
Fascinating debate in all respects, but I think some clarification of the terms used is important. Apologies to those for whom English is not their first language, I am not intending to be 'picky' in this regard.
Although 'Replica' and 'Fake/Forgery' may appear to be very similar, in this context we have to look at the intent of producing it in the first place. And also the item itself. If the item has a face value by it's very nature (ie money, stocks, bonds, stamps etc) then reproductions would almost always be forgeries.
If the item is a 'reproduction' (replica) and is made available with full disclosure of that, then it is 100% legitimate and has its place in the market.
But if the production of the item is intended to be passed off as the 'real thing' (or part of it) then that is entirely a different matter. That would be a forgery and quite illegal.
Even money can be made as a replica (such as used in movie props etc) but is usually clearly marked or identified in such a way as to be easily spotted as such.
Where it becomes more shady is where one purchaser obtains a loco with a replica box and he is told it is a replica and pays an appropriate price, but then resells the loco and box and does not tell the next purchaser that the box is a replica, he is being dishonest. The box itself really is still a replica because it was produced honestly.
But if someone was to start producing these boxes and selling them to 'traders' for the purpose of repacking items without boxes but with the intention of saying they are boxed and original, then that would also be dishonest.
It becomes a very murky area indeed. If you are a true collector who prizes authentic originality then you will (or should) already be aware of the risks of fakes and do the required research.
One area that puzzles me a little is the printing of the date stamps. To make them so close to original that only an expert could tell is fairly dubious. A genuine 'replica' sold to compliment an item where the original box was long-lost is ok, but perhaps the date stamp should reflect this - a discrete "R2005" or whatever year it was printed would make it obvious it was not original, but would still add value rather than no box at all?
And for that matter, is the use of the Märklin diamond & bicycle logo authorised? - probably not. over 50 years since those boxes were used, does copyright still even exist?
Keep the debates coming - I love it.
Cheers
Cookee
NZ
Edited by user 06 August 2012 04:46:19(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified